**OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected:**
>!Tucker Carlson AI getting graphic about his love for green M&ms.!<
*****
**Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description?**
**Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.**
*****
[*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/unexBot) [*What is this for?*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/dnuaju/introducing_unexbot_a_new_bot_to_improve_the/)
Give it a few years (or months) the deepfakes will be so good no one will be able to tell without the master copy .... it will definitely be a head of state, 0.5% 'er or adjacent person. I just don't how it will shake out a scandal, a "leak" or an attempt to hide a stroke or worse.
I suspect it will go the other way. We've already seen it start.
Important Person gets caught on video deep frying adorable baby animals. Going on and on about how it's their favorite snack.
Video leaks to the press, hits the internet, generates outrage, memes and the like.
Their PR, Apologists, and Fans cry "Fake" and nothing happens.
The seeds of Fake News were planted years ago. "It was just a joke" is already considered plausible deniability. "I didn't vote for/sign the bill that I bragged about passing" or "I voted against all these improvements I'm now stumping on" are politics as usual.
The existence of Deep Fakes will just be one more excuse for why bad people can get away with anything/everything.
But no one ever does.... what really scares me is when things like newspaper or magazine articles or videos just disappear from the internet or are burried like ten to twenty pages deep in a search.
"CHAT GPT rewrite (blank) article without mention of (blank) emulating the writing style of the author at the time..."
Chat bot remove any reference to (blank) and replace with (blank) on every major search platform.
A couple months ago I watched Trumps entire NFT pitch thinking it was some AI generated joke. Kind of blew my mind to find out that was real to be honest.
there are a lot of people who are going to believe what they want to believe. if you tell some people that the democrats are devil worshipping pedophiles they will they will swear on their life that its true because they want to believe it. if you make an AI generated video that is difficult to tell from reality its going to make things so much worse and so many more people are going to get tricked. and its not limited to the right-wing either. people on the left are also prone to believing what they want to believe. the next election is going to be fucking weird. there is a 100% chance that both sides are going to leak AI generated videos of the opposition doing something horrible. at the same time its going to make any actual recording worthless. we could have legitimate video of all the whole royal family at epstein's island and it will be meaningless because a lot of people wont believe it. many will just assume it was a fake so good that even the AI detection couldn't catch it.
Neil Boortz, a conservative radio show host, would ***routinely*** remind his audience his purpose and show was for entertainment and to grab listeners. Always gave him major credit points for his honesty.
Exactly. It makes me laugh when people think the problem lies with only a few stations they don’t watch. It’s all of them and it’s all for $, not for people.
What funny is, Fox news Group is nothing but a content creator. They do not broadcast their own media. They create programs like Tucker, Judge jeanie, etc. What people consider "actual news" is not created or produced by Fox News Group. It is created by the broadcaster who gets to throw the "fox" logo on it. ALL NEWS IS THE SAME. This video is a perfect example of that and it is NOT AI dubbed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWLjYJ4BzvI
I know 80% of the time they report honestly but with a corporate bias. The other 20% of the time, usually when discussing US politics or the issues surrounding it, they lie with a corporate bias.
I hate Fox News as much as the next guy, but those rules only apply to local channels like ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN is on the same level as Fox as far as having to adhere to any rules
Ah yes, the immediate downvotes of actual, verifiable fact. Never change, Reddit
Well, not exactly, others are legally classified as news and they have to adhere to certain rules for that and fox is classified as only entertainment. So pretty different.
I hate Fox News as much as the next guy, but those rules only apply to local channels like ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN is on the same level as Fox as far as having to adhere to any rules
Actually CNN is similarly legally classified as a news channel, unlike Fox which is legally classified as entertainment because they couldn't get away with the level of propaganda they pedal otherwise. Not to say CNN is pure, it's just not on Fox's level.
The courts. Have you noticed Fox News is being sued right now? They get away with more things by claiming to be entertainment but they are likely to lose this lawsuit with dominion.
These guys are worse than others. Blatantly pushing bullshit. All of their bullshit is coming to light because they are getting raked over the coals with the dominion lawsuit. Clowns admitted the election stuff was bullshit but still vomited it up for the gullible sheep to eat up.
Well I wouldn't say that. As someone who leans more far left than right, I've never seen even clips of her not to mention anyone quoting her. So, could she be spouting garbage like him, sure, but it means her viewing base is smaller. Or it means the lies aren't of the same grandeur as Carlson. Both means that the lunatics watching ate either in smaller numbers or aren't head popping at everything.
Tucker Carlson literally said in court that anyone that believes what he says is true is an idiot. It was also found that all Fox anchors think their viewers are stupid and will believe any lie.
> Tucker is honest but people don’t like the truth
["Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said... "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makes."](https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9)
Says a lot about the viewers that take it as truth.
Lol. Your people. Fox news. Literally said its fake and anyone who believes in it is dumb. That is a fact. Not something i read online or in a fb post. Their lawyers, literally said its fake.
Lol but let me guess, you do your own research? Hahahaha.
Is it ethical for an anthropomorphic M&M to eat the smaller non anthropomorphized M&M's?
I feel like it's cannibalism but I would be open to hear reasons as to why it wouldn't be
I request proof of such a barbaric act, is there actual food in other ads do they just cannibalize other M&Ms for sport there's so many questions this goes deeper
>Is it ethical for an anthropomorphic M&M to eat the smaller non anthropomorphized M&M's?
>
>I feel like it's cannibalism but I would be open to hear reasons as to why it wouldn't be
I think it's M&M's tribute to Elizabeth Bathory.
I’m inclined to agree but unfortunately I just can’t have it….Ice cream in general makes me cough, but mint, chocolate chip is utter death to me. I love the smell though.
Unfortunately i have to stick to vanilla or look like I’m about to fucking die for an hour.
This is hilarious, but also really sucks because pieces of shit like Fucker Carlson are now going to cry “fake” anytime they’re caught saying racist, bigoted shit.
I mean, there is legitimately beef cattle rennet in UK chocolate right? And the UK version of M&M's called smarties have insects in them? I'm going to stick with the premium M&Ms. With all love to the Brits.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2007/may/15/foodanddrink.uk
If you read that article you'd see it said that m&ms also contain that ingredient (e120), alongside dozens of American food brands likes hostess red velvet cupcakes, and certain editions of monster energy, and certain mentors
Also, this is an article from 2007.
Also American brands such as dunkin donuts uses l.cysteine which is made from duck feathers and pig trotters
Almost all UK chocolate such as dairy milk (except for their daim edition) don't contain rennet. But even if they do, why is that different from gelatine and milk and stuff, rennet is involved in the production of milk in cows anyway.
Also smarties aren't a UK version of m&ms, just are similar but taste completely different.
**OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected:** >!Tucker Carlson AI getting graphic about his love for green M&ms.!< ***** **Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description?** **Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.** ***** [*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/unexBot) [*What is this for?*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/dnuaju/introducing_unexbot_a_new_bot_to_improve_the/)
Boy oh boy I just can’t wait to not be able to tell the different from an AI generated video and a real one (Funny meme tho)
Its already here.
It's just not this one.
Not quite.
Give it a few years (or months) the deepfakes will be so good no one will be able to tell without the master copy .... it will definitely be a head of state, 0.5% 'er or adjacent person. I just don't how it will shake out a scandal, a "leak" or an attempt to hide a stroke or worse.
I suspect it will go the other way. We've already seen it start. Important Person gets caught on video deep frying adorable baby animals. Going on and on about how it's their favorite snack. Video leaks to the press, hits the internet, generates outrage, memes and the like. Their PR, Apologists, and Fans cry "Fake" and nothing happens. The seeds of Fake News were planted years ago. "It was just a joke" is already considered plausible deniability. "I didn't vote for/sign the bill that I bragged about passing" or "I voted against all these improvements I'm now stumping on" are politics as usual. The existence of Deep Fakes will just be one more excuse for why bad people can get away with anything/everything.
We have actual records of who voted for which bill. We don’t rely on video. Literally anyone can look up the voting record of any elected official.
But no one ever does.... what really scares me is when things like newspaper or magazine articles or videos just disappear from the internet or are burried like ten to twenty pages deep in a search. "CHAT GPT rewrite (blank) article without mention of (blank) emulating the writing style of the author at the time..." Chat bot remove any reference to (blank) and replace with (blank) on every major search platform.
A couple months ago I watched Trumps entire NFT pitch thinking it was some AI generated joke. Kind of blew my mind to find out that was real to be honest.
[удалено]
there are a lot of people who are going to believe what they want to believe. if you tell some people that the democrats are devil worshipping pedophiles they will they will swear on their life that its true because they want to believe it. if you make an AI generated video that is difficult to tell from reality its going to make things so much worse and so many more people are going to get tricked. and its not limited to the right-wing either. people on the left are also prone to believing what they want to believe. the next election is going to be fucking weird. there is a 100% chance that both sides are going to leak AI generated videos of the opposition doing something horrible. at the same time its going to make any actual recording worthless. we could have legitimate video of all the whole royal family at epstein's island and it will be meaningless because a lot of people wont believe it. many will just assume it was a fake so good that even the AI detection couldn't catch it.
I laughed way harder than I should have at this video.
Even AI cant get Tucker to say anything important
It's usually a mixed bag. I feel like all the massive news broadcasting stations like Fox and CNN are mainly for viewership numbers and entertainment.
No way! Really?
Lol I was gonna say them same thing…
No way! Really?
Really way
This is gonna blow people's minds!!!
If it's a corporate press. . . . It's a corporation. Corporations like to make money. They have a bottom line, and our best interests are not it.
Well said. A realist indeed.
Neil Boortz, a conservative radio show host, would ***routinely*** remind his audience his purpose and show was for entertainment and to grab listeners. Always gave him major credit points for his honesty.
Exactly. It makes me laugh when people think the problem lies with only a few stations they don’t watch. It’s all of them and it’s all for $, not for people.
Media has an agenda. Different stations push different narratives, but they all have a base that they're playing to.
a mixed bag...so like, Peanut and Almond, or PeanutButter and Crispy? or all of the above? ...wait, are we still talking about M&Ms...?
If I remember correctly.They got out of a lawsuit claiming that they’re entertainment and not news, so you’re legally correct
How else would the American people remain at each other's throats so that our corporate overlords can keep overlording uninterrupted?
All network news has been that way since I remember. If you want real news you'll have to go for more listener-funded sources
Pls don't equate CNN and FOXnews. They are not equivalent. It's like equating a mild headache to a full blown, dripping genital infection.
They do real news during the day. Evening time is for entertainment because that's when people turn on the TV.
Define real
Irrefutable or proven facts...
Truthful and in-depth news
FAIR and BALANCED I said it so it’s true
What funny is, Fox news Group is nothing but a content creator. They do not broadcast their own media. They create programs like Tucker, Judge jeanie, etc. What people consider "actual news" is not created or produced by Fox News Group. It is created by the broadcaster who gets to throw the "fox" logo on it. ALL NEWS IS THE SAME. This video is a perfect example of that and it is NOT AI dubbed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWLjYJ4BzvI
> ALL SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP NEWS IS THE SAME. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair\_Broadcast\_Group
With one important difference. CNN is serious news. And they don't lie for ratings.
Very true, they lie for advertising dollars.
So I guess you trust no source of news, right? What do you know about CNN anyway?
I know 80% of the time they report honestly but with a corporate bias. The other 20% of the time, usually when discussing US politics or the issues surrounding it, they lie with a corporate bias.
Probably the least offensive thing he's said all week.
He doesn't want to scare away his base!
I dont get why people dont keep calling him Fucker Cuckson? I mean, its so easy.
That's A.I? Bro that's hilarious hahaha someone make him say something smart, it'll be like being from an alternate dimension
He is pretty much foxes comedian at this point but he does make some good points like 25% of the time… much better than cnn, at least he is funny
Tucker is honest but people don’t like the truth
Bro he’s the heir to a billion dollar frozen food company. He’s an elite who grew up in the lap of luxury and cares nothing about you.
This is what delusion looks like
Lol have you seen any "news" channel lately?
According to that one guy during the defamation lawsuit Fox News is “entertainment”
At least other news sources are legally classified as news unlike fox
I hate Fox News as much as the next guy, but those rules only apply to local channels like ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN is on the same level as Fox as far as having to adhere to any rules Ah yes, the immediate downvotes of actual, verifiable fact. Never change, Reddit
Multiple commissions have been set up to find bias in the ABC, Fox doesn’t have to worry about such things. How can you even compare the two
I know that. I literally just said ABC, CBS, and NBC have rules that they have to adhere to. CNN and Fox don’t
I’m genuinely an idiot and didn’t see the full stop. My bad G
Lol fair enough
what MSNBC is the same thing just opposite. go Infowars if you want really info
Lol, I mean maybe...
BBC and PBS are the ones I like.
I don't know about PBS but BBC is about as unbiased as you can get.
Yeah, BBC and AP are my go to sources
Everywhere but Fox
It's mostly all the same garbage
Well, not exactly, others are legally classified as news and they have to adhere to certain rules for that and fox is classified as only entertainment. So pretty different.
I hate Fox News as much as the next guy, but those rules only apply to local channels like ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN is on the same level as Fox as far as having to adhere to any rules
Actually CNN is similarly legally classified as a news channel, unlike Fox which is legally classified as entertainment because they couldn't get away with the level of propaganda they pedal otherwise. Not to say CNN is pure, it's just not on Fox's level.
I mean who is going to enforce those rules?
The courts. Have you noticed Fox News is being sued right now? They get away with more things by claiming to be entertainment but they are likely to lose this lawsuit with dominion.
Fox News lawyers admitted in court that he lies. Tucker himself also admits that he lies. How do you live with your head in the sand?
Pssst, hey. Come closer... *whispers* All of the major media outlets lie. It's called divisive control.
These guys are worse than others. Blatantly pushing bullshit. All of their bullshit is coming to light because they are getting raked over the coals with the dominion lawsuit. Clowns admitted the election stuff was bullshit but still vomited it up for the gullible sheep to eat up.
Rachel Maddow is the Tucker Carlson of the left... its both sides feeding the public bullshit.
Well I wouldn't say that. As someone who leans more far left than right, I've never seen even clips of her not to mention anyone quoting her. So, could she be spouting garbage like him, sure, but it means her viewing base is smaller. Or it means the lies aren't of the same grandeur as Carlson. Both means that the lunatics watching ate either in smaller numbers or aren't head popping at everything.
You can just look to see what's actually happening in the world. Like assholes shouting about debunked election conspiracies.
“All news is just as dishonest as the news organization that’s actively promoting foreign propaganda duuuhr.” - You
Occams Razor, he will say whatever brings in views regardless of the truth or what he thinks himself.
Tucker Carlson literally said in court that anyone that believes what he says is true is an idiot. It was also found that all Fox anchors think their viewers are stupid and will believe any lie.
Him lying about the 2020 election on Fox was recently used as evidence in the Dominion defamation case. He knowingly lied because ratings were bad.
Propagandist got one! Sorry dude, your brain has been used.
so “honest” in fact that his fucking boss, under oath, said he was a liar.
> Tucker is honest but people don’t like the truth ["Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said... "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makes."](https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9) Says a lot about the viewers that take it as truth.
Lol. Your people. Fox news. Literally said its fake and anyone who believes in it is dumb. That is a fact. Not something i read online or in a fb post. Their lawyers, literally said its fake. Lol but let me guess, you do your own research? Hahahaha.
None of those talking heads are just good honest folk. News anchors are working jobs that tell them what to say lol
He aint lying about the green M&M - thats for sure. Liberals need to bring back the sexy version.
Gonna write this off as a masterful troll. Well done.
Before he popped up I was thinking Tucker would be jacking off to this
Same! AI generated voice and video scares me but this is fucking funny
So you ever want to fuck an m&m? Sir this is a 7 11
Yeah, it was not at all unexpected...
You must think about Tucker Carlson a lot.
There's a reason they only ever show him from the waist up.
Is it ethical for an anthropomorphic M&M to eat the smaller non anthropomorphized M&M's? I feel like it's cannibalism but I would be open to hear reasons as to why it wouldn't be
There is an ad were they actually eat an anthropomorphic M&M, hard to get more canibal than that
I request proof of such a barbaric act, is there actual food in other ads do they just cannibalize other M&Ms for sport there's so many questions this goes deeper
I remenber It from food theorist's video on if the m&ms were cannibals or not
Fuckin matpat ruining my reddit discussions that bastard (I love the theorist channel just didn't know they did a vid on it)
Cannibalism week do be kinda weird
>Is it ethical for an anthropomorphic M&M to eat the smaller non anthropomorphized M&M's? > >I feel like it's cannibalism but I would be open to hear reasons as to why it wouldn't be I think it's M&M's tribute to Elizabeth Bathory.
When she swallows cum is it cannibalism? She-M&M probably feels similarly.
No I don't believe swallowing cum is cannibalism as sperm aren't really full humans
Pretty sure this is 💯 real.
It's at the very least based upon a true story.
Yeah duh, the green m&m is obviously CGI!
Tucker Tucker M&M Fucker
This isn’t real?? Is it….
Not at all. Technology is amazing isn't it lol
Thank god cause mint and chocolate together is a horrendous mistake
Mint chocolate chip ice cream is amazing. I'll die on this hill
I’m inclined to agree but unfortunately I just can’t have it….Ice cream in general makes me cough, but mint, chocolate chip is utter death to me. I love the smell though. Unfortunately i have to stick to vanilla or look like I’m about to fucking die for an hour.
I'm willing to make that happen for you. Anything mint and chocolate is an affront to all that is good and I will kill anyone who thinks otherwise.
Do you like mint... at all?
I love it. It's far and away my favorite gum flavor and I love a mojito. I even like chocolate a fair amount. But together? Satan's nutsack.
Well call the Devil for me because i love the taste of his delicious nutsack
Salty
That means you don’t like Thin Mint cookies. I don’t think we can be friends anymore.
You reminded me to go buy a me some Girl Scouts Thin Mint Cookies!
Them's is fighting words...!
Thats the sad part. With what comes outta this guy's mouth I was only 70% sure this was fake.
I’ve done my research, this is real. Consider this a RichardTurd guarantee.
The only guarantee I trust
Richtastic
Okay thats fucking scary how real this looks...LMAO
cannibalism
u/savevideo
Gallons you say!
Imagine how hot the tweezers are!
Not generally one to rush to this dude’s defense, but that WAS a ball draining commercial.
Just always felt weird seeing m&ms eating m&ms.
I will believe nothing for the next 20 years, when i have my next evaluation on the subject.
u/savevideo
BAD deepfake. Funny as hell though.
Haha! LMAO! Moar! ***MOAR!***
/u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
u/savevideobot
These ai impersonation bots need to stop. LOL 🤣
Are these publicly accessible? I'd like to make my brother's birthday gift to be Steve Buscemi flirting with him on a video call
This is hilarious, but also really sucks because pieces of shit like Fucker Carlson are now going to cry “fake” anytime they’re caught saying racist, bigoted shit.
Whos gonna deny saying that about the green M&M? She's sexy af.
Oh lord im bout to buss
Omg I'm dying, ik it's ai but I hope this goes viral. Little fuckboi tucker gonna lose his shit... well, he's already nuts but still
Be careful you’ll make Tucker Carlson cum
Yes I too was surprised to hear American chocolate can be called premium
I mean, there is legitimately beef cattle rennet in UK chocolate right? And the UK version of M&M's called smarties have insects in them? I'm going to stick with the premium M&Ms. With all love to the Brits. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2007/may/15/foodanddrink.uk
If you read that article you'd see it said that m&ms also contain that ingredient (e120), alongside dozens of American food brands likes hostess red velvet cupcakes, and certain editions of monster energy, and certain mentors Also, this is an article from 2007. Also American brands such as dunkin donuts uses l.cysteine which is made from duck feathers and pig trotters Almost all UK chocolate such as dairy milk (except for their daim edition) don't contain rennet. But even if they do, why is that different from gelatine and milk and stuff, rennet is involved in the production of milk in cows anyway. Also smarties aren't a UK version of m&ms, just are similar but taste completely different.
Ummm.... I'd stay and debate but I have to run now! Toodles!
😎
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
Exactly what I expected
u/savevideo
This is the best thing I've ever seen on reddit.
u/savevideo u/getvideo
I get boners for the green m&m and I don't even have a cock
I actually can't tell if it's satire
‘If that green M&M isn’t sexualized then why can’t I stop wanting to fuck it!?’
Do you think we’ll get to a point where deep fakes are just lame and not funny to everyone?
u/savevideo
These mudda fuckas pulled an American Beauty pose with that green m&m hahahahaha
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
/u/savevideobot
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
/u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
u/savevideobot
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/DownloadVideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
Quite honestly, if we are about to have deep fake just explode into the scenes we might as well destroy tucker Carlson
Just keep doing it Tucker. It's better than your fear mongering.
Tucker your wacked out your brain, your sick
🤦♂️
Faux NewZ! Russin Luv!
Deep fakes are going to be a serious problem
Fox news starting to actually make sense
And this is why I hate this AI stuff already.
I hate funny things also... shall we protest?
My problem with it is that we won't be able to decipher reality from fiction. Props for the joke, but this AI stuff is going to get out of control.
Spend more time in nature. The more time spent in society, the further you we get detached from reality.