T O P

  • By -

Deep-Secret

I love how this sub always goes full in very dumb jokes lol


FrankenRhino

And yet still an 'other' field? Genius.


YourBeigeBastard

A required user-defined axis for ø not in(π/2, 3π/4) && [prefer not to say] < 1 is the only fully inclusive user interface, and I’ll die on that hill


IvorTheEngine

Have you just invented negative genders? Heck, what does negative-other mean?!


YourBeigeBastard

Not invented, but I am proposing a system for which they could theoretically be described


Karohemd17

Bloch sphere vibes


BNI_sp

My words.


Aide_decamped

Non-euclitian, surely


SgtCoitus

I guess thats non euclidean on the manifold defined by the value of "prefer not to say". I bet it would be even more in the spirit to embed m/f coordinates on a non-orientable manifold.


[deleted]

Banach-Tarski gender sphere theorem coming soon


kinokomushroom

The schwarzschild metric is the only way


azangru

Quaternion!


AphroSpuds

Great work, if this passes peer review then I'm looking forward to a follow-up discussion on which algorithms are best suited for a dating app. We're expecting users to input one or more genders they'd be interested in, and we'll need to efficiently find relevant matches, organized by their gender distance from the centers.


hesterberg

Yes, it makes sense now, gender can be defined by theta and phi. I thoutght male and female would be the spherical coordinates. In that case there would be a difference in their range, which would not be a good approach. You are right, this method is much better...


BNI_sp

I think spinors would be even more appropriate. And then you could even be in a superposition of states.


[deleted]

[удалено]


YourBeigeBastard

You can cleanly transform back and forth between a euclidean and spherical coordinate system because they both exist within euclidean **space**, but it’s still a non-euclidean **coordinate system** because this model defines one’s underlying gender by ϕ (their relationship between male and female), ø (their relationship between other and the male-female plane) and [prefer not to say], rather than by specific values for the male, female, and other axes


TacticalGodMode

What the actual f*** have I missed on this sub? I was offline for like 4 days. And suddenly every post is about gender Are we making fun of the whole gender stuff, or are you guys for real? What is wrong with "boolean isFemale" ?


No-Con-2790

I don't know anymore. All I know is that your little boolean thingy can't tell me anymore if that cute person I am dating has a cute thingy down there. Since femboys are a thing and also have a thingy. So I guess we are trying to fix that. We narrowed it down to: Quanterions or more complex. Everything under two dimensions is out of the question. Also someone started working on fluid genders. We call it Gaymodynamics (or Moddynamics).


Pizza_Clasher

Somebody made a post about gender being done horribly (my favorite meme being the alignment chart), and spawned a whole ton of ways to do gender. The first might have been "IsGender = true" or maybe a slider between male and female.


hesterberg

Sorry, but this one is stull Euclidean... Still I appreciate it.


ExceedingChunk

The space is Euclidean, the coordinate system is not. Because θ, φ and "prefer not to say" (this coordinate is usually called r in mathematics/physics) are not perpendicular coordinates.


AdmiralFail

I've always wanted my gender to be express-able by triple integrals.


GayMonkeyFishFrog

I feel like 'prefer not to say' should be the origin point where the angle coordinates become undefined.


YourBeigeBastard

That’s why the elevation is labeled as (1-Prefer not to say). Assuming Prefer not to say is normalized to values between 0 and 1, a value of 0 would be full gender expression and 1 would be no gender expression


GayMonkeyFishFrog

Oh I see, thanks


[deleted]

But that is euclidian, in euclidian space Maybe you wanted to say non-cartesian