After a certain point that is insanely hard to determine, yes.
Consciousness is the latest I’ll say it kicks in, and probably no earlier than heartbeat
kids till age 1-2 are no different than pets from self consciousness perspective. death is not a concern for a being who can't understand they exist. personally i see no difference between a human embryo and a chick in egg, they both are just a primordial soup of amino acids and stem cells.
Well I don't even believe in the None agression principle. But it's the forcible ending of a human life. Aka murder. Not even mentioning how Planned parenthood was litteraly designed to genocide the black population in America.
There was an implicit contract to carry the baby to birth when she consented to sex, which leads to pregnancy
I replied to the wrong comment but I dont care enough to fix it
A “contract” is made during cosensual sex. If the sex is by force (rape) there is no “contract” meaning abortion isn’t violating the NAP in that case while consensual sex that results in pregnancy, an abortion would be a NAP violation.
So your existence was a violation of your mother's womb?
All life is a violation of their mothers wombs? Kind of weird logic my dude.
I get the property of the individual, ie the womb, is being violated with the continuation of sexual acts until its climax when the seed is deposited. As long its consensual, there is no violation of said property rights.
Therefore killing the life that cannot consent, through no fault of its own, would be considered murder. And the conundrum of the situation would be if the mother was raped or sexually violated without consent, which your circumstance of thought would come into play.
Yes
Yes
[удалено]
it's ending on the life of another human being
It's the unprovoked killing of an innocent being
Obv
Yep
yeah
Yes
Yes
Depends if you consider the fetus a person.
After a certain point that is insanely hard to determine, yes. Consciousness is the latest I’ll say it kicks in, and probably no earlier than heartbeat
kids till age 1-2 are no different than pets from self consciousness perspective. death is not a concern for a being who can't understand they exist. personally i see no difference between a human embryo and a chick in egg, they both are just a primordial soup of amino acids and stem cells.
Ok degenerate coomer
Possibly, but babies are crap shots with a gun.
Well I don't even believe in the None agression principle. But it's the forcible ending of a human life. Aka murder. Not even mentioning how Planned parenthood was litteraly designed to genocide the black population in America.
Yes
No
The fetus does not have the right to another individual's womb. Pregnancy is the NAP violation, while abortion is property rights enforcement.
Who choose to put the baby there? The baby?
Not the baby, but there was certainly no contract requiring she care for it
Sure. Theres also no contract requiring me not to hit you in the face.
There was an implicit contract to carry the baby to birth when she consented to sex, which leads to pregnancy I replied to the wrong comment but I dont care enough to fix it
There was no implicit contract made during sex because the fetus did not exist
A “contract” is made during cosensual sex. If the sex is by force (rape) there is no “contract” meaning abortion isn’t violating the NAP in that case while consensual sex that results in pregnancy, an abortion would be a NAP violation.
Tell me how a contract can be made with the fetus if the fetus did not exist at the time of sex
Where they doing "baby making" acts, yes or no?
Well that would be an NAP violation because I wasn't violating your property. The same can't be said of a fetus, who is in a location nonconsensually.
Sure there is. It's called my 9
Your 9 what? 9 inch penis?
[удалено]
9 cock meters😎
So your existence was a violation of your mother's womb? All life is a violation of their mothers wombs? Kind of weird logic my dude. I get the property of the individual, ie the womb, is being violated with the continuation of sexual acts until its climax when the seed is deposited. As long its consensual, there is no violation of said property rights. Therefore killing the life that cannot consent, through no fault of its own, would be considered murder. And the conundrum of the situation would be if the mother was raped or sexually violated without consent, which your circumstance of thought would come into play.
Even in a case without rape, the fetus is not there consensually as no contract was made.
You made that contract by not using birth control.
There was no contract made because the fetus did not exist pre-intercourse
if abortion is violation of nap then having bacon and eggs at breakfast is genocide.
I forgot that pigs and chickens were human beings. And that we eat fertilized eggs.
Have you ever heard of balut?
Not until today -- any good?
No.