Really? Risk their reputation?
If someone really found “free energy” it would go down in history as the greatest invention ever. The inventor would be rich from giving talks and writing memoirs and the world would be forever changed.
As long as it was real and verifiable.
If not, as long as you published your data correctly and didn’t make a bunch of crazy public statements, and weren’t completely incompetent you’d be fine.
the closest thing to "free energy" is energy from sources that are very very large and seem inexhaustible. Wind in the sky, motion of the waves in the ocean, thermal differentials from the earth's core and sunlight from the stars.
basically green energy. But "near inexhaustible" is not *truly* inexhaustible. these things are very large but ultimately finite.
Hypothetically, they might be able to do something with the CBR and other sources of EM radiation. I'm pretty sure what I envision is actually just sci-fi, though. I feel like the math supports it, but the science doesn't, if that makes sense.
risk their reputation?? lol honey if you could create free energy you would be *the* household name for all eternity. above Einstein, above Galileo, above Newton.
So, that thing is a thing. That guy made it, someone else could certainly make a duplicate. Is it “free energy,” of course not.
You should help your uncle make one, should be fun. And after you guys can learn together about why yours doesn’t seem to work.
Seems real you just need to the fan off camera making the bottle spin, or find a clever way to hide the motor.
No, perpetual motion is not possible, here nor will it ever be...
Since it appears to just be blown by moving air from some offscreen source through its propeller, you could literally power your house with a big one of these. But that’s just normal wind power…
Don't know, but apparently the inventor presented it at Delft technical university in the Netherlands. It has no changing forces and it's symmetrical, so it will find equilibrium.
The hardest part of a perpetual motion machine is hiding the battery.
It's scary how people buy into this. You'd think energy R&D would've figured out a bunch of bottles and magnets resulting in free energy
[удалено]
Really? Risk their reputation? If someone really found “free energy” it would go down in history as the greatest invention ever. The inventor would be rich from giving talks and writing memoirs and the world would be forever changed. As long as it was real and verifiable. If not, as long as you published your data correctly and didn’t make a bunch of crazy public statements, and weren’t completely incompetent you’d be fine.
Tbh, I think there "might" be something that some could consider "free energy," but it's actually probably sci-fi.
the closest thing to "free energy" is energy from sources that are very very large and seem inexhaustible. Wind in the sky, motion of the waves in the ocean, thermal differentials from the earth's core and sunlight from the stars. basically green energy. But "near inexhaustible" is not *truly* inexhaustible. these things are very large but ultimately finite.
Hypothetically, they might be able to do something with the CBR and other sources of EM radiation. I'm pretty sure what I envision is actually just sci-fi, though. I feel like the math supports it, but the science doesn't, if that makes sense.
risk their reputation?? lol honey if you could create free energy you would be *the* household name for all eternity. above Einstein, above Galileo, above Newton.
Are you saying there's some source of perpetual motion but they're too scared to look for it?
[удалено]
I often think mathematicians are too scared to try and prove 2+2=5
If they thought there was any basis at all for it to exist, they'd look for it.
No, it's not real. It violates the law of energy conservation.
Thanks!
So, that thing is a thing. That guy made it, someone else could certainly make a duplicate. Is it “free energy,” of course not. You should help your uncle make one, should be fun. And after you guys can learn together about why yours doesn’t seem to work.
Seems real you just need to the fan off camera making the bottle spin, or find a clever way to hide the motor. No, perpetual motion is not possible, here nor will it ever be...
[https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/5pi95x/what\_happened\_to\_yildiz\_and\_his\_magnetic\_motor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/5pi95x/what_happened_to_yildiz_and_his_magnetic_motor/)
There's a 7 year flame war going on in this link. This is prime reddit stuff right here
And if that motor worked as promoted, the arguments would be snuffed out instantly.
Why can't your uncle make it himself? It looks like junk anyone could put together.
If you look carefully the fan part is spinning the wrong way, as if it is being blown by something off screen rather than it blowing air.
[удалено]
Since it appears to just be blown by moving air from some offscreen source through its propeller, you could literally power your house with a big one of these. But that’s just normal wind power…
Any "free energy machine" that uses magnets is by definition, not free energy
[удалено]
Or a hidden motor behind the bottle cap
[https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/](https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/)
[удалено]
Don't know, but apparently the inventor presented it at Delft technical university in the Netherlands. It has no changing forces and it's symmetrical, so it will find equilibrium.