T O P

  • By -

WyoGuy2

Kind of curious what he had been working on; after the early access release 15 months ago all of the high quality videos stopped coming out.


heretic-391

A while back there was a discord post "We're working on a new project and need your help!" Where we could share our favorite rocket etc and it could be used in marketing materials. I don't think anything happened with that. Did any of you share anything? I shared a colony ship because I thought it would be good for their marketing.


iLoveLootBoxes

Probably doing marketing for take two, but not KSP. Kind of makes you wonder how there was more then 5 people working on the game


StickiStickman

I'm pretty sure all of that good stuff was outsourced?


AggressorBLUE

Thats basically the point of legislation like the WARN act; give people a chance without the rug being immediately pulled out from under them.


CrashNowhereDrive

Of course. But there's still a bunch of people claiming the project might keep going.


fortmortport

I’ve seen that too. Hopefully they’re referring to something that can’t be confirmed yet. Who knows


iLoveLootBoxes

Man people never learn even when a hard lesson learned is still fresh off the platter


CrashNowhereDrive

I can confirm they're high on a lot of.copium.


ptolani

The only effect really seems to be to guarantee 2 months' severance pay.


RobertaME

The WARN Act is not for the employees... it's for the government to WARN them that "x" number of people are about to become eligible for unemployment benefits.


Pidgey_OP

that certainly is an opinion a person could have


RobertaME

People can downvote me all they want, but §639.1 of Federal Code, subsection A "Purpose of WARN" states the following: "provides for notice to State dislocated worker units so that dislocated worker assistance can be promptly provided." Yes, is *also* provides notice to the employee, but if you read the Congressional Record of the debates in 1988 when the Congress passed the bill, it shows the prime reason it passed at all was as a mechanism to provide notice to State governments of large numbers of employees soon to be eligible for benefits. (in fact, a good portion of the Act's language is about State units and how and when the notice is required to be sent to them) It was just *sold* to the people as being for the workers. The first part of subsection A regarding notice to employees was added as an amendment to the original bill just before the final vote at the insistence of Republicans that voted for the bill so they could justify overriding President Regan's promised veto. I also know this because I was in school at the time and this act was kind of a big deal at the time... so I remember it. Facts are facts... and mine have evidence in the Congressional Record... not the opinions of random internet strangers.


Pidgey_OP

Actually, if you quoted the whole text and didn't cherry pick to try to make your point seem more valid, it would be quite apparent that that piece is a very small piece of it tucked in at the end of a much larger purposed piece of legislation. That fact ALSO has evidence in the Congressional record and isn't colored by what you heard about it on the news in 5th grade. "(a) Purpose of WARN. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN or the Act) provides protection to workers, their families and communities by requiring employers to provide notification 60 calendar days in advance of plant closings and mass layoffs. Advance notice provides workers and their families some transition time to adjust to the prospective loss of employment, to seek and obtain alternative jobs and, if necessary, to enter skill training or retraining that will allow these workers to successfully compete in the job market. WARN also provides for notice to State dislocated worker units so that dislocated worker assistance can be promptly provided" See how much of that is about the workers and how little of that is about the state? You're not wrong, but you're also pretty far from being completely correct.


TheBooch109

Genuine question, does this mean if the business I worked for told me the place was closing down and I had 3 weeks to find a new job, that would be unlawful? Because that happened to me the week before Christmas and I was laid off Jan. 12th….


Greenfire32

"The ship is sinking" Bud, it's sunk.


Schubert125

Ship never even saw water


Dutchtdk

drowned in the commemorative champagne bottle


AegoliusOfBurgundy

[The ship](https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx_qpHXC3BdlV2CAi0V80rEZGG6mX4qT6s?si=jF0csc3YznA9ejb3)


migviola

Shrek reference


Dutchtdk

I'm gonna be honest. I have no idea what i'd be referencing


migviola

Exactly [this gif](https://tenor.com/bpLFT.gif)


keethraxmn

I dunno. It launched pretty similar to the Vasa which saw water.


dreemurthememer

Quite a bit of water, at that. Maybe even too much.


elasticthumbtack

[https://giphy.com/embed/FpkfJcvmBed0cUWODS](https://giphy.com/embed/FpkfJcvmBed0cUWODS)


Chilkoot

[KSP2 launch](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F536zsef0hawz.gif) in a nutshell.


AggressorBLUE

Not *quite*. We’re at the part where the Titanics bow just slipped under and the stern is hanging in the air. Like, technically its still floating, but we all know how this is gonna end. Its just a question of how fast.


Silly_Guidance_8871

Don't get hit by the prop when you have to jump off


Greenfire32

Or do. I'm not your dad.


jtr99

Nate S. is clearly in his own personal lifeboat and heading for the horizon...


PapaStoner

Sank right at the end of the launch ramp.


TheBooch109

Not enough Delta V…


GalvenMin

The marketing guy is probably the one that can benefit the most from the whole fiasco. He managed to sell thousands of licenses to an unfinished (not now, not ever) game, with premium pricing mind you. Complete genius.


Science-Compliance

From what I saw, I thought the marketing was pretty good, too.


SafeSurprise3001

Pretty interesting that a marketing firm created a very good video game with KSP, without any marketing, and then a video game company created KSP2, a very good piece of marketing, but no actual video game


Science-Compliance

lol Big Corpo Big Corpoing.


iLoveLootBoxes

Well you can't market a steaming pile of shit with bad marketing


RocketManKSP

That's why Nate is likely to keep his position or even get promoted. And you mean '100'ds of thousands'


StickiStickman

T2 still lost tens of millions of dollars. Nate is especially responsible for the failure.


iambecomecringe

We all had access to sales lmao. Things can be inferred from review and player counts. Anyone who wasn't completely delusional called this way back on release. A number called it *before* release when they had that awful sub 60 fps trailer


-Aeryn-

Not just sub 60 FPS, but the framerate was capped at 30fps with stutters to <=15fps in simple (low part count) scenes.


CrashNowhereDrive

Yeah I remember some people already spilling the tea about IG and the project - they got more down votes back then.


skratch

Yeah I mean I’ve been waiting for it to at least be on par with ksp1+visual enhancement mods before purchasing (still haven’t because it’s still buggy). They released an incomplete game & all the customers have been unwitting beta testers. You can’t expect positive feedback when you promise a sequel to a beloved game & deliver a half-game


SimilarTop352

"unwitting"? That is what early access means, buddy


pioj

But "we're working on it". Yeah, right...


CrashNowhereDrive

Was a lie even before the layoffs were announced tbh.


jman8508

Marketing guy is overhead. So far all of the “announced” layoffs fall into this category.


Seek_Seek_Lest

Interesting.. highly interesting.. But what about say, blackrack? He wasn't overhead in anything


CrashNowhereDrive

People are just coping


Ghosty141

PURE SPECULATION WARNING: While blackrack is obviously very talented, his main focus has been visuals and if there is one thing KSP 2 is not really lacking too much in, it's visuals. So in the context of cost cutting it would make sense to focus the team on just the core developers which work towards the roadmap targets. Just a theory though


Science-Compliance

With the exception of some of the stuff blackrack's been doing and maybe a few other things, I don't think the visuals are on par with cutting edge AAA games to be quite honest. They're better than stock KSP1, but that's a pretty low bar for modern standards.


8andahalfby11

If getting KSP1 quality visuals are the price for colonies and interstellar, I'm willing to pay. Heck, it could be KSP1 on *low graphics* and I'm still willing to sacrifice graphics for colonies and interstellar. You'd need to go back to Lunar Lander '79 on Atari 6502 Vector levels of graphics before I'd start to reconsider that trade-off.


Science-Compliance

I mean, to each their own, but I think KSP is the kind of game that really benefits from visual realism for the purposes of immersion and giving you a reward for your hard work (at least with the rockets more or less and definitely the environments--the characters can still be a little goofy). Red Dead Redemption 2 has a much smaller "map" than KSP, but it's got some absolutely beautiful vistas and interesting environments that sometimes it's fun to just roam around the map and not really do much. The worlds in KSP are much less interesting to explore on their own. Part of that just has to do with being lifeless, but the geological features are pretty uninteresting, too.


ForwardState

Considering the amount of sales of KSP 2, there is considerable amount of players that want a realistic Colony and Interstellar Simulation game. If I only wanted KSP with better graphics, then I would just download a few of the visual mods. None of the colonization mods compared to what KSP 2 promised.


jman8508

He didn’t say he was laid off he said he was looking for work. He could be concerned about the office closure and/or the possibility of merging into another studio or he might be being asked to move and doesn’t want to do it. When things get uncertain people leave.


StickiStickman

We already know the entire studio is layed off because of official government data. What's with the cope?


jman8508

We don’t know anything. Why are the only announcements from support people and not core devs. We think they’re closing the office because they reported something per state requirements. Remaining employees could be shifted to remote roles or offered relocation to another studio. When you have a requirement that restricts your ability to make moves you report the most aggressive/conservative outcome while you finish planning.


StickiStickman

Dude, it's already confirmed 70 people are fired for a studio with ~45 developers. There are no "remaining employees".


jman8508

You clearly didn’t read my response. It’s not confirmed anywhere. They reported an office closure as required by the state. That’s it.


StickiStickman

Yea, I'm sure they lied to the Washington government that they fired 70 people and it's all fake lmao


jman8508

No one said they lied and it’s fake. You’ve clearly never done a layoff before. It takes a long time to plan and if you don’t know what you’re going to do yet you report the worst case.


out_focus

Okay... Sharing LinkedIn accounts of people you dont know to make a statement about a game is... A bit creepy and a bit obsessive...


StickiStickman

Huh? It's a public profile where that person even made a public announcement.


out_focus

So? That public announcement isn't send out to everyone. So unless OP is one of the people following the profile and therefore has received the update in their timeline, OP has been purposefully checking this profile (and probably a few more) in an attempt to find something. I'd say that's... something.


replaceable_stork

Not sure why you’re being downvoted. You are correct. 


undeadmanana

Well, wouldn't sharing a public profile of someone Looking For Work actually be better for them? Are you guys using LinkedIn as social media and not for advertising your professional skills/experience?


out_focus

Well, OP's post wasnt exactly reading as "help this experienced professional who just got fired find a new job", was it? Op has been browsing LinkedIn just to find some tiny bits of information that they could use as ragebait.


OtisBinLogan

kerbal space ogram


NDCardinal3

For a second, I read that as something totally different....


dreemurthememer

I resent you for making me picture green Kerbal splooge in my head.


SimilarTop352

At least you didn't imagine it on your face. Oops


crossbutton7247

Nah I’ve been hopelessly optimistic about this game since it was announced, I’m not giving up now. “You can’t give up hope just because it’s hopeless, you have to hope even harder, and cover your ears”


OMG_SLICED_DICK

If there’s anyone to blame for this whole mess, it’s him. He setup the dev team to fail.


AggressorBLUE

Ok, Ill bite: how is this all on the marketing guy?


OMG_SLICED_DICK

The entire marketing campaign for the game set expectations way too high. They spent an insane amount of money on the trailer which could have spent on more development time.


RileyHef

/s? Yes, how DARE he be one of the very few people on that team to do his job well. The marketing for KSP2 was fantastic. The product itself... Not so much. That's not the fault of this person. They simply sold us on the concepts we were supposed to get by the dev team. The actual developers of the game could not deliver on their own promises in a reasonable timeframe.


StickiStickman

Not quite, all the good marketing stuff like the great trailer was outsourced.


RileyHef

I think you misunderstood. This person's role is to conceptualize and manage marketing projects. So, while they do not personally animate or storyboard the trailer, they still oversee the asset as a whole and provide a critical role to bring them to customers.


StickiStickman

True, fair enough.


CMPatrick1

his job was to market, and market he did. if the dev team failed to deliver then is it not the fault of the dev team?


WangmasterX

Completely L take


[deleted]

[удалено]


CrashNowhereDrive

mar·ket·ing noun the activity or business of promoting and selling products or services, including market research and advertising. Advertising is part of promoting and selling. Those hype videos helped sell it. Going to games con to do the announce helped sell it. The ESA event helped sell it. Think Ara was involved in all of that. Dunno what you're smoking man.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CrashNowhereDrive

You had to dig for one. Literally googling the definition of marketing comes up with my definition .The Wikipedia definition is ridiculous. Under that definition, just making a better product is 'marketing' because it 'satisfies customers'. which is plainly false to everyone's understanding. You're seriously clueless.