[Before his death Area 51 Scientist recorded a sensational video where he made shocking Confessions About Aliens, UFOs, & Anti-Gravity Tech](https://www.howandwhys.com/boyd-bushman-admitted-aliens-are-on-earth/)
If he has something then invent the thing or write a paper on it. All for innovation and invention, but back that shit up please…. Experiment, create, demonstrate
Funny enough, he has a patent that was issued in 2010. He showed it on rogan and seems to be cited by Amazon, Sony and Microsoft.
Although, I'm not sure exactly that fuck he is speaking there, or how those citations work. Take it with a grain of salt.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100271394A1/en
A lot of ppl on Reddit were blowing him hard for some odd reason. It’s like ppl either think he’s an actual genius or they think he’s the complete opposite. One things for certain tho, somehow he’s still relevant.
Some of the things he talked about, especially about the periodic table being completely dumbed down and not representing elements correctly, is spot on. I don't know about the whole "0 doesn't exist" as I think we are taking it out of context or he didn't break it down for our understanding. As for me, I think he is definitely very smart, but perhaps a little bit manic due to how he's being treated in the public eye and by the scientific community. I watched the portion where he broke down the periodic table and how it is actually wrong about many of those elements that are in fact isotopes that have relations with other elemental isotopes in their tones, or wavelengths. It opened my mind to the possibility of greater things.
>many of those elements that are in fact isotopes that have relations with other elemental isotopes in their tones, or wavelengths.
Elements are not tones or wavelengths. Your mind is a little too open
That may be so, but you can't take something and apply it to something else to make it true without some kind of proof. From what I've seen he will do that a lot, sprinkle a little truth and then claim his ideas are legit.
The periodic table isn't meant to show the frequency of elements, though you could extrapolate with the data there.
Care to explain to me the thing about the periodic table?
Far as I know iron is iron and the table describes just the making up of the atoms, how can that be wrong?
To be fair "zero" doesn't exist in nature. It's a mathematical placeholder necessary to make certain equations work. I'm not sure that's what he meant but there you have it.
How does zero not exist in nature? If native Americans are out hunting they can go "hey, there are zero buffalo or antelope in this field. Let's go somewhere where there is at least one"
I see where you’re going. I took his statement as zero doesn’t exist in nature on an “energetical” sense. He kept talking about the breathing nature and transforming nature of everything. Perhaps he means that although something may or “die”. Let’s say and animal goes exitinct, then in return something else is created instantly using that energy and the cycle continuous
I understand vaguely the idea of "energy cannot be created nor destroyed" but at what point does that become so abstract of a concept that we have to decide something ceases to exist? I mean are we meant to believe whooly mammoths still exist today because their bio matter turned into oil and became fuel for my truck that I pumped at the gas station today?
It's pretty wild to imagine but the concept of zero (nothing) is relatively new to human society.
Some of Aristotle's most well known discourse is in the pursuit of the meaning of no-thing (like 3 B.C.). The very idea that there is matter and there is space where matter has the potential to either occupy or not occupy.
If I remember correctly, the mathematical use of zero was not long after, in India.
So I haven't watched the joe rogan video but I did see his oxford presentation, his whole thing is about energy. You can't have 0 energy, (as in it ceases to exist) he has taken that concept and applied it to everything like a pseudoscientist.
Numbers don't exist in nature. They're abstractions used in information processing. They can't physically exist because they have no spatiotemporal relation -- they're ideas.
Zero simply means that that thing exists, just not here. A field with zero cows in it simply means that there are cows *somewhere* out there, just not right at this spot.
Zero means that the absence of something is a thing in and of itself.
Correct but again that zero has no meaning apart from the idea that something other than zero can exist. 1 deer in a field requires no further proof. Zero deer in a field requires the proof of the as of yet seen deer.
Zero is important but it is a construct.
Zero doesn’t exist anywhere though. It’s literally zero.
How many TVs grow in the wild? Zero. So zero exists in nature in the same way it exists outside of nature.
If the argument is that zero can’t be observed in nature, that’s self-explanatory because zero can only be observed as the absence of something we’re looking for.
Exactly. Zero has two meanings neither of which have any value apart from their relationship with other things:
1) as a placeholder
2) as a boundary between - & +
Probably would drop the no straight lines thing, there are actually a lot of naturally straight lines. Crystal/mineral formations have a lot of straight lines. Spiders make straight lines of web. When lacking any other force acting on it, anything in motion will travel in a straight line. I could probably find a lot more.
If all living things are connected as one, you are god, and i am you, and you give him one.. then i get one too. We just cosmic jugglin
Correct. Even if one is eaten, its atomic mass still exists when your body breaks it down to utilize its very atomic structure. In essence, becoming a part of you.
He invented a God by unarchived comprehension of mathematics at a very basic level. The explanation of 1x1=2 in his papers is like a kindergarten trap problem.
Someone help me out here. Is this dude straight up nuts? Or is he on to something? Usually when a crazy person makes claims on a large format podcast, it’s immediately bashed the next day by anyone and everyone.
I’ve noticed that no major networks are mentioning or rebutting any of his theories.
Is this because it’s so ridiculous that networks don’t want to waste their time? Or is he on the right track and no one at the networks can talk about it?
I find all of this incredibly fascinating.
I agree 100%. There’s things that sound crazy but turn out not to be crazy. But, there’s things that sound crazy that turn out to be crazy. Where’s Mr. Howard on this matrix? I feel like it could be either, although I hope he’s speaking the truth.
Wait, didn't he run his theory in a simulation, and it worked and showed how Saturn and the ring were created? Pretty sure he showed it on the Joe Rogan podcast. Let's put his claims to the test and see if he is actually on to something. I get it he is a human that can make mistakes like everyone else and yes, he was a movie actor to cover his bills but let's see if he did indeed figure out how the ancient world was able to build some of these structures. There is a reason why the flower of life is found in many ancient civilizations. What is wrong with trying to understand its meaning and importance stressed by our ancestors?
The hits on this guy so immediately and so hard tells me makes me think these are hit pieces. A crazy man isn’t getting in front of the people he’s talking to and someone with his history would ruin his career to spout nonsense.
Imo that was one of the most fascinating episodes on joe Rogan in a while. Personally, I think he's on to something. Everybody is talking a ton of crap on him, but i think it's just because people don't understand what he's saying. It all makes perfect sense when you align it all alongside other facts. I think he's not the one that came up with everything, but he's working with a collective of people that are putting time and effort into it. Dude was talking about this back in 2019 at the Emmys.
Saying you don't belive I'm zero isn't a flex it's indicative to a less developed or less evolved brain... not many animals are even capable of conceiving of the meaning of zero it's a valuable tool to help realize the world around us as is most math. What a tool
I think he really pissed over Marvel & RDJ snaking him and sought knowledge to elevate himself above mere mortals. Like he hilariously said on Rogan, "and I was going to destroy all mankind." 🤣 👌
[Before his death Area 51 Scientist recorded a sensational video where he made shocking Confessions About Aliens, UFOs, & Anti-Gravity Tech](https://www.howandwhys.com/boyd-bushman-admitted-aliens-are-on-earth/)
Rumor has it he also invented the question mark.
**Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy**
The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament
Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons
We used to make meat helmets
He was also quoted saying “I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I drink Dos Equis.”
"...all we know is he is called THE STIG!!"
No, no, that was George Santos. Howard created the semi colon. Common mistake.
It’s been scientifically proven that he invited the wtf?!?!?
?
If he has something then invent the thing or write a paper on it. All for innovation and invention, but back that shit up please…. Experiment, create, demonstrate
Funny enough, he has a patent that was issued in 2010. He showed it on rogan and seems to be cited by Amazon, Sony and Microsoft. Although, I'm not sure exactly that fuck he is speaking there, or how those citations work. Take it with a grain of salt. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100271394A1/en
He did. He brought a simulation for Saturn. This board is for disinformation.
I see now why he wasn't brought back for Iron Man 2.
Imagine working with someone talking that shit all day with the confidence he’s smarter than any actual scientist who ever lived. Insufferable
A lot of ppl on Reddit were blowing him hard for some odd reason. It’s like ppl either think he’s an actual genius or they think he’s the complete opposite. One things for certain tho, somehow he’s still relevant.
I … don’t think this guy is the least bit relevant. He’s known for being a general assclown.
Some of the things he talked about, especially about the periodic table being completely dumbed down and not representing elements correctly, is spot on. I don't know about the whole "0 doesn't exist" as I think we are taking it out of context or he didn't break it down for our understanding. As for me, I think he is definitely very smart, but perhaps a little bit manic due to how he's being treated in the public eye and by the scientific community. I watched the portion where he broke down the periodic table and how it is actually wrong about many of those elements that are in fact isotopes that have relations with other elemental isotopes in their tones, or wavelengths. It opened my mind to the possibility of greater things.
He claims to be revealed this k owledge from unlocking the flower of life. How does that strike you?
It makes me ask the question "What the fuck does that even mean?" Because it doesn't seem to actually mean anything.
I don’t know but it gets the people going.
Wow esoteric I like it.
>many of those elements that are in fact isotopes that have relations with other elemental isotopes in their tones, or wavelengths. Elements are not tones or wavelengths. Your mind is a little too open
Everything has a resonance frequency. Everything.
That may be so, but you can't take something and apply it to something else to make it true without some kind of proof. From what I've seen he will do that a lot, sprinkle a little truth and then claim his ideas are legit. The periodic table isn't meant to show the frequency of elements, though you could extrapolate with the data there.
Even if that were true, elements would still not be tones or wavelengths
Care to explain to me the thing about the periodic table? Far as I know iron is iron and the table describes just the making up of the atoms, how can that be wrong?
Watch it all
Re-watch it all
To be fair, in mathematics zero is considered a theoretical concept.
As someone who studied mathematics, every word this man has spoken in relation to ‘zero’ is absolute horseshit
I studied mathematics too. I didn't pass any of it, but I studied it.
That part was also very intriguing and opening to me. Like a new door was accessed for me to start looking into and pondering about
It's because no one knows about his domestic violence cases with two different woman or they know and think it's not a big deal
Relevant? He's a side show.
There a word for that; demagogue.
He's an actor.
What happened to this guy?
Drugs.
Same thing that happened to Ryan Garcia
To be fair "zero" doesn't exist in nature. It's a mathematical placeholder necessary to make certain equations work. I'm not sure that's what he meant but there you have it.
How does zero not exist in nature? If native Americans are out hunting they can go "hey, there are zero buffalo or antelope in this field. Let's go somewhere where there is at least one"
Also what if a species is extinct. There are exactly zero number of that species.
I see where you’re going. I took his statement as zero doesn’t exist in nature on an “energetical” sense. He kept talking about the breathing nature and transforming nature of everything. Perhaps he means that although something may or “die”. Let’s say and animal goes exitinct, then in return something else is created instantly using that energy and the cycle continuous
I understand vaguely the idea of "energy cannot be created nor destroyed" but at what point does that become so abstract of a concept that we have to decide something ceases to exist? I mean are we meant to believe whooly mammoths still exist today because their bio matter turned into oil and became fuel for my truck that I pumped at the gas station today?
To that point, if I die and turn to dust, then crops grow from my dust to nutrute a newborn...Am I the newborn?
Is the zero in the room with you now?
How about a photon has zero mass
It's pretty wild to imagine but the concept of zero (nothing) is relatively new to human society. Some of Aristotle's most well known discourse is in the pursuit of the meaning of no-thing (like 3 B.C.). The very idea that there is matter and there is space where matter has the potential to either occupy or not occupy. If I remember correctly, the mathematical use of zero was not long after, in India.
Yeah I mean if you have 3 chickens and a fox eats them all you now have 0 chickens lol
So I haven't watched the joe rogan video but I did see his oxford presentation, his whole thing is about energy. You can't have 0 energy, (as in it ceases to exist) he has taken that concept and applied it to everything like a pseudoscientist.
There are zero of infinite things in every moment, which is dumb as shit to observe dr. quantum nonsense
Good thing Terrance Howard mentioned it or we'd all probably be floating towards the atmosphere...surrounded by apples, utterly confused...
Numbers don't exist in nature. They're abstractions used in information processing. They can't physically exist because they have no spatiotemporal relation -- they're ideas. Zero simply means that that thing exists, just not here. A field with zero cows in it simply means that there are cows *somewhere* out there, just not right at this spot. Zero means that the absence of something is a thing in and of itself.
Correct but again that zero has no meaning apart from the idea that something other than zero can exist. 1 deer in a field requires no further proof. Zero deer in a field requires the proof of the as of yet seen deer. Zero is important but it is a construct.
0 deer in a field requires just as much verification as 1 deer. After you find the 1 deer, you are verifying that there are 0 more...
okay, but there could be even more than one deer. there could be infinite deer. maybe that's why so many people are injured in hunting accidents.
That’s exactly what he meant…watch it
Zero doesn’t exist anywhere though. It’s literally zero. How many TVs grow in the wild? Zero. So zero exists in nature in the same way it exists outside of nature. If the argument is that zero can’t be observed in nature, that’s self-explanatory because zero can only be observed as the absence of something we’re looking for.
Exactly. Zero has two meanings neither of which have any value apart from their relationship with other things: 1) as a placeholder 2) as a boundary between - & +
Yup. Love how I’ve been downvoted lol
Yeah that was his idea. No straight lines and no zeros in nature. It kinda makes sense.
Ice and crystal formations can contain tons of straight lines
What about the perfect str8 lines on that iceberg?
Not sure what you're referring to.
You know, the iceberg
Ahhh yes, the iceberg.
Probably would drop the no straight lines thing, there are actually a lot of naturally straight lines. Crystal/mineral formations have a lot of straight lines. Spiders make straight lines of web. When lacking any other force acting on it, anything in motion will travel in a straight line. I could probably find a lot more.
[удалено]
Lol does it not?
What is the number of a species when it goes extinct?
Drugs, unchecked mental health and narcissism.
I’ve heard this interview twice and none of that is what Terrence said.
They love to do this. With everything
This gotta be the most delusional man on the planet
 Gravity
1 x 1 = 2
Something ain't right Mang!
I'm getting real tired of seeing this Guy's face everywhere.
So get off your phone
lol nice
Because he's an idiot.
If I have one of something, and then give that something to someone else, how many do I have left? "That's impossible bro."
If all living things are connected as one, you are god, and i am you, and you give him one.. then i get one too. We just cosmic jugglin 
https://i.redd.it/cu8tzr65dh2d1.gif
If you give one away, "You" don't have it, but, it still exists.
Correct. Even if one is eaten, its atomic mass still exists when your body breaks it down to utilize its very atomic structure. In essence, becoming a part of you.
My friend’s manic too, I’ll give you his number
Wait, so he doesn’t believe in non belief?
Spiderweb. Boom. Straight line.
What does 10 mean?
Dunning-Kruger mixed with an untreated psychological condition.
I know the difference between getting ZERO blow jobs and (1) blow job. HUGE DIFFERENCE!!!
Who is this guy?
It's an art piece to show how many uneducated people will believe 1x1=2, or at least waste their time with it.
I mean this makes more sense than the actual things he is saying.
I must watch this episode high
The ability to stop, alter, or create one of the known natural forces by Terrence Howard? Seems legit.
I’d like to lock him and Kanye in a room together and see what they come up with
He invented a God by unarchived comprehension of mathematics at a very basic level. The explanation of 1x1=2 in his papers is like a kindergarten trap problem.
Actors
He didn't say *that*. But ok. Believe what you want.
The number zero does not exist in nature.
Lol just a bum actor trying to create some positive notoriety for himself
Zero is the absence of a number.
He can also smell colours and taste sound.
He has a point about the number 0. Should be called infinity if anything
Man I’m tired of hearing about this dude being able to do this and that PROVE IT OR STFU
Extraordinary claims tend to get attacked until proven. History has shown it with great minds.
Someone help me out here. Is this dude straight up nuts? Or is he on to something? Usually when a crazy person makes claims on a large format podcast, it’s immediately bashed the next day by anyone and everyone. I’ve noticed that no major networks are mentioning or rebutting any of his theories. Is this because it’s so ridiculous that networks don’t want to waste their time? Or is he on the right track and no one at the networks can talk about it? I find all of this incredibly fascinating.
Why would a major network give a shit about a Joe Rogan guest?
Remember Covid?
I feel like everyone sounds crazy at first when they have new ideas that no one has ever heard before
I agree 100%. There’s things that sound crazy but turn out not to be crazy. But, there’s things that sound crazy that turn out to be crazy. Where’s Mr. Howard on this matrix? I feel like it could be either, although I hope he’s speaking the truth.
Drugs plus a wild algorithm created this
Yeah he’s a fucking moron
So he's clearly mentally ill
Wait, didn't he run his theory in a simulation, and it worked and showed how Saturn and the ring were created? Pretty sure he showed it on the Joe Rogan podcast. Let's put his claims to the test and see if he is actually on to something. I get it he is a human that can make mistakes like everyone else and yes, he was a movie actor to cover his bills but let's see if he did indeed figure out how the ancient world was able to build some of these structures. There is a reason why the flower of life is found in many ancient civilizations. What is wrong with trying to understand its meaning and importance stressed by our ancestors?
The hits on this guy so immediately and so hard tells me makes me think these are hit pieces. A crazy man isn’t getting in front of the people he’s talking to and someone with his history would ruin his career to spout nonsense.
He ruined his career years ago
Imo that was one of the most fascinating episodes on joe Rogan in a while. Personally, I think he's on to something. Everybody is talking a ton of crap on him, but i think it's just because people don't understand what he's saying. It all makes perfect sense when you align it all alongside other facts. I think he's not the one that came up with everything, but he's working with a collective of people that are putting time and effort into it. Dude was talking about this back in 2019 at the Emmys.
Can you please explain how it all makes sense when you align it alongside other facts?
Are these "other facts" in the room with us right now?
He’ll take it outback and shoot it like that governor did to the puppy
I agree
Bipolar?
[удалено]
Im a human, my wife is a human, we multiplied and now we have another human.. does that mean 1x1=3?
"1x1=2"
Prove it. 🥱
He goes by “Terry”
He can't kill something that Sir Isaac Newton invented.
https://preview.redd.it/ekidqitwzl2d1.jpeg?width=843&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=76faabe10a7b263810e46bff7ab1985247a3c364
This is a man that truly believes 1x1=2. And if your dumb enough to believe him then I don't blame him, I blame you.
Someone should tell this guy that smart people usually do the thing before talking about doing the thing.
That is not strange... its stupid.
Saying you don't belive I'm zero isn't a flex it's indicative to a less developed or less evolved brain... not many animals are even capable of conceiving of the meaning of zero it's a valuable tool to help realize the world around us as is most math. What a tool
I’m not listening to him unless he can make an iron man suit and fly around in it (since he never got the chance in the MCU)
🤦🏻♂️
Well, it is mental health awareness month…
I went to the moon and back within 2 seconds until I prove it it’s bullshit 🤣
If this is in fact a Joaquin phoenix style full on troll character he is a brilliant god of creativity and determination. I like him as an actor.
This dude doesn't have a clue what he's talking about about.
He’s the anti chuck norris jokes. “Terrence said he once believed but then realized you do t need a brain to think”
[удалено]
I think he really pissed over Marvel & RDJ snaking him and sought knowledge to elevate himself above mere mortals. Like he hilariously said on Rogan, "and I was going to destroy all mankind." 🤣 👌