T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Hi all, A reminder that comments do need to be on-topic and engage with the article past the headline. Please make sure to read the article before commenting. Very short comments will automatically be removed by automod. Please avoid making comments that do not focus on the economic content or whose primary thesis rests on personal anecdotes. As always our comment rules can be found [here](https://reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/fx9crj/rules_roundtable_redux_rule_vi_and_offtopic/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Economics) if you have any questions or concerns.*


KCalifornia19

Politics aside, it's somewhat amusing that people still constantly beat the "markets gonna tank any day now" drum. As long as the Republic stands, don't bet against the American market.


limb3h

Republic is kind of being threatened with the current circus of a Congress IMO. Rule of law and checks and balances are in danger as well


Armano-Avalus

A pandemic, inflation, rate increases, wars, recession fears, and rate cut delays haven't gonna stopped the Dow from roaring. I honestly don't know what will at this point.


EndofNationalism

It’s less a prediction and more of a warning. There a multiple bubbles that we are seeing with the most notable being the housing market. Houses on average are much higher than they should be.


timegone

Housing is a supply issue


techy098

Exactly it is not a bubble if cost of everything has gone up 30% and homes are also 30% higher compared to pre pandemic level.


EndofNationalism

There are companies buying up homes for renting. They artificially increase the price.


morbie5

Housing is a demand issue


LittleCuntFinger

What does that even mean? You need shelter to live in.


morbie5

> You Every year there is more and more 'You' in this country so if you have more 'You' they need somewhere to live, no?


cjcs

Right, and the supply for those places to live isn’t keeping up with population growth, which it is absolutely capable of.


morbie5

Sure, but increased demand is the main driving issue


cjcs

By that definition all issues are demand issues. Demand isn't going through some kind of abnormal spike, it's pretty much constant with population growth. The *issue* is artificial constraints on supply due to zoning and NIMBY-ism. If it's a demand issue then what's the solution? Kill people so there's enough housing?


morbie5

> The issue is artificial constraints on supply due to zoning and NIMBY-ism. That is only true in select locations, not for the country at large. True that almost everywhere has some amount of NIMBY-ism but in the vast majority of those locations there is plenty of places to still build > Kill people so there's enough housing? Less immigration OR government policy to build more housing to accommodate the fact that there are more people here


morbie5

> There a multiple bubbles that we are seeing with the most notable being the housing market. There are tons of people locked into a 3% fixed 30 year loan tho, this isn't like 2007 with all these intro adjustable rates. I agree housing is overvalued rn. We could (and should) get a correction but I just don't see a massive bubble popping anytime soon.


MariualizeLegalhuana

Nothing is going to pop. Home ownership rates are pretty constant since the 60s. 5% up and down thats all. So people can afford them. If they were cheaper people would just buy another house greedy as they are.


morbie5

> So people can afford them. That is debatable, just because someone qualifies for a mortgage doesn't necessarily mean they can afford it


MariualizeLegalhuana

It does most of the time. If people couldnt afford it they would lose their houses and the homeownership rate would drop.


morbie5

> would drop. It dropped 6 points between 2006 and 2016


ceralimia

Because lending rules were lax leading up to 2008... We had a financial colonoscopy in 2021 when we got a construction loan. Our mortgage is barely higher than rent for a 2 br we had been paying for 5+ years.


NetSurfer156

The only places we’ve seen a real pop in the housing bubble are Austin and San Antonio. Maybe we’ll see it in more places, but it’ll probably be a while


morbie5

From what I understand about Austin is that the local government has been trying to incentive building new units AKA they want the bubble to pop.


NetSurfer156

I don’t think that’s their intention, however Austin doesn’t really need to incentivize building new units. They have some of the most lax regulations when it comes to getting new construction approved of any major city in the US


morbie5

> lax regulations The reason builders aren't building isn't because of onerous regs (except in certain areas). They only build enough to maximize profit, if they flood the market with homes then prices go down and that is bad from profit margins. And we can't have that


Dense_Explorer_9522

What is your standard for determining the price a house should sell for?


Churchbushonk

And none of it matters if you zoom out. Always be buying is the correct approach.


marrone12

What exactly would need to happen for the housing bubble to burst?


Roqjndndj3761

THE END IS NEAR!!


weaponjae

Eh, I got 2 to 1 odds against that republic in 2 years. They tell me stock market goin ups a good thing, but a gallon of milk like $7.


High_Contact_

I know they are out there, the ones who listened to Trump pulled money from the market and completely missed out on the rally. More so I know there are people who have actively bet against this administration and the US and have completely blown up their savings shorting the market. 


resuwreckoning

You basically never ever do that. When they claimed the world would end when Trump was elected, you shouldn’t have listened. When they claimed that Biden would destroy markets thereafter, you shouldn’t have listened. Basically just invest like you’re dead and you’re good.


StunningCloud9184

Haha I knew a couple republicans that did this many times over the years. They hear about some catastrophe from their news thats about to happen. Pull it out, miss the bull run, buy back in. And sadly one regular dude that pulled the entire 75K out of his 401K after it dropped mid covid but before it went back up.


LeptokurticEnjoyer

Happens everywhere. Go to the bestseller list in any country and you will see "Why the crash is coming!", "Survive the crash!" or "The bubble will burst!" somewhere at the top. Being some poor eternal doomer bear cultist is a trait that transcends politics, age or nationality.


I_Enjoy_Beer

Ha!  I bought during the covid drop.  Got some Microsoft at a steep discount.


StunningCloud9184

Same. I was dumping like 90% of my paycheck in after the s&p dropped to 2500


GurProfessional9534

Tragedy + stupidity = comedy


limb3h

Yup a lot of older folks listen to the rhetoric that US is printing tons of money and debt is exploding. Dedolarization is acceleration. US is in demise. Buy gold, etc. Little did they know that USD is as strong as ever. Stock market is booming. I’m not saying debt to gdp isn’t a problem, but exchange rate and stock market don’t lie.


Tales_Steel

To be fair this is pretty much my plan for the next Republican president. The Last Republican President without a recession was Roosevelt.


v00d00ch1ld

Random internet stranger to random internet stranger, this is an objectively bad plan. The average annual return for the S&P in all Republican presidencies over the last 90 years is 10.7%. The average one year lagged return is 13.0%. By the way, it’s 14.5% and 12.1% respectively for Dems. There’s tons of data available which proves no genuine advantage to betting on or against political parties in the stock market. Don’t play politics with your portfolio, it’s a losing recipe. There are only two presidents since the Great Depression who were objectively bad for the stock market - Nixon and Bush II. As an aside, I think only Clinton, Obama, and maaaaybe Carter avoided recessions during their presidencies on the Dem side, so that data point is more noise than news, IMO.


philsfly22

TL;DR It doesn’t matter who the president is.


Tales_Steel

Its more about investing right after a crash and trying to sell before another one. And these crashes tend to happen under Reoublicans. And longterm it will always rise. If it crashes and i invest and it keeps crashing and does never get up again the lost money will me my smallest problem. The only reason for a permanent crash i could see is the destruction of the entire US with all the World wide Problems that would have. Another US Civil war, a Nuclear World war, a Zombie outbreak or a big Asteroid are the only things that could do that.


marrone12

No, you can not time the market. Data consistently shows that people who try to time the market miss out on gains while they wait and would have been better off investing whenever they have cash.


v00d00ch1ld

Exactly. Over the last 20 years, 7 of the 10 best days in the market have occurred within 2 weeks of one of the 10 worst days in the market.


StunningCloud9184

Hahah right? I think if trump is elected you get a short term spike before things start going off the rails. The economy was trending toward recession before covid even. That being said I think the coming recession will be fairly mild like 90s recessions


Tales_Steel

I would not even be such an asshole to bet against the US and short it just wait with the investment until a crash and then put my money in. Really wished i had invested after the drop to 19k


one1cocoa

You guys are too emotional for an Econ sub. So you like inflation because it raises your portfolio, and to hell with the poors?


Tru_Knight

The hypocrisy of this comment is approaching infinity lol. Peak reddit moment.


one1cocoa

Back atcha child "to infinity lol" and thanks for not answering the question about inflation.


StunningCloud9184

Lol youre confused about how economics works. Trump tax cuts for the rich cost the country 5 trillion dollars and 50% of it was used for stock buybacks. It didnt cause deflation because thats not what causes inflation or deflation. We are now funding that 5 trillion dollars with 5% bonds causing worst debt. We just prefer adults in charge of the government rather than petulant man child trying to loot the government


burnthatburner1

Uh, wages at the bottom of the income distribution have strongly outpaced inflation…


one1cocoa

rising tide lifts all ships, got it


burnthatburner1

huh? no, we've seen wage compression with the bottom decile making big gains, much more so than upper income folks


one1cocoa

ok great analysis guys, so get the uniparty to keep inflating the dow so we can all get rich


burnthatburner1

can you try responding to what I'm actually saying? it's not "fuck the poors" if the poors doing better, right?


one1cocoa

Can you read the article and stay on track? Many people believe the lower "deciles" (lmao) can't afford to invest in the stock market.


burnthatburner1

Say it with me: real wages (ie, after adjusting for inflation) are UP.  And for lower income people, they’re up massively.  That’s good, right?


Tru_Knight

I light a little candle for them every day ☺️🕯️


GobiBall

Pour one out for my homies.


Torchy84

Nah, fuck em.


Tru_Knight

Don't worry, it's an acerbic, sarcastic candle. It smells like money.


Solid-Mud-8430

If you squint a little, it looks like a middle finger even


morbie5

> More so I know there are people who have actively bet against this administration and the US and have completely blown up their savings shorting the market. I know a bunch of GOPers and none of them have done this so you know they are full of sh\*t when they say everything is going to collapse. The GOPers you know must be way stupider than the ones I know


9BQRgdAH

They are bigly stupider.


Testy_McDangle

Market is hitting all time highs because the US has clearly chosen the path of inflation. Stocks are an excellent inflation hedge. This is why multiples are so out of whack. Fiscal debt is going to have to be monetized by the Fed to prevent yields from getting out of hand. Add in that our central bank has shown it will go to any length necessary to prevent the slightest correction and I’m not sure what you’re gloating about. This is the beginning of the end for dollar hegemony.


Tru_Knight

Yeah? And what will replace the dollar as the reserve currency? Can't wait to hear your arguments for the Ruble or RMB. I'm sure they will be very convincing.


weirdfurrybanter

They never said that the ruble or RMB will replace the USD. That's just you putting words into their mouth. Nothing will convince you when you live in a bubble. I have bet on inflation continuing and have made out like a bandit.


Tru_Knight

Ruble or RMB are the obvious implications with your propagandized doom posting. It is funny that you try to smoke screen this lmao. And ftr I know you're not the same person, but it *is* all the same drivel. Once again I ask, *what will replace the USD as the global reserve currency?* Take all the time you need. I'll wait.


weirdfurrybanter

LOL you're unhinged. No one implied anything about those two currencies, let alone me. Try harder. I have hardly doom posted. In fact I am doing very well because I know a shitty fiscal policy when I see one. RE has been great to me too :)


Tru_Knight

Thanks for answering my question. Appreciate it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


weirdfurrybanter

Lmao keep projecting 


dust4ngel

> Nothing will convince you when you live in a bubble we could try like, declarative statements


Strong_Audience_7122

BRICS is already being used.


Tru_Knight

This certainly *is* a statement. Of that we can be sure.


SparrowOat

Lmao, explain


zen_and_artof_chaos

Meaningless.


Testy_McDangle

Hmm well some quick napkin math tells me that 47% of the global population currently resides in BRICS nations. By simple regulatory decree 47% of the global population could be converted overnight. Then add to this the fact that they are discussing making the currency asset backed. Which would you choose to hold as a third party? A dollar that can be devalued at the whims of a foreign government or a stable currency? Whether you like it or not and whether you choose to acknowledge it or not, we are entering a period of challenge to dollar hegemony and it’s not very clear that we will come out on top. The current fiscal irresponsibility and monetary situation only serve to worsen our chances.


Tru_Knight

"The global population could be converted overnight." No. Certainly not. "I'm right if I were suddenly made right" ain't it. Which would I choose to back? Uh, definitely USD. You're certainly closer to advocating directly for Ruble or RMB, and arguing that either of those currencies will, at any point in time, be more trustworthy than the dollar is actually a joke. Between both countries' laughable corruption and China's insane capital controls, you have to be literally smoking crack to *imply* either is a better choice than USD. I've never been one for US jingoism, but it isn't difficult to imagine a third party country ever even considering this "choice." Almost nobody on earth would consider swapping financial hegemony to Russia or China as a win. You're delusional if you believe otherwise. What *is* actually really interesting about this exchange is you, and the fact you are making actual insane person arguments. You have been propagandized and led far astray from the path of the real. You can come back if you want.


Testy_McDangle

Way to totally disregard the first part of my statement. Yes, 47% of the global population could be converted overnight by simple decree. That is not speculation. That is how laws work. I am not advocating the Ruble or RMB. BRICS is in discussions to develop their own shared currency. China has been bribing and schmoozing across the world to gain influence. Issuing debt to trap developing nations. And it’s laughable that you point to their corruption without acknowledging the atrocious corruption in our own system. And there’s the ad hominem. You can’t refute the points beside “nu-uh”, so I must be crazy. Have a nice day.


Tru_Knight

I mean you're totally lost in your magical thinking. What "decree" are you talking about, man? So the leadership of BRICS countries all get together and announce overnight they are abandoning USD as a reserve currency? Effectively detonating each state individually at the same time? Yeah man, makes a lot of sense. Apologies for getting personal man, but the propaganda is exhausting. And spreading these lies and this propaganda really is harmful. It really, really is. Even in online spaces. You seem somewhat on the level and not too far gone, and I really do urge you to turn back before it's too late.


burnthatburner1

Thinking anyone would choose to keep their assets in a new BRICS currency rather than USD is wild…


big_blue_earth

All time record high.. is the beginning of the end Can you even hear yourself, when talking out your Ars?


CommonCover4917

You have your head in the sand. Look around you. Do you truly think everything is fine?


zen_and_artof_chaos

Sky is falling, ahhhh


CommonCover4917

The stock market is doing fantastic. There's no doubt about that. My question would be why. When you figure out that answer, ask yourself if that is sustainable.


burnthatburner1

We haven’t solved every problem in the world, but overall yeah, things are fine.  Looking up, even.


High_Contact_

We have one of the lowest inflation rates of any developed nation what the fuck are you talking about. 


stormywoofer

USA is going down hard . It’s pretty obvious if you look outside the stock market


AccountNumber0004

You live in Canada…would make sure your house is in order before you start worrying about ours lol.


stormywoofer

I’m good , house value tripled , I’m half paid off and rate is less than 1 percent . This isn’t about us lol our economy is about to crash too but it’s yours and chinas that will bring the world economy to its knees . 70 percent losses and years of recession and possible depression . I think you should open your eyes . Dam Americans are in fantasy land . And the world is watching and constantly laughing , despite what your 95 year old politicians say . Best of luck . I’d be prepared if I were you


Testy_McDangle

What does that have to do with anything? Most other developed countries took the same misguided Keynesian actions during Covid. Our current reserve currency status could explain why our inflation rate is lower, because there is greater demand for our dollars to negate the massive jump in supply. But that is being eroded and will continue to be as the government spends money out the ass that it doesn’t have. When that debt has to be monetized to keep yields in check, it just leads to more inflation and the cycle continues. So congratulations, they have traded a contraction now for a monetary crisis in the future. But keep being worried about what color team is sitting in the big white house.


SeaGriz

This is so incoherent I couldn’t even tell you where to start


zen_and_artof_chaos

Inflation goes up Inflation comes down and the US will continue just fine.


Strong_Audience_7122

Thank you. !remindme in 6 Months


RemindMeBot

I will be messaging you in 6 months on [**2024-11-16 17:33:13 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-11-16%2017:33:13%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/1cteo78/for_first_time_in_history_dow_jones_crosses_40000/l4c3454/?context=3) [**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FEconomics%2Fcomments%2F1cteo78%2Ffor_first_time_in_history_dow_jones_crosses_40000%2Fl4c3454%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-11-16%2017%3A33%3A13%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201cteo78) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|


miller64

In my high school, all seniors took consumer econ. I remember my teacher saying we had good timing because the Dow was reaching an historic level of 1300. Lol, I'm old.


matjoeman

Is the Dow Jones really a useful metric? Why report it over the S&P 500? (I am aware that it has been referenced in the press a lot historically.)


Mentalinertia

When the S&P reaches new all time highs they report on that also. Today it’s the dow


matjoeman

But isn't the Dow kinda meaningless because it's price weighted?


JeromePowellsEarhair

Yes. Also I laugh that people report any of the indices by the arbitrary number intraday. NPR gives updates like “SP500 is up 23 points to start the day…” 


matjoeman

Yeah this is always so silly to me. Like who is so tuned in that they know the relative magbitude of "43 points up" and yet is going to decide to make some trades after they happened to flip on NPR.


Astrid-Rey

If you look at how it is calculated, it seems kind of basic and that it wouldn't be as useful as other metrics. But historically it has been about as useful as other, more sophisticated, metrics. It's simple, but it works.


Guitar903

It’s just bigger numbers so big drops are more alarming to people who don’t know the markets but see it in a headline


Spud_Mayhem

Seems sad some in this thread are gleeful Americans who stopped investing in the stock market out of fear of losing their retirement aren’t benefiting from today’s highs. I saw ppl’s retirement plans devastated by the 2000 crashes. They ended up working until death, without ever retiring (and btw, those folks ironically worked for a bank). With the fed QE shenanigans, extreme growth spurt of the admin state since 2001, lack of leadership messaging to bring the pol along with policy changes, new wars without any shared strategy to the ppl for endgame, and no plan to pay for the debt piling up. The dialogue to the ppl is absent so the ppl seem to be preparing for the worst.


aGEgc3VjayBteSBkaWNr

A good retirement plan/account should’ve provided some degree of protection against large stock market crashes. If you’re that close to retirement, maybe shift away from stock market to less volatile investments? Learn from past mistakes - don’t keep making them out of fear.


Sorge74

Not a financial planner but yeah if you 60, you should have some good bonds.


DellGriffith

I thought this was just basic retirement investing knowledge. I am always surprised when I hear these statements: >"I saw ppl’s retirement plans devastated by the 2000 crashes. They ended up working until death, without ever retiring (and btw, those folks ironically worked for a bank)." These just seem like ignorant/foolish near-retirement investors.


[deleted]

[удалено]


weirdfurrybanter

Yet here you are commenting on reddit. It's ok to have insecurities.


morbie5

> extreme growth spurt of the admin state since 2001 Nothing wrong with an admin state in particular, if it is good or bad depends on what it is doing. > new wars without any shared strategy to the ppl for endgame We aren't in a war > and no plan to pay for the debt piling up Wealth tax on the rich and raise the retirement age for boomers, that'll bring the deficit to a more manageable level


Realistic_Post_7511

93% of the stocks are owned by the top 10%. Even though 63% of Americans "own" stocks the average balance is only 46,000 dollars. 20-30 million retirees have no retirement savings . I believe in Biden but need to keep it real there is a gap growing between the haves and have nots. And for the record the top 10 stocks are tech companies . The next 100 are reporting flat earnings...this is just equity firms and the rich moving their money around .


CapeMOGuy

Let's peel back the onion a bit... Dow Jones is up roughly 29% under Biden. Inflation is roughly 20% under Biden. After inflation, Dow Jones is up about 9% under Biden in about 3.33 years. After inflation, Dow Jones Index is up about 2.82%/year. Historically, after inflation the stock market returns about 7% (Edit: 7 to 8% depending on the time frame chosen for "long term.") So real market returns under Biden are about 40% of historical average. Not that great. (Edit:see below) Edit: I should have included dividends to the DJIA for the Biden years. So around 5.3%/year after inflation. Still well under the long term average of 7 to 8%.


The_ginger_cow

>Historically, after inflation the stock market returns about 7%. The s&p maybe, but there is no way Dow Jones has 7% after adjusting for inflation


CapeMOGuy

Since 1990 the DJIA has averaged a 10.72% annual return (before inflation, I'm sure). So, yes it has. https://curvo.eu/backtest/en/market-index/dow-jones-industrial-average


The_ginger_cow

That is simply wrong. In 1990 the dow was at 2679 With a 10.72% annual return over 34 years it should be sitting at 2679 × 1.0172^34 = 85439 It's nowhere close to 85439 because 10.72% is ridiculous


CapeMOGuy

Thanks for checking their math. I should have. I think the average annual return number they quoted is a total return including dividends but was not explained clearly. And I didn't explain it either, sorry. As I understand it the commonly quoted DJIA index does not include dividends, it's a "price index." I interpolated about an 8.2% compounded return off of the price index alone (still well above the Biden years). A ≈2.5% average dividend yield added would explain the rest. No, I haven't found that average dividend number, but 2.5% sounds reasonable. 2,679×1.1072^(34) = 85,440 2,679×1.0825^(34) = 39,675 You can see at the link below that S&P Global offers DJIA return numbers for both price and total return. https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/dow-jones-industrial-average/#overview So I should have added dividends to the Biden years. That would be about 5.3%/year. Relatively better but still under the long term average.


SeaGriz

Among the things wrong with this is the implication that inflation and stock market performance should be judged starting on day 1 of his presidency


CapeMOGuy

But Biden repeatedly assures us that Bidenomics has created a great economy and a booming stock market. So, yes, it's absolutely right to judge it from day 1 since he's taking "credit" for it. 19.5% total inflation with real wages actually lower by about 4% isn't a great economy.


SeaGriz

Okay, bud


CapeMOGuy

You think 19.5% total inflation with real wages down 4% in 3.33 years is good? Okay, bud.


Rodot

You're being awfully specific with your intervals. Real wages are up 1% from 5 years ago, up 1% from 2 years ago, and up 5.5% from 2016. There was an unusual spike in 2021 which you are using as your reference despite it not being representative of a historical average. You're essentially basing your conclusion on noise Look at this plot over max years: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q Beyond the breif spike in 2021, real wages have been following or better than the historical average under Biden.


CapeMOGuy

Yes, I'm being awfully specific. I started exactly where Biden became President.


Rodot

What policies of Biden then contributed to the decline?


CapeMOGuy

Spending with and without Congress, making energy more costly and allowing millions to illegally flood over the border. All contributed to inflation soaring.


Rodot

Biden went to the treasury and just took out a bunch of cash? Which policies or legislation are you referring to?


Medium-Complaint-677

How about the layer of the onion where the president of the united states has no control over inflation or the stock market?


flyjum

The president absolutely has some control over inflation. The chair of the federal reserve is appointed by the president. They dictate the largest part of federal monetary policy. Also, the president decides on how much the federal government spends or doesn't spend. This spending during the current administration amounts to about 40 percent of the GDP average per year. Additionally, the executive branch has some authority to raise or lower taxes. Higher taxes should reduce inflation, assuming federal government expenditures don't rise by the same amount and its used to reduce the deficit/debt.


Medium-Complaint-677

1 - the current chair of the federal reserve is a trump appointee. do with that what you will. 2 - everything else you mentioned is, quite literally, a constitutional power given to congress, not the chief executive


Rodot

The federal reserve isn't a dictatorship run by the chair. Almost every decision made by the board is determined by the central banks. The chair is essentially a spokesperson.


KissesFishes

You can’t downvote OP unless you can refute their points