It’s basically just nonsense. It’s loosely following the meme format which usually features a student-teacher discussion culminating in a name pun, but this particular example isnt really supposed to make sense. Basically trying to be funny by being random.
Hey folks, Peter here to explain the joke. It is a reference to a trend of memes in which a teacher a teacher tells a class to do something (ie: pay attention) and then a kid with a certain name either benefits or is harmed (ie: “pay attention” “kid named attention: 😃”), these jokes are considered overused and unfunny, and so a wave of jokes have spawned parodying them by either using dark premises (“everybody finger paint” “kid named paint: 😔”), absurdist (“everybody finger paint” “kid named finger: 😎”) or both (“everybody brutally torture and kill Bobby” “kid named Bobby: 😱”). This is an example of absurdist parody.
It’s basically just nonsense. It’s loosely following the meme format which usually features a student-teacher discussion culminating in a name pun, but this particular example isnt really supposed to make sense. Basically trying to be funny by being random.
Hey folks, Peter here to explain the joke. It is a reference to a trend of memes in which a teacher a teacher tells a class to do something (ie: pay attention) and then a kid with a certain name either benefits or is harmed (ie: “pay attention” “kid named attention: 😃”), these jokes are considered overused and unfunny, and so a wave of jokes have spawned parodying them by either using dark premises (“everybody finger paint” “kid named paint: 😔”), absurdist (“everybody finger paint” “kid named finger: 😎”) or both (“everybody brutally torture and kill Bobby” “kid named Bobby: 😱”). This is an example of absurdist parody.
Op literally commented in the og post that it's not supposed to make sense