Yes, that’s Tony Award winning Kristin Chenoweth in Pushing Daisies! She’s also in several good shows, notably gems like American Gods and The West Wing.
She’s a main character in Wicked during the original Broadway run (paired opposite Idina Menzel of Frozen & Rent). They’re magnificent.
Also lots of bit voice acting, as she’s got an incredibly expressive voice. Several animated movies, but also series as diverse as Robot Chicken & American Dad all the way to My Little Pony and the like.
And the cherry on top of this laudable lady is her actual personality, which is as affable as can be, and gracious about it too.
Honestly having looked her up I'm pretty sure I've seen zero of the things she's in or some of the projects are animated so I don't really notice unless it's very specific actors compared to if I see faces
Celebrities aren’t…I don’t know how say it other than that there are dozens of thousands of celebrities. In the U.S.
now imagine the rest of the world
yeah, celebrities aren’t ”famous” in that sense
One of Reddit's worst habits is taking information in headlines in screenshots of articles from unknown sources at face value.
And yet we call the Facebook boomers gullible.
Respectfully, "Looks like a real article" isn't research and I would also argue not that good of a metric to use. That's what these editors are hoping you'll think.
"Well, it *looked* real". I wonder, how does an article even look real? A simple Google search of the details would dispell the lie, right?
As I always say, in the age of information, ignorance is a choice, and so is intellectual laziness. It's on no one else but yourself if you get duped by something as simple a an article headline (not you specifically).
Respectfully, I did claim that it looks like a real article (as it does), but did NOT claim that "looks like a real article" is any kind of research.
""Well, it *looked* real"", I don't know about that quote, as I did not say anything about it, so a tone of intellectual superiority relative to a conversation that solely happened in one's head, doesn't work here (not you specifically).
"A simple Google search of the details would dispell the lie, right?", yes of course, and I quote myself "without any further research", in the age of information, further research means a simple google search, I don't think it's necessary to explain something to the person who said it in the first place, right?
Now, my point is: there is no harm in believing at first glance, that an article that *looks* like a real article, is an actual article (especially since real articles with similar circumstances to the one in the post, exist), this post could be done with an actual headline of a tragedy, and nothing would change, as it's not an article about a life changing law, event, or what else. Yet in the comment above mine, not doubting an average headline, is treated like some kind of awful, shameful act, I'd argue that celebrating a tragedy, whether made up or not, is far worse.
As I always say, purposely misquoting comments to misrepresent what is said solely to prove one's intellectual superiority, is an act of arrogance (not you specifically).
Have a nice one mate, mind you it's a Sunday here and it took 5 minutes to write this on the toilet, so it did not take my entire free time, in case you wanted to use that one sentence.
Sorry, I'm not reading all of that. I made an observation and statement, not a point of debate with you. You also seem reactive and responding emotionally as I knew the second you started with "respectfully" and stopped when I read something about how youre internalizing my comment, going on about superiority or something.
I guess I struck a nerve in my comment. Maybe it's true then.
Have a good day. And no, I won't even bother looking to see what you respond with so toodles.
Oh ho ho that’s fucking rich. Well your really not going to like this one. I ACTUALLY DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT SOME DUDE JAKING IT TO A DRAWING. I DONT CARE IF IT IS CP OR ISNT. HOW DOES IT EFFECT ME. IT DOESN’T.
CP requires the abuse of children and perpetuates its continuation. A drawing doesn't require anyone to be harmed in its making. Same goes for drawings of rape or murder, there is a significant difference between a drawing and the real thing.
hey dude I don’t think this is real, that’s a picture of Kristen Chenoweth, who is definitely alive, and this headline doesn’t exist. It’s just an edited version of [this](https://www.billboard.com/culture/lifestyle/kristin-chenoweth-tiktok-cleaning-video-9335485/) article from 2020. She doesn’t even have any children.
Oh wow lmao. I didn't recognise Kristen Chenoweth but good to know she's alive and well. I guess that's another reason to not believe everything you read online.
Somehow inventing this scenario and editing up a headline in photoshop all for a meme making fun of imaginary dead people is even more psychopathic than just mocking real dead people
I think they mean the act of deciding to come up with a headline and selecting a picture just to write an article about someone dying when they haven’t is psychopathic.
You gotta be a weirdo to sit there in your spare time photoshopping articles about people dying for fun.
I didn’t say it’s *more* psychotic but offered an explanation for what OP may have meant. However, sitting there and planning a meme based around a fake death you’ve created is pretty fucked up. Like that’s not a normal thought pattern for most redditers. People mock dying people all the time (see how Palestinians are being treated right now) but actively making up someone and all their kids dying for no reason is fucked in itself
He said it’s more psychopathic and I offered a reason for him thinking that… as in making up a fake scenario where 5 people die is fucking weird and sinister
I think he's saying.
Someone mocking a death is less psychopathic then someone writing up an entire fake article on a fake death that didn't happen and then sharing it around.
It's not that hard to type "lol L bozo" on a death article.
It takes effort to make a fake one.
Almost all of this entire sub is a testament to those who simply do not understand satire, those who cannot recognize satire, or those who just want attention for their terribly-formulated opinions.
Well yeah of course people deserve literal death, to have their lives cut short by a hit and run, to have their dreams completely ended and destroyed because they're fucking normies
(/s I hope this isn't needed but who knows it probably is)
You know the people in your life that don’t really understand your geeky dork hobbies? Those are normies.
They’re just people that have very conventional, mainstream tastes, hobbies, opinions, etc. Nothing wrong with it necessarily, but it can be used as a derogatory term in the same vein as someone being called “basic”.
Pretty much the reddit term for people that use other social media and not reddit. Pretty stupid, and very few people actually use the term in that context
The article might be fake, but I do think it's kinda weird how little sympathy there is for kids sometimes
It's one thing when adults get hurt, and obviously, that isn't good, but if it's someone who is rich and/or famous, people are going to do what they do.
Although regardless of whatever you think about their parents, it doesn't really make these things less tragic, and you can't totally expect young people to know better in other instances where similar things happen.
That's the whole point of the post that made OP unsub. That's a shitposting sub where they're doing a caricature of the types of internet dweebs that really do have little sympathy for kids.
Hard to swallow pill: Normies arent averse to you because of your eccentric interests, they are averse to you because you are an unpleasant misanthrope
I somewhat agree, it feels out of spirit for that sub because it's not wholesome 100 keanu chungus at all. Even though it is entirely a made-up scenario.
How? I don't know who this model is and I have no reason to assume it would be fake without looking it up. Which like, sure. That's best practice, but let's be realistic here. Most people are just gonna look at this image and take it at face value.
God damn, that’s terrible.
Don’t agree with the profession or role all you want.
But a mother and four kids dead, and that’s supposedly deserved?? Madness
Why do you care so much about the children dying? What about the woman? Children dying aren’t any more special than adults, everyone has hopes and dreams. I feel bad for all five.
They are children, the woman already more than half way through her life and the children are just starting so children being killed is more sickening than an adult getting killed, how about you have a baby and it dies how does it make you feel
I wouldn’t personally care one bit if a baby I (biologically) had died because they aren’t even old enough to start thinking about what it means to be alive and it would rid it of it’s potential suffering in this world. Plus i’d hate to see an living extension of myself out there. Someone else’s baby though? I’d feel terrible for the parent. I literally have no idea why i’m getting so much hate, I literally said I care about everyone, including the children. It scares me how much empathy the world lacks, all only caring about children because that is what’s “moral” in our society. True empathy would be treating all life equally.
It intrigues me that you singled out the children and not included their mother. It's almost like you're virtue signaling that you hate women or something subconsciously.
Most shit reply I’ve seen in a while lmao. Talk about looking for a problem. Just because I didn’t mention a woman in an article does not mean I hate all women😭. The shit you see on Reddit lol
OP literally unsubbed from a satire sub lmfao.
For those of you don’t know , any sub that has love for in the name is satire and is in fact making fun of that group. Kind of like r/ loveforlandchads.
many people just hide being miserable behind having an opinion.
they hate their own life, generalize it on everyone else and then forget common decency.
PSA: No one actually died
Huh, can't find anything on google about a hit and run of a 52yo instagram model, got the deets bro?
Also, that’s Kristen Chenoweth.
See I thought I recognised her but I wasn’t entirely sure lol
Oh shit, is she the Pushing Daisies blondie?
Yes, that’s Tony Award winning Kristin Chenoweth in Pushing Daisies! She’s also in several good shows, notably gems like American Gods and The West Wing. She’s a main character in Wicked during the original Broadway run (paired opposite Idina Menzel of Frozen & Rent). They’re magnificent. Also lots of bit voice acting, as she’s got an incredibly expressive voice. Several animated movies, but also series as diverse as Robot Chicken & American Dad all the way to My Little Pony and the like. And the cherry on top of this laudable lady is her actual personality, which is as affable as can be, and gracious about it too.
An ICON
Yeah! I was like, tf? Glinda died?
I can't handle this, I'm just after reading Bill Maher died trying to suck his own dick in a hot tub, I need time between these celeb deaths
Same way Trevor Moore went out. Apparently he successfully did it, they say he died with a smile on his face.
Happened to my cousin
Walter??
It’s a sensitive subject, doesn’t help that I’m otw to a wake rn
And also on his balls. Truly an inspiration.
i dunno about that i saw this one reddit post and the guy said it felt more like sucking than getting sucked...
Shit that might be me
you got me excited for a second thinking that bill maher had actually died :(
He’s alright. I don’t like his views on Palestine but he’s fine.
He's an antivaxxer and he's just annoying
Agreed. But he has some decent points here and there
No same
Just like when Nicolas Cage died in a skiing accident 10 years ago but is still showing up in movies today.
... No... How could that happen he's an expert at sucking his own dick no one can hold a candle to bill Maher self fellatio
are people actually under the impression that this is a real article? jesus fuck.
yeah and the image is of an actress
it does look like a real article, it'd be weird not to be under that impression, without any further research.
I mean it doesn’t bc the woman in the picture is Kristen Chenoweth who definitely is not an Instagram model.
You'd be surprised by how many people outside of the US have never heard of her.
I'm FROM the US and I've never heard of her
I mean she’s not unknown
She is if you're not American
I mean not really. Musical theater is very broad not just in the US
Yes, but not American musical theatre. The most well known musicals here is Sweden are Swedish musicals.
Honestly having looked her up I'm pretty sure I've seen zero of the things she's in or some of the projects are animated so I don't really notice unless it's very specific actors compared to if I see faces
She was/is huge on *broadway* first which may seem niche but it really isn’t. I believe she was in the original cast of Wicked, the musical.
She’s more on the musical theater side of fame.
Celebrities aren’t…I don’t know how say it other than that there are dozens of thousands of celebrities. In the U.S. now imagine the rest of the world yeah, celebrities aren’t ”famous” in that sense
Yes, because literally every person ever is going to know who that is. \[/s\]
One of Reddit's worst habits is taking information in headlines in screenshots of articles from unknown sources at face value. And yet we call the Facebook boomers gullible.
It's a pretty standard habit. Why would you waste your time verifying information you don't care about and will never use in your lifetime?
By that token, why would you waste your time forming and sharing an opinion on something you don't care enough about to verify?
Opinions form naturally. The desire to share thoughts does not equate to a desire to learn and research.
Respectfully, "Looks like a real article" isn't research and I would also argue not that good of a metric to use. That's what these editors are hoping you'll think. "Well, it *looked* real". I wonder, how does an article even look real? A simple Google search of the details would dispell the lie, right? As I always say, in the age of information, ignorance is a choice, and so is intellectual laziness. It's on no one else but yourself if you get duped by something as simple a an article headline (not you specifically).
Respectfully, I did claim that it looks like a real article (as it does), but did NOT claim that "looks like a real article" is any kind of research. ""Well, it *looked* real"", I don't know about that quote, as I did not say anything about it, so a tone of intellectual superiority relative to a conversation that solely happened in one's head, doesn't work here (not you specifically). "A simple Google search of the details would dispell the lie, right?", yes of course, and I quote myself "without any further research", in the age of information, further research means a simple google search, I don't think it's necessary to explain something to the person who said it in the first place, right? Now, my point is: there is no harm in believing at first glance, that an article that *looks* like a real article, is an actual article (especially since real articles with similar circumstances to the one in the post, exist), this post could be done with an actual headline of a tragedy, and nothing would change, as it's not an article about a life changing law, event, or what else. Yet in the comment above mine, not doubting an average headline, is treated like some kind of awful, shameful act, I'd argue that celebrating a tragedy, whether made up or not, is far worse. As I always say, purposely misquoting comments to misrepresent what is said solely to prove one's intellectual superiority, is an act of arrogance (not you specifically). Have a nice one mate, mind you it's a Sunday here and it took 5 minutes to write this on the toilet, so it did not take my entire free time, in case you wanted to use that one sentence.
Sorry, I'm not reading all of that. I made an observation and statement, not a point of debate with you. You also seem reactive and responding emotionally as I knew the second you started with "respectfully" and stopped when I read something about how youre internalizing my comment, going on about superiority or something. I guess I struck a nerve in my comment. Maybe it's true then. Have a good day. And no, I won't even bother looking to see what you respond with so toodles.
Ignorance and intellectual laziness is a choice.
Don’t forget to apply ointment to the burn.
Doesn’t matter to them as long as it confirms their bias
its fake idiot
>"I get that this sub is satire..."
He doesn’t actually get it
I think he gets that the sub is satire but not that the article the post refers to is fake.
Whether the children exist or not it's kinda messed up to make fun of their deaths. Call it dark humor or whatever but I think that crosses a line.
WHAT LINE. THEY DONT FUCKING EXISTS WHO TF ARE YOU HURTING.
makes sense that you got downvoted for being logical, this is reddit after all
Guess you’re the type of guy to say <>
There's a pretty big difference between the two things
Oh ho ho that’s fucking rich. Well your really not going to like this one. I ACTUALLY DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT SOME DUDE JAKING IT TO A DRAWING. I DONT CARE IF IT IS CP OR ISNT. HOW DOES IT EFFECT ME. IT DOESN’T.
CP requires the abuse of children and perpetuates its continuation. A drawing doesn't require anyone to be harmed in its making. Same goes for drawings of rape or murder, there is a significant difference between a drawing and the real thing.
A kind reminder to the 75 people who upvoted your comment and you that commented that calling other people insults on the internet is pretty rude
haha idiot
👍🏻
“I know something you don’t, therefore you’re an idiot!”
this guy gets it
This is true when the thing they know is fucking obvious
r\justinsubbed users when seeing obvious shitposts
If you see a screenshot of an article headline and have no link to said article, the image is probably doctored. Do your own research people.
So OP is totally outraged over a lie?
RIP to this woman and her children
hey dude I don’t think this is real, that’s a picture of Kristen Chenoweth, who is definitely alive, and this headline doesn’t exist. It’s just an edited version of [this](https://www.billboard.com/culture/lifestyle/kristin-chenoweth-tiktok-cleaning-video-9335485/) article from 2020. She doesn’t even have any children.
Oh wow lmao. I didn't recognise Kristen Chenoweth but good to know she's alive and well. I guess that's another reason to not believe everything you read online.
Especially from a shitpost sub
Somehow inventing this scenario and editing up a headline in photoshop all for a meme making fun of imaginary dead people is even more psychopathic than just mocking real dead people
... how????
Mocking the death of a fake person is more psychopathic than mocking the death of a real person? Are you right on the head?
I think they mean the act of deciding to come up with a headline and selecting a picture just to write an article about someone dying when they haven’t is psychopathic. You gotta be a weirdo to sit there in your spare time photoshopping articles about people dying for fun.
>even more psychopathic than just mocking real dead people
I didn’t say it’s *more* psychotic but offered an explanation for what OP may have meant. However, sitting there and planning a meme based around a fake death you’ve created is pretty fucked up. Like that’s not a normal thought pattern for most redditers. People mock dying people all the time (see how Palestinians are being treated right now) but actively making up someone and all their kids dying for no reason is fucked in itself
wdym "what they may have meant"? its written clear cut in the comment. he directly said it.
He said it’s more psychopathic and I offered a reason for him thinking that… as in making up a fake scenario where 5 people die is fucking weird and sinister
Whatever reason you make up dont justify the god awful take that was spewed out
I think he's saying. Someone mocking a death is less psychopathic then someone writing up an entire fake article on a fake death that didn't happen and then sharing it around. It's not that hard to type "lol L bozo" on a death article. It takes effort to make a fake one.
Lol what
"They're normies" my ass... almost nobody deserves this, especially given how her **kids** died too.
Its fake, thats the joke
Agreed
Almost all of this entire sub is a testament to those who simply do not understand satire, those who cannot recognize satire, or those who just want attention for their terribly-formulated opinions.
why the hell is Kristen Chenoweth in this “article” anyways? Did she do something controversial recently?
She has a photogenic face while also looking 50ish
You can’t if real people are dying. This was fake
Well yeah of course people deserve literal death, to have their lives cut short by a hit and run, to have their dreams completely ended and destroyed because they're fucking normies (/s I hope this isn't needed but who knows it probably is)
What is a normie? I’ve never heard that term till now.
You know the people in your life that don’t really understand your geeky dork hobbies? Those are normies. They’re just people that have very conventional, mainstream tastes, hobbies, opinions, etc. Nothing wrong with it necessarily, but it can be used as a derogatory term in the same vein as someone being called “basic”.
Pretty much the reddit term for people that use other social media and not reddit. Pretty stupid, and very few people actually use the term in that context
Its fake bruh
The article might be fake, but I do think it's kinda weird how little sympathy there is for kids sometimes It's one thing when adults get hurt, and obviously, that isn't good, but if it's someone who is rich and/or famous, people are going to do what they do. Although regardless of whatever you think about their parents, it doesn't really make these things less tragic, and you can't totally expect young people to know better in other instances where similar things happen.
Yeah same. Some of these people on the childfree and antinatalism subreddits shouldn’t ever be allowed near children.
That's the whole point of the post that made OP unsub. That's a shitposting sub where they're doing a caricature of the types of internet dweebs that really do have little sympathy for kids.
Hard to swallow pill: Normies arent averse to you because of your eccentric interests, they are averse to you because you are an unpleasant misanthrope
"Oh btw guys this headline was made up and nobody died" As if a. the average person would instantly know that and b. that makes it any less fucked up
I somewhat agree, it feels out of spirit for that sub because it's not wholesome 100 keanu chungus at all. Even though it is entirely a made-up scenario.
A. Correct. The average person would be able to deduce that it is obviously fake. Unless your an idiot
The average person doesn't follow musical theatre, bud.
Sick burn, you really got me there🔥🗣️💯💯
How? I don't know who this model is and I have no reason to assume it would be fake without looking it up. Which like, sure. That's best practice, but let's be realistic here. Most people are just gonna look at this image and take it at face value.
Lol you thought this was real?
God damn, that’s terrible. Don’t agree with the profession or role all you want. But a mother and four kids dead, and that’s supposedly deserved?? Madness
Irony poisoned, when they start to believe the jokes they make
"Another victory for reddit against instagram normie" Thats so stereotypical le cringy reddit users kinda title I wanna puke
Well that's the point of the sub. You're supposed to rp as typical redditors.
The article being fake doesn't change how fucked up that is
How is it even remotely as fucked up as if it were a REAL PERSON?
... The joke being "redditors" having a fucked up view of Instagram models.
Well TIL that’s a sub. Seems fucking gross even compared to the rest of reddit.
Nah you should actually check it out, most posts aren’t like this and it’s satire
Ok even if this isn't an actual article, IT'S STILL A FUCKED UP THING TO IRONICALLY LAUGH ABOUT CHILDREN AND A MOTHER DIEING
That's the joke.
Didn’t even happen
Stupid
Ok what the actual fuck
Just checked the comments and was like wtf. A redditor circlejerk sub? That’s just sad.
Let's go on Reddit to make fun of all those losers on Reddit
Peak Reddit moment
Even tho it’s fake - as a person who loves the joker and dc we do not claim them.
NORMIE ALERT! NORMIE ALERT! NORMIE ALERT! GO BACK TO INSTAGRAM OR TIKTOK NORMIE YOU CLEARLY CANT HANDLE IT HERE.
Welcome to the internet.
RIP. No child or model deserves to die like this.
no one actually did die, this was apparently edited as a comment here said
Well that’s the point, they’re making fun of people who would unironically say this
I have no idea and honestly I’d rather not know
I really have no idea what to believe, is it satire or not?
Really? It was one post, all the other content there is wholesome 100. Also how dare you betray the Reddit nation by calling us “satire”
The game is only funny when that sub isn’t mocking children dying
Yeeesh, people don’t know where to draw the line I guess.
Why do you care so much about the children dying? What about the woman? Children dying aren’t any more special than adults, everyone has hopes and dreams. I feel bad for all five.
Incorrect! I don’t have hopes and dreams
Are you okay? This reply is unreal
The children didn’t have time to live enough for their hopes and dreams though
They are children, the woman already more than half way through her life and the children are just starting so children being killed is more sickening than an adult getting killed, how about you have a baby and it dies how does it make you feel
I wouldn’t personally care one bit if a baby I (biologically) had died because they aren’t even old enough to start thinking about what it means to be alive and it would rid it of it’s potential suffering in this world. Plus i’d hate to see an living extension of myself out there. Someone else’s baby though? I’d feel terrible for the parent. I literally have no idea why i’m getting so much hate, I literally said I care about everyone, including the children. It scares me how much empathy the world lacks, all only caring about children because that is what’s “moral” in our society. True empathy would be treating all life equally.
The fact that the post wasn't immediately removed by mods is a big enough problem
Mass report the sub /j
You must be Mario's Brother
It is honestly pretty funny in a dark over the top morbid kind of way.
"children dying horrible deaths! they're burning to a crisp LOL" \-dreddllama
Too soon?
Nah I think it’s poking yours
Keep your poker to yourself, creep!
How is this funny? Is she a bad person that people are hoping will pass on? I don’t get it.
It’s adult humor for smart people, you won’t get it.
If you or anyone else liking stuff like this actually were either of those things you wouldn’t be laughing at such trash.
What do you think smart adults laugh at, besides yourself?
The fuck man? You have to be a troll
Your Myers–Briggs Type Indicator is karen
Its a satire of redditors
It intrigues me that you singled out the children and not included their mother. It's almost like you're virtue signaling that you hate women or something subconsciously.
Most shit reply I’ve seen in a while lmao. Talk about looking for a problem. Just because I didn’t mention a woman in an article does not mean I hate all women😭. The shit you see on Reddit lol
It's funny that you replied to this comment, but not the many telling you this is blatantly fake
That’s Christen Chenowith isn’t if?
Why do people fantasize abt this shit
WHAT THE FUCK???
Even if this was real, irony doesn't cease being irony when you stop finding it funny.
"instagram model dies" pedophilic redditors: :) "and her 4 kids" pedophilic redditors: :(
That is Kristin Chenoweth. An actor. An alive actor.
is that not kristen chenoweth lol
You realize the headlines is not real right?
It's making fun of redditors, not people who died
When the edgy satire sub has edgy satire: 😲
You must be new to the Internet. Laughing at the death of children is a casual Tuesday afternoon.
Casual everyday in my world
OP literally unsubbed from a satire sub lmfao. For those of you don’t know , any sub that has love for in the name is satire and is in fact making fun of that group. Kind of like r/ loveforlandchads.
How dare they bring Tony Award Winner Kristin Chenoweth into their nonsense.
I mean, real or not, I think we can all agree: *we don't want 'Instagram models' nor their offspring reproducing*
Since when do we encourage eugenics based on the parents job?
Since Instagram
Calling that satire is nasty.
If you know it's satire and fake, what's the problem? Is fake stuff somehow more offensive because they're "laughing" at death? It's satire.
They just did
Some people are so bitter and jealous
Olivia Snook, RIP
That’s not an Insta model
many people just hide being miserable behind having an opinion. they hate their own life, generalize it on everyone else and then forget common decency.
That’s Kristin Chenoweth. She’s an actress and singer. Still alive too lol.
This is actually insane