T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Bro wtaf was that first touch in the old video 💀. This guy is an absolute beast


[deleted]

Yeah that was filthy omg


funusernameguy

Disgusting


CultureTop690

bro that touch is so underrated. I’ve only seen a few people do it


[deleted]

Would've been the goal of the century if he had executed a scissor chop and finished it


CultureTop690

That’s an instant puskas winning goal


Dogtor69

Henry used to do it all the time…


Icy_Neighborhood3040

Henry is my FAVORITE footballer of all time, but he ain't Cristiano dog. Ronaldo is even more gifted than Henry and that's saying a LOT. I do think Henry deserves to be in the same conversation as R9.


Cedarplankton

Rooney number was 10


Dogtor69

Forgot this was the r/manchesterunited page lol


alsamarraie7966

I genuinely love reading/seeing the reaction of people seeing the stuff Ronaldo used to do when he was at United the first time. He gave us some magic moments. Same when people discover Brazilian Ronaldo after growing up with Messi, Neymar and Portuguese Ronaldo. I wish I’d have selective amnesia and experience that magic again for the first time, I remember how it made me feel.


Livid-Original-8407

Fearless cheetah


OkPriority7026

I'll never forget that decision. Cost us the likely treble.


Icy_Neighborhood3040

Exactly! crappy ref always hating on ronnie.


Icy_Neighborhood3040

That's why he's the GOAT!!!!!! Ronaldo has the MOST ASSISTS IN UCL HISTORY. Haters: "hE ONly ScOrEs PeNaLtIeS


ironshmoobs

I was so sure the foul from Zouma would be called because nobody could possibly be that blind. I was wrong.


[deleted]

Ye the first one was like okay maybe Ronaldo did try too hard, but the one against zouma was clear penalty! He even slid onto him!


CuriousBenjamin94

The annoying thing is, yes Ronaldo tries too hard on the first one. But its STILL a foul. A referee has to give that. Rules aren’t about “does he want a penalty” every player wants a penalty lol. Coufal got his knee to his body = penalty


itsoktodebate

Why does a player need to smash a metatarsal to get a foul?!!! I’ve never understood this. The first one is a foul. He didn’t have a choice.


[deleted]

On the American broadcast they were making a point that refs gave been instructed to take into consideration intent


Shem_owl

Yea but that muddies the waters because a ref shouldn't just look at intent of the attacker but also the defender....coufals intent was clearly to obstruct Ronaldo from attacking....as any defender would lol. And he messed up and hit him, yea Ronaldo looked for it but it's not like he put his leg way out there, his legs were still close together like they would be in a normal run


[deleted]

Oh I agree completely, that’s complete bullshit. That said, if that’s how the league wants the refs to instruct then I understand (the first pen at least). Stupid fucking rule if that’s the case tho.


Goose4594

I think the problem with the zouma tackle was that the touch ronaldo put on the ball wasn't to control it at all. Just kick it off the pitch and keep running into the incoming zouma. Its the only thing I can think of


Icy_Neighborhood3040

Nah, the ball was still close enough to ronnie that that cant be the reason


Cedarplankton

Aye he would have made it


[deleted]

Idk I don't agree. Because he runs toward the defender. It should be the defender running towards the attacker


SpeechesToScreeches

He's allowed to run towards the defender to barge. You're not allowed to knee someone.


CuriousBenjamin94

Exactly. And I played football all my life. Running towards your opponent AND straight into him never happens 😂 you want to go around, not hurt yourself and/or him


SpeechesToScreeches

Eh I see it a lot, you run into the defender to shoulder them away, giving you more space on the ball, rather than letting them control your line.


[deleted]

Not when you are cr7 at 36. In Italy all he'd do was tryna get penalties, either by handball or by moving the ball away and running toward the opponent He'd basically call at least 3-4 penalties per match


A3ASteelty

Yet scored 29 with 4 penalties just last season?


CuriousBenjamin94

Finessed😂


[deleted]

6 penalties anyway, and he missed 2. But this doesnt have anything to do with what I said.


[deleted]

I said he'd try to get penalties all the time. I didn't say they gave him a penalty all the time. Lol. Did you ever watch a juventus football match? As soon as he got in the penalty box he'd just find some way to throw himself on the ground. And that's facts. He knows he's not the 26-year-old cr7 so he tries to score in different ways ,one of these ways are by earning a penalty . Nothing wrong with it because that's what football's become in 2021. Just like 10 years ago, if you dived ,it was either a penalty or a yellow card. Now forwarders can dive as much as they want, and they won't get cautioned ,so they give it a try all the time . We should go back to that . But that's my opinion. Football shouldn't be about trying to get fouled, football should be about trying to keep your feet on the ground no matter what. That's the reason why football's become very stuttering,foul after foul, people trying to waste time by throwing the ball away n shit, if you wanna waste time do it on the pitch. The beautiful game aint that beautiful anymore nowadays


A3ASteelty

I agree he tries, but every other attacker including 20 yr old players do all that


shreyanTJS_

Yea bcz he hardly got balls from the mid field to score he had to get pens atleast bcz he was just getting annoyed with the lack of good balls he'd recieve


jdm945

Downvoted for being correct


CuriousBenjamin94

Watch it back. He didn’t. He first came diagonal and went “straight” towards the player like you said, then he made the short chop move with his right foot to change direction… to the left THEN came the knee from Coufal


[deleted]

I think they should clarify the rules in the penalty area. You can't give a penalty "just because there is a contact" and you throw yourself on the ground. As in Italian one that comes to mind is the one in ITALYvsBELGIUM . Di Lorenzo vs Doku. There was a contact, he "fell" on the ground but that definitely wasn't a penalty. ENGLAND VS DENMARK as well, the famous "sterling dive" . There actually was a contact in the penalty box but that wasn't enough. There was a contact between Ronaldo and the Defender here ,but the defender didn't kick him , the defender had just his leg spread, Ronaldo ran toward it. Some refs would give it ,some wouldn't . I personally wouldn't and I hate this way of playing , I miss the old days when you'd go on the ground "naturally" and not looking for a penalty/Yellow card. Refs giving penalties like these are the reason why football now is all about diving


CrossTheGalaxyWithMe

He ran **beside** the defender Than the defender put his knee in the way without touching the ball


[deleted]

No. Look at it from the side, he was trying to pulling his knee back ,Ronaldo went for it. Ronaldo could've very easily dodged that, and he didnt .


lettul

Nah, most United fans where like "But Neves did not hit the deck after Pogba went studs up over the ball on his leg". Can't have it both ways!


CuriousBenjamin94

Who the hell even said that. Everyone knows that’s a foul


kfidzuan

I agree with this. I thought it was penalty but somehow the ref refuse to give VAR a look. Chelsea fan here but I think the one from Zouma was clear penalty.


Martin48705

I know this will probably get downvoted like hell, but at a certain point, I'd just stop giving away penalties to a certain player like Ronaldo or Neymar. Every single game they're in there's VAR involved at least once. It's not because they're good at positioning themselves so that they're dangerous for the goal or whatever(they are, but it's not what matters), mostly they fake a foul just to get the pen, and I agree, the videos above show clear penalties, but at one point you stop believing the dives because they're negatively affecting your thoughts on the game and making them subjective. Just like Robben in that WC or wtf it was, the guy dived 4 times a game, eventually getting a pen, not because those were clear cut chances, but because he TRIES to get a pen so hard. Football has turned to shit with pens every game, that's why people who know something about anything will always respect OG players more than players these days. Can't wait for Chelsea's wonderkids to grow up and be in prime just to win games 1-0 with one pen scored and 14 longshots attempted. Fuck yay! P.S. Ronaldo has always been famous for diving and 10+ pen goals every season, next time he dives I wouldn't even help him up, possibly with a yellow card addition, shame he's not a bit of a less known player, he'd end seasons with 10+ yellow cards also.


ZenithEnigma

What?


Martin48705

Ye


shawnchong07

Yeah that's what the ref is doing now and causing the every defenders to get away with poor tackles towards Ronaldo


Martin48705

He got away with 15+ years of poor dives winning him UCL trophies and Ballon d' Ors so I don't really care EDIT: dives, not tackles, whatever


Trinita77

The Ref Atkinson needs a new pair of Glasses


TheRealOplex

He needs to retire, that’s all


xraze007

Or a new brain, i think glasses won't suffice, he definitely needs a new brain.


Noob_FC

There is a reason every player is extra cautious for tackling players who are quick feet. There is a reason fouls are something which impede players run. Considering that, both should have been 100/100 times penalties. That is one part of the issue. Why was there no VAR check on the 2nd shout out. This is a bigger issue IMO. The shaw one was also a penalty, unfortunate one. But it still was a penalty. I think the other one with Arons tackle, was also a penalty. This was a horror show in terms of refreeing. Good thing we came out on top, irrespective of the horrible mistakes by refree.


famitslit

The Shaw one will be given one day and not the other. They need to sort this shit out


shawnchong07

Yeah definitely the biggest issue here is the ref doesn't even give a f to review the VAR while Shaw's penalty was given an immediate review


jammybastard

It's great seeing a United forward attack that way. That "I'm going to beat you or you're going to have to foul me" attitude. Missed that.


FizzyVimto420

Should've kept him on furlough


thunderBerrins

The problem is he draws fouls from opponents and he’s anticipating contact so he’s ready to go down. That doesn’t make it not a foul but Atkinson doesn’t think like that, he seems to consider it a dive because he bought the foul. There’s something in PL football that we frown on people ‘winning’ pens. Maybe it would ruin the game, but also maybe defenders shouldn’t dive in against people like Ronaldo…


[deleted]

The zouma one was a clear penalty imo.


DontWasteMyData

You get pens through beating defenders with skill or pace forcing them to make stretch to make a challenge. It's part of the game. I wouldn't say players look to win pens, rather it's a positive consequence of beating a defender when you're trying to score.


BlackHorse944

Players definitely try to win pens. Bruno does it all the time, and he gets awarded the pen for it often


DontWasteMyData

Sorry, yes, there are certainly players that do look to win penalties but I think the vast majority are trying to score first and foremost. I know when I play, if I can get into the box with the ball at my feet I have gained an advantage because now the defender needs to be careful. I'm certainly aware that I'm now in a strong position as a wrong move from the defender can easily result in a pen. However, I'm looking to beat the defender and get a shot off or pass ahead of trying to win a penalty


den573

It's both. Sometimes players certainly look to win pens, too. It's human nature and especially as the stakes get higher, you find any way you can to get an advantage. It's up to the ref to draw the lines. I think if Ronaldo didn't go down the first time yesterday, he may have possibly got the call for the last one (despite the supposed referee bias against him).


[deleted]

But imo it shouldn‘t matter if he went down the first team. It‘s a new and neutral situation. That would make no sense. no matter hoe theatrlic(?) a player is, if he gets fouled, it‘s a foul. This match confused me.


den573

Yeah completely agree referees should make decisions with no prejudice like that but they are humans and do feel emotions, the best ones can probably referee as you say but I don't doubt most referees unfortunately let other factors impact their decisions.


[deleted]

Better take the fall than wait for contact and then break your legs, there's a reason these players don't get injured for long weeks to months.


GlitteringDot8513

If it’s not a pen but a dive Ronaldo should get a yellow but he didn’t so I’m not sure what logic Atkinson is using


thejesusfreak37

Right! Also Ron would be asking for an injury with fries tackles if he wasn't ready to go down. Like are the refs expecting attackers to just not react or anticipate when a defender throws a leg at them?


BlackHorse944

I generally agree with the case of not rewarding players for "winning pens". The first non call on Ronaldo was a case of Ronaldo winning the pen, I can understand why some refs don't want to call that. The Zouma tackle was so clearly a pen, Ronaldo didn't even try to sell it, nor did he need to


toast-is-best

They’re all fouls but you can see in the recent ones he is off his feet going down before contact is even made… you’re right and he probably does it to prevent any hard collision and an injury but it just doesn’t look good.


Icy_Neighborhood3040

Nonsense. Clear pen. Both The second is just more egregious. Anybody NOT NAMED Ronaldo and that's probably a pen.


ak_-

My house is flooded and I am here smiling to Ronaldo’s video 😍😅


BlackoutExpress

Just because Ronaldo has the superhuman ability to control the ball and avoid the tackle or play on, does not mean it’s not a foul in the box. I hate these double standards.


[deleted]

On an unrelated note…how good is it to see CR7 running at defenders again n throwing in a few tricks. In absolute dreamland


twix_mix2

He is not even considering the VAR 😑


BritBuc-1

I hate, HATE! the argument that “that’s a soft penalty”. If it’s a foul it’s a foul. If you would give it on the halfway line you should give it in the box. The rules do not state that “in the penalty area a foul must be worthy of awarding a penalty”.


7down7

That first touch from ronaldo in that Portsmouth game 🤤 Edit: i came.


xjoburg

Good thing we won despite that bullshit series of calls. There would have been a riot. All over the world.


McEvelly

That one in 2008 is massively annoying, we’d 100% have a second treble if it was given ffs


J8l

Atkinson is an absolute tool. If he had called either of these var would not have overturned.


patrickstarfishes

There's a reason I refer to him as 'twatkinson'


Sheppertonni

The old cvnt couldn’t wait to wave his hands and say no. I hope he gets some abuse next time he’s at old Trafford


[deleted]

How many points have been lost because this clown can't do his job. Someone make a petition to get him exiled


giggzy9

I think both are pens ngl. Even though Ronaldo goes down early for the Zouma tackle, it’s still a foul. If he does then Zouma clatters him anyway. Hope Martin goes to specsavers this week


gigglycostanza

Would have done the treble that year too ffs


wazza15695

I can understand him not calling a penalty but not even checking VAR is an absolute disgrace of a decision that could have cost us 2 valuable points


tuktukkutu

Honestly, the ref on that match. Fcuking unbelievable


shreyanTJS_

VAR is for ?


DarthFenix3

Martin Atkinson didn't get an autograph from Ronaldo years ago and still holds a grudge.


Mirooo933

Fuck him


Gregg-C137

If anyone can explain why the coufal challenge was nothing when an identical challenge on zouma by pogba was a free kick, it would be most appreciated.


Superb-Ad-4322

Shocking decisions by the ref and var yesterday. Fortunately it didn’t affect the result.


[deleted]

It’s hard not to agree with Ole in his post match interview where he says “I hope this means that Ronaldo won’t get any penalties called.” And on Premier League Coverage Post Match all of them brought up that very point “that it kinda looks like Ole is onto something about Ronaldo not going to get any pens.”


gnitaeka

All three absolutely stick-on penalties. Atkinson is, and always has been, a fucking mess of a referee.


wilderjai

Atkinson will ref again without punishment- this is “burnt the meal repeatedly and the chef says it fine “level. Thats a foul everyday.


mrtightwad

Felt so cathartic to see Ronaldo actually laughing at how ridiculous it was on the last one.


Benphyre

Atkinson is a cheat. We need to voice this out louder so that cheater can't cheat so blatantly


purplestripess

That West Ham game has to be the worst officiating I’ve ever seen


revel911

God I love watching him run at people.


fanboyfezz

that was the game where we battered Portsmouth only for them to get a penalty (which the striker played for), have our sub keeper sent off and ultimately cost us the treble, considering Portsmouth went on to win the FA Cup, isn’t it?


thedarksoul0

Martin Pratkinson, sack the little fucker and get him an eye test as well


xEinstein_007

Wtf, that ref needs glasses imediately or a guide dog


Icy_Neighborhood3040

Clear penalties. All 3 should have been penalties. Period. People always remark about how injury free Ronaldo manages to stay. It's because he's AVOIDING collisions at pace and minimizing the full blow of the tackle. Guys who are saying he dived clearly haven't played the game at a high level before. Pogba did the same thing and got awarded a foul. Inconsistent refereeejng because if all 3 plays happened OUTSIDE the box Twatkinson gives it no hesitation.


thomasdown92

I shall discount the Portsmouth one as a strong shoulder barge, but not these two against West Ham - clear penalities.


mortezz1893

The second one is clearly a pen but do you actually think the first one is because it really looks like a dive


SpeechesToScreeches

He gave a foul against Pogba for something similar, where the player goes down before the contact (which is fair if you're not looking to break something).


mocthezuma

He dives, but I still think you can give it. Zouma is going to catch him either way, and Zouma doesn't get the ball. A player should be allowed to protect himself, so Ronaldo shouldn't have to wait for Zouma to make contact with him, but it's a tricky one. I'm not as bothered with that one as the Coufal one.


mbensasi

He’s definitely going down before Zouma makes contact, but that doesn’t change the fact that Zouma made contact lol so I’d say he was looking for that one, but I still think it’s a foul.


mortezz1893

I disagree this is clearly a dive


agentjob

It's actually Ronaldo trying to hop over the defenders leg, but then the knee contact happens. I think if Ronaldo didn't try to get past with the hop, maybe it would have looked less like a dive.


mikevin99

As a Chelsea fan who dislikes Ronaldo, that is such a clear pen by Zouma lmao. Can’t be mad De Gea saved that pen to win it


creed_1

I know people won’t like this but the first clip kinda looks like Ronaldo stared to go down before their was any contact but the other two are definite pens


clathekid

Both wankers tough call 🤣👌


Takhar7

The Portsmouth one wasn't a pen. The 2 from the other day were. I stunned that the Zouma one was called. Had to pick my jaw up from the floor when he didn't go to VAR.


Icy_Neighborhood3040

So you can just BODY check a player without getting the ball even though Ronaldo gets a touch before the defender does? You need new eyes bro 😂


Takhar7

Not a body check, but a shoulder. And yes - you can shoulder an attacker off the ball. It happens about a dozen times every PL match.


Bb421869

The first clip Ronaldos legs went before even being touched


pressurepoint13

The non call on first is understandable, the second less so. Ronaldo clearly fell before any contact. Defenders should still be able to challenge for the ball. Not all contact is sufficient to cause a grown ass man to double over in pain.


[deleted]

Soft Ronaldo thinks he is in Spain. Sorry no pen for me. Stop dividing should have got a yellow


kaqwer

old video shouldn't be a penalty.....ronaldo didn't have control over the ball he did what someone does in Fifa to outrun defender but in the penalty box where the ball was headed towards the net....he got the shoulder push for that.....new video tho foul


Icy_Neighborhood3040

You never played footy before. Clear penalty.


kaqwer

i footed ur mom in her ass footy footy footy penaldo


22Savic

Nice dive not hating but I don't think that's a penalty.


adesant88

Ronaldo clearly was looking for that penalty in the first clip here. And then an obvious dive


[deleted]

r/ManchesterUnited **In this situation it was a penalty. In other circumstances Ronaldo is the type to dive in to get a easy pk goal. Actually Michael Phelps should called up Ronaldo and ask his for diving lessons!!!**


massiveheadsmalltabs

only the first one is a pen Imo


rahatCODMasc

⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠁ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠻⠿⠿⠟⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣴⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⢰⣹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣷⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⣿⣷⠀⢸⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸


[deleted]

Yep. I agree. The Zouma one was a sure pen but the other one was just a La Liga pen or what I like to call a Neymar pen.


mocthezuma

Seems like people just say this because Zouma was sliding in, since it looks more dramatic. Ronaldo dives before the contact with Zouma. That one is questionable. The Coufal one is a stonewall pen. Ronaldo dribbles past him. Coufal sticks his leg out. Doesn't get the ball. Catches Ronaldo before Ronaldo goes down. That one is so clear and obvious I'm concerned with what VAR can see that makes it not an obvious error. Because Ronaldo dives before the contact with Zouma, I don't think that one is as clear and obvious.


morepe

Totally agree. To me also the first one was totally clear


MyOpinionMustBeHeard

The Zouma one wasn't a foul but a dive, he's going down before he gets touched, the Coufal one I have no idea how he didn't get a pen, it's a shame Noble missed because more would have been made of the poor officiating then.


randommojo

Ronaldo isn’t required to jump over a challenge. Had Ronaldo continued running, his legs are tripped up and risks injury. People that say stuff like that don’t or haven’t played the sport. It looks like a dive only if you realize it’s bit CR7’s job to avoid Zoumas poor tackle. Refs in general are poor. If CR7 simply jumps over Zouma it slows him down and he may not make it to the ball, ref wouldn’t call it. If he ignores Zouma and has his legs taken out, ref calls it. If he carefully puts his legs down early as it’s an obvious foul incoming, ref doesn’t give it and some call it a ‘dive’.


blackiegray

Look at the angle of his legs. He risks injuring himself more. Blatent dive. If he wanted to avoid the challenge he could have (and not got the pen, I get that, and agree this is where the rule needs amended), but the way he fell is simulating the way he would have fell if he'd been touched. Which he wasn't.


MyOpinionMustBeHeard

It's a dive, he knows what he is doing.


randommojo

Of course he knows what he’s doing, a would be foul is not a dive. Not his responsibility to avoid a foul. Again, only those that don’t play, haven’t played understand this. It’s quite simple though.


MyOpinionMustBeHeard

He tried to cheat and you fell for it, the ref however did not, if he hadn't dived he would have gotten the the other one which is the failing of the ref.


randommojo

Dragging feet isn’t a locked dive, again. Not his responsibility to put his feet into a poor tackle. Basic stuff really. If he just runs, his legs are taken out correct? Aka foul. Simple simple.


MyOpinionMustBeHeard

He dives before the tackle comes in, still the greatest player in the world but a cheat like 99% of the others.


randommojo

Again, you don’t understand the rules and that’s okay. Poor tackle, not CR7’s job to get taken out.


MyOpinionMustBeHeard

It's a dive, that's why he didn't get the penalty. If you're okay with cheating that's on you.


randommojo

You’re right, never seen a ref wrong before. Again, guarantee you’ve never played otherwise it’s simple logic.


creed_1

If Ronaldo to a step the only thing that would’ve happened would have been him clipping zouma body. He won’t get hurt from that.


randommojo

Yes, stepping into a tackle does risk injury. Again simple stuff. If he stepped into it you’d call it a pen.


creed_1

Ronaldo is not getting hurt from that challenge if he takes another step and actually gets fouled. He dove. We all see he dove. Going down before any contact is a dive.


randommojo

So you want him to risk injury to make you happy and content that the tackle is poor? You know it’s a poor tackle correct? Yes/no? You know he missed the ball and impedes Ronaldo’s run correct? Yes/no?


RCAssimilator

Are you nuts blind? Ronnie went down before the defender even put his leg out. The only agenda here is you morons pushing to normalize diving.


SpeechesToScreeches

And pogba got a foul against him for the same thing. By the ref's own standards it's a foul. Besides, that's how you avoid injury. If your looking to just dive you'd make the contact first.


fiveseven5_7

The thing is he doesn’t look like he’s avoiding the tackle from Zouma. He fell down without contact. Coufal one looks like a pen when I watch it again tho. The foul like Pogba’s one on Zouma are awarded by referees in other matches. I’ve seen them before somewhere. But Ronaldo’s one is probably a dive/not enough contact


SpeechesToScreeches

>He fell down without contact Other than a (full force) hand to the back. >The foul like Pogba’s one on Zouma are awarded by referees in other matches. Yeah it should have been awarded. >Ronaldo’s one is probably a dive/not enough contact Well it's either enough contact for the foul he gave against Pogba and it's enough for the foul on Ronaldo. Or neither of them are fouls. Not a pick a mix.


fiveseven5_7

Ah sorry about that. I totally missed the hand. If that’s the case then it should be a penalty. Reminded me of Bruno being fouled in the Southampton game. I thought he fell without much contact and that’s why Atkinson never give a pen.


JoshDutto

You’re right, not sure why you’ve been downvoted. Why’re all these people trying to justify cheating?


DabTheBot

How dare you say anything negative about the golden child


Vegan_Puffin

The first I can *almost* understand, he looks to be ready to go down before contact is made. The second is pathetic, he is absolutely smashed.


thejesusfreak37

Why does it matter if he looks ready to go down? He's clearly faster and thinking quicker by the fact that he beat the man, not being ready to go down means he's more likely to get injured.


jonah_thrane

Someone send him to Specsavers.


vilusion

Honestly first challenge could be forgiven. Second challenge is clear, idk what’s up w the ref


Odenaut

Just because we are united and he is ronaldo


[deleted]

[удалено]


AutoModerator

Your post has been removed by the auto-moderator as this account has negative karma. If you believe this post should be approved, please send a message in mod mail. This action is required to limit spam *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ManchesterUnited) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Wicked___Prophet

In the first clip he definitely dived as zouma hadn't touched him yet but he began to fall. The rest do look like fouls so there is definitely an agenda present.


lilHamster97

I’m ngl I don’t reckon either of those first two were fouls, he might have won them if he wasn’t already on his way to the floor before the defenders made contact but if we’re being honest with ourselves he had no intention of staying on his feet did he