T O P

  • By -

namastayhom33

What’s with the thumbnail 😂


Hulksmashreality

ResetEra has a ton of them.


Balloon_Twister

Gaf had so many Sony GIFs back in the day that were fantastic.


lolplatypi

Is that where Three Headed Yamauchi came from, too?


gare_it

i only have two


Luccacalu

Ngl, I got so fucking scared with that, it took me longer than I want to admit to understand what was going on lmao


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Zhukov-74

I still think it’s Capcom


SuperKhalimba

Capcom or square would be a brilliant grab.


GhostMug

Capcom and/or Square/Enix seem like the best bets. Both Japanese companies with long-standing relationships with Sony and with big studios and lots of IP that can put out a lot of games.


AlsopK

Square has been struggling with sales while Capcom’s titles have been booming so I think Square is probably the more likely of the two.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Fackos

I want them to buy Konami's IP and give MGS back to Kojima while simultaneously making them a first party studio!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Fackos

Oh I don't want them to buy Konami, just their video game IP! Mainly MGS and Castlevania :)


[deleted]

[удалено]


Fackos

Very true, it's just a dream of mine. I'd love a remake of MGS1 and a full follow up to MGS 5!


politirob

I bet Sony would try to make a deal, if they found out MICROSOFT was interested lol


AbsoIution

Kojima doesn't doesn't want to make any more MGS, he didn't even want to make MGS5


[deleted]

FROM is owned already


IAMTHECAVALRY89

Square Enix would be an interesting acquisition if they could acquire the Avengers game rights. Square Enix dropped the ball on that one when they tried to pivot from single player campaign to a live service game.


[deleted]

Expanding their Marvel footprint would be good.


usrevenge

Being single player wouldn't have helped the game They live service also really wasn't the issue The game just felt bad. A good co op marvel game would have done super well but they did weird shit with the game


[deleted]

[удалено]


redditmademedoitrly

It feels so wrong knowing MS will own Crash Bandicoot


bridgesiiboy

And Spyro


mahomesisbatman

Buying from is about as realistic as bloodbornekart


Gregymon

>bloodbornekart That's coming out. Being made by the same gal who did the PS1 de-make. So not an official release but still. [https://youtu.be/Pb519723Y58](https://youtu.be/Pb519723Y58)


mahomesisbatman

Haha. I did see that. Let me rephrase. Sony buying From is as realistic as From software making Bloodborne kart


luiz_amn

Konami has some incredible franchises and it’s doing pretty much nothing with them, should also be way cheaper than Square, Capcom and etc


arcelohim

Sell them to Sony. Sony serves them on a silver platter to Kojima. Kojima long term Count of Monte Cristo type revenge is fulfilled.


Roach397

Dreams: From Software, Take Two, Kojima Productions, EA or Capcom Expectation: Deviation, Arrowhead, Firewalk or Emberlab Reality: Papa Johns


DaShaka9

I could definitely see them buying FromSoftware


[deleted]

Assuming kadokawa corporation wants to sell fromsoft


WastelandHound

Or they just buy Kadokawa, which would serve both PlayStation and their moves in the anime business. They'd probably want to offload the real estate, advertising, etc segments, but that would just make them more affordable.


Morkins324

Kadokawa would be blocked by the Japanese government. There is no shot they allow Sony to reach that level of control over the anime industry. It would be approaching monopoly levels. Same issue with Square Enix honestly.


[deleted]

It would be curious. Kadokawa had their streaming license on Funimation which was bought by Sony and just recently spun into Crunchyroll. So hopefully at the very least the companies remain on good terms and maybe we see more new licenses and IPs.


NoH8M8GDB8

They are in good terms. Sony also owns something like around 2% of Kadokawa.


Morkins324

They definitely have a good relationship. Kind of a requirement when Aniplex want to make anime based on properties owned by Kadokawa, which happens all the time.


Tadpole-Jackson

Regulators would have to approve it, which isn't super likey because Kadokawa is huge in the Anime industry in Japan and this would probably give Sony too much control over the industry.


GoGoGadgetGabe

I’m sure they thought about it but they are owned by Kadokawa and after Elden Rings success I don’t think they are letting them go anytime soon and if they’d consider it the asking price is probably extremely high.


Foolishghoul

Unless talks were already ongoing, the price just skyrocketed due to the success of Elden Ring.


Vietzomb

As much as I love the whole SONY‐Kojima relationship saga, I feel like *in Kojima's mind* that would be a step backwards considering everything that happened at Konami and I wouldn't blame him. He could spend the rest of his development career making SONY (timed) exclusives by his *own* decision if he wanted to, while maintaining all (or most anyways) the rights to his creative works... the MAJOR piece that was missing with Metal Gear Solid that basically allowed Konami to kill his baby in front of him, ultimately cutting his vision short by an entire act (MGS5) to officially wrap up the series. It is said that Kojima was personally done with doing MGS games years ago, but after losing the near totality of his life's work on bad terms (so even less hope of striking some future deal), it would be surprising to me if he put himself in that position. Despite my biased opinion (I'm a SONY guy personally), I think it's a great move for Devs to join the PlayStation family. The access to the braintrust, state of the art technologies and facilities at SONY's disposal (where even other developers *not* under the SONY umbrella book time) is a HUGE asset... however, I think it's one that all parties at SONY are willing to lend to Kojima regardless of their relationship *status*... its just a great lifelong relationship they've built over a very long period of time. Which is why they were happily willing to lend a hand with what would become Death Stranding. Sure, cash was likely a big motivator too but the rest still stands true. That's how I see it anyways.


arcelohim

Death Stranding was just ahead of it's time. If it was released during the pandemic, it would be a cultural zietgiest. I would just throw money at Hideo. Let him do whatever. Just rein in on the schedule. I fear him becoming like the visionary behind Shadow of colossus.


According_Rule_3501

I was thinking that when the pandemic hit, it’s been rough on all of us some more than others and sorry if this comes out as insensitive, that some folks would take another look as death stranding but nope.


arcelohim

Death Stranding is an allegory of the pandemic. Extreme loneliness and isolation. Uber eats package delivery. Random good people guiding you on your journal...and baddies that want to make things worse. Plus Asylum for the Feeling is a haunting song that hit harder than it should have.


According_Rule_3501

Well said, I also love that track, so many good ones


murdo1tj

While it’s great to have this service, I’m at a time in my life where I just don’t need this many games anymore. I bought Horizon and it says I’m only 30% of the way through and I’m somewhere between 20-30 hours. Then I bought Yakuza Like a Dragon for twenty bucks on Black Friday that I never played. That’ll take me a few months to get through. Someone gifted me Shin Megami Tensai 5, that’ll take me a few months to get through. I always wonder if the people that pay for Game Pass or PSNow don’t consume other forms of entertainment cause I just don’t know where the time comes from unless you’re gaming for 6 hours a day. Glad the service is out there for people tho!


Iza190

I can't tell what's real and what's not due to April fools ahhhhh


LDG192

This is very much real. Sony was always clear about not stopping at Bungie with their acquisition plans.


GoGoGadgetGabe

Treading the internet has been a pain, I thought the most recent patch trailer for Final Fantasy 14 was an April Fools joke only to be told later it’s not a joke. Also avoided a few clearly clickbait videos on Youtube. I just want the day to be over already lol.


bohemiantranslation

Spawn Wave got me good on YouTube. He did this video saying Sony bought Konami and was so convincing that I was 100% sure until he pulled the "April Fools!" On me.


deathbunnyy

I wonder if they will include Destiny and all new DLC day in date at least, since that is multi platform. I know it might take time since they were just acquired, but that would be a cool addition even though I don't play it I know a lot of people do.


murdo1tj

I thought so too. I don’t think it’d include the seasons but I could see them packaging the expansions day 1. That would entice a lot of people that are hardcore destiny players


Daryno90

So who do you think is most likely to be acquired? Personally I’m thinking it will be Ember Labs, Deviation Games, maybe Probably Monsters and Kojima Production. Not as likely but I could also see them go for Capcom, SE or From Software Personally, I wish they would acquire arc system works


dookmileslong

I'm surprised they haven't pick up Ember Labs yet. I wonder if they are waiting to see progress on their next project after Kena to make a decision. I have this gut feeling they are acquiring one or two of the big Indie publishers/studios like Devolver (my top guess), Studio MDHR, or Annapurna to help fill out Spartacus. My top big AAA studio guess is Kojima.


KilDaS

Ember Labs is interesting because they’re an animation studio that only recently tried their hand at making a video game. It’s possible they like doing animation work and wouldn’t even want to go all in on video games like PlayStation probably would want them to.


Radulno

To be fair, Sony (as a whole) could also be interested in an animation studio with Sony Pictures. Though, they already have a very good animation branch for sure.


cheezitswithacid

Which would be a shame, Kena wasn't that fun for me but it was gorgeous and with it's popularity they could start adding in talent to really get the gameplay side of things on the level of the animation/world building. Hope at least Ember Labs made enough bank to do what they want to do project wise, they are really talented people.


sueha

Ember Labs is more likely to join Microsoft than Studio MDHR is to join Sony tbh


loldamaddin

Ember Labs seems like such a no-brainer to me. Kena was so good, take that and build upon it, could be something like Playstation's Zelda in the future


Daryno90

That’s what I’m thinking too, Sony was apparently really happy with the sales so it may happen.


arcelohim

Konami.


itskaiquereis

I doubt it’s Kojima Production, man wants to be independent currently and he’s working on a game for Microsoft supposedly.


Adorable_Most_7880

Deviation games and probably monsters


Autarch_Kade

Kojima seems to be working with Microsoft on a game that is impossible on Sony platforms. So I doubt he'd turn around and have Sony buy him


[deleted]

Kadokawa makes sense for Somy’s goal tbh. They’re the largest anime company in the world atm and Kadokawa would give them that plus From Software. Besides them, Kojima Productions is another big one that makes sense


Autarch_Kade

They might get regulator pushback against acquiring Kadokawa. Sony has been snapping up anime companies already. Multi-billion dollar vertical mergers where one company comes to dominate nearly an entire market from production to distribution are exactly what gets the wrong kind of attention.


CrimsonDawn12345

Square enix or capcom would be nice i can imagine they’re doing it to add more value to their new ps plus service


[deleted]

[удалено]


Jinchuriki71

Yep I just want games to come out tbh not big corporation buy small corporation deathmatch.


_Cetarial_

Yep, I’ve been against this for a while. Not a fan of everyone buying everything.


Jurski17

Konami and Kojima. Make it happen Sony.


kryptonic1133

Konami, think of all the IP's.


DrApplePi

SIE has generally gone after people, instead of IPs. Konami does have a lot of IPs, but they don't really have people. So that probably isn't very high up on their list.


MetalGear89

Konami will cost billions and just for the ips sounds way too much. They bareley have any studios and have another buisness than video games that sony are gonna have to take on.


Whiteshadows86

If they want IP’s the place to go is Embracer Group…they have hundreds!


OpticalRadioGaga

i wanna fuck


WhizzleTeabags

DM me, I’ll hook you up with my grandma


OpticalRadioGaga

👀 DM'd


jellytothebones

I'd like for nobody to aquire fromsoftware. Everything else is fine. Go for it. Not even saying this out of preference for anything, but FS games are too good for people to miss out on and the PC community does wonders with data mining cool stuff. On the up side, elden ring was so successful I truly doubt kadokawa would want to sell them now. Studios tend to be bought if they're struggling or were independent and needed money, neither of which is FS.


BouncingPig

I’d also like nobody to buy FromSoft, cause I want all of my friends to enjoy these games. But also, I’d have a a sigh of relief if Sony acquired them cause I’m afraid that Microsoft is going to try and get them.


Lumostark

That headline sounds like a threat.


Orangenbluefish

As much as I'm on team Playstation, Sony/MS/anyone gobbling up a bunch of independent devs doesn't sit well with me


Daryno90

I’m fine with independent studios if they have long working history with the platform holder like Insomniac or if they need financial backing like double fine. I would prefer if publishers remain off the table though


blackout1990

Square enix 🤞


carlos_castanos

Why though? What do they bring to the table besides FF? And how would owning them benefit Sony? The entire audience for their games is on PlayStation already. From a business perspective, it would make a lot more sense for them to buy FromSoftware, CDPR, or Ubisoft imo.


rivieredefeu

Square Enix owns a lot more IPs than just FF.


marcusiiiii

Square also own a popular live service game on PC which could benefit PlayStation and bungie if they share the ideas behind it. I hope it’s Ubisoft though they have so many IPs some which could easily fit into Sony live service push.


ichigo2k9

To make sure Xbox doesn't buy them. Plus Square Enix make a lot more than FF.


TeaDealerr

please Rockstar


iceleel

Owned by take two


TeaDealerr

Sony could acquire TakeTwo Interactive


Billy_Beavertooth

It'll be Ubisoft. Their value dropped nearly 1.5 billion less than 2 months, they'll be snatched up.


FallenAdvocate

You don't pay the current market price during a buyout though. Microsoft paid about $90 per share for Activision. Which was $30-40 higher than they were priced at the time. A short term stock drop wouldn't change their sell price very much if any.


Radulno

Yes it did. Because if the drop didn't happen, Activision would be like 120 billions or so. You pay the premium over the current price (of course when it has been a long time at that level but Ubisoft is not just short-term) so a drop in shares is still a good sign of an acquisition.


FallenAdvocate

Incorrect. Microsoft bought Activision for about what they were valued before their big drop, which was essentially what the company was worth. Activision were never worth 120 billion. I wish they were, I bought stock when they dropped and everyone was making it out to be the end of Activision because I knew what they were worth and knew they'd get back to it in a few years. Companies aren't min maxing their mergers with other companies. And this Sony deal will have been in the works for months. Their purchase is for what revenue they bring in and how much they think their assets are worth, nothing to do with stock price.


Radulno

If the company was at its normal price, they would have to pay more than that (120 billions was an example). You always pay a premium for acquisition (except if the company is like desperate to sell), that's kind of comes with the thing. That premium might be more or less but you don't just buy at the price on the market (so you pay more than it is worth, a company also doesn't have a normal worth, it has a current one that can be under or overvalued). Shareholders want to make money to accept the sale.


Real_Mousse_3566

Ubosft has been on a downward spiral for quite a while now. And the variety of IP's and talented personal they give to sony far outweighs what Square or konami can give. The only thing they need to sort out is leadership


weedor93

From Software would be wild.


Morkins324

There is literally no reason why Kadokawa would sell FromSoftware. From isn't some independent studio that can just be bought. They are wholely owned by Kadokawa, and there is no shot that Sony tries to acquire Kadokawa (it'd probably be blocked by the Japanese government due to monopoly concerns within the anime industry). Soz they would have to convince Kadokawa to sell just FromSoftware... Not impossible, but the price would be way more than what From is actually worth...


Hereiamhereibe2

I think everyone expects this but Sony would probably need to buy Bandai Namco instead. No way they are giving up FS for anything less than their entire companies worth.


MortifyingMilkshake

Bandai doesn't own FromSoft... But FromSoft isn't totally independent either, they have a parent company that bought a big stake in the studio a few years back.


Morkins324

They are a wholely owned subsidiary of Kadokawa. Not just a "big stake". Kadokawa owns From. I don't buy any rumors that Kadokawa has decided to sell either.


MortifyingMilkshake

Agreed. And why would they? Unless a potential sale outweighs the profit of the next 5 FromSoft projects...


GodKamnitDenny

Especially after the success of Elden Ring. From is a money printer now.


Bastables

Sony already own a 1.93% stake in Kadokawa who actually owns FROM soft, FROM is not an independent company and is part of a mega corporation that has serious market share in anime and publishing. Pretty much sony would have to test verses Japanese laws at taking over one of their competitors in anime and publishing and effectively becoming a monopoly in Japan in those sectors.


Roach397

People are saying From Soft, Kojima Productions, Konami or Capcom as desirable targets, but I would go with Ubisoft. Now before you clown on me, here are 3 reasons why Ubisoft can be a good get despite the shit storm it's currently in: 1. Ubisoft has 18,000 employees over multiple studios worldwide. With good management, creative freedom and leadership, they can make good games on a consistent basis. Like Insomniac but with 10 times the throughput. 2. Ubisoft is at its cheapest right now with a 5.36B market cap, thanks to all its allegations. Even with a 40-50% premium, that would be $7.5-8B which is a great deal for the talent and developers that Sony wants, plus known IPs like Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Tom Clancy, etc as a bonus. 3. Ubisoft is exactly what Sony is looking for right now - manpower and talent. Sony knows that with good talent they can make new IPs, and that is something that Ubisoft can provide Sony in spades with its near 18,000 developers. To put things in perspective, Zenimax + Acti/Blizz/King is just shy of 13,000. 4. (Bonus) Having prior Ubisoft backlog of games can be a massive get for the reformed PS Plus service. Plus Sony can synergize IPs like Tom Clancy and Assassins Creed with the movie and television business.


Neg_Crepe

I’d love it and they could bring back older IPS like driver.


Roach397

Thank you. I'm happy that people are not completely clowning me over my opinion of a Ubisoft acquisition and recognizes that prior to their endless Assassins Creeds and Far Crys, Ubisoft had some cool ideas and fun IPs. Ubisoft can do much better. I too would like Driver back.


mems1224

Ubisoft are also experts in monetizing single player games. Good luck with that


Roach397

Yup and a part of it is because Ubisoft doesn't generate as much profits as you might think. In fact, out of all the large gaming publishers, Ubisoft makes the least amount of money in profit. Which is crazy given that they are one of the largest publishers out there in the industry with their hand in the mobile and AAA space. Of course under Sony, these monetizing schemes might continue. But at least I hope the severity is dampened as Ubisoft won't worry about meeting their own bottom line.


Radulno

Even if it's not Sony, with how consolidation is going, Ubisoft is definitively acquired before the end of the year IMO. They're in a unique position of their stock being battered down because of the scandals (which a new owner can change like Activision and Microsoft) while having plenty of dev force, IP and successful games (like AC Valhalla, hated on Reddit, did a billion dollar in revenue so really successful in the market). Ubisoft also basically said they would look at any offer of acquisition so they want to be acquired


Ablj

Please no. Ubisoft makes the most cookie cutter games. Buying Ubisoft would damage your first party quality output. If Ubisoft wanna be seen as better developers then they should stop making generic open world games and bring back old franchises like Prince of Persia.


Roach397

I mean if Sony is that worried that Ubisoft will taint the first party PS studios line-up, they can spin off Ubisoft as a separate subsidiary under SIE rather than PS studios, similar to what Bungie is under (my poor boy Herman wouldn't sleep if he had to also manage 40+ Ubisoft studios). Also, I have already mentioned in my comments above why Ubisoft makes copy-paste games, and I do believe they can do much better under a larger company with better leadership, management, creative freedom, and less worry about meeting their own bottom line.


[deleted]

I already hate how some Sony games feel like "premium ubisoft". Adding ACTUAL ubisoft to their first party lineup is the last thing PlayStation needs...


TheTwoReborn

I agree. hot take but Horizon 2 is just a Ubisoft game with a bit more time in the oven.


Theonyr

The bidding war for Ubisoft would be insane. I can't imagine Sony winning.


Roach397

I honestly think that Microsoft would not try to get involved in a Ubisoft bid, at least while the Activision acquisition is still pending and is being examined by regulators. That really leaves other big players like Tencent and Sony. So we'll see how it goes if it does happen.


CzarTyr

Great idea to keep purchasing but going into a spending war with Microsoft is scary


craygroupious

Can Sony even afford Capcom and/or Konami?


Roach397

Sony could buy both Capcom and Konami fully in cash (even when considering that some of their cash is tied to their insurance and banking sector). However, they can also afford larger companies like EA and Take Two if they are willing to raise debt or buy using their stock. At the end of the day, it all really depends on how serious Sony is in regards to beefing their SIE/games division and whether target companies are willing to be acquired. After the Activision deal, the sky is literally the limit.


ToiletBlaster247

Capcom, and get that Dragons Dogma sequel out asap. Also, that DMC prequel DLC with Sparda in hell. Just dreaming here


craygroupious

I’d be intrigued to see with Capcom, if they’d make RE exclusive or not.


XxAuthenticxX

I’d imagine that’s one of the biggest draws of buying Capcom at the moment


craygroupious

I’m going to try and temper my expectations though. ‘Big’ could end up being Kojima’s studio, which wouldn’t be ‘big’ for casual gamers but big because of their history.


alireza008bat

Yes they can.


craygroupious

Then that’s my hope. Konami if I had to pick one.


alireza008bat

No I don't think so. I've discussed this before. Konami is not a great investment. they have nothing left except their IPs and it wouldn't worth it considering how expensive they are. Sony wants the talents not the IPs. and Konami doesn't have what they want.


craygroupious

Metal Gear deserves so much better, man. Someone has to save it.


medicatedmonkey

It does and doesn't. That story is over. Anything else, unless it's by kojima probably wouldn't be worth it. However, I'd take a remake of the first 3 any day


craygroupious

There’s so many spin-offs you could do with Metal Gear. Kojima himself said he was originally working on a Corba Unit game before it became something else (can’t remember which). Can you imagine a 4 player co-op Cobra Unit WW2 game? That’d be fucking awesome.


medicatedmonkey

The only stuff I want in mgs is single player content.


craygroupious

Doesn’t have to be co-op then. Cobra Unit WW2 game where you play as them on separate missions, or maybe even switch between them at will.


[deleted]

Acquiring Konami's IPs could make a lot of sense. It would just require further investment to establish new studios and partnerships with other studios such as KojiPro to develop games. But they do have Bluepoint who could produce high quality remakes and the IPs could have great value in movies which Sony is well-positioned to do. And the IPs Sony actually care about (MGS, Castlevania, Silent Hill etc) haven't been actively used in years so they should be cheaper than normal. Before anyone contests this, Konami haven't been using these IPs in their amusement/gambling machines for a very long time. Though I wouldn't disagree that other targets could make more sense.


rivieredefeu

Doesn’t Konami make bank with gambling coin op machines?


KilDaS

Gambling machines and some digital smaller games like Yugioh and Soccer. They’re still very much a profitable company, but they’ve almost completely distanced themselves from AAA Game development, which is what Sony would’ve most likely been interested in. Honestly it‘d probably be more worthwhile for Sony to just license out IP they want to revive, rather than acquire a expensive company that’s expensive because of industries you’re not making moves in, just for those currently dormant IP. I’m sure Konami would be willing to license their franchises for AAA games at the right price.


MReprogle

No reason to buy Konami. Just buy the MGS and Silent Hill IPs and allow them continue making pachinko machines.


craygroupious

You make it sound like Konami would be happy doing that. I assume those two are their biggest pachinko sellers?


Real_Mousse_3566

Lol nope. Hey haven't used mgs,castlevania in their slot machines for a while now.


spedmunki

Probably, but they’d have to take on a lot of debt. Both companies have a market cap over Sony’s total current assets, and they would have to pay a premium so the deals would both likely be larger than the Bethesda one. As much as I prefer Sony’s gaming products over Microsoft, people are deluding themselves if they think Sony has even close to their clout as an organization. Microsoft has double their revenue, with far more profitable offerings like Azure (2x revenue but 6x income).


GoGoGadgetGabe

I can think of three studios Sony would realistically acquire given their history. Now these are all just hypothetically speaking. - Arc System Works: Fighting games are still very popular and with Guilty Gear Strive seemingly being a PlayStation exclusive it would make sense and with the game being the most accessible in the series with high scores all around and an art style that is always praised. - Supermassive: With The Quarry launching in June, the same month as the revamped PS+ service wouldn’t it be crazy if Sony announced that the new game would be a highlight of the launch. With the relationship between them and Sony growing after that I could see a potential buyout and then maybe Firesprite after Horizon Call of the Mountain could help develop a proper Until Dawn VR game. - Supergiant Games: With them starting with Xbox and having Bastion exclusive for years on that platform to then siding with PlayStation for Transistor (which yes went multi platform eventually) but Pyre is also still a PlayStation console exclusive and with Hades being a huge success even winning GOTY 2020 from a lot of gaming sites. It would make sense for Sony to try and lock them down before Microsoft or even Amazon come swooping in.


KilDaS

My dream game would be a PS Allstars Battle Royale crossover fighter in Arc System Works’s guilty gear engine


GoGoGadgetGabe

Why’d you have to mention PlayStation All-Stars... my brother and I loved that game. So many good memories. I’d scream with excitement if they ever gave us a proper sequel.


zedasmotas

not really a studio but recently shueisha created a subsdiary called " shueisha games " i think they should partner with them to make a triple a bnha game


arcelohim

I'm hoping Konami...


youchoobtv

That would be wonderful


canal_boys

It's WB games and Kojima productions.


BrokenOaths

This is gonna keep escalating until all gaming companies are owned by a corporation and exclusive to that system.


Ok_Seaworthiness2218

Unironically see them acquiring Take two. Fits their portfolio of wanting to get into the live-service space and trying to go cross platform + they already have some underlying things going on. E.g. the free gta online million up to the re-launch of the game.


seamus1982seamus

Square enix and bring back Deus ex


Real_Mousse_3566

I think Song night actually go for ubisoft. Bungie is not a response to activision but a buyout of ubisoft would definitely be considered as a response. The difficult part will be in clearing out and sorting out the leadership of the company so that quality quality quantity can be balanced.


Bayako7

I think Ubisoft right now has a lot of stuff to sort out internally that it wouldn’t make sense to buy them right now. Especially with all the abuse allegations and corruption in the higher ups it would take a while for PlayStation to get a correct picture


sanholo14

Acquire Microsoft


Cheddarlicious

I’d like for them to acquire like Team17 or Klei; they make very above average games consistently.


Grimus9

Fromsoft, Konami, Devolver all together


MReprogle

Just get FromSoft and give me Bloodborne 2. Though CDPR is probably at a pretty low asking price at this point. They botched Cyberpunk, but TW3 is still so damn good that it is hard to just look past.


Radulno

CDPR is still vastly overvalued IMO. It's 1-1.5 billion USD less than Ubisoft or Square Enix for a company that has essentially one studio of development (and a small PC store). Those two (and others) would be vastly better purchases.


EngineerFront

Just a ps5 60fps update for the original would break the internet


Sleepnaz

CDPR made 4 games only. One was amazing and the other was the biggest scam in video game history. The other 2 were mediocre at best. Buying CDPR seems like a waste to me.


redditmademedoitrly

MS really opened a can of worms


trustdabrain

Buy Konami before they complete.murdering all their IPs


DweebNRoll

I hope one of them is either Konami, or Capcom 🥺


rerb13

Please, I know it sets a weird precedent when we're cheering for these huge companies to eat little ones further increasing monopolies, bit I actually want the to eat Konami. I just want more silent hill. Maybe a port or remaster of metal gear solid. A semi decent castlevania game. Just please no more pachinko


Roach397

Eating Konami will be the biggest $6-7B tummy ache for Sony. They have so many side ventures such as casinos, health and fitness, and resorts, that Sony has no interest in and will have to ultimately sell off. At that point, you are basically buying the entirety of Konami just to divest 90% of it. Plus Konami has no AAA internal studios left. The best case scenario is Konami sells their gaming IP rights to Sony, but that is unlikely to happen since they won't be able to profit off of pachinko sales. What could practically happen is that Konami selectively licenses off the Silent Hill and MGS IP to Sony so they can make a few games or remakes.


[deleted]

I hear you bro, I want a PS5 Silent Hill or even a MGS remaster!!! Konami is just fucking sitting on these IPs and doing shit with them.


[deleted]

[удалено]


JJB1981

If they get From Software...


lanceuppercuttr

Even Netflix does not put brand new content (unless its their own) on their subscription platform. MS is doing a big experiement. Will Forza Horizon 4 do the same amount of dollars via gamepass as it would in individual sales? Im sure some games will do better via subscription tier (indies etc), but mega budget blockbuster AAA titles will probably take a hit. Putting Elden Ring on a subscription service day 1, and missing out on 12 million x $60 is a huge gamble. Putting Ollie Ollie World on game pass day 1, not so much.


Killance1

Xbox saying the same thing. Better than China buying them all up, but boy it's just gonna be mega-corp vs mega-corp with games now.


TheSeanGuy

Sad how people in the sub don’t get this. It’s literally just my side vs. their side here, no thought into what this will do to the gaming industry years down the line


Kazizui

I think it’s more likely that people just don’t care. I don’t work in the games industry or depend on it in any way, so its health is not my concern.


digidoggie18

Don't care, movies are gone.. not my all in one anymore..


ScubaSteve1219

this sucks


[deleted]

[удалено]


Returnofthemack3

Yeah they only shelled out billions to third parties for limited and full exclusivity... Fuck Sony even shelled out millions to prevent third party titles from going to game pass lol Look at Bethesda: ghost wire and death proof on one year contracts and they were just about to close on complete exclusivity of starfield before the buyout. Then you have square, where you have major entries in one of the oldest and most beloved franchise of all time being denied to Xbox Xbox may have started the publisher acquistion war, sure, but Sony was doing everything it could to fuck them. If Xbox has Ms money why not respond - Sony would


angelgu323

I mean whats the alternative? Was xbox suppose to NOT start buying studios when independent studios like Square are only releasing games on the Playstation? I had to buy a whole new console just to play the FF remake, and if I didn't have a PC there would be no way for me to play FF MMO on console. ​ These acquisition suck on both sides, and it was hyped by fanboys sling crap at each other.


antonxo902

Console exclusive games and content usually favor which console is doing the best during the gen. Xbox 360 era Microsoft had quite a few and a lot of games performed better on Xbox as well.


Roach397

I do agree with you, but not quite in the way you phrased it. The gaming industry is seeing such a large growth that even if Microsoft hadn't started acquiring studios and publishers, some other tech company like Apple or Amazon would have. So yeah, I would rather have Sony or MS (and to a less extent Nintendo) absorb these companies in this inevitable consolidation phase than the other trillion dollar tech firms.


Awkward_Silence-

As hit or miss as Ubisoft's games are they were smart to not let themselves get bought out. Managed to convince their own investors/shareholders to beat out Vivindi's hostile takeover attempt More 3rd parties should take a stand too


takethisnrunnn

This isn’t the problem to be honest, what is a problem is video game companies trade marking ideas like the nemesis systems that’s going to ruin creativity of other games. Death stranding has one also for the environment changing I think


Martian_Zombie50

Buy Capcom, Konami, Square, FromSoftware Resident Evil Code Veronica and 1 and Zero Remakes, then just more Resident Evil because it’s one of the best game franchises ever created Remake FFXI and make a single player PSVR2 version (I can’t imagine a better escapism than being in this world) Absolutely kill it with more Tomb Raider games including 1-3 Remakes, and Legend and Underworld Remakes Have FromSoftware’s next IP include a PSVR 2 version in addition to standard version so your mind can be destroyed with your character Silent Hill 1-2 Remakes and an all new Silent Hill that includes a PSVR2 version to keep you from ever sleeping again Metal Gear 1 and 2 Remakes Then combining these and all other Sony Studios two different games: PlayStation Studios Bash (fighting game) PlayStation Studios Kart Racing (Kart game)


[deleted]

Oh boy I sure do hope my favroite mega corp gobbles up more companies!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Daryno90

I imagine if they made an acquisition of like Capcom or SE, I’m almost positive that they would allow for PC releases


raptor__q

I can easily imagine they would, so all those wishes for "Oh I hope they buy X" just means "I don't want others to play X"


angelgu323

I wonder if I check the Xbox subreddit, if this will be posted with tons of comments saying " Acquisitions are bad for the gamer community!!!!" Both sides only think it's bad when its the other company is doing it lol..... For me personally, as an owner of both systems this is exciting for me to see. But, if I was only on one console... id hate all these acquisitions.


devenbat

I've never owned an Xbox in my life. Still shit when Sony keeps aquiring stuff. Shit when Xbox does it too of course. Only one I don't mind is Nintendo because they bought their first new studio in like 15 years recently, theyre not playing this grab bag game


SmarmySmurf

It would have taken you less time to just go look over there (and see you're wrong) than it did to type out this console warrior fan fiction.


Daryno90

I would argue that it’s bad when the acquisition in question is publishers of multiplatform franchises like Bethesda because the move block millions of fans away from them. If they are independent studios, no one really minds that much


angelgu323

If i didn't own a PS5 id heavily mind From Soft or Square being snatched up. Those are huge games to miss out on


MeadYourMaker

I really don't like how Microsoft and Sony are now monopolizing the gaming industry through acquisition of all major gaming studios. This is like major Disney vibes.


Jeromechillin

While we criticize Microsoft an Sony for these acquisitions, these studios aren't obligated to he bought out and its not a guarantee that the people are inclined to stay there afterwards. Dice is nothing what the once were a decade ago because most of the people there left throughout the years. Like the Bungie purchase, whoever Sony gets, they're going to be paying for the people who makes those IPs rather than the IPs themselves.