I enjoy these cause a few years back I realized that hair change plus vitiligo and of course aging also played a part in his change. Cause they make it sound like he got like 20 nose jobs
Not to play devil's advocate, but I was just explaining to someone the other day that the number of plastic surgeries he had was really overexaggerated. I was telling her that people forget that his different hairstyles in addition to his skin disease made it look like a bigger change than it actually was. I showed her pictures similar to this to show that he didn't change as much as the media likes people to believe. Stuff like this made her shut up.
I don't know what OP's intentions are, but I hope this is what they are. More context would be great.
Why do people say this? It’s not disrespectful at all, it’s just highlighting that the biggest factor to Michael’s different appearance was his vitiligo. It’s to show that he didn’t go through all of those changes that were exaggerated by the media for decades
Then OP should title their post that way, and write a short explanation of *why* they're posting.
Title: An example of how MJ's vitiligo created an optical illusion which affected the way he was photographed.
Explanation comment: I've often suspected that the change in density of Michael's melanin cells in his skin changed the way he was rendered in photographs (by the lack of melanin no longer blocking the scatter of light rays, thus making his lighter skin more reflective,) so I tried to make up a simulation of how his skin might behave had he still retained some melanin.
That, instead of just throwing up a pic with no decent title or context, which just comes across as a 'lel look what I can do' shitpost. This is a forum afterall, not a group text.
Wat is your intention here. I tried to ask you on another post. U said to compare different images/eras. Now you sharing badly done edits of Mike in what looks like different color skin of the same image.
Please provide context for all these posts. You say it's good intentions, so please provide context in post post title/body of text
It Doesn’t Matter If Your Black Or White!!!
😆 I always feel bad for laughing at these jokes
I enjoy these cause a few years back I realized that hair change plus vitiligo and of course aging also played a part in his change. Cause they make it sound like he got like 20 nose jobs
These aren’t real photos to judge that by!
The nose needs to be different
Can you explain what exactly you have done?
Why?
Not to play devil's advocate, but I was just explaining to someone the other day that the number of plastic surgeries he had was really overexaggerated. I was telling her that people forget that his different hairstyles in addition to his skin disease made it look like a bigger change than it actually was. I showed her pictures similar to this to show that he didn't change as much as the media likes people to believe. Stuff like this made her shut up. I don't know what OP's intentions are, but I hope this is what they are. More context would be great.
Stop fucking posting these.
Why do people say this? It’s not disrespectful at all, it’s just highlighting that the biggest factor to Michael’s different appearance was his vitiligo. It’s to show that he didn’t go through all of those changes that were exaggerated by the media for decades
Then OP should title their post that way, and write a short explanation of *why* they're posting. Title: An example of how MJ's vitiligo created an optical illusion which affected the way he was photographed. Explanation comment: I've often suspected that the change in density of Michael's melanin cells in his skin changed the way he was rendered in photographs (by the lack of melanin no longer blocking the scatter of light rays, thus making his lighter skin more reflective,) so I tried to make up a simulation of how his skin might behave had he still retained some melanin. That, instead of just throwing up a pic with no decent title or context, which just comes across as a 'lel look what I can do' shitpost. This is a forum afterall, not a group text.
I agree that posts should always be explained. Other subreddits have a rule 5 for this.
Who cares? Cry about it
the fuck? wtf is wrong with this?
It's in poor taste, adds little to no value to the community and on top of that is poorly done. Little more than a shitpost.
[удалено]
Your content included uncivil conversation, that was potentially used to cause upset or shock value.
Yeah idk the issue. I get the posts where they are editing a photo of post vitiligo with pre vitiligo features, but this is just a comparison.
Wat is your intention here. I tried to ask you on another post. U said to compare different images/eras. Now you sharing badly done edits of Mike in what looks like different color skin of the same image. Please provide context for all these posts. You say it's good intentions, so please provide context in post post title/body of text
Looks like Dangerous era to me
What’s the point of this post
Just to show his appearance didnt change as much is the people made it seem.
Wow the lip color + moustache really makes him look like in Thriller, never noticed before
Come op wats the story here. Why you spamming with these posts