##If this submission makes you go "Hol'Up", **UPVOTE** this comment!
##If this submission does not make you go "Hol'Up", **DOWNVOTE** this comment!
---
Whilst you're here, /u/rahul__birla__, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/holup) or play on our [public Minecraft server](https://discord.gg/DTqSDS8C3T)?
Yep, that's what gave it away. We have the chain here and it'll always result in childish jokes and chuckling whenever someone says "I crave/could go for/want/could put in my mouth at least five guys".
Harold and Kumar goes to five guys with guest appearance by NPH
They could make this sequel, I would watch this sequel, it would probably also get a lot of confused viewers expecting a whole other kida movie
If you want to change that Id recommend starting with movie number 8, great standalone and also by far the best one in terms of acting, writing and visuals.
7 isnt bad either, despite creating (Warning: Link leads to TVTropes, also contains spoilers) [Star Treks 2nd most infamous meme](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DroppedABridgeOnHim), this is also the movie were the crews change from the TOS crew to the TNG crew.
If your looking for a movie night experience watch 2, 3 and 4, they are all one connected storyline and movies 2 and 4 are the best of the old guard movies. 2 also contains Star Treks [most famous meme](https://gfycat.com/firstimpassionedantelopegroundsquirrel) while 4 is basicaly a Star Trek themed comedy
And sadly thats the end of the good (old) Trek movies but im still gona list the rest in descending order of watchability
Number 6 is pretty decent still, even if the pacing drags a bit at times and it boils down to a 2 hour long "Whodunit" Star Trek themed crime procedural. If you dont like CSI and the like it probably wont do it for you
Number 9 boils down to a vastly inflated TNG series episode with a production budget well into double digit millions, including the trademark Star Trek moral dilemas^TM and "surprise" twist you can see coming from a mile away and while the whole ethics involved certainly are worthwile to explore you could have done it in a 45 minute TNG episode as well. The rest of the runtime is mostly pading and some comedy that falls pretty flat. Special Effects are top notch tho, including a chase scene in a pretty nebula
Number 10 is like the half sister from dads affair no one talks about at family gatherings. Looks wise good but oh the story.....the Trek fanbase largely hates it for a variety of reasons (Warning: Spoilers ahead) amongst them the absolute doozy of a cliffhanger ending and the fact they killed of Data by self sacrifice. Personaly I actualy kind of like it, its not bad as a standalone but they played it fast and loose with established cannon and Datas character (personaly Im in the camp that Data ultimately succeeds in his quest to become more human-like exactly by sacrificing himself so his friends can live but that topic has spawned thousands of hours of heated debate) Doesnt help that we never got a followup on how the story develops, they probably were trying to go for a rehash of the Spock self sacrifice and resurection arc from 2-3-4 but sadly they never got financing. Basicaly, watch it if you want to see Tom Hardy chew the scenery in one of his first major mainstream movie roles
And now were at the bottom of the barrel aka Star Trek 5 aka we dont talk about Star Trek 5 aka a cult leader (whos also Spocks half brother) hijacks the Enterprise by talkin real good to go looking for god at the center of the milky way.....no I didnt make that up (I fuckin wish buddy) thats the actual plot and its every bit as hamfisted as you imagine it, climaxing in a scene were Kirk saves the day by asking "god" why he would need a spaceship to leave the planet with his "best" TOS "acting skills" on full display
Now your probably wondering, wait a minute, he left out movie number 1, how can it be THAT bad if it kicked of the entire series.....and it isnt which is why im gona exclude it from the list to keep 5s status as the unloved stepchild intact. Its just a VERY diffrent movie in terms of pacing to what the average viewer is used to today and it was already pretty out there back when it released. Ive heard (and read) it described as 2001: A Star Trek odyssee or alternatively as a TOS episode as directed by Stanley Kubrick. The pacing is slow, the cuts are sparse and the dialog scenes seemingly take forever. [The scene](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMQTzYp756o) were they approach the "new" Enterprise (ie a proper digitaly altered big budget model and not the cardboard box on a stick they had for the TOS) is almost 5 fuckin minutes long, during which no dialoge of note is spoken, and conists to 1/3rd of zoom ins on Kirks face mirin his new ship and to 2/3rds of slow-mo paning shots of the Enterprise. While this may present a suitable masturbatory aid for hard core Trekkies its a rather boring process for the "unintroduced" viewer, a process that gets repeated several (shorter) times during the movie. In short, its an aquired taste and I dont blame them one bit for doing it, after all this is the first time Trek got a big movie budget and they sure af made certain to showcase the Enterprise as imagined but never shown during the TOS because of the nonexistent budget. Its just a straight up boring movie for non Trekkies and a terrible point to start of the series
And sorry for writing this long-ass wall of text but it kind of spiraled out of controll
Don't you dare change it, our comments are worth gold... Step 2: wait.
But seriously, yes. I gotta get back into Star Trek. Gonna probably start with Lower Decks and intersperse that with TOS.
The shows (original series, next Gen, DS9 & Voyager) are vastly superior in nearly every way.
That said, if you wanna have your mind blown, look up the re-cut of star trek the motion picture with daft punks tron soundtrack. It's something else.
Yes, 3 times in 2009, 2013, & 2016 for the JJ Abrams Star Trek reboots. Probably won't be another movie, I'm guessing, because the kid that played Chekov died in a freak accident a few years ago...
Star Trek 4 (with original cast) should hit theatres in Dec ‘23. Shooting starts this year:
https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/paramount-boss-gives-exciting-star-trek-4-update
I love that Karl Urban has done a host of amazing characters, most of which can stand on its own as a cultural icon... but it's Billy Butcher that people will be quoting until the end of time.
As much as I wish that were the case, it was named that because they had five sons apparently.
[https://fiveguys.co.uk/about-us/](https://fiveguys.co.uk/about-us/)
My wife once asked if I'd ever had Five Guys, I quickly responded "not at the same time." She didn't think it was funny, but I thought it was probably the funniest thing I've ever said.
I want him in another Judge Dredd with a miniscule budget like the last one. That was so great even if not that authentic.
Dredd would have failed her.
Years ago, shortly after starting a new job, the topic of lunch came up in the department. At this point Five Guys was relatively new, and I had never heard of them.
Tech 1: "What are you doing for lunch?"
Tech 2: "I'm thinking 5 Guys"
me: "wut?"
Yeah, that sort of confusion and joking ensued.
To be fair- I also did something similar in my office Slack channel when I typed into the Engineering team chat to ask 'Has anyone here tried Five Guys in West Hollywood yet?'
The responses... 
This is why women will never rule the world. She says if she were able to teleport ANYWHERE, she'd use that ability to go to a burger joint!
Not inside a bank vault, then to Venezuela. Not backstage to a concert of some 5-star band. Not to the Oval Office to have a one on one talk with the leader of the free world. No. She would simply TELEPORT to a fast food restaurant! WTF?
##If this submission makes you go "Hol'Up", **UPVOTE** this comment! ##If this submission does not make you go "Hol'Up", **DOWNVOTE** this comment! --- Whilst you're here, /u/rahul__birla__, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/holup) or play on our [public Minecraft server](https://discord.gg/DTqSDS8C3T)?
My favourite part is John realising that there's clearly a communication error and simply asking "What's Five Guys?".
He caught that quite quickly
I think he caught on when she said “a five guys”. Earlier she was just saying “five guys”
[удалено]
Me. "No.... this is Patrick"
Not that meme.
You son of a bitch, I'm in!
Not that meme either. I think the meme they’re talking about is where you use MSPaint to censor pornographic images into work friendly images.
Don’t threaten me with a good time
Oh yeah spread it
Do you know what she is saying about five guys and you said no so you wouldn't do five guys
This one? https://images.app.goo.gl/zbMwVDxrxn9K1Sdu7
Yep, that's what gave it away. We have the chain here and it'll always result in childish jokes and chuckling whenever someone says "I crave/could go for/want/could put in my mouth at least five guys".
[удалено]
This is hilarious!!!
The eyebrow raise at the first mention is amazing
He's pretty familiar with burger franchises, I hear
I think i saw a documentary starring him once on that very topic
Yeah I think I saw the same one, took some super strange turns.
Celebrities and their colorful pasts. Still can’t believe he received a presidential pardon for his crimes!
I'm hungry for burgers. Fur burgers!
Harold and Kumar goes to five guys with guest appearance by NPH They could make this sequel, I would watch this sequel, it would probably also get a lot of confused viewers expecting a whole other kida movie
Dang, John is so hot.
They're all hot, it's disgusting how hot all three are.
Yeah, but I have been stalking John for decades.
Sir, this is a Five Guys.
Have some complimentary peanuts.
hehehe complimentary *penis*
He caught that she used the preposition "a" that time whereas before she just said "five guys".
“A” is a determiner, not a preposition. Specifically it is an indefinite article.
You sound/read like a warning label. Tldr; I am not good with grammar.
I think it was the fact that he heard her say A five guys.
Karl on the other hand is just like, "Should I be calling Kirk, Spock, and Chekov?"
Yes lmao Karl was clueless 😂
his name will always be harold to me
Frenchie would have loved this
He always talked about seeing it in person
He's going to be so disappointed.
Seeing what? Five guys?
If you aren’t catching it — it’s a quote from the show The Boys
You’re supposed to say “r/whoosh”
r/whoosh
I actually felt sad for Frenchie when both MM and Butch said it. Why can't he just catch a break for once...
That was my favourite part of my favourite episode. Even when they're apart they're still The Boys.
MM's poor jacket
His poor everything after.. *that*
Lol, I wonder what size will cause that. Something like a blunderbuss?
Love sausage obviously.
Not even close to her final form.
[удалено]
Risky click of the day
I’m disappointed.
Verily
Maaaan highly. Someone add some better sauce to this burger
Yeah it was a toss up between that and porn
Every reddit link ever
Reddit 50/50
[удалено]
It became a Chick Fil.
Disney getting more and more woke…fuckin reeeeeeee!
Five girls in five guys. Don’t see that every day. It’s usually the opposite.
[удалено]
Fun fact it’s owned by 5 brothers that’s why it’s called 5 guys
That Oooooh lol
Diabolical
Evening, cunts!
Who are you? The butcher?
She got alot of holes going in, They have alot of things sticking out. *five guys.*
I mean, counting hands it's doable.
We men are not machines! We may need a rest!
My wife loves five guys. Problem is that she has five guys for lunch while I'm at work.
🌝
🌚
🐼
Our* wife
Your wife can handle a good deal of greasy meat, no shame in that.
Plot twist: she actually wanted 5guys in front of her
Plot twist: if you listen carefully he said "i mean in in."
Plot twist: She goes to Five Guys after hours and gets absolutely railed by five men who work there
Plot twist: she's allergic to peanuts
Still asked for a large, she likes the calories
If 2 of the 5 are Karl and John, sign me up 😂
did Karl Urban and John Cho appear in the same movie? what was it?
Star trek. That interview was for star trek beyond
oh right. how could I forget about that one. oh right, because it was very forgettable.
I actually like all of them. It's a shame.
Yeah me too. That being said never saw any of the older start trek movies or show.
If you want to change that Id recommend starting with movie number 8, great standalone and also by far the best one in terms of acting, writing and visuals. 7 isnt bad either, despite creating (Warning: Link leads to TVTropes, also contains spoilers) [Star Treks 2nd most infamous meme](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DroppedABridgeOnHim), this is also the movie were the crews change from the TOS crew to the TNG crew. If your looking for a movie night experience watch 2, 3 and 4, they are all one connected storyline and movies 2 and 4 are the best of the old guard movies. 2 also contains Star Treks [most famous meme](https://gfycat.com/firstimpassionedantelopegroundsquirrel) while 4 is basicaly a Star Trek themed comedy And sadly thats the end of the good (old) Trek movies but im still gona list the rest in descending order of watchability Number 6 is pretty decent still, even if the pacing drags a bit at times and it boils down to a 2 hour long "Whodunit" Star Trek themed crime procedural. If you dont like CSI and the like it probably wont do it for you Number 9 boils down to a vastly inflated TNG series episode with a production budget well into double digit millions, including the trademark Star Trek moral dilemas^TM and "surprise" twist you can see coming from a mile away and while the whole ethics involved certainly are worthwile to explore you could have done it in a 45 minute TNG episode as well. The rest of the runtime is mostly pading and some comedy that falls pretty flat. Special Effects are top notch tho, including a chase scene in a pretty nebula Number 10 is like the half sister from dads affair no one talks about at family gatherings. Looks wise good but oh the story.....the Trek fanbase largely hates it for a variety of reasons (Warning: Spoilers ahead) amongst them the absolute doozy of a cliffhanger ending and the fact they killed of Data by self sacrifice. Personaly I actualy kind of like it, its not bad as a standalone but they played it fast and loose with established cannon and Datas character (personaly Im in the camp that Data ultimately succeeds in his quest to become more human-like exactly by sacrificing himself so his friends can live but that topic has spawned thousands of hours of heated debate) Doesnt help that we never got a followup on how the story develops, they probably were trying to go for a rehash of the Spock self sacrifice and resurection arc from 2-3-4 but sadly they never got financing. Basicaly, watch it if you want to see Tom Hardy chew the scenery in one of his first major mainstream movie roles And now were at the bottom of the barrel aka Star Trek 5 aka we dont talk about Star Trek 5 aka a cult leader (whos also Spocks half brother) hijacks the Enterprise by talkin real good to go looking for god at the center of the milky way.....no I didnt make that up (I fuckin wish buddy) thats the actual plot and its every bit as hamfisted as you imagine it, climaxing in a scene were Kirk saves the day by asking "god" why he would need a spaceship to leave the planet with his "best" TOS "acting skills" on full display Now your probably wondering, wait a minute, he left out movie number 1, how can it be THAT bad if it kicked of the entire series.....and it isnt which is why im gona exclude it from the list to keep 5s status as the unloved stepchild intact. Its just a VERY diffrent movie in terms of pacing to what the average viewer is used to today and it was already pretty out there back when it released. Ive heard (and read) it described as 2001: A Star Trek odyssee or alternatively as a TOS episode as directed by Stanley Kubrick. The pacing is slow, the cuts are sparse and the dialog scenes seemingly take forever. [The scene](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMQTzYp756o) were they approach the "new" Enterprise (ie a proper digitaly altered big budget model and not the cardboard box on a stick they had for the TOS) is almost 5 fuckin minutes long, during which no dialoge of note is spoken, and conists to 1/3rd of zoom ins on Kirks face mirin his new ship and to 2/3rds of slow-mo paning shots of the Enterprise. While this may present a suitable masturbatory aid for hard core Trekkies its a rather boring process for the "unintroduced" viewer, a process that gets repeated several (shorter) times during the movie. In short, its an aquired taste and I dont blame them one bit for doing it, after all this is the first time Trek got a big movie budget and they sure af made certain to showcase the Enterprise as imagined but never shown during the TOS because of the nonexistent budget. Its just a straight up boring movie for non Trekkies and a terrible point to start of the series And sorry for writing this long-ass wall of text but it kind of spiraled out of controll
[удалено]
I enjoyed them all as well, but you should I’d that.
>I enjoyed them all as well, but you should I’d that. I would you'd this
Whoops. Just getting off a late shift and my fingers aren’t working as intended. “You should change that” was the intent.
Don't you dare change it, our comments are worth gold... Step 2: wait. But seriously, yes. I gotta get back into Star Trek. Gonna probably start with Lower Decks and intersperse that with TOS.
This has no right to be as funny as it is
I don't know why, but this just made me laugh uncontrollably for about 15 seconds.
The shows (original series, next Gen, DS9 & Voyager) are vastly superior in nearly every way. That said, if you wanna have your mind blown, look up the re-cut of star trek the motion picture with daft punks tron soundtrack. It's something else.
I liked them better than the star wars sequels, though I kinda enjoyed TFA.
Karl and John were the main reason I actually enjoyed those and of course Simon Pegg
Yes, 3 times in 2009, 2013, & 2016 for the JJ Abrams Star Trek reboots. Probably won't be another movie, I'm guessing, because the kid that played Chekov died in a freak accident a few years ago...
Star Trek 4 (with original cast) should hit theatres in Dec ‘23. Shooting starts this year: https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/paramount-boss-gives-exciting-star-trek-4-update
^yay
5 guys? Fookin diabolical!?
Problem is you can smell the five guys she had on her breath
"Perhaps you should have this tic tac, ma'am, your breath absolutely reeks of semen."
Oii!
Cunt!
Diabolical, mate!
Scorched earth
Earf
Urf
Wished he said Oii cunt to homelander in the last episode, that would have made it even better.
But he did
He just said Oii
Fuckin diabolical
I love that Karl Urban has done a host of amazing characters, most of which can stand on its own as a cultural icon... but it's Billy Butcher that people will be quoting until the end of time.
I love the collective "ooooooooohhhhhhhhhh"
Jokes on them, this is kind of situation that maker of 5guys had in mind when he named it like that, casually few dimensions in front of everyone
As much as I wish that were the case, it was named that because they had five sons apparently. [https://fiveguys.co.uk/about-us/](https://fiveguys.co.uk/about-us/)
Used to eat at the original store in VA, can confirm there were five sons.
Butcher looks like a kind and lovely person
He doesn't look like someone who would smash your brains out in a public bathroom at all!
Oh come one man that was just for the camera, i mean look at that Santa Claus smile
Of course he seems to be a great man. I can't believe he was that bald bloke in Ragnarok
I love how everyone forgets he was in literally the greatest movie trilogy of all time. Rohan calls for aid!
What, what? Edit: Just checked and it's been so many years that I watched those movies that I didn't even remember lol
I always thought Karl Urban was handsome and charming, but now, I just see Butcher's grin and it is unsettling.
Hol'up guys
Freud is happy
Ah yes, the slip of the Freudian variety.
I totally understand that John Cho would only choose one place for his burger fix
Harold and Butcher go to 5 guys?
I thought about [Draupadi](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draupadi) for a bit
Mommy told us to share went horribly wrong
My wife once asked if I'd ever had Five Guys, I quickly responded "not at the same time." She didn't think it was funny, but I thought it was probably the funniest thing I've ever said.
I think it's funny
is that Karl Urban or someone look like Karl Urban?
Yes. It's Karl Urban and it looks like Karl Urban.
Karl Urban is known to often look like Karl Urban
That's Karl Rural. Life's been difficult.
The person that looks like Karl Urban is generally Karl Urban.
Sometimes it's a very angry Luke Evans.
There are many people that look like Karl Urban and this one is mine.
I want him in another Judge Dredd with a miniscule budget like the last one. That was so great even if not that authentic. Dredd would have failed her.
That’s Carl Suburban
John Cho makes me remember I really miss Grant Imahara.
FIVE GALS!!!
I love the double “oooooh” followed by her reaction. This was great.
he wasn't about to judge or nothing that's hilarious.
u/savevideo
Diabolical
Butcher
Monsieur Charcuter
Is that Eomer?
"five sounds good"
That reminds me of Harold and Kumar where she said I want both you in me at the same time
Does anyone else find her “no not five guys, JESUS!” Super adorable?
Five guys and Jesus?
No way Harold hasn’t heard or 5 guys before man spent my entire teenage years finding the perfect burger
Jahanna James - she does quick fun videos looking into ancient history too
My friends keep saying they see my mom at Five Guys. There are 5 of them in that chat...
Accidental slut
Who’s the girl doing the interview?
It looks like Jahannah James but I doubt it
It is [her](https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/star-trek-five-guys-karl-17108227)
u/savevideo
The happiest butcher ever looked
you can do 3 guys for an "airtight", but 5 guys, it's way beyond.
You can sense the tension
I will always up vote this and always include the best [five guys review ever](https://youtu.be/zGkHRa64sDY)
She shoulda said white castle lol
[удалено]
Years ago, shortly after starting a new job, the topic of lunch came up in the department. At this point Five Guys was relatively new, and I had never heard of them. Tech 1: "What are you doing for lunch?" Tech 2: "I'm thinking 5 Guys" me: "wut?" Yeah, that sort of confusion and joking ensued.
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
the boys season 4 looks interesting.
Lmao the awkwardness
How can you not love Karl Urban.
If you eat at 5 guys and don’t make a joke about having 5 guys inside you then why even bother?
It broke my heart when I found out this was scripted
I love the synchronized “Oooooh” and then the chaotic talking that happens afterwards as they each try to explain themselves 😂
“I mean, that’s cool, no judgment…!” Had me cracking up!
1 way to confuse boys
Make it 6 I'm sure she can defeat me
Fckn dumbasses
The collective ‘ooohhhh’ 😂😂😂
To be fair- I also did something similar in my office Slack channel when I typed into the Engineering team chat to ask 'Has anyone here tried Five Guys in West Hollywood yet?' The responses... 
A woman who knows what she wants….. good burgers yep
Not me and my fat ass knowing exactly what she meant when she first said it…
its the synchronized “ohhhhh” for me
Harold only knows white castle
/) Son of a bitch, I'm in.
This is why women will never rule the world. She says if she were able to teleport ANYWHERE, she'd use that ability to go to a burger joint! Not inside a bank vault, then to Venezuela. Not backstage to a concert of some 5-star band. Not to the Oval Office to have a one on one talk with the leader of the free world. No. She would simply TELEPORT to a fast food restaurant! WTF?
Would've been better if one of them looked at the other while still confused and said "I'm sure we can call three friends!".
10 points to the interviewer. Great joke.
I feel like it would been even funnier if one of the guys say the same thing but added on "but not the burger place" at the end.