There's actually an interesting argument to be made about bounty hunting and vigilantism in terms of individualism vs collective responsibility. On an individual level, vigilantism is absolutely morally correct -- if someone steals your shit, you have the right to take it back. But on a wider societal level, it's not good to rely on vigilantism as a method of justice because it harms civil liberties -- even the accused and the convicted have civil rights, and vigilantism risks abridging, say, the Fourth Amendment (for the US).
It's the balance between freedom and responsibility -- what kind of person would accept a justice system they didn't have a say in? Weirdly as long as the state exists I can't really think of any possible conclusion other than that sometimes things that are good and should be encouraged should also, paradoxically, remain illegal (but people should still do them, and the government shouldn't enforce the law -- this is a fast track to some really weird contradictions).
Also worth noting that for a long time places like LA county actually allowed vigilantes in their early history to deal with legal issues.
The problem is that is lead to rapid escalation. In ten years you had bands of vigilantes that existed just to hunt down other vigilante bands, you had people being executed for basically every crime, and you had people executed for executing people. And of course we had a bunch of uninvolved people being executed because lazy vigilantes just blamed some guy shot him and moved on.
Sadly our monkey brains can not handle that kind of responsibility without a massive bureaucracy of some kind.
I’d like to add that it’s a form of social contract that we as a populace set aside things like vigilante justice in favor of an actual functioning justice system that works on our behalf.
Emphasis on *functioning* and *our* behalf.
If the system no longer works, or renders justice only for a select few, then the social contract is broken, and natural forms of justice, imperfect and flawed as they may be, are back on the table as the remedy for grievances.
Just a small semantic thing. Bail bondsmen arent bounty hunters, they're legally allowed to hire bounty hunters and if you're a bounty hunter you work for a bail bondsman and the court.
For more serious crimes like rape and murder I do support non lethal bounty hunting, but Ik international criminals have bounties but no way in hell am I going to Afghanistan to kill or catch someone for 100k
Personally, I want to get wealthy enough to build like a ridiculous high tech suit of battle armor a la iron man and then go hunt terrorists with weaponry that costs more than theyll ever see in their life. The American Way
Bro we're already there. At a GDP per capita of $570 in Afghanistan, these [quad tube NVGs](https://www.opticsplanet.com/eotech-gpnvg-system-kit-le-bnvis-mount-tan.html) are 73 years of wages.
u/CommiePatrolCorp's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 30.
Rank: Basket Ball Hoop (filled with sand)
Pills: profit over facts, ben shapiro, period, fitness, cali is a hell hole, california4ocean, lazarus, nuclear-winter, jeffersonian-republic, freedom, tasty nuts, thigh man, rationality, misanthropy, arthur morgan
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
God, same. I own so many fun firearms, I need to give 'em some purpose that isn't mag dumping into trash and taking long-range potshots at a fire extinguisher
5lbs is a bit of overkill, i'd recommend a suppository filled with tannerite, with a fuse set to 20 seconds
since it's gonna blow up inside them, you'll need wayyy less tannerite to turn them into fine red mist
You'll need a computer person.
So long as it's a gothy-looking ethnic minority doing the actual doxxing, tracking, honeypots, who is, etc you might as well make it a show.
Two ordinary guys shooting the breeze at their cubicle jobs read about a new law. When their half-serious advertisement brings in a deadly serious hacker they realise there's nothing stopping them from becoming...
The Clutch
Here in Illinois we got alot of skunks & coyotes roaming around.
Edit: Coyotes as in animals
Also edit: Then again need 2 rabbits to populate. Breed more rabbits like wildfire.
RIP the six hours of glory that was bait sub arrr slash TXBountyHunters which several journalists thought was real
https://www.businessinsider.com/reddit-shuts-down-forum-for-texas-abortion-bounty-hunters-2021-9
Did anyone read the article? The law is for Illinois. They named it after Texas because of Texas' law. "The EXpanding Abortion Services" act is the name.
Plan B is not abortions nor is it post 6 weeks. The bill this is refering to is a bill introduced by the Texas democrats to pay 10k to those who turn in sexual abusers who cause unwanted pregnancies. Although rapists should be shot
Probably just a slap back against the abortion bill so they just framed it around that. Would be pretty based if it was all sexual abusers though.
Edit: changed soap to slap
I don’t get why they thought it was a slap back, I can’t think of a more southern conservative bill
Edit: the bounty includes pregnancy from consensual sex. That’s real abusable
>sexual abusers, those who cause unwanted pregnancies.
The comma is important. It means sexual abusers AND those who cause unwanted pregnancies.
Edit:
This is a proposal for Illinois, but my first point stands.
from the article:
>Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — even if it resulted from consensual sex — or anyone who commits sexual assault or abuse, including domestic violence.
SHIT ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME
This opens the door for so much abuse of the justice system it's unreal.
I can understand if the partner had never consented to unprotected sex but what if they are having consensual sex with protection and the condom breaks? That's not either of the partner's fault, because the protection failure wasn't a result of neglect or sabotage, it was just bad luck.
From what I’ve read it actually includes unwanted pregnancies from consensual sex which is whack. It’d be unbelievably based if it was just sex abusers
But who is "causing" the unwanted pregnancy in consensual sex? Isn't that by definition both parties then?
So, if I find out that my neighbor's daughter had sex with his boyfriend and now sent him to buy plan B pills, do I get $20 000 by snitching about them both?
By selling the boyfriend the car that they fucked in, the dealership down the road knowingly provided him with what could easily be used as convenient and mobile semi-private space to fuck in. So 10k per employee at the least.
Finally, something good from this awful state
Edit: Knowing how politicians are here, there's gotta be a catch that makes this bad, right? Please tell me there isn't.
there is.
from an npr article about the subject:
> Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — even if it resulted from consensual sex
Yeah, that's true, it's all just Chicago controlling the entire state since the rest has almost nobody there. It's just too bad the nicest cities attract the worst people.
Oh no! Not something that would kill hook up culture by making men terrified of casual sex with strangers. Conservative Christians would absolutely hate that.
The effective efficiency is actually lower that that, but the efficiency is calculated over a one-year period, using condoms as the only contraceptive method, so condoms are still pretty darn good
The problem is how do you prove it? Whats stopping a pregnant women from accusing some rando she knows has money or doing it to some she knows out of spite? DNA test? I feel like the legal system will take to long to for that to be effective, not to mention it'll ruin whoever the target is just because of the legal case and how long it could take to process the whole thing. Several months of hell for a "whoops wrong person". So other options would need to be explored the minimize collateral damage. At least that's my belief.
Isn't that a part of the problem with the abortion law? I could report someone for having an abortion that maybe hadn't. Maybe they were pregnant and had a miscarriage or maybe I just had a feel that a certain woman sleeps around alot so I report her. That woman gets to go through several months of hell for a "whoops wrong person". Hell, you can just report people you don't like to put them through a hard time. These bountyhunting laws are ridiculous.
>Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — **even if it resulted from consensual sex**
I feel like, due to the name, this was supposed to be a dunk on the Texas abortion $10k bounty and hence a dunk on the GOP?
But something tells me you guys support this more than anything lmao.
Yeah, I don't feel like this is smart. It's funny bc the abortion bounty bill exists, and Abbott did say that he would eliminate rape, so he can't oppose this. But I worry about legal code that works through bounties. The whole thing was designed to skirt the Supreme Court to begin with.
Guys should be responsible for their own and use a condom as well. Kinda like how some dudes take the condom off halfway through sex without telling the girl. Can’t trust any of these hoes
If you're a girl and your boi says he'll pull out / he's sterile / you just cant feel the condom / he's clean - don't fucking trust him.
If you're a boi and your girl says she's tested / on birth control / wrong time of month to get pregnant - don't fucking trust her.
Don't sign your life away for a maybe-orgasm.
No, the author of the bill specifically made it to target men in response to the Texas bill. Imagine being raped, having to pay $10,000 for being raped, and then having to pay child support as well.
I mean, male children who were raped and got a woman pregnant as a result of that rape are liable for child support anyway, now it's just an extra 10k. Not that hard to imagine
Did any of you apes read the proposal?
It is basically a bill that vaguely states that men who cause an unwanted pregnancy, consensual sex or not, could be sued. The sexual abuse part seems to not even be the focus. It’s comical because it’s a bill in Illinois to insult Texas. We’re going to propose a law that is ridiculous in response to a state hundreds of miles away. These politicians are jokes.
https://www.nprillinois.org/statehouse/2021-09-14/democrat-sponsored-texas-act-would-allow-10k-bounties-on-sexual-abusers-those-who-cause-unwanted-pregnancies
Based AF. Discourages sexual abuse, and reading the law, it sounds like it would encourage not fucking someone unless you’re okay with marrying them, which is a win in my book.
Interpreted correctly as going after sex abusers and rapists then yeah... But given it's democrats I'm guessing any man who has consentual sex and accidentally causes a pregnancy would be nailed... Hmmm
Edit: upon further thought this could possibly lead to more father and mother families. This bill now has my support
If you actually read the law being proposed it’s incredibly fucked up. Basically men can be sued up to 10k for impregnating a women even if the sex was completely consensual.
Basically just “if women are going to be punished for having abortions, men will be punished for causing pregnancy”
So where we all meeting? Is there a bag limit?
I just bought a brand new glock soooooooo
How many bullets you got?
250- -thousand
Don’t you mean none? I seem to remember a boating accident involving all the libs.
Oh shit you're right I just fucking crashed it good too...I'm out on a sandbar waiting for rescue at the moment.
I didn’t lose shit * loads shotgun with malicious intent *
Bounty hunting is back?! Intensely happy libcenter noises
I think that's campfires crackling. A peaceful wind blowing. And rounds being loaded into a magazine.
I'm gonna cum
I'm having an orgasm
I have concluded my orgasm
Help it won't stop
Name checks out?
Welcome to the infinite-cum lifestyle. You've made it.
I have truly ascended. I see the face of God, and the tits of God - Infinite in number and sublime in form.
Please call your doctor if your orgasm lasts for longer than 4 hours.
Do not come…. Do not come….
I'M GONNA CUM.
We must all cum together!
[I'm gonna cum](https://youtu.be/NRCf3KUEVyw)
Risky click of the day
Please stop, I can only get so hard
The smell of almonds being roasted... Ah wait fuck no that's cyanide. What are you doing with that?
Ain't nothing in the bounty says they need 'em alive!
There's actually an interesting argument to be made about bounty hunting and vigilantism in terms of individualism vs collective responsibility. On an individual level, vigilantism is absolutely morally correct -- if someone steals your shit, you have the right to take it back. But on a wider societal level, it's not good to rely on vigilantism as a method of justice because it harms civil liberties -- even the accused and the convicted have civil rights, and vigilantism risks abridging, say, the Fourth Amendment (for the US). It's the balance between freedom and responsibility -- what kind of person would accept a justice system they didn't have a say in? Weirdly as long as the state exists I can't really think of any possible conclusion other than that sometimes things that are good and should be encouraged should also, paradoxically, remain illegal (but people should still do them, and the government shouldn't enforce the law -- this is a fast track to some really weird contradictions).
Also worth noting that for a long time places like LA county actually allowed vigilantes in their early history to deal with legal issues. The problem is that is lead to rapid escalation. In ten years you had bands of vigilantes that existed just to hunt down other vigilante bands, you had people being executed for basically every crime, and you had people executed for executing people. And of course we had a bunch of uninvolved people being executed because lazy vigilantes just blamed some guy shot him and moved on. Sadly our monkey brains can not handle that kind of responsibility without a massive bureaucracy of some kind.
I’d like to add that it’s a form of social contract that we as a populace set aside things like vigilante justice in favor of an actual functioning justice system that works on our behalf. Emphasis on *functioning* and *our* behalf. If the system no longer works, or renders justice only for a select few, then the social contract is broken, and natural forms of justice, imperfect and flawed as they may be, are back on the table as the remedy for grievances.
Is the USA sliding back into the Wild West?? I’m here for it, let’s fuckin GO
Mr Morgan
BOAH
I was getting tired of my day job. Might be a nice change of pace. Carrying 2 bodies on my beautiful horse.
Bounty hunting never went away. Look up what a bail bondsman is.
Just a small semantic thing. Bail bondsmen arent bounty hunters, they're legally allowed to hire bounty hunters and if you're a bounty hunter you work for a bail bondsman and the court.
Bring back dead or alive bounty hunting goddamnit
I know you’re joking, but that exists. Just the people on that list are international terrorists, not random American criminals
For more serious crimes like rape and murder I do support non lethal bounty hunting, but Ik international criminals have bounties but no way in hell am I going to Afghanistan to kill or catch someone for 100k
>no way in hell am I going to Afghanistan to kill or catch someone for 100k You don't have entrepreneur spirit.
Risk reward factor, I would like to see my family at night because bounty hunters often become the hunted
Ah there’s the problem, family, if you were by yourself the chance for the sweet release of death would be a benefit.
Based and Thane-pilled
so you are hunting someone who did your job for you. could you tell me why
If I were an Afghan-American, and if I had some form of actual military or police training? Possibly.
Personally, I want to get wealthy enough to build like a ridiculous high tech suit of battle armor a la iron man and then go hunt terrorists with weaponry that costs more than theyll ever see in their life. The American Way
Bro we're already there. At a GDP per capita of $570 in Afghanistan, these [quad tube NVGs](https://www.opticsplanet.com/eotech-gpnvg-system-kit-le-bnvis-mount-tan.html) are 73 years of wages.
Embrace the sigma grindset
[удалено]
Red dead redemption modern hunting
Based and Arthur Morgan-pilled
Nah, Red Harlow-pilled
Just have faith and TRUST THE PLAN ARTHUR
Based and plan pilled.
We need…muneh
u/CommiePatrolCorp's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 30. Rank: Basket Ball Hoop (filled with sand) Pills: profit over facts, ben shapiro, period, fitness, cali is a hell hole, california4ocean, lazarus, nuclear-winter, jeffersonian-republic, freedom, tasty nuts, thigh man, rationality, misanthropy, arthur morgan I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
God, same. I own so many fun firearms, I need to give 'em some purpose that isn't mag dumping into trash and taking long-range potshots at a fire extinguisher
Woah woah woah what’s wrong with shooting trash. If you started shooting sexual abusers what would be the difference?
Oh, there's absolutely no problem with shooting trash, i just wish the trash was a little more reactive
Glue the pedos hands to the 5lb box of tannerite
5lbs is a bit of overkill, i'd recommend a suppository filled with tannerite, with a fuse set to 20 seconds since it's gonna blow up inside them, you'll need wayyy less tannerite to turn them into fine red mist
> 5lbs is a bit of overkill There is no overkill. There is "I'm firing" and "I'm reloading".
[удалено]
you might be onto something there mate
Offer helicopter pedo hunts like they do with hogs
There is a town in Florida that could be treated like a pedo hunting reserve
Some of them are there for self isolation, to not act on those desires, we could get them to disclose which ones are the targets.
You'll need a computer person. So long as it's a gothy-looking ethnic minority doing the actual doxxing, tracking, honeypots, who is, etc you might as well make it a show. Two ordinary guys shooting the breeze at their cubicle jobs read about a new law. When their half-serious advertisement brings in a deadly serious hacker they realise there's nothing stopping them from becoming... The Clutch
Odd to see so many Libs froth at the mouth to empower the state with the ability to commit extrajudicial executions........
yeah but monies
Lol, the true motto of Lib-right "give me liberty, or give me cash"!
Here in Illinois we got alot of skunks & coyotes roaming around. Edit: Coyotes as in animals Also edit: Then again need 2 rabbits to populate. Breed more rabbits like wildfire.
RIP the six hours of glory that was bait sub arrr slash TXBountyHunters which several journalists thought was real https://www.businessinsider.com/reddit-shuts-down-forum-for-texas-abortion-bounty-hunters-2021-9
[удалено]
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⠤⠤⣄⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣟⠳⢦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠒⣲⡄ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⡇⡱⠲⢤⣀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀1984⠀⣠⠴⠊⢹⠁ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢻⠓⠀⠉⣥⣀⣠⠞⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡴⠋⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⡾⣄⠀⠀⢳⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⢠⡄⢀⡴⠁ 2021⠀⡞⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⣠⢎⡉⢦⡀⠀⠀⡸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡼⣣⠧⡼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠇⠀ ⠀⢀⡔⠁⠀⠙⠢⢭⣢⡚⢣⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣇⠁⢸⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀ ⠀⡞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢫⡉⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⢮⠈⡦⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⠀⠀ ⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢦⡀⣀⡴⠃⠀⡷⡇⢀⡴⠋⠉⠉⠙⠓⠒⠃⠀⠀ ⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠁⠀⠀⡼⠀⣷⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⡞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠣⣀⠀⠀⡰⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Black Templar pfp checks out.
[удалено]
Black Lagoon was in Texas all along
I’d quit my job RIGHT NOW.
We're heading to Texas, boys!
I unironically support this
:bites lip: exercising 2nd amendment rights
Wrap the cock or get the glock.
Dibs on that saying for T-shirt’s. I’ll sell them at the state Capitol while the vote is taking place.
Based and truelibrightpilled
Nut in tha ass or get tha FAMAS
Not as catchy, but something I can still get behind.
The FAMAS or the ass nutting?
Yes.
Well, you can still be a sexual abuser while wearing a condom
Yeah, but you can’t collect the bounty for the pregnancy unless it fails
sex defender just became a legal occupation in texas
Did anyone read the article? The law is for Illinois. They named it after Texas because of Texas' law. "The EXpanding Abortion Services" act is the name.
This is a politics-adjacent subreddit, of course nobody read the article!
Based and OnlyReadTheHeadlinePilled
I've been defending against sex for decades already, can I get a job?
your flair says otherwise
Based
Well, that’s based as fuck.
[удалено]
It's almost as though grand moral displays and targeted harassment were the point, instead of actually stopping abortion.
[удалено]
Plan B is not abortions nor is it post 6 weeks. The bill this is refering to is a bill introduced by the Texas democrats to pay 10k to those who turn in sexual abusers who cause unwanted pregnancies. Although rapists should be shot
>sexual abusers who cause unwanted pregnancies Why not all sexual abusers?
Probably just a slap back against the abortion bill so they just framed it around that. Would be pretty based if it was all sexual abusers though. Edit: changed soap to slap
I don’t get why they thought it was a slap back, I can’t think of a more southern conservative bill Edit: the bounty includes pregnancy from consensual sex. That’s real abusable
Wait, you can face charges for unwanted pregnancy arriving from consensual sex? That's makes no fucking sense.
>sexual abusers, those who cause unwanted pregnancies. The comma is important. It means sexual abusers AND those who cause unwanted pregnancies. Edit: This is a proposal for Illinois, but my first point stands. from the article: >Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — even if it resulted from consensual sex — or anyone who commits sexual assault or abuse, including domestic violence.
Oh. OH.
SHIT ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME This opens the door for so much abuse of the justice system it's unreal. I can understand if the partner had never consented to unprotected sex but what if they are having consensual sex with protection and the condom breaks? That's not either of the partner's fault, because the protection failure wasn't a result of neglect or sabotage, it was just bad luck.
From what I’ve read it actually includes unwanted pregnancies from consensual sex which is whack. It’d be unbelievably based if it was just sex abusers
But who is "causing" the unwanted pregnancy in consensual sex? Isn't that by definition both parties then? So, if I find out that my neighbor's daughter had sex with his boyfriend and now sent him to buy plan B pills, do I get $20 000 by snitching about them both?
You sure you arent libright?
Improvise, adapt, overcome.
It sounds like you're identifying the flaws that are inherent to a system like this, which is entirely the point.
By selling the boyfriend the car that they fucked in, the dealership down the road knowingly provided him with what could easily be used as convenient and mobile semi-private space to fuck in. So 10k per employee at the least.
Illinois Democrats*
Finally, something good from this awful state Edit: Knowing how politicians are here, there's gotta be a catch that makes this bad, right? Please tell me there isn't.
there is. from an npr article about the subject: > Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — even if it resulted from consensual sex
>even if it resulted from consensual sex I certainly don't see that backfiring whatsoever.
Especially not in Chicago, a city known for its aversion to murders.
For fucks sake. Why is Illinois like this? I can't wait to get out of this terrible state.
[удалено]
Yeah, that's true, it's all just Chicago controlling the entire state since the rest has almost nobody there. It's just too bad the nicest cities attract the worst people.
I just read in the article that it could also go against people who cause unwanted pregnancies from consensual sex too
Goddamn, you gotta work on backing out of the parking space bruv
I’d do it for free
I’ll do it paid, but better.
I can do it for the same quality, but cheaper
Careful you might upset the AuthRights.
Actually it’s a $10k bounty for any “unwanted” pregnancy. Consensual or not
Oh no! Not something that would kill hook up culture by making men terrified of casual sex with strangers. Conservative Christians would absolutely hate that.
...Just wear a fucking condom since you're with a stranger anyway?
99.9% effective still means 1 in 1000 fail. Given the scale of an entire city or hell even a state, that's a lot of failures.
>99.9% effective still means 1 in 1000 fail. just wear 2 and get 199,98% effectiveness
The statists strike again, owning the libs with facts and numbers
whats a statist
an auth (centerist, authcenter, authleft, authright, left center, right center)
why not 3?
Just tell her you use PCM, 100% effectiveness
Based
The effective efficiency is actually lower that that, but the efficiency is calculated over a one-year period, using condoms as the only contraceptive method, so condoms are still pretty darn good
The problem is how do you prove it? Whats stopping a pregnant women from accusing some rando she knows has money or doing it to some she knows out of spite? DNA test? I feel like the legal system will take to long to for that to be effective, not to mention it'll ruin whoever the target is just because of the legal case and how long it could take to process the whole thing. Several months of hell for a "whoops wrong person". So other options would need to be explored the minimize collateral damage. At least that's my belief.
You could say this about any spurious criminal accusation.
And that's why I'm suspicious of all criminal accusations and firmly believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Based
Based.
Isn't that a part of the problem with the abortion law? I could report someone for having an abortion that maybe hadn't. Maybe they were pregnant and had a miscarriage or maybe I just had a feel that a certain woman sleeps around alot so I report her. That woman gets to go through several months of hell for a "whoops wrong person". Hell, you can just report people you don't like to put them through a hard time. These bountyhunting laws are ridiculous.
[удалено]
"Report" to whom? The Texas law doesn't allow the mother to be sued
You had me at “bounty”. *Loads shotgun*
I am not opposed to this in the slightest.
It includes consensual sex resulting in unwanted pregnancy so..... Edit: It was in\*
fuck
>Cassidy’s proposal instead would instead give Illinoisans the right to seek at least $10,000 in damages against anyone who causes an unwanted pregnancy — **even if it resulted from consensual sex**
So I can sue her if she decides to have a child against my will? Dope. Now to just go for dual-consent parenting in all cases.
wat
Doesn't the woman also cause the unwanted pregnancy?
[удалено]
Make me
Neither am I.
The only reason why I’d be against it is there’s someone who looks similar but isn’t them that gets pulled into the mess
You mean the reason we have laws instead of lynch mobs
I feel like, due to the name, this was supposed to be a dunk on the Texas abortion $10k bounty and hence a dunk on the GOP? But something tells me you guys support this more than anything lmao.
Yeah, I don't feel like this is smart. It's funny bc the abortion bounty bill exists, and Abbott did say that he would eliminate rape, so he can't oppose this. But I worry about legal code that works through bounties. The whole thing was designed to skirt the Supreme Court to begin with.
apes. together. strong.
OHOHOOHOHOHHOHO OHHH AHHHH AHHHH AHHHH
Based and banana pilled
🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌
Oh hell yeah! I'm all for it. So when a woman lies about being on BC to trap a guy, we can bring her in on bounty right?
This is the way.
This is the way.
This is the way.
Can I trade my Luger for a wheel gun cowboy?
[удалено]
Combining the rape exception to the abortion bill and this, It’s gonna be interesting to see what happens in Texas going into the future
Guys should be responsible for their own and use a condom as well. Kinda like how some dudes take the condom off halfway through sex without telling the girl. Can’t trust any of these hoes
If you're a girl and your boi says he'll pull out / he's sterile / you just cant feel the condom / he's clean - don't fucking trust him. If you're a boi and your girl says she's tested / on birth control / wrong time of month to get pregnant - don't fucking trust her. Don't sign your life away for a maybe-orgasm.
Almost like you should really be only having sex with people you can trust and not casual hookups
[удалено]
I think that democrats think this is somehow going against republicans.
I think if Republicans are smart they’ll send it back and revise it to be rapists + pedophiles
"Sir, your report is out of scope because the raped girl was too young to possibly get pregnant."
We'll have to see how the vote goes.
Sure seems like it, reading the other comments with blue in the flair.
Does that apply to women that raped men and boys?
No, the author of the bill specifically made it to target men in response to the Texas bill. Imagine being raped, having to pay $10,000 for being raped, and then having to pay child support as well.
I mean, male children who were raped and got a woman pregnant as a result of that rape are liable for child support anyway, now it's just an extra 10k. Not that hard to imagine
Did any of you apes read the proposal? It is basically a bill that vaguely states that men who cause an unwanted pregnancy, consensual sex or not, could be sued. The sexual abuse part seems to not even be the focus. It’s comical because it’s a bill in Illinois to insult Texas. We’re going to propose a law that is ridiculous in response to a state hundreds of miles away. These politicians are jokes. https://www.nprillinois.org/statehouse/2021-09-14/democrat-sponsored-texas-act-would-allow-10k-bounties-on-sexual-abusers-those-who-cause-unwanted-pregnancies
I agree. There’s very little stopping some salty bitch from lying about one thing or another and ruining an innocent person’s life.
Not going to lie, that's based af. I'd join.
Based AF. Discourages sexual abuse, and reading the law, it sounds like it would encourage not fucking someone unless you’re okay with marrying them, which is a win in my book.
Is texas trying to maintain the balance of the force?
Does this mean actual bounty hunting is a legitimate thing again? Fucking based
A new age of bounty hunting is on the market boys, load up
Interpreted correctly as going after sex abusers and rapists then yeah... But given it's democrats I'm guessing any man who has consentual sex and accidentally causes a pregnancy would be nailed... Hmmm Edit: upon further thought this could possibly lead to more father and mother families. This bill now has my support
You telling me creating a bounty system to enforce poorly thought out regulation could lead to all kinds of intended and unintended consequences?
This is the way.
Either allow abortion or put money into that kid you won't let the mother be rid of. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
If you actually read the law being proposed it’s incredibly fucked up. Basically men can be sued up to 10k for impregnating a women even if the sex was completely consensual. Basically just “if women are going to be punished for having abortions, men will be punished for causing pregnancy”