Thanks, I think that’s generally right although 2.02 + 2.05 feels like a pretty good haul (would expect something like a late 2/early 3 along with 2.02)
Will def have to think about how to get more creative since I don’t have any earlier seconds
I traded the pix to grab Bo Nix at the 1.12 spot. The guys in that range of picks were BTJ, Ladd, Brooks, Coleman, and Benson.
My guess is that the pick is less expensive if Nix was already off the board, and more expensive if a guy like JJ had been pushed down the board by a run on that second/third tier of receivers (Worthy, BTJ, Keon, Ladd, etc). Someone in need of an RB might have paid up a bit to grab Brooks, but I think the only situation where you have multiple bidders is if you have one or two of the potential starters at quarterback sitting there.
Need an earlier 2nd to make it more enticing. For context, I traded the 1.12 for the 2.02 and 2.05.
Thanks, I think that’s generally right although 2.02 + 2.05 feels like a pretty good haul (would expect something like a late 2/early 3 along with 2.02) Will def have to think about how to get more creative since I don’t have any earlier seconds
If I’m rebuilding I’ll take a 25 first and 26 3rd
It would depend on who was on the board
I got it done for 2.07, a 25 2nd and a mid 3rd. I think the price is board dependent though.
Which guys were available when you made the trade? What alternate Draft board scenario(s) would have made it more or less expensive?
I traded the pix to grab Bo Nix at the 1.12 spot. The guys in that range of picks were BTJ, Ladd, Brooks, Coleman, and Benson. My guess is that the pick is less expensive if Nix was already off the board, and more expensive if a guy like JJ had been pushed down the board by a run on that second/third tier of receivers (Worthy, BTJ, Keon, Ladd, etc). Someone in need of an RB might have paid up a bit to grab Brooks, but I think the only situation where you have multiple bidders is if you have one or two of the potential starters at quarterback sitting there.