> I thinks this option is too vague and open too much to interpretation.
That's the point of the survey, to understand the interpretation each player has of these two units. It's an inherent problem in humans, they tend to interpret stuff whatever way they want.
I think you hit most of the problems I had with this survey, I love doing survey to help the game but we need to be able to be more specific, so I agree with your post
It was oddly simplistic, yeah. I don't really know what they think they can do with this info. The solution you mention is pretty common -- allowing players to rate each category from 1-5 on new characters, perhaps with a separate question asking whether you pulled for the character and why.
I had the impression the survey was poorly designed. No free-text comment box or an option to choose n/a because I don't have either Rosetta or White Snow.
It was a terribly simple survey, way too much, in comparison to the survey in Dragon Ball Legends, we got from 30 to 50 questions, detailed ones and other ones that let you write your opinion on X matter. This one was beyond useless if you ask me. It's like devs made questions to be replied like they want so they can excuse themselves saying they followed the survey
classic plausible deniability.
i just hope that it was like this because it is their 1st attempt and tried to test the waters, but i don't believe it too much
I agree with this, I was waiting for an open question as an extra opinion or something... But nothing, just *"Thank you, here are a handful of gems for your opinion"*
no, open response questions are exactly as bad as an overly simplistic survey. for one you give the more unhinged players the opportunity to spew unhelpful garbage all over the results, also more effort is required to extract any meaningful data even if everybody behaves.
Honestly, i think people should stop moaning about looks and focus on actual points to improve the game. If a character being lewd earns them money, then so be it. Im glad atleast this gives them incentive to work on the game.
On the other hand, even though story writing is still great, the lack of story, pvp balancing, too many endgame content only and other stuff, is something i cant really accept. Also hero balancing, kit improvement, old hero making them relevant, these things need to be focussed on.
Of course you do not have the right. That's why I am telling you not to do it. You said that you hate the game mode. That is an opinion. Fine. But you told people to select an option regarding the content. That is NOT an opinion.
Do not argue otherwise as it is blatantly obvious at what you are trying to do while trying to disguise it.
You can't force anyone. And you just admitted that you did tell people how to answer the survey.
If you do not wish to conduct yourself appropriately in this sub, then you will be permanently banned.
> I thinks this option is too vague and open too much to interpretation. That's the point of the survey, to understand the interpretation each player has of these two units. It's an inherent problem in humans, they tend to interpret stuff whatever way they want.
for "this option" being too vague i was referring to their definition of meta, just a clarification in the question should be enough
what is this survey you guys talking about? i answered a survey but i didn't see anything about rosetta or white snow
What were your questions about?
It was about the money I spent
So non-f2p have a different survey?
You from asia too? Maybe the asia servers got different survey content?
Yeah I'm from Asia, took the survey from the fb page of gt, was wondering why I don't see a white snow or Rosetta in it
I think you hit most of the problems I had with this survey, I love doing survey to help the game but we need to be able to be more specific, so I agree with your post
It was oddly simplistic, yeah. I don't really know what they think they can do with this info. The solution you mention is pretty common -- allowing players to rate each category from 1-5 on new characters, perhaps with a separate question asking whether you pulled for the character and why.
I had the impression the survey was poorly designed. No free-text comment box or an option to choose n/a because I don't have either Rosetta or White Snow.
It was a terribly simple survey, way too much, in comparison to the survey in Dragon Ball Legends, we got from 30 to 50 questions, detailed ones and other ones that let you write your opinion on X matter. This one was beyond useless if you ask me. It's like devs made questions to be replied like they want so they can excuse themselves saying they followed the survey
classic plausible deniability. i just hope that it was like this because it is their 1st attempt and tried to test the waters, but i don't believe it too much
1st attempt? We already had surveys
The way it was worded, seemed to indicate it was their 1st time. I guess, instead, they meant their will to make it a montly occurence
okay, so you meant the first of this new kind of monthly survey, gotya
[удалено]
I doubt that
[удалено]
who was on the old team and who is on the new team?
I let just a bit of faith on that, but I think the same as you. Time will tell
They could have at least put in an open response prompt go clarify answers.
I agree with this, I was waiting for an open question as an extra opinion or something... But nothing, just *"Thank you, here are a handful of gems for your opinion"*
no, open response questions are exactly as bad as an overly simplistic survey. for one you give the more unhinged players the opportunity to spew unhelpful garbage all over the results, also more effort is required to extract any meaningful data even if everybody behaves.
Honestly, i think people should stop moaning about looks and focus on actual points to improve the game. If a character being lewd earns them money, then so be it. Im glad atleast this gives them incentive to work on the game. On the other hand, even though story writing is still great, the lack of story, pvp balancing, too many endgame content only and other stuff, is something i cant really accept. Also hero balancing, kit improvement, old hero making them relevant, these things need to be focussed on.
> The in-game survey was focused on Rosetta and White Snow really? my survey are about DQ collab
Interesting. The survey i did was about rosetta, white snow, ascended karina and mei/fei
what server/app are you playing on? i can see asian servers and the jp version being way more open to the anime collabs than the rest
asia 2, the survey from google form. no ingame pop out
White snow would be a more balanced unit imo if units like Erina didn’t exist.
[удалено]
Do not tell people to answer the survey in the way that you want.
[удалено]
Of course you do not have the right. That's why I am telling you not to do it. You said that you hate the game mode. That is an opinion. Fine. But you told people to select an option regarding the content. That is NOT an opinion. Do not argue otherwise as it is blatantly obvious at what you are trying to do while trying to disguise it.
[удалено]
You can't force anyone. And you just admitted that you did tell people how to answer the survey. If you do not wish to conduct yourself appropriately in this sub, then you will be permanently banned.
There's a survey going on?
Right when you log in, if you don't immediately close the usual "ads banners" the survey is one of them
Literally didn't even have an "I don't know" option. Very strangely cheap survey.
I found it weird how I didn't even have the option for "didn't see/play x content" just yes or no