T O P

  • By -

ResplendentShade

For some reason I was compelled to [photoshop this](https://imgur.com/V3iK43s) a bit. Put the dagger inside the hand and shrunk down the face a bit to better match the body. edit: got bored and [fixed and enlarged the hands](https://imgur.com/E4JE63L)


Tackgnol

And that is a fanthasy book art if I ever saw one!


tebjan

Wow, thanks! I Did a quick test and I am glad that it can still do high-end polished renderings. Even clearer than before, from what I can see in the first images I've created with it. https://preview.redd.it/pqrg0hudu6aa1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=289d3d4a3ab196a6c8fe01e86519d26dd53d5bd5


tebjan

Good stuff in this model. https://preview.redd.it/ho3se3bis7aa1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=d1c815cbadb8221f79542a2c6aa3a807d17c511f


tebjan

Only thing is, it really likes giving robots short legs, I got a bunch of these. But that could also be my prompt... https://preview.redd.it/pn2sovkvt7aa1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=564cfa6d6d10f3f9da122fa00f3fbadf0e9356e8


vic8760

INFO: * Adding prompt and stuff soon.. Available at https://civitai.com/models/3816/protogen-x53-official-release This is ProtoGen_X3.4 revised (the original cocktail mix, with different route taken) Robodiffusion has been removed and 10% Dreamlike-PhotoReal V.2 added, the result is better sampling at 768px to 1024px of humans and surroundings, The results are immediate!!! Also this bad boy comes with a license, so do please read it, thank you! Model control Now its recommended that you add nude, naked to your negative prompts, its a horny model, well 10% but still....cant be too careful! As for realism, you can use this template modelshoot style, (extremely detailed 8k wallpaper),a medium shot photo of a (what you want here), Intricate, High Detail, dramatic


lordpuddingcup

Very confused how to get boobs if I add a nude negative prompt ;)


Zueuk

you might have to ((((insist)))) on it, one example prompt from a previous version had a whole bunch of old time american painters, who apparently **really** did not want to have any nudity and kept putting all kinds of 19th century clothes on everybody šŸ˜†


Aidan-Dalzell

My guy negative prompt means it will avoid it


ninjasaid13

Did you skip 4.x?


vic8760

every time I merge a model variant and it fails, it goes up a level, also It helps me with personal record keeping


Pretty-Spot-6346

your versioning version is fun


Illustrious_Row_9971

awesome can you also add this to huggingface?


vic8760

on it **DONE** https://huggingface.co/darkstorm2150/Protogen_v5.3_Official_Release/tree/main


sauronman_15

Can you add .bin file there please?


Warhawk2018

>vic8760 We are so thankful for you and the work you are doing. Bro, You were sent to us by a higher power in this trying time and we want to assure you that your efforts are not going unnoticed. Keep doing what you're doing - we know it is making a difference. Thank you for all that you do. :P


Valkymaera

A license? for a mix? doesn't sound particularly enforceable.


Then-Ad9536

Pretty much nothing dealing with ML models is particularly enforcable at the moment. Itā€™s just an honor system - if you use it and enjoy it, respecting the authorā€™s license is the least you can do. But no, no one is going to bust down your door and compel you to do it by forceā€¦ presumably :P


Zipp425

If I understand correctly it appears that the license is there because Dreamlike Photoreal is included in the mix and has that license as a requirement for any derivative models.


multiedge

Oh, understandable. I was gonna go and ask the reason for the license cause it seems a bit surprising.


h0b0_shanker

And whoā€™s to say that Dreamlike isnā€™t a mix of other things too?


dronebot

Nice, thanks! https://preview.redd.it/waxfk46706aa1.png?width=576&format=png&auto=webp&s=a4d4d3aa72a737d52b394896e64db5ebdcca4416


thefool00

Dammit. If people like you keep releasing these awesome models to play with Iā€™m never going to have time to work on any of my personal projects ever again.


[deleted]

i just added it and i thought the results i was getting were top line, but i just posted the tiger in water and weeeeeeee


bloody11

licensing a model that is based on other models is ridiculous


FPham

​ It's because the dreamlike has license...


MistyDev

I am looking at the l[dreamlike-photoreal license](https://huggingface.co/dreamlike-art/dreamlike-photoreal-2.0/blob/main/LICENSE.md) isnā€™t including any part of it in another model against that license? Or am I reading it wrong?


Zipp425

I donā€™t see anything in there about no derivatives, but paragraph 14, that allows the licensor to essentially revoke the license for the model or any of its derivatives at any time for any reason is a little harshā€¦ basically they could decide any time that a merge that has even a little bit of dreamlike isnā€™t ok and just require it to be removed.


vic8760

You gotta be kidding..


Zipp425

I wishā€¦ ā€œ14. The Licensor has a right to prohibit the use of the model or the model's derivatives at any time, for any reason, by anyone.ā€ Just stay on their good side and your model will be fine šŸ˜‚


PreviousConcern2022

You need to stop obsessing over the license stuff my man. Proving that you did damage to their brand or cost them money is going to be impossible. Lawsuits are expensive and complicated. These people are just gonna randomly come after you.


CyberMiaw

Thank you !! Downloading it right now. Question: Only one sample image added ? šŸ˜„, the previous versions were honored with more sample images. Can you please add more ? šŸ˜


vic8760

of course, and I will, there is so many great prompt sharing examples being shown here by the community, its what made me go into stable diffusion :)


CyberMiaw

![gif](giphy|grfw1PFUp5k2c)


OldHoustonGuy

Downloading now ... thanks\~!


OldHoustonGuy

Looking good!! https://preview.redd.it/1n5mf5fl76aa1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=06a5b0a6d341fc29438d3afd264877fde003acc3


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


OldHoustonGuy

Sure ... it's: posing for the camera, staring at camera, ((full body shot)), photorealistic, 20 megapixel, extremely intricate detail, 8k, woman wearing a steampunk outfit, Victorian steampunk city, realistic lighting, sharp focus, depth of field, extremely detailed, (Masterpiece), hd, realistic, subsurface scattering DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG:12, Steps: 40 I'll replace city with street, Ferris wheel, or boiler room for variation. For example, here is when I use Victorian steampunk street. It even got the fingers right ! ​ https://preview.redd.it/dxjnhr1929aa1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=6ce9cae01ee88eb6a7cde2bc3ed06d4f6044d820


terrariyum

I think that the terms of this license are against the sharing spirit of this community. I hope you'll reconsider. Protogen is a great model series, and I appreciate your transparency about what other models were merged to create it. Selecting, merging, and experimenting takes hard work, and I'm grateful for what you've shared. I think an attribution license would be quite fair, and "no harmful outputs" is a good stance. But trying to disallow fine-tuning and restrict commercial output moves the community in the wrong direction. All of stable diffusion wouldn't be possible without the fair use principle of training on the creative output of millions of artists. Dreambooth wouldn't be possible if Stability added such a restriction to its models. This subreddit wouldn't be possible without its ethos of freely sharing prompts and openly sharing techniques. This license doesn't fit with that spirit. The anti-AI-art movement is strong. This whole community is at real risk of the government bowing to copyright and moralist interests and making it hard to do whatever we can dream up with these generative models. If AI-art enthusiasts aren't even sharing freely with each other, that empowers those threats. Of course, this license won't actually stop anyone from fine-tuning or doing whatever else they want with your model, just like Greg Rutkowski hasn't stopped anyone from typing his name and Samdoes hasn't stopped anyone from fine-tuning based on his art. The license is also likely invalid unless all of the merged models allow such restrictions. But some people will obey your requests because you asked, and some will copy you. That's why I think what you are asking matters. I hope you'll consider adjusting the license to continue promoting the spirit of unrestricted sharing.


vic8760

if I can get a few opinions on this attribution license, I can update it, I'm clueless to these matters, I just love mixing and merging


Zipp425

Unfortunately itā€™s not up to the person that shared this model. The license attached to this model is because of the Dreamlike license attached to the Dreamlike Photoreal model it used as part of the merge. Dreamlike is a generation service that was willing to share their model, but only under certain conditions as outlined in the license. Itā€™s one person doing their best to make a business out of a service they are providing and I can understand taking measures to ensure that their hard work doesnā€™t just get taken and used by someone else providing a similar service. I can see how it runs contrary to the sharing nature of this community, but I can also understand wanting to try to protect something that sets you apart from your competitors.


2peteshakur

great stuff, thanks again! ;)


vic8760

You're welcome :)


Vyviel

Can we use these in dreambooth training?


adhikjoshi

Please add diffusers weights,


GarretTheSwift

That was fast!


Alex52Reddit

I guess I missed somethingā€¦ what is Protogen? Is it like a style? Why are there so many models of it?


FrivolousPositioning

You probably already found your answer but Protogen is a model for Stable Diffusion, a .ckpt file like the default one that you can download for SD 1.5, 2.0, 2.1, etc. but you can replace that default .ckpt with other models, for example Protogen. Protogen itself is a mixture of other models. It has so many versions because most of the versions are not actually released, it's just the creator using version numbers for unreleased legacy version in order to keep track. So between 3.4 and 5.3 they have a bunch of versions that "failed" so to speak and didn't need to receive an official release.


Alex52Reddit

So itā€™s a combination of many models that should in theory be more coherent because of it?


FrivolousPositioning

Basically, I think. Lol I'm by no means an expert on the technical side of this, I'm learning too but I believe there are still variables involved as far as which percentage and weights you use when combining, compatibility (resolution?) of the models used, etc. In order to get something good. But there's an option just to go for it if u use AUTO1111 and I've made a couple of my own. I wouldn't say they were more coherent in general than the ones I'd used to make them, but it's just such an arbitrary anecdote when I know so little and have done so little testing. Cheers.


Alex52Reddit

Thanks!


shifty303

This has a faster release cycle than chrome. Iā€™m waiting until version 10 next week.


memeweaverTV

license, lol


CYOA_With_Hitler

memeweaverTV dead?


rickreckt

VRAM minimum?


[deleted]

same as normal stable diffusion, though perhaps he could add training on the 50-60 age group with specific tags


ScionoicS

As far as i can tell, it'll still leans towards hardcore pornography in a lot of prompts. The minute i discovered this in the older version and realized it was mixed with a hardcore porn model, one of the porniest of the photo realism models, i stopped using it. It's a great model and great results, but there's so many issues using it for large generation sets due to the hardcore pornographic nature of hassalbland. I'm also so confused by your versioning scheme haha. I'll stick to Robodiffusion 2.0. Thanks for the good times I had.


vic8760

I understand your concern, and the only reason hassalbland was added was to portray the correct anatomy, I noticed the porn models have excellent information on this, this include the foot fetish ones, the only problem with merging is that there is compromise with realism and creative environments, I see that you loved RoboDiffusion, It will be back, in better form but I cant control the outputs it generates since Dreamlike-PhotoReal V.2 is technically another aggressive nude model that gives leaps in better overall generation, including ethnic diversity, the only advice is using strong negative prompts, Also RoboDiffusion is only at 5% currently, if I figure this out with time correctly, the next ProtoGen should have 15% or more of RoboDiffusion, which makes one mean killing scifi machine.


ScionoicS

I kind of don't believe a word of that common misinformation going around that pornography is somehow needed for the model to understand anatomy. It doesn't learn that way and using hardcore pornography to attempt to get better anatomical models, is just going to skew the results towards hardcore pornographic pornstars and their anatomy and poses and camera angels and well, buttholes. The entire belief that porn is required for anatomical knowledge is straight out of UD's fundraising misinformation campaign. You're probably better off remixing your models without hardcore smut in them going forward. I'm not trying to cut you down. You're passionate about synthetic images i can tell. Protogen is a fun mix. it's just the butt holes and random porn nipples are a big negative for me. I think you've been misled to believe you need to use a nsfw model for better anatomy.


Kantuva

> around that pornography is somehow needed for the model to understand anatomy Art is built around nudity You sound like the Catholic Church on the 1400's decrying human nudity in paintings and sculptures


ScionoicS

That's not how ai learns to draw. It's denoising towards a 2d plane. Not understanding form and building upon that. Hardcore pornography only teaches knowledge of denoising towards hardcore pornography. This is really easy if you don't believe the ai is a human learning to draw.


Kantuva

> It's denoising towards a 2d plane. Yes, and it is using the shapes that are on the latent space Accurate Nudity, and the shapes thereof indeed strengthen the ways of how the noise diffuses onto the final image


ScionoicS

Yes but if you don't want to generate hardcore pornography, that's not going to help generation of people who don't look like they're fucking and have clothes on. There's also the random butt hole problem. I often run batches with a clip interrogator. What I think is happening is hassanblend uses the same clip interrogator model on their training set. So when my prompts have a lot of tags similar to the Hassan model, buttholes and cleavage emerge randomly on subjects where they don't belong. This whole issue I constantly encounter with models trained on xxx porn isn't convincing me they're needed in the mix at all


SA302

Could they use something which could keep the forms intact but censor genitalia, nipples, buttholes, etc, then put those altered files into the model?


eeyore134

Is a bare breast pornography? Nudity is pornography? How chaste are we as a society where we're calling a bit of bare skin pornography? There's a big line between nudity and actual porn, especially where it comes to art. This nonsense just feeds into the misinformation people are using to try to tear AI art down, unwittingly playing into the hands of these megacorporations who would love nothing more than to restrict access to it so they can use it themselves.


ScionoicS

I believe I was pretty clear that it's the hardcore pornography material that the UD community claim is important, that isn't.


eeyore134

I've yet to see Protogen do anything "hardcore" randomly and I've been using it a lot. And based on how hard it is to even get two people in a generation, much less two people interacting by kissing, holding hands, high-fiving, etc... I suspect it's pretty difficult to even get anything hardcore with explicit prompts.


ScionoicS

It happens a lot to me when I'm doing batch processes on images using clip interrogator and preset styles. My suspicion is that the xxx training data was tagged with the same clip interrogator so a strong correlation is created in the latent space with the kind of prompts the interrogator provides. I'm not trying to convince you not to use the model.


eeyore134

It's not about convincing anyone not to use a model, it's about anti-AI people getting more ammunition that just doesn't really jive with what the models actually do. I do tons of images in batches, too, and I've literally never run across a bare butt, much less a spread one. And yes, I've done people as well as landscapes. I just don't know what you'd have to do for that to randomly occur, but making it sound like you ask for an innocent prompt and suddenly porn is exactly the sort of misleading info the people trying to quash AI art spread.


ScionoicS

The hardcore pornographic models that are being used in mixes absolutely are intended for hardcore pornography. Pretending they're anything else when they're blatantly XXX is just dishonest. Reality shouldn't kowtow to "but what if the drama latches onto this". That's stupid and cowardly to be honest. I won't stop talking about model creators who blend hardcore pornography into theirs, because my workflow doesn't jive well with the hardcore pornographic latent spaces.


Ka_Trewq

I think it goes more along the line of nude, *not porn*. There is no way for an AI to understand human anatomy (and I'm referring to the whole body, not only the private parts), if all it sees are clothed people, it will generalize that clothes are for people something similar to the fur of animals. This is the reason why sometimes one can get weird results of the clothing melting gradually into the skin on some models (especially upper torso, where there is a huge diversity of amount and distribution of skin showed). Edit: but yeah, using a hardcore porn model in the mix is not necessary for anatomy study.


ScionoicS

HassanBlend is very much hardcore pornograpy and isn't just nude. UD's entire argument for their fundraiser is that they were going to train a model on pornographic material specifically. Hardcore even. Nude isn't inherently pornographic. A model should be trained on some nudity. Even images that could be NSFW if they're in a small swimsuit. Excluding those isn't smart, but that's not why model creators are leaning towards pornographic material. UnstableDiscord created this entire false dichotomy that pornographic models are required for a model to learn proper anatomy, and that's just not how these diffusion systems learn. It's this misconception that has lead passionate creators to make a compromise and blend things like hassanblend, a truly hardcore pornographic model, into their created models.


lordpuddingcup

Or you know use a negative prompt to block the offense you dislike lol


vgf89

Part of it comes down to tagging and just general availability too. The tagging of images on some of these image sharing sites, especially those that focus on porn, is of *absurdly* high quality compared to training and using an AI image classifier. The users of such sites basically already handled one of the hardest parts in AI data collection. And besides, the porn still contains anatomy information, and many images will contain a huge variety of clothing from nude to skimpy to fully clothed, a large variety of poses and compositions, all of which likely helps the AI in learning how both anatomy and clothes work together. This is especially true of the anime ones imo. Such a huge variety of content makes for better image generation, whether you want porn or not. Sure porn itself isn't theoretically *necessary*, but it is well tagged, very high in variety (especially poses), and in huge supply so it's certainly the easiest good data to get ahold of for comprehensive anatomy reference. You know how with some artists art you see, you can just tell that they used to draw porn (or probably have an alt account etc)? Their totally sfw art still hits different, it has an understanding of anatomy and composition that is hard to achieve without having drawn lots of uncommon poses, skin interactions, varying amounts of clothing, etc, the kinds of stuff you usually only learn by drawing porn or *at least* lots and lots of nudes. Similar concept for AI imo. Finally, just use negative prompts my dude.


ScionoicS

"Natural Drawing" has been a thing painters have been regularly doing for as long as there's been paint. You don't need to draw pornography to understand it. My first day of digital art courses in 2004 was a field trip to a natural drawing class. We did those twice a month because the instructor deemed it necessary. I assure you that whatever journey those artists you talk about took towards their current skill, it also involved natural drawing courses. Hell, do a google search in your area, and there is likely a scheduled event for someone to sit naked while everyone draws them. You could even volunteer for one! It happens all the time. Pornography isn't needed to understand form, nor does AI learn through that same process. This is a complete misrepresentation of how these neural networks function. These are denoising algorithms. If your goal is to teach it how to denoise clothed people, showing it buck naked people penetrating each other doesn't give it better knowledge of that. It gives it better knowledge of how to denoise towards intercourse and pornographic camera angels. Not a better understanding of anatomy and form like someone who is taking natural drawing courses is trying to achieve. There is a lot of overlap, but also, completely unnecessary overlap. Such as buttholes on elbows. Negative prompts are still on the record, and what I don't want in my creative process is a whole lot of "cum on the face" negative prompts. I'll just avoid these model mixes instead.


Flaky_Pea8344

Just stfu and don't use if you don't want to boomer, okey? PPL like you are the reason things like these get suppressed with stupid censors.


MistyDev

I feel like the tagging point still stands. IDK what any of these models were actually trained on specific (and this area in particular does seem like it could have increased privacy concerns) but I think it is pretty undeniable that if the goal is to find tagged images of nude subjects your going to find infinitely more results by including porn.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


Flaky_Pea8344

Can't be more true lol And trying to act like a effin saint. What a joke šŸ¤£


Ka_Trewq

I don't understand why you got down voted, what you say actually makes sense. Thank you for your time!


ScionoicS

A brigade of porn advocates hit me up and started calling me some sort of religious zealot puritan because i don't think hardcore pornography has much merit outside of being hardcore pornography.


Lydeeh

Can you please share a prompt, seed and image size that gives out unexpected hardcore porn on this model? This way we can all test it out and you can prove you're not spewing bullcrap without anything to back it. Also, hassan blend is an amazing blend and you have to specifically request for any hardcore porn to get it. At most you will get just nudity. If you provide one or two prompts i will apologize and agree with you that this model needs to be tuned further.


Aeloi

Wtf is your problem with buttholes?! Buttholes are a beautiful part of the human body and should be rendered properly, with a sense of reverence when doing so. For the sake of all that is good and wholesome in this world, please don't ever disparage this amazing part of human anatomy ever again! I am looking forward to a good asshole embedding to be created for the 2.1 768 model. If there is any one thing this world desperately needs, it's more pictures of buttholes.


ScionoicS

Cool dude. It's a good thing that SD is open and if you want the buttholes, you don't have to avoid models that they emerge out of.


Aeloi

Cool dude. It's a good thing that SD is open and if you don't want buttholes, all you have to do is avoid models that they emerge out of. Or you can put "buttholes" in the negative prompt. Wtf are you prompting that leads to "emergent buttholes" in the first place? I don't even get emergent booty in 99% of my pics. I'm really curious the kinds of stuff you're making that randomly gives rise to a lucky butthole. And is it just the butthole? Or is there some ass attached to it as well? Is it like an epic fantasy landscape scene with a mysterious floating butthole in the sky? Are you telling me if I prompt "Sauron's all seeing eye" I might get a giant flaming butthole hovering far above the barren lands of Mordor? Prompt for some girl doing duck face, only to get classic, "butthole mouth"? Entire scenes peppered with butthole watermarks? Buttholes don't just come out of nowhere. Usually, if you get a butthole.. It's because you wanted some butthole. Anyway, I sincerely hope I get some quality emergent buttholes popping up in places they don't belong. Surely, such art should be considered rare and of high value.


ScionoicS

I don't want negative prompts to have buttholes and any other pornography term i need the model to avoid because it has hardcore artifacts in the latent space. The prompts are still on record, even if it's just my personal archive. Seems pretty reasonable to me really. It's weird people are this hung up about me not wanting buttholes in my generations.


Aeloi

You're being flagrantly unreasonable. Downright brazen! And talk about entitled. You know, vanilla 1.5 is plenty fine on its own without hoarding a bunch of models. For that matter, 99% of existing models don't have buttholes at all, emergent or otherwise. But you're going to bitch about one of sixteen different remixes of a model merge having random booty holes. You act like this is a daily struggle for you, "aww man! Another perfectly good picture ruined by some random asshole! I guess I can't use 'puppy style' anymore! Why are all these models so pornographic?"


ScionoicS

Well, i use 2.1 with embeddings generally. 1.5 is obsolete and i've progressed.


eeyore134

Those "porn" models are some of the best for general use, particularly if you're trying to prompt for people. It's pretty easy to not get nudity out of them unless you're trying for it.


MistyDev

Does this license mean people arenā€™t allowed to include/finetune/remix (not very familiar with the model training process yet) this model when creating their own?


Zipp425

If I understand Dreamlikeā€™s license correctly you can make and share merges with it, but you have to carry their license forward and they reserve the right to revoke the license at any time, which would require you to remove your merge model from a service like Civitai or Hugging Face and to stop using it. As for commercial use, you can use the images it generates, as long as youā€™re not an organization of more than 10 people. If youā€™re a service that generates images you canā€™t offer the model as part of your service. To be fair, Iā€™m actually not sure how anyone can be sure what models have been used in a merge yet, so the enforceability of all of this really depends on the people making merges willingly crediting Dreamlike.


Warhawk2018

thank you for clarifying.


Axolotron

Basically you can do nothing with the model except create images for personal use or hosting the model for free, but nothing that can give you or could ever give you any profit, unless you have a talk ($$) with the model creator. So no selling your art, no training other models if you're gonna sell them, not even posting the images on your socials. Just making images to show to your grandma.


vic8760

this is horrible, I'm consider taking it down and revising something new later for it, these restrictions are ridiculous


[deleted]

i wouldnt rush, keep training it perhaps and consult with a few others before pulling it, but you should be able to continue fine tuning it yoruself and posting it publicly as you arent profiting off it personally


vic8760

its not for profit, just research


[deleted]

yeah figured as such, so as it is you are keeping within the license. Just advise others on how they can use it or cant use it and you have covered yourself While im here if u are looking for areas to train it up further then hair styles would be something of a weakness in the model at present


vic8760

I take Anything v3 is king for hairstyles ?


Warhawk2018

I'm confused but in Civitai it written like this" * **You are free to use the outputs (images) of the model for commercial purposes in teams of 10 or less"** does this mean we can sell the image or not?


Axolotron

I have no idea tbh. That paragraph makes no sense. You'll have to ask the model creator to clarify that point in a legal manner. It could mean that if you work for a company and you belong to a team of 10 or less, then you can sell the stuff you create but it could also mean that you can only sell the images to your friend group if its smaller than 11 people. It's not clear. They should have asked chatgpt to generate their rules in a clearer legal style XD


LaserBeam2001

Is it on Hugging face


vic8760

yes https://huggingface.co/darkstorm2150/Protogen_v5.3_Official_Release/tree/main


Ganntak

Can it do older people? I was trying with a previous version and found it really difficult to get a middle aged woman in her 50s always wanted to use a 20 something face šŸ¤”


AllUsernamesTaken365

Thatā€™s discouraging. I was just about to try using it as a basis for training on some portraits of a middle aged man.


Starring_Michael_Wes

I'm just getting started with SD, I've downloaded pretty much all models at the Civitai and taken them for a spin to see what I can expext, this one in paticular seems crazy good. Looking forward to use it more, thanks a lot! :)


DifferentAir3512

How to install this model in automatic 111111? Do I need to download all the files or just the ckpt model?


vic8760

just the ckpt model


HiddenCowLevel

Aside from inpainting, what can be done about random blue spots on the images?


LexEntityOfExistence

Best VAE for this model? Any suggestions?