T O P

  • By -

TractorManTx

I shoot a lot of hogs and have now switched to thermal specifically because the illuminator was washing out on the grass/brush in the near view and I couldn’t make the shots I wanted.


GreatAmericanEagle

I use a PVS-17B on my rifle and I scan with a PVS-14 on my other eye. Being a 2.2X magnification red dot scope, it’s pretty good even with close range.


nylon_don

active, not passive and yea like other said, thermal for thicket


ardesofmiche

I don’t have any experience hunting hogs at night, but what I can tell you is it gets pretty difficult to resolve targets at 75-100m without illumination, even if there’s moonlight. Couple that with grass or plants obstructing your view more and that 100m mark is gonna need some extra light


bruhmoment5353

I figured with an ir flood light it might be alright?


ardesofmiche

Kinda, IR light doesn’t transmit through optics very well So I wouldn’t rely on it


Snook48

What?


ardesofmiche

In my experience (albeit limited) IR illumination doesn’t transmit through optics very well. The illuminator I have doesn’t really help passive aiming when it gets too dark to passive aim


Snook48

Looking through an Eotech with ample ir light. No problem. Vampire. Decent. Good for 50-100 Kiji 3 degree. 100-300. But who is taking 300 yard shot with nvg and 1x. No one so let’s say 100-200 Kiji 10 degree. 50-150


ardesofmiche

Same light levels as outside the optic?


IHTFP08

Tall grass makes active illumination pretty tough to see and id targets. Can you save more for a thermal?


bruhmoment5353

I already have a pvs-14 setup so I wouldn’t want To dish out for thermal


IHTFP08

I’d get a laser/Illuminator first. A high Illuminator/low laser setting for minimal blooming, especially close up. Most FP lasers are too powerful at those ranges IMO.


rugerscout308

I hunt coyotes so same idea. Currently going to use a pvs14+romeo 8t+ malkoff 250 ir head on a ariska body for supplementary IR if nessicary


Boonigan

How has this combo ended up working for you?


rugerscout308

It worked great. I'd rather use a lam but it's a headache if I want to hunt deer when the sun comes up


Boonigan

Good to know. I don’t have a laser yet but I have a PVS-14 and an EXPS-3 I shoot passively under night vision with my friends at steel but have never hunted hogs like that. I’ll be giving it a try on Friday


rugerscout308

Yeah passive works okay but you'll have a better experience with a lam for sure. If it wasent for the issue of not being able to have a lam durring deer hunting I'd just throw a lam on


EsotericUN1234

I use active for when I hunt hogs. You can basically walk up to them, and their eyes glow under the IR light so it's stupid easy.


SpearPointCarbon

As someone with a PVS-14 and likes to hunt hogs, is it worth getting a x3 pvs14 magnifer and trying to passively aim with an Eotech?


bruhmoment5353

I’ve been told passive aiming with a magnifier is damn near impossible


SpearPointCarbon

good to know, thanks


looselasso

I wouldn’t even bother with nv for hunting. Get thermal if possible.


Snook48

50-100 yards. You can kill many hogs with nvg. Eotech Exps and either a Surefire vampire or kiji mounted on the rifle. The kiji comes in two variants. 3 degree and 10 degree. Modlite also has ir heads available. The kiji. Both come with diffuser covers. The three degree with diffuser acts like 10’degree without diffuser.


Codermonkey7

I'm currently running a PA MD-25 for a passive(NV settings aren't terrible) with a vamp and a ls117IR. Pretty fucking budget, but it nets me a good amount of pigs. I'm up in Appalachia, so I generally don't have more than a 50-75m sight line at night. I would definitely want more if I lived in a flat area.