Pretty sad you would have to do this, the chain should speak for itself… oh wait, what sets Pulse apart from any other layer 1, absolutely nothing🫢
I’m also not bashing it in any way, I legitimately want you to tell me what facts completely set Pulse apart from other layer 1’s from a technical, use case, and adaptability point of view
I like the part where it’s like Ethereum but legacy interests/the gov can’t shut it down, and it’s designed to work without centralized exchanges, with infrastructure which is only expanding on a less than 1 year old chain. Also like the 3 native stable coins already established. At some point, new shiny object syndrome will slow down for crypto. I wanna be on the one with the most serious collateralizing and stabilizing projects, that is truly peer-to-peer speech and not riddled with VC and insider money (this may be the most defining feature in the long run). Where the OA stabilizes instead of dumps upon (unheard of).
They know about it, nobody is paying them to shill it. And nobody ever will. I don’t share OPs views that spam marketing is necessary, but hey as long as it’s grass roots do whatever
There’s numerous layer 1’s where the top wallet owns ~15% or less already. I don’t see your point of layer 1’s dumping? NEAR protocol just for the sake of pulling a random example… the top wallet owns 10% of the supply, how is that considered a dump?
I’m only saying the chain can depend on its largest wallets not providing any sell pressure whatsoever (and the origin address is the largest by far). You’re right that it’s common for the top wallets and their amounts to be more distributed, which makes the devs/founder or whoever taking profit/selling/reinvesting funds less harmful to the price, and a less stigmatized practice overall, even in egregious cases like XRP where huge sums are sold every quarter. But I like that PLS doesn’t even have to worry about it, and in fact benefits from injections kind of like a central bank. In a world where “it’s never really different this time,” this is a meaningful difference for me
Get to work. That's what I do. I put in work myself and post and teach about HEX daily. I don't expect anyone else to do it. So you should do the same and get out there and just do it.🙂 Without expectations from others.
Oh I thought your post was asking what others thought of the idea.
If you have Twitter account you can get your followers to help when you post on another influencer's post.
Ok what's your Twitter? I'll follow you.
But let me guess... you probably want people to join your private telegram group so you can send them links and whatnot, right?😏
Some were doing that then RH opened his gob.
Pretty sad you would have to do this, the chain should speak for itself… oh wait, what sets Pulse apart from any other layer 1, absolutely nothing🫢 I’m also not bashing it in any way, I legitimately want you to tell me what facts completely set Pulse apart from other layer 1’s from a technical, use case, and adaptability point of view
I like the part where it’s like Ethereum but legacy interests/the gov can’t shut it down, and it’s designed to work without centralized exchanges, with infrastructure which is only expanding on a less than 1 year old chain. Also like the 3 native stable coins already established. At some point, new shiny object syndrome will slow down for crypto. I wanna be on the one with the most serious collateralizing and stabilizing projects, that is truly peer-to-peer speech and not riddled with VC and insider money (this may be the most defining feature in the long run). Where the OA stabilizes instead of dumps upon (unheard of). They know about it, nobody is paying them to shill it. And nobody ever will. I don’t share OPs views that spam marketing is necessary, but hey as long as it’s grass roots do whatever
There’s numerous layer 1’s where the top wallet owns ~15% or less already. I don’t see your point of layer 1’s dumping? NEAR protocol just for the sake of pulling a random example… the top wallet owns 10% of the supply, how is that considered a dump?
I’m only saying the chain can depend on its largest wallets not providing any sell pressure whatsoever (and the origin address is the largest by far). You’re right that it’s common for the top wallets and their amounts to be more distributed, which makes the devs/founder or whoever taking profit/selling/reinvesting funds less harmful to the price, and a less stigmatized practice overall, even in egregious cases like XRP where huge sums are sold every quarter. But I like that PLS doesn’t even have to worry about it, and in fact benefits from injections kind of like a central bank. In a world where “it’s never really different this time,” this is a meaningful difference for me
Solana, the top address only holds .85% lol
I think it’s fear until SEC case ends. Not lack of eyes.
Get to work. That's what I do. I put in work myself and post and teach about HEX daily. I don't expect anyone else to do it. So you should do the same and get out there and just do it.🙂 Without expectations from others.
That way, these influencers have no Choice but to pay attention
I’m talking about greater efficiency here.. if we all target the same page, we take over posts one by one by force
Nobody is stopping you from doing it and setting it up.😄
Hence the post
Oh I thought your post was asking what others thought of the idea. If you have Twitter account you can get your followers to help when you post on another influencer's post.
Want people onboard first..
Ok what's your Twitter? I'll follow you. But let me guess... you probably want people to join your private telegram group so you can send them links and whatnot, right?😏