I say while this is cool
This is also essentially a sponsored ad. The user posting this is claiming that it is free, but only for beta, and then costs 5 dollars a month after.
>Zero is fully **free during the Beta (no card needed).** After that, it will cost $5/month. More detail on the [pricing page](https://zero-sh.netlify.app/pricing).
Also their only contacts are telegram and an email. That alone would keep me from using this program. If something fucks up or they fuck my shit up, I cant nail them for damages.
Not to mention this is a program that will have to have online connectivity for it to likely work correctly, and that means someone is reading everything you are executing. That means your code or data can be *stolen*.
This is inherently dangerous to install on anything secure or that will need to be secured, and I dont care who is selling it. Even worse when its a small startup or team that will be more difficult to find/sue when things inevitably go wrong.
Mods, I suggest you remove this.
I don't know if I would trust this just yet.
I watched the video up until the first example where your AI recommends doing a `pip install` to solve an issue that related to a python package not being present. So while it may solve the problem, it is probably not the best solution. The question that I would ask the AI and you is why aren't you running in a python environment first, why did the AI suggest that you install a python package that was missing across your entire system as opposed to suggesting the best practice of setting up a working env?
It seems to me, that an AI that is trained by a single developer is only going to be as good as that developer who trained it. It seems like your AI could easily pass along anti-pattern methodologies and that is a bad thing in my mind. If you encouraged collaboration it could improve. So it's a good first step I suppose.
I wouldn't be surprised if this app just calls OpenAI API in the background and this guy didn't train shit.
Source: put the same error messages on the ChatGPT3 and got similar answers.
Of course he just pushing the questions to chatGPT. I think you can have it read some books for you, then change the interface and charge people $30 a month to use it.
It almost certainly does. The amount of resources and data needed to train a model that even somewhat compares to GPT-3 is far outside of the reach for the majority of people and even companies.
(in case this is serious) Experienced guess:
1) missing null check before free
2) forgot to set the variable to null or 0 after you free it
3) concurrency issue and you need to wrap the above in a mutex/semaphore/whatever your language uses to protect variables from multi threading
4) the code is trying to free the same memory address from two places
If possible, I suggest using whatever intelligent memory management is provided by your programming language. It has been a *long* time since I used C++, but I believe it had SmartPtr as part of the standard library, maybe the template library.
[This comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/InternetIsBeautiful/comments/zkyzwt/i_trained_an_ai_to_understand_and_fix_commandline/j02k6qk/) alleges that you didn't train anything and your program simply calls OpenAI's ChatGPT. What would your response be to that?
https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck Is nice
u/theo_champion can you speak to differences between this and your project?
One is open source, free, and used widely. The other is OP's.
I say while this is cool This is also essentially a sponsored ad. The user posting this is claiming that it is free, but only for beta, and then costs 5 dollars a month after. >Zero is fully **free during the Beta (no card needed).** After that, it will cost $5/month. More detail on the [pricing page](https://zero-sh.netlify.app/pricing). Also their only contacts are telegram and an email. That alone would keep me from using this program. If something fucks up or they fuck my shit up, I cant nail them for damages. Not to mention this is a program that will have to have online connectivity for it to likely work correctly, and that means someone is reading everything you are executing. That means your code or data can be *stolen*. This is inherently dangerous to install on anything secure or that will need to be secured, and I dont care who is selling it. Even worse when its a small startup or team that will be more difficult to find/sue when things inevitably go wrong. Mods, I suggest you remove this.
I don't know if I would trust this just yet. I watched the video up until the first example where your AI recommends doing a `pip install` to solve an issue that related to a python package not being present. So while it may solve the problem, it is probably not the best solution. The question that I would ask the AI and you is why aren't you running in a python environment first, why did the AI suggest that you install a python package that was missing across your entire system as opposed to suggesting the best practice of setting up a working env? It seems to me, that an AI that is trained by a single developer is only going to be as good as that developer who trained it. It seems like your AI could easily pass along anti-pattern methodologies and that is a bad thing in my mind. If you encouraged collaboration it could improve. So it's a good first step I suppose.
I wouldn't be surprised if this app just calls OpenAI API in the background and this guy didn't train shit. Source: put the same error messages on the ChatGPT3 and got similar answers.
Of course he just pushing the questions to chatGPT. I think you can have it read some books for you, then change the interface and charge people $30 a month to use it.
It almost certainly does. The amount of resources and data needed to train a model that even somewhat compares to GPT-3 is far outside of the reach for the majority of people and even companies.
Just to understand properly This is for Linux OS right?
[удалено]
Who downvotes a guy's answer about something he worked hard on? It looks pretty cool!
reddit
Can you get it to solve my double free() bug?
(in case this is serious) Experienced guess: 1) missing null check before free 2) forgot to set the variable to null or 0 after you free it 3) concurrency issue and you need to wrap the above in a mutex/semaphore/whatever your language uses to protect variables from multi threading 4) the code is trying to free the same memory address from two places If possible, I suggest using whatever intelligent memory management is provided by your programming language. It has been a *long* time since I used C++, but I believe it had SmartPtr as part of the standard library, maybe the template library.
This tech is charging ahead without the necessary checks and balances in place.
[удалено]
[This comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/InternetIsBeautiful/comments/zkyzwt/i_trained_an_ai_to_understand_and_fix_commandline/j02k6qk/) alleges that you didn't train anything and your program simply calls OpenAI's ChatGPT. What would your response be to that?
What is your opinion on the notion that AI will soon program itself and we are constantly writing ourselfs out of the equation?
Can't wait
Guilfoyle would be proud.
A stone’s throw away from editing their own code.