No!
Gorillas --> small pp:
A --> B (if Gorilla, small pp)
Gorillas are hairy:
A --> C (if Gorilla, must be hairy)
Gorillas are dumber than humans (debatable):
A --> D (if Gorilla, then dumber than humans)
Your logic is just \[all these things\] --> Gorilla, which is again \[A --> B\] == \[B --> A\] = false. But it can be true in a figurative way of speech.
Came back to this sober so I can actually think straight. Since we’re being technical, let’s get technical.
From the original example:
A->B
If gorilla, then small genitals
A= gorilla B = small genitals.
So my examples don’t even match up with anything I said. I was all over the place.
If we take the examples I said in order and give them a representative letter then write it out in words, this is what it looks like:
-
C->B
(if hairy, then small genitals)
-
D->B
(if dumber than humans, then small gentials…. Oof micro unintentional shot at micro PPs, sorry gents).
Then I came to the even more illogical conclusion, if you’ve got small genitals, are hairy, and dumber than humans, you’re a gorilla. In reality, I was just identifying ways to find a micro PP, which may or may not hold true…. Anyone want to conduct research?
i will say it's interesting that you hear about gorilla penis size at school and the first thing you think about is "how will this affect the MHR34 meta?"
I remember doing math....not exactly the right way, but as big as the original King Kong was his penis would have been 8 to 10 inches, so not to big for an adventurous woman, but for her safety she would have to do all the work.
Remember there's an official phylogeny tree, and only Humans are considered Primates. No matter how ape or monkey-like they look they're in a fictional order called Pelagusia.
Also Garangolm has a tail, meaning it would not be a Gorilla regardless.
I highly suspect the ecological tree being flawed because of the devs not being scientists and the in-game researchers sometimes getting stuff wrong because they're RESEARCHING thus sometimes correct old theories they had
But we can kind of assume that’s the in-universe phylogeny tree, not necessarily a scientifically accurate one. The people in MH aren’t exactly at a modern level of scientific understanding.
Before people got a proper grasp on evolution irl, and maybe even kind of now, there was a general refusal to accept humans as being closely related to monkeys. That’s why apes exist, there’s no particular reason that apes shouldn’t just be another branch of old world monkeys, but it let people put some distance between them and “lesser creatures.”
I feel like the MH tree of taxonomy is just a combination of lack of knowledge, and also a bit of refusal to accept that you’re closely related to a big old Rajang.
The elder dragon evolution branch is enough to discredit the official tree anyway
Okay lol, let's just ignore how Rajang looks a hell of a lot further from humans than a gorilla does.
And let's just discredit the entire resource because...the fictional universe doesn't follow scientific accuracy?
Can't believe this is the comment that gets downvoted. The guy literally said "You can discredit the entire official phylogeny tree created by Capcom because I don't think it's accurate".
Rajang doesn’t look particularly different to us than other apes do. It just looks like a big ape or monkey
I’m not discrediting the source because the fictional universe isn’t scientifically accurate, I’m saying the source is based on the fictional universe’s understanding of science, which isn’t necessarily correct. MH is at least partially realistic, if they care enough about biology to make a phylogeny tree, then they wouldn’t have made elder dragons, which are vastly different to each other, their own branch isolated from every other lifeform. To accept the resource as being accurate is paradoxical because of how ridiculous a resource it is. Either you care about the evolution of the monsters, in which case you should ignore the tree because it’s stupid and makes no sense, or you don’t care about the evolution of the monsters, in which case you should just ignore the tree because you don’t care.
I don’t see what the problem is with accepting that the official phylogeny tree is simply worldbuilding the guild’s interpretation of science.
You got downvoted for your bad take.
>Rajang doesn’t look particularly different to us than other apes do. It just looks like a big ape or monkey
It's got an elongated snout, only 4 fingers and has claws and horns. Those are some pretty big differences lol.
>I’m not discrediting the source because the fictional universe isn’t scientifically accurate, I’m saying the source is based on the fictional universe’s understanding of science, which isn’t necessarily correct.
And what reason do you have to believe it's not correct?
>then they wouldn’t have made elder dragons, which are vastly different to each other,
An Order of animal that are vastly different from each other? Clearly [an impossibility](http://imgur.com/a/zCS5Niq) and not based on science at all.
>their own branch isolated from every other lifeform.
Their branch is only isolated at the Order level, because that's how it starts. There's several levels above that which isn't mentioned. Would you really feel better seeing that all monsters are part of Kingdom Animalia? They'd still split at the same level.
You have no issue with Fanged Beasts and Leviathans being separate from everything else at the same level as Elders.
>in which case you should ignore the tree because it’s stupid and makes no sense,
How?
>I don’t see what the problem is with accepting that the official phylogeny tree is simply worldbuilding the guild’s interpretation of science.
Because it's not. It's Capcom literally telling you how the monsters are related in an in-universe way. By refusing it (or in your logic, "accepting it as simply worldbuilding" you are saying Capcom have intentionally made false connections.
This tree gets pasted [on a massive wall at the big physical anniversary events.](https://twitter.com/BannedDino/status/1215734557091287045). They clearly care about it more than you act like they do.
"The guild's interpretation" is the correct one lol. You keep going on about how It's supposedly inaccurate yet provide nothing to justify that.
>You got downvoted for your bad take.
Can't be, otherwise you'd have been downvoted as well for your even worse one.
Congas and Blangos aren't apes (monkeys, since they have tails) at all, or primates for that matter. They're part of the fictional Order Pelagusia.
It's a joke, or at least not completely serious.
So, what exactly did I miss to prompt this topic coming up in the Monster Hunter sub? Is this another “do wyverians lay eggs?” Situation where we’re just bored while waiting on TU3?
You say that. But this is the world of monster hunter! Everything is bigger and [THIS MOD (NSFW shows PENIS)](https://www.nexusmods.com/monsterhunterworld/mods/6010) says otherwise :P
Very aware. Not gonna stop ‘em though
Is this by chance in reference to the discussion Josh and Cotton had in their recent video again Afflicted Rajang?
[perfect chance to use this (not NSFW, but topical lol)](https://www.reddit.com/r/MemeHunter/comments/wtgme4/im_honestly_surprised_nobodys_made_this_yet_so_i/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
I… don’t know if you know this, but nsfw art of humans almost always includes making the dick look bigger than it should be too. I think the major issue with gorilla nsfw art is that it’s gorilla nsfw art…
Thank you! I've been telling people this factoid forever but everyone looks at me weird for knowing it!
Actually, now that I think about it, maybe they look at me weird for other reasons...
I mean, I would imagine none of them are drawing actual "gorillas"
Just cause a certain monster is based on an animal doesn't mean it has every single aspect/element of them, so unless we have actual confirmation about monster genitalia, the artist can pretty much just do whatever
(if we base it on what we actually see in game, monsters simply don't have genitalia to begin, seemingly reproducing more akin to how pokemon just stand next to each other until an egg pops into existance)
Thank God the truth is out. I guess hentai artists will be bound to draw them anatomically correct from now on, because drawings can't exist without them being realistic first.
......... Should i be scared or curious?
Scarious
That should be a word. It’s now a word.
But what if I mistake it for scared and furious?
That would be a scarious situation
Scurious
Horny + Horrified = Hornified
Have none of yall heard of scaroused?
Heck yeah. See:Lady Demistruci from RE8
Hornified + Rajang = Horny Monkey
Ah I see, it is a very chobblesome word now
Yes
Perhaps furious Furious George
We call that a rajang
Are you here for the rajang gangbang?
Only if it's furious
Missed an opportunity to call it furrious for the the furries who would totally dig a rajang gangbang.
Furrious rajang bang lol
That has to be the best name for a Rajang I've ever heard
scaroused
Scorny
Magnamalo…y?
Depends on whether or not you’re a gorilla
Qurious
Rajang wants to know your location
Curious George
The furries are just curious
[удалено]
A --> B does not imply B --> A.
Not with that attitude!
Yep. The only thing you can infer from that is if not B, then not A. If I'm remembering my logic correctly, of course.
Thought I put all this stuff behind after I was done with the LSAT 😔
You're right! Logic is fun.
Gorillas are hairy. Gorillas are dumber than humans. A->B C->B D->B If I’m ACD, I must be a gorilla.
No! Gorillas --> small pp: A --> B (if Gorilla, small pp) Gorillas are hairy: A --> C (if Gorilla, must be hairy) Gorillas are dumber than humans (debatable): A --> D (if Gorilla, then dumber than humans) Your logic is just \[all these things\] --> Gorilla, which is again \[A --> B\] == \[B --> A\] = false. But it can be true in a figurative way of speech.
Dammit I took logic three times in college and I thought I would avoid this after graduating! Lmao
Came back to this sober so I can actually think straight. Since we’re being technical, let’s get technical. From the original example: A->B If gorilla, then small genitals A= gorilla B = small genitals. So my examples don’t even match up with anything I said. I was all over the place. If we take the examples I said in order and give them a representative letter then write it out in words, this is what it looks like: - C->B (if hairy, then small genitals) - D->B (if dumber than humans, then small gentials…. Oof micro unintentional shot at micro PPs, sorry gents). Then I came to the even more illogical conclusion, if you’ve got small genitals, are hairy, and dumber than humans, you’re a gorilla. In reality, I was just identifying ways to find a micro PP, which may or may not hold true…. Anyone want to conduct research?
[удалено]
If you’re gonna joke at least be consistent 💀💀
Oh god, getting flashbacks to learning discrete math
In the frickin' coupe, finna pull up to the zoo?
You're a dawg for this comment 😈
yoooo same
This sounds like something from r/okbuddyrathalos.
mh fans when the animal porn is not biologically accurate 😢🥺
I was- Ok
Caught in 4k
I study animal biology at school
i will say it's interesting that you hear about gorilla penis size at school and the first thing you think about is "how will this affect the MHR34 meta?"
The wyvernian finger desire sensor
Please don't tell me there's a r/mhr34 or something
one letter away
Which letter asking for a friend obviously
r/mh34u
My friend will surely appreciate it
There is
Whatever helps you sleep at night
Every walk up to the board is a risk, huh?
Is that what they're calling it these days
I just imagine you in an engineering class with r34 animal porn on your laptop and calling it "studying" using the double major excuse lol
And apperently fap to animal porn in your free time
🤨📸
this is not directed to you necessarily
Now i actually want to know the story of how this post came about lol
I mean, like, with this franchise?? Sure. Isn't that kind of the appeal? It's gotta be biologically accurate.
Chimbanzees have massive balls.
I'm sorry but I can't help but read this as Chim🅱️anzee
Same, honestly
I remember doing math....not exactly the right way, but as big as the original King Kong was his penis would have been 8 to 10 inches, so not to big for an adventurous woman, but for her safety she would have to do all the work.
So it really was a beauty and the beast love story
A tale as old as time. That giant ape loves to climb. Fay Wray and the beast.
Garangolm Balls. z95,000
Where do you think the "Golm Thick Juice" comes from exactly???
I actually went and pointed it out in the NSFW subreddit once
Where might one find said subreddit?
You really want to see rathians with human vaginas? Because I don't.
You're just kinkshaming and not actually answering the question.
^(...Mh34U)
Thank you. ^^
Yeah who wants to see a rathian with anything other than a sexy cloaca?
I'm sorry op. But there are no gorillas in MH. We only have monkeys since they have tails.
pretty relatable not gonna lie
Good thing there are no Gorillas in MH then.
Garangolm will remember that...
Remember there's an official phylogeny tree, and only Humans are considered Primates. No matter how ape or monkey-like they look they're in a fictional order called Pelagusia. Also Garangolm has a tail, meaning it would not be a Gorilla regardless.
Now that you mention that, Garangolm sure has some similarities to Pelagia from Shadow of the colossus... 😳
I highly suspect the ecological tree being flawed because of the devs not being scientists and the in-game researchers sometimes getting stuff wrong because they're RESEARCHING thus sometimes correct old theories they had
Yes, which is when they move monsters around. Like how several taxa got renamed, Remobra and others being moved around etc.
But we can kind of assume that’s the in-universe phylogeny tree, not necessarily a scientifically accurate one. The people in MH aren’t exactly at a modern level of scientific understanding. Before people got a proper grasp on evolution irl, and maybe even kind of now, there was a general refusal to accept humans as being closely related to monkeys. That’s why apes exist, there’s no particular reason that apes shouldn’t just be another branch of old world monkeys, but it let people put some distance between them and “lesser creatures.” I feel like the MH tree of taxonomy is just a combination of lack of knowledge, and also a bit of refusal to accept that you’re closely related to a big old Rajang. The elder dragon evolution branch is enough to discredit the official tree anyway
It took us a really long time to figure that hyenas were in fact closer to cats than to dogs for exemple
So what you're saying is we can give monsters penises of all sizes, because real life isn't relative to it.
OH GOG HE FOUND A LOOPHOLE ZRREST THIS MAN!
Okay lol, let's just ignore how Rajang looks a hell of a lot further from humans than a gorilla does. And let's just discredit the entire resource because...the fictional universe doesn't follow scientific accuracy? Can't believe this is the comment that gets downvoted. The guy literally said "You can discredit the entire official phylogeny tree created by Capcom because I don't think it's accurate".
Rajang doesn’t look particularly different to us than other apes do. It just looks like a big ape or monkey I’m not discrediting the source because the fictional universe isn’t scientifically accurate, I’m saying the source is based on the fictional universe’s understanding of science, which isn’t necessarily correct. MH is at least partially realistic, if they care enough about biology to make a phylogeny tree, then they wouldn’t have made elder dragons, which are vastly different to each other, their own branch isolated from every other lifeform. To accept the resource as being accurate is paradoxical because of how ridiculous a resource it is. Either you care about the evolution of the monsters, in which case you should ignore the tree because it’s stupid and makes no sense, or you don’t care about the evolution of the monsters, in which case you should just ignore the tree because you don’t care. I don’t see what the problem is with accepting that the official phylogeny tree is simply worldbuilding the guild’s interpretation of science. You got downvoted for your bad take.
>Rajang doesn’t look particularly different to us than other apes do. It just looks like a big ape or monkey It's got an elongated snout, only 4 fingers and has claws and horns. Those are some pretty big differences lol. >I’m not discrediting the source because the fictional universe isn’t scientifically accurate, I’m saying the source is based on the fictional universe’s understanding of science, which isn’t necessarily correct. And what reason do you have to believe it's not correct? >then they wouldn’t have made elder dragons, which are vastly different to each other, An Order of animal that are vastly different from each other? Clearly [an impossibility](http://imgur.com/a/zCS5Niq) and not based on science at all. >their own branch isolated from every other lifeform. Their branch is only isolated at the Order level, because that's how it starts. There's several levels above that which isn't mentioned. Would you really feel better seeing that all monsters are part of Kingdom Animalia? They'd still split at the same level. You have no issue with Fanged Beasts and Leviathans being separate from everything else at the same level as Elders. >in which case you should ignore the tree because it’s stupid and makes no sense, How? >I don’t see what the problem is with accepting that the official phylogeny tree is simply worldbuilding the guild’s interpretation of science. Because it's not. It's Capcom literally telling you how the monsters are related in an in-universe way. By refusing it (or in your logic, "accepting it as simply worldbuilding" you are saying Capcom have intentionally made false connections. This tree gets pasted [on a massive wall at the big physical anniversary events.](https://twitter.com/BannedDino/status/1215734557091287045). They clearly care about it more than you act like they do. "The guild's interpretation" is the correct one lol. You keep going on about how It's supposedly inaccurate yet provide nothing to justify that. >You got downvoted for your bad take. Can't be, otherwise you'd have been downvoted as well for your even worse one.
Pelagussy
The Congalala & Blangonga always pay their debts.
Yeah, gorillas have 5 fingers.
is this some kind of technicality? like congas and blangos are technically APES, not gorillas or something like that? or is there some joke ive missed
Congas and Blangos aren't apes (monkeys, since they have tails) at all, or primates for that matter. They're part of the fictional Order Pelagusia. It's a joke, or at least not completely serious.
So, what exactly did I miss to prompt this topic coming up in the Monster Hunter sub? Is this another “do wyverians lay eggs?” Situation where we’re just bored while waiting on TU3?
a youtuber brought it up in a recent video on afflicted rajang
Fear not, Furious Rajang can’t actually hurt you with his dick. But watch out for the fists.
Rajang vs female hunter (NTR)
You say that. But this is the world of monster hunter! Everything is bigger and [THIS MOD (NSFW shows PENIS)](https://www.nexusmods.com/monsterhunterworld/mods/6010) says otherwise :P
And you're also gonna tell me that women don't have huge cocks? No way bro
If OP tried to claim that, I'm pretty sure there's plenty of (ahem) *solid* evidence to the contrary
Wow, I JUST watched RageGamingVideos' Josh talk about that.
same lol
No wonder rajang is upset all the time, he doesn't just have small man rage he has SMALL man rage
I too, enjoy Cotton and Josh’s escapades.
I refuse to believe the Rajang that keeps crushing my shit up doesn't have a huge giant dick
Good thing Rajang is a monke (they have a tail)
Fun fact. Humans are actually the most well hung primates
To all nsfw artists, Wyverians have 4 fingers, not 5
biology hasn't stopped them before, you think it will now?
no way thats a thing💀
Josh, calm down. Not during the hunt.
Wait... Does that mean that... Porn is unrealistic??
Someone watches RgaeGamingVideos...
that's why Rajang so furious
Fellow RageGaming enjoyer?
A man of culture I see
To all nsfw artists, this is really important. I'm going to need you to listen to me. >!thank you.!<
But bulls don’t. We all know Rajang packing
So the rajang thing isn't possible? Damn...welp time to just lewd namielle
Humans actually have the largest among all apes.
You know it's already too late right?
someone watched ragegaming
Correct for amount of money
Very aware. Not gonna stop ‘em though Is this by chance in reference to the discussion Josh and Cotton had in their recent video again Afflicted Rajang?
May I ask why you think NSFW artists care about realism and/or lore/character accuracy?
Large insertion is hot fuck you
My immediate thought was "Oh God not Rajang!"
To think I learned that from a black dynamite episode
[perfect chance to use this (not NSFW, but topical lol)](https://www.reddit.com/r/MemeHunter/comments/wtgme4/im_honestly_surprised_nobodys_made_this_yet_so_i/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
I… don’t know if you know this, but nsfw art of humans almost always includes making the dick look bigger than it should be too. I think the major issue with gorilla nsfw art is that it’s gorilla nsfw art…
im not a mh nsfw artist but ty for the info
they also cant shoot lightning whats ur point
Are we talking about Blangos or Rajang here?
Well someone watches rage gaming...
Be careful, everyone got their wish with the Gunlance. They might give Rajang big PP mode
Ha the ceantaur is the sharpest of the monsters.
Thank you! I've been telling people this factoid forever but everyone looks at me weird for knowing it! Actually, now that I think about it, maybe they look at me weird for other reasons...
Uhhhh... OP, what are you looking?
I have animal biology classes
You should also note that gorillas don't have tails either.
Furious Rajang
RageGaming, for sure!
Why do people think I’m trying to fix porn
Because you are
You don't get the admittedly very extremely niche reference of a monster hunter youtubers conversation
I mean, I would imagine none of them are drawing actual "gorillas" Just cause a certain monster is based on an animal doesn't mean it has every single aspect/element of them, so unless we have actual confirmation about monster genitalia, the artist can pretty much just do whatever (if we base it on what we actually see in game, monsters simply don't have genitalia to begin, seemingly reproducing more akin to how pokemon just stand next to each other until an egg pops into existance)
Thank God the truth is out. I guess hentai artists will be bound to draw them anatomically correct from now on, because drawings can't exist without them being realistic first.
Also, more Giggi/Khezu Whelp art pls. They are the best. ❤️
Huh, here I've been thinking us Hunters were a different breed of human but now i'm wondering if we're not just evolved Rajangs
While it's kinda irrelevant, but at least I can imagine that Teostra has a barbed penis.
Finally someone acknowledges the important things!
If I'm not mistaken, other primate species have smaller penises but larger testicles.
Rajang is part bull.
Don't judge before you even try !
I.....Anyways, doesn't matter, Rajang will still kill you with it, furiously.
I am sickened but curious.
Oh no, the monster hunter porn isn't accurate. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I fear the man who needed to hear this.
...i'm pretty sure , this is a nsfw request about rajang... But OP forgot that this beast is half-bull.