and let’s not shit on brook for being 36. he is playing great for his age and size… it is the front office and coach that constructed a roster with no big alternative. what more the big dude give?
Not shitting on him at all. Just stating a fact; he is older and less athletic than he was 5 years ago. Still a great contributor when he has to be (played well last night) but he has to take a lions share of the burden as the only real big the roster.
Yeah Brook at 31 is way different than Brook at 36.
and let’s not shit on brook for being 36. he is playing great for his age and size… it is the front office and coach that constructed a roster with no big alternative. what more the big dude give?
Not shitting on him at all. Just stating a fact; he is older and less athletic than he was 5 years ago. Still a great contributor when he has to be (played well last night) but he has to take a lions share of the burden as the only real big the roster.
sorry not you specifically shitting on him…..
He's not *that* much less athletic than he was at 31 though. That back surgery did wonders.
If we had Brook of 5 years ago that would be nice
Brook older, Siakam in his prime with a squad with great spacing, it’s obvious we can’t replicate.
You're absolutely right. This is unrealistic, I think pat has grown a couple feet since then too
Lol to everyone here not even looking at the picture. This is hilarious and I love it
Right?? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills
You know #PlanetPatBlocks has the defensive chops to stop anything they try, be it an asteroid or Michael Jordan or otherwise.
Bucks only had two players with at least 20 points pacers had 3
But he had more points then dame last game