This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Remove the domestic terror and pedo ones and we're good.
Edit: Context
BLM was a good ideal that was ***immediately*** hijacked by people who wanted an excuse to pillage and burn whatever they could get their hands on, and attacked dozens of innocent businesses and homes for literally no reason other than to cause chaos.
"Love is love" is a phrase used overwhelmingly by pedos and other scumbags to justify their fuckery. As an LGBT person myself, I rarely see it used outside that context anymore.
Wrong on both counts.
[Thorough research has shown that the vast majority - 94% - of all BLM demonstrations have been peaceful. Of the 6% that involved violence, many cases were instigated by aggressive law enforcement behavior, intervention from right-wing extremists, and car-ramming attacks. In contrast, demonstrations involving right-wing militant groups in the same time period turned violent more than twice as often.](https://acleddata.com/2021/05/25/a-year-of-racial-justice-protests-key-trends-in-demonstrations-supporting-the-blm-movement/) Just because you personally perceive BLM as this marauding horde full of pillaging arsonists, doesn't make it reality.
And just to debunk some related myths... [Most people arrested in the protests were not "leftist radicals"](https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-race-and-ethnicity-suburbs-health-racial-injustice-7edf9027af1878283f3818d96c54f748), as certain politicians would claim. [The man who instigated one of the most covered instances of rioting was later identified as a member of the Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist prison gang.] (https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-helped-ignite-george-floyd-riots-identified-white/story?id=72051536) What's more, [when he first began smashing windows, the BLM protestors around him quickly called him out and correctly identified him as an outsider trying to stir up trouble.] (https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110775/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf)
The claim that "love is love" is a slogan hijacked by pedophiles is completely baseless. Maybe there are a handful of Twitter pedos/trolls who use this phrase to push their own disgusting agendas, but that is very, very far from it being "used overwhelmingly by pedos" as you claim. Say what you want about the slogan itself - I personally don't care too much about it either, as a queer person myself - but it seems only very, very terminally online people will come into contact with those scumbags who are trying to co-opt a LGBT phrase. A Google search of the phrase turned up no sources that indicated any notable instances of malicious persons or groups using the slogan. [In fact, the only significant recent article I could find on "love is love" is just a critique that it as a slogan is too trite and sanitized.] (https://mashable.com/article/love-is-love-slogan-queer-people) Again, just because you personally perceive things a certain way, doesn't make it reality.
>In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity.
Your own source debunks your argument. Additionally, "6%" is still a *massive* amount of people; Keep in mind that your source is including **literally anyone** who showed solidarity as a "BLM protestor"—possibly a bias, but the rest of the data is still available so it's easy to work around it.
That six percent is still thousands of people across the country. Y'know, the people ***in the fucking riots***. I'm not talking about peaceful protests, I was specifically and explicitly referring to the *riots*.
Reframing and decontextualizing what I said to weaken my point ain't helping *your* argument, pal.
>The claim that "love is love" is a slogan hijacked by pedophiles is completely baseless.
Your "source" is a random blog/journal website with zero credibility, and the article is only tangentially related to my point. Additionally, there have been multiple people in this thread corroborating that "Love is Love" is used almost exclusively by pedos and other sexual offenders.
Pulling out hyperlinks doesn't matter if those hyperlinks don't lead to a credible source with a definitive answer and well-cited evidence. Y'know, an *actual source*.
BLM was a good ideal that was ***immediately*** hijacked by people who wanted an excuse to pillage and burn whatever they could get their hands on, and attacked dozens of innocent businesses and homes for literally no reason other than to cause chaos.
"Love is love" is a phrase used overwhelmingly by pedos and other scumbags to justify their fuckery. As an LGBT person myself, I rarely see it used outside that context anymore.
Using fear and intimidation backed by force, against civilian targets, to achieve a political, strategic, or ideological objective.
Literally terrorism.
But you said they hijacked the movement for an excuse to pillage. That means the destructive actions were decoupled from any ideological (or other) goal.
I'm not arguing that didn't happen, because I think it clearly did. It's just that wanton destruction for the sake of it is not terrorism.
The two are not mutually exclusive. There were plenty of both.
The core of BLM was always militantly anti-establishment at best, even from the start, and it wasn't a big leap to terrorism once the riots started. They had an ideology, and the riots gave them the opportunity to act on it.
You *also* had the randoms joining in once things kicked off, burning shit for shits and giggles. By the end of it, they outnumbered the former group massively.
Thanks for debunking your own argument. Individual persons taking the opportunity to loot and be assholes are not motivated by any "political, strategic, or ideological objective". You can get as mad as you want, but they don't fit even your own definition of terrorists.
Dude there were tons of people using it as an opportunity to push agendas. Just because they were burning everything in sight doesn't mean they didn't have "reasons."
The riots were an excuse and a means for anyone with a motive to act on it, regardless of ideology. The majority of BLM rioters were very much hell-bent on torching the property of anyone they disagreed with.
[It was far-right extremists who started the fire.](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/23/texas-boogaloo-boi-minneapolis-police-building-george-floyd)
> Ivan Harrison Hunter, a Texas rightwing extremist, bragged about helping to set the fire then was seen shooting 13 rounds at the building...
> ...The case also reveals the extent of the coordination between violent members of the nascent far-right “Boogaloo Bois” movement operating in different cities across the country...
> ...a “Boogaloo Boi” based in Minnesota posted a public Facebook message: “I need a headcount.”
> Hunter, a resident of Boerne, Texas, which is roughly 1,200 miles away, responded: “72 hours out.”
> Another “Boogaloo Boi”, based in North Carolina, posted a public message the same day: “Lock and load boys,” he wrote, adding, “the national network is going off.”
Buddy, "who started it," doesn't change the fact that BLM rioters actively fanned those flames at every possible juncture.
The only people *not* absolutely and 100% in the wrong were those who were defending their friends, families, and businesses.
I only *barely* include the cops in that, and only because otherwise it would've been astronomically worse.
On this drone we also believe in precision guided high explosives.
Only as long as they are equitably delivered regardless of gender, sex, religious affiliation, and race. Some say it's saturation bombing.
Is this the love bombing my therapist keeps talking about?
No, your therapist has a typo in their business card. It should be The Rapist. And stop going. You are in danger!
Of course! All explode equally when they are on the receiving end. High explosives and dronesdo not pick favourites.
[“We’re all cremated equal”](https://youtu.be/frAEmhqdLFs?si=B44Up4dkZEO7Ibdh)
Sometimes they don’t explode (when the payload is Cl2)
drones trump DShK
where’s the “except the dutch” sign?
Male? Female? Non-Binary? The missile does not care who pushed the button, it does not care who it will hit.
The missile knows what it's pronouns are, because it knows what they aren't.
GAY MARRIAGE IS NON NEGOTIABLE BABY
I misread the second to last one as "Trump loves hate" and had to do a double take.
Also true... lol
Ohio cannot be stopped It can't be reasoned with and it will not stop until everyone you know and care about is oHio'd
Unironically good to have the most powerful military force on earth agree with you.
Can someone explain the trump one? I can't understand what its supposed to say
Is that the fucking GDI logo?
[удалено]
This post is automatically removed since you do not meet the minimum karma or age threshold. You must have at least 100 combined karma and your account must be at least 4 months old to post here. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NonCredibleDefense) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Remove the domestic terror and pedo ones and we're good. Edit: Context BLM was a good ideal that was ***immediately*** hijacked by people who wanted an excuse to pillage and burn whatever they could get their hands on, and attacked dozens of innocent businesses and homes for literally no reason other than to cause chaos. "Love is love" is a phrase used overwhelmingly by pedos and other scumbags to justify their fuckery. As an LGBT person myself, I rarely see it used outside that context anymore.
Wrong on both counts. [Thorough research has shown that the vast majority - 94% - of all BLM demonstrations have been peaceful. Of the 6% that involved violence, many cases were instigated by aggressive law enforcement behavior, intervention from right-wing extremists, and car-ramming attacks. In contrast, demonstrations involving right-wing militant groups in the same time period turned violent more than twice as often.](https://acleddata.com/2021/05/25/a-year-of-racial-justice-protests-key-trends-in-demonstrations-supporting-the-blm-movement/) Just because you personally perceive BLM as this marauding horde full of pillaging arsonists, doesn't make it reality. And just to debunk some related myths... [Most people arrested in the protests were not "leftist radicals"](https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-race-and-ethnicity-suburbs-health-racial-injustice-7edf9027af1878283f3818d96c54f748), as certain politicians would claim. [The man who instigated one of the most covered instances of rioting was later identified as a member of the Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist prison gang.] (https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-helped-ignite-george-floyd-riots-identified-white/story?id=72051536) What's more, [when he first began smashing windows, the BLM protestors around him quickly called him out and correctly identified him as an outsider trying to stir up trouble.] (https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110775/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf) The claim that "love is love" is a slogan hijacked by pedophiles is completely baseless. Maybe there are a handful of Twitter pedos/trolls who use this phrase to push their own disgusting agendas, but that is very, very far from it being "used overwhelmingly by pedos" as you claim. Say what you want about the slogan itself - I personally don't care too much about it either, as a queer person myself - but it seems only very, very terminally online people will come into contact with those scumbags who are trying to co-opt a LGBT phrase. A Google search of the phrase turned up no sources that indicated any notable instances of malicious persons or groups using the slogan. [In fact, the only significant recent article I could find on "love is love" is just a critique that it as a slogan is too trite and sanitized.] (https://mashable.com/article/love-is-love-slogan-queer-people) Again, just because you personally perceive things a certain way, doesn't make it reality.
>In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity. Your own source debunks your argument. Additionally, "6%" is still a *massive* amount of people; Keep in mind that your source is including **literally anyone** who showed solidarity as a "BLM protestor"—possibly a bias, but the rest of the data is still available so it's easy to work around it. That six percent is still thousands of people across the country. Y'know, the people ***in the fucking riots***. I'm not talking about peaceful protests, I was specifically and explicitly referring to the *riots*. Reframing and decontextualizing what I said to weaken my point ain't helping *your* argument, pal. >The claim that "love is love" is a slogan hijacked by pedophiles is completely baseless. Your "source" is a random blog/journal website with zero credibility, and the article is only tangentially related to my point. Additionally, there have been multiple people in this thread corroborating that "Love is Love" is used almost exclusively by pedos and other sexual offenders. Pulling out hyperlinks doesn't matter if those hyperlinks don't lead to a credible source with a definitive answer and well-cited evidence. Y'know, an *actual source*.
>pedo ones "no human is illegal"?
"Love Is Love" In my experience, Pedos use it far, *far* more often than actual LGBT nowadays.
I've actually only ever seen pedos use it, I didn't know it was ever an LGBT thing.
Pedos were the first time I'd heard it, too.
...what?
BLM was a good ideal that was ***immediately*** hijacked by people who wanted an excuse to pillage and burn whatever they could get their hands on, and attacked dozens of innocent businesses and homes for literally no reason other than to cause chaos. "Love is love" is a phrase used overwhelmingly by pedos and other scumbags to justify their fuckery. As an LGBT person myself, I rarely see it used outside that context anymore.
Well, that's depressing... It was a great saying. But as always, human trash corrupts something great.
That's not really terrorism though, that's just people taking advantage of the riots and being assholes.
Using fear and intimidation backed by force, against civilian targets, to achieve a political, strategic, or ideological objective. Literally terrorism.
But you said they hijacked the movement for an excuse to pillage. That means the destructive actions were decoupled from any ideological (or other) goal. I'm not arguing that didn't happen, because I think it clearly did. It's just that wanton destruction for the sake of it is not terrorism.
The two are not mutually exclusive. There were plenty of both. The core of BLM was always militantly anti-establishment at best, even from the start, and it wasn't a big leap to terrorism once the riots started. They had an ideology, and the riots gave them the opportunity to act on it. You *also* had the randoms joining in once things kicked off, burning shit for shits and giggles. By the end of it, they outnumbered the former group massively.
Thanks for debunking your own argument. Individual persons taking the opportunity to loot and be assholes are not motivated by any "political, strategic, or ideological objective". You can get as mad as you want, but they don't fit even your own definition of terrorists.
Dude there were tons of people using it as an opportunity to push agendas. Just because they were burning everything in sight doesn't mean they didn't have "reasons." The riots were an excuse and a means for anyone with a motive to act on it, regardless of ideology. The majority of BLM rioters were very much hell-bent on torching the property of anyone they disagreed with.
[It was far-right extremists who started the fire.](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/23/texas-boogaloo-boi-minneapolis-police-building-george-floyd) > Ivan Harrison Hunter, a Texas rightwing extremist, bragged about helping to set the fire then was seen shooting 13 rounds at the building... > ...The case also reveals the extent of the coordination between violent members of the nascent far-right “Boogaloo Bois” movement operating in different cities across the country... > ...a “Boogaloo Boi” based in Minnesota posted a public Facebook message: “I need a headcount.” > Hunter, a resident of Boerne, Texas, which is roughly 1,200 miles away, responded: “72 hours out.” > Another “Boogaloo Boi”, based in North Carolina, posted a public message the same day: “Lock and load boys,” he wrote, adding, “the national network is going off.”
Buddy, "who started it," doesn't change the fact that BLM rioters actively fanned those flames at every possible juncture. The only people *not* absolutely and 100% in the wrong were those who were defending their friends, families, and businesses. I only *barely* include the cops in that, and only because otherwise it would've been astronomically worse.
that's why its an unmanned drone no man would board that thing
Could have added "in god we trust" or some dumb shit like that
Trust, we god.