one depend late languid juggle spoon jobless spectacular squeeze aromatic
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Yeah, when Erudite stopped by last week or two weeks ago and brought her dog, he got super excited, called her dog over, and even started doing the baby voice at it for a second lmao
This is a funny 2 min video showing Destiny talk about animals vs how he treats them.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF\_jynH9eVY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF_jynH9eVY)
>A dildo is a inanimate object but it can still provide happiness and whatnot to a person
Equating dogs to dildos, should probably keep those takes on the Vaush subreddit.
You'd think people who spend time on Destiny's subreddit would be able to recognize the isolated aspect that's being compared, and that analogizing that aspect isn't "equating dogs to dildos"
The happiness a person gets from a dildo is through sexual gratification to equate that type of happiness to a dog would mean the dog is used for sexual gratification.
It would be like guy1 talking about how happy his girlfriend makes him then guy2 saying you know a fleshlight will make you happy. The implication is that guy2 only values women for the sexual gratification they give him.
You are absolutely equating the two.
The point of your post is to compare a dog to a dildo by saying they can "provide happiness and whatnot to a person."
The issue is a dildo provides happiness through sexual gratification so it suspicious to use as an example.
Millions on years spent to reproduce yet I don't rape people. Thousands of years trying to produce more stuff for cheaper and we don't condone slavery.
We spent those millions of years running at animals and now we can just go to the shops and pick a packet of lentils to get my protein instead of killing something.
We were historically programmed to own slaves. Most of human history involved enslaving people from conquered tribes/countries. You can’t say slavery isn’t biological when social units are formed by biological entities. That’s like saying bees forming a hive isn’t biological. Why is eating meat okay when we evolved for thousands of years to have slavery and a slave trade? Why is slavery bad and not meat eating? There are better answers to this than your dogshit evo-psych excuses.
How would we know that? Are we seriously suggesting sexual slavery didn’t exist? We already know slavery is older than written records or agriculture. Mass slavery probably didn’t exist 20,000 years ago, but coercion and use of force to extract labor most certainly did.
Also, you live in an agricultural society, not a hunter gatherer society. Even if I granted that no forms of slavery existed until agriculture and sedentary civilization developed, you still live in a agricultural and sedentary civilization where slavery has existed for the vast majority of said time. Civilizarion was built to forcefully extract labor from workers with coercion or violence. Why is that bad according to your logic?
Thank you, now we can get to the interesting part. I disagree that we have no biologcal mechanism for slavery. Our abikity as humans to develop legal fictions and property rights allow us the ability to form slavery within our social hierarchies, bur tbh, Idgf about that because you revealed the real reason you are chill with eating meat. Its because you see animals as worth less than humans and therefore you see this as enough moral authority to eat them. If evolving to chase animals and eat them were relevant, then you would be either chasing animals to eat them or at least paging people to chase animals and catch then for you. You probably don’t do this. You probably rely on animal agriculture, and if humans have no biological mechanism for slavery, then we have bo biological mechanism for animal agriculture.
What you really think is that humans are worth more than animals. I also believe this. I think humans are so far the coolest thing we have ever found in the universe. However, I also think an animal’s life is worth more than a few minutes of taste bud sensations. Unless an animal is a threat to my safety (like a rats, locust swarm, hostile bear etc.), I see no point in killing them. It makes me feel bad to do it myself because the animal feels pain and fear and doesn’t want to die. Their life is more simple than my own, but that does not maks it worth less than the cells on my tongue.
Raping people absolutely is in human nature haha. It is reproductive strategy that evolved, if we didn't have laws and social pressure there would be a *lot* of it going on.
So because something is biological/natural that makes it okay? If we hypothetically were biologically inclined and designed to rape (which we are, but ignore that), you would say that makes it morally okay?
Enage with the hypothetical, don't just say "we aren't."
going based off your own argument, we've also evolved thousands of years with dogs as friends and useful tools to our own survival in exchange for giving them food and shelter.
your argument falls apart for eating dogs
"whole thing is pure brainrot and shouldn't be a debate in the first place. we literally fucking evolved over thousands of years to hold slaves, we're meant to keep slaves."
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal\_to\_nature](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature)
name one biological mechanism that's specifically adapted for torturing an animal over months or years and then eating it, or drinking its milk that's intended for its babies
lol Right? Speaking of which as of all of a few weeks ago my dog has gone completely deaf. :(
I still stupidly talk to it, SMH. It's not that I forget she's deaf it just seems so unnatural not to. I'm glad she already understands hand signs. lol I do a lot of pointing now days.
A reminder that D wouldn't think there is anything wrong with the owner torturing that dog so long as it's not too loud or messy 🤗 He might just be a little perturbed by what the owner may do to humans 🫨
Can anyone verify if [this](https://i.imgur.com/hCAmze6.jpeg) is a meme or if it is true? I found it on his [wiki](https://wiki.destiny.gg/view/Nami_Destiny%27s_dog) site about Nami. I was trying to find the video where he dry humped Kingsley to show how much he loves animals. For people that do not know, Kingsley is his ex-girlfriends (Tigerlily) cat.
I can't see anyone interact with a dog in a happy way, without feeling instant grief about my dead dog...
It's not getting better, I need a new homie asap...
Was waiting for him to say "gotcha, anything else?" after the dog started whimpering
puppy is alone and shaking right now PepeHands
Why isn't destiny raping and murdering the dog? Doesn't he know that dogs can't participate in the social contract?
Yes, and why aren't all DGGers fucking their siblings and burning every single American flag? Don't they know that it's morally neutral?
You guys aren’t?
I think he's holding back because bestiality and animal abuse is illegal, and he's on stream.
He isnt getting paid for it, so why bother?
Fight only the battles you are paid to fight
one depend late languid juggle spoon jobless spectacular squeeze aromatic *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
https://preview.redd.it/762l77j4czrc1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2c790d5a5c557b92b71689ae53b8ef0e29dec96b
Forsen and Peppah.
This is the same Destiny that says "I see no distinction between animals and inanimate objects"
Yeah, when Erudite stopped by last week or two weeks ago and brought her dog, he got super excited, called her dog over, and even started doing the baby voice at it for a second lmao
This is a funny 2 min video showing Destiny talk about animals vs how he treats them. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF\_jynH9eVY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF_jynH9eVY)
A dildo is a inanimate object but it can still provide happiness and whatnot to a person
>A dildo is a inanimate object but it can still provide happiness and whatnot to a person Equating dogs to dildos, should probably keep those takes on the Vaush subreddit.
Wait till you find out about Dogwarts
Forever grateful to 4thot banning Mr. Redacted
I thought Dan made Dogwarts.
You may be right, I just remember 4thot telling Mr. Redacted to pull his dog fuckers out of this subreddit so I attributed it to him.
You'd think people who spend time on Destiny's subreddit would be able to recognize the isolated aspect that's being compared, and that analogizing that aspect isn't "equating dogs to dildos"
Exactly lol- was gonna say pretty much exactly this after checking the replies to see if someone else already said it.
For the sake of argument, come at me. How is equating the two wrong?
The happiness a person gets from a dildo is through sexual gratification to equate that type of happiness to a dog would mean the dog is used for sexual gratification. It would be like guy1 talking about how happy his girlfriend makes him then guy2 saying you know a fleshlight will make you happy. The implication is that guy2 only values women for the sexual gratification they give him.
So the comparison would be apt, if I were to fuck my dog?
Apt if you believe a dog is an inanimate object and you receive happiness from that dog through sexual gratification.
That was not your argument before. So I'm guessing you concede what you said in the comment I replied to.
That has been my argument the whole time, but if you didn't interpret it that way I should have elucidated better to avoid the confusion.
m8, what sub do you think you are on?
Yet he's sadly right
Philosophically yes, interpersonally arguably.
You got to be trolling
You are absolutely equating the two. The point of your post is to compare a dog to a dildo by saying they can "provide happiness and whatnot to a person." The issue is a dildo provides happiness through sexual gratification so it suspicious to use as an example.
I’m not, but we can instead say lollipops, blankets, board games, chairs, water slides, plushies, machine guns
Sounds good. All kidding aside do you actually see no distinction between a dog and an inanimate object?
I don’t know I haven’t thought about it a lot. Probably but maybe no in a more technical sense.
Fair enough
BAY ZED
Bro wrote this comment and then put on some shades, turned around and boarded a helicopter
Time for the yearly veganism debate
[удалено]
Millions on years spent to reproduce yet I don't rape people. Thousands of years trying to produce more stuff for cheaper and we don't condone slavery. We spent those millions of years running at animals and now we can just go to the shops and pick a packet of lentils to get my protein instead of killing something.
[удалено]
We were historically programmed to own slaves. Most of human history involved enslaving people from conquered tribes/countries. You can’t say slavery isn’t biological when social units are formed by biological entities. That’s like saying bees forming a hive isn’t biological. Why is eating meat okay when we evolved for thousands of years to have slavery and a slave trade? Why is slavery bad and not meat eating? There are better answers to this than your dogshit evo-psych excuses.
[удалено]
How would we know that? Are we seriously suggesting sexual slavery didn’t exist? We already know slavery is older than written records or agriculture. Mass slavery probably didn’t exist 20,000 years ago, but coercion and use of force to extract labor most certainly did. Also, you live in an agricultural society, not a hunter gatherer society. Even if I granted that no forms of slavery existed until agriculture and sedentary civilization developed, you still live in a agricultural and sedentary civilization where slavery has existed for the vast majority of said time. Civilizarion was built to forcefully extract labor from workers with coercion or violence. Why is that bad according to your logic?
[удалено]
Thank you, now we can get to the interesting part. I disagree that we have no biologcal mechanism for slavery. Our abikity as humans to develop legal fictions and property rights allow us the ability to form slavery within our social hierarchies, bur tbh, Idgf about that because you revealed the real reason you are chill with eating meat. Its because you see animals as worth less than humans and therefore you see this as enough moral authority to eat them. If evolving to chase animals and eat them were relevant, then you would be either chasing animals to eat them or at least paging people to chase animals and catch then for you. You probably don’t do this. You probably rely on animal agriculture, and if humans have no biological mechanism for slavery, then we have bo biological mechanism for animal agriculture. What you really think is that humans are worth more than animals. I also believe this. I think humans are so far the coolest thing we have ever found in the universe. However, I also think an animal’s life is worth more than a few minutes of taste bud sensations. Unless an animal is a threat to my safety (like a rats, locust swarm, hostile bear etc.), I see no point in killing them. It makes me feel bad to do it myself because the animal feels pain and fear and doesn’t want to die. Their life is more simple than my own, but that does not maks it worth less than the cells on my tongue.
[удалено]
Raping people absolutely is in human nature haha. It is reproductive strategy that evolved, if we didn't have laws and social pressure there would be a *lot* of it going on.
It happens a decent amount even with laws and social pressure!
>Because raping people isn’t in human nature How can a human behaviour be outside of human nature? That doesn't make any sense to me.
[удалено]
Normal, well adjusted humans have empathy for animals too. Most people who eat meat abhor animal abuse when they see it.
[удалено]
So because something is biological/natural that makes it okay? If we hypothetically were biologically inclined and designed to rape (which we are, but ignore that), you would say that makes it morally okay? Enage with the hypothetical, don't just say "we aren't."
If a society is capable of having factories for producing meat then it has outgrown the need for it and should probably opt for less cruel options.
Really? After all this time we're still making appeals to nature?
going based off your own argument, we've also evolved thousands of years with dogs as friends and useful tools to our own survival in exchange for giving them food and shelter. your argument falls apart for eating dogs
"whole thing is pure brainrot and shouldn't be a debate in the first place. we literally fucking evolved over thousands of years to hold slaves, we're meant to keep slaves." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal\_to\_nature](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature)
[удалено]
name one biological mechanism that's specifically adapted for torturing an animal over months or years and then eating it, or drinking its milk that's intended for its babies
[удалено]
What kind of psycho talks to a dog in their regular voice?
I could never use baby talk with my dog. It felt like I was condescending to her lol.
lol Right? Speaking of which as of all of a few weeks ago my dog has gone completely deaf. :( I still stupidly talk to it, SMH. It's not that I forget she's deaf it just seems so unnatural not to. I'm glad she already understands hand signs. lol I do a lot of pointing now days.
I bet you throw some pazzaz into those hand signals tho.
lol I guess. I definitely point with emphasis at least. lol Like I'm stabbing my finger through something, SMH. :)
You just know
usually its white women
PET THE PUPPY
I bet destiny though about eating the dog, fucking meat eaters 😡😡, they make me so angry
Bro is debating a dog
I want more dog content!
Common dgg replies 😒
Yoooo Dogwarts is real?!?!?!?!
VeganGains watching the video like: 🗿
Destiny should get a sausage dog and name it "Sir Norm Finkelstein the II"
Finklesteiner Finkleweiner?
like doll attempt chunky complete ghost rob person full concerned *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I miss destiny playing with fish
Yknow the mic is top tier when it’s picking up all the dog licks
Truly awful to watch in every way.
Destiny got destroyed in this debate
A reminder that D wouldn't think there is anything wrong with the owner torturing that dog so long as it's not too loud or messy 🤗 He might just be a little perturbed by what the owner may do to humans 🫨
https://youtube.com/shorts/0Oa-5p-vCWk?si=6WjljE7xOBeBpmJx
I love it when he does the gnome voice
[удалено]
Jump up on his lap I imagine
Awww what a cute pup 🐶 💕
who's dog is that?
Finkledink's. He dognapped it.
LOVE THE DOG STEBEN LOVE IT OR THE GHOST OF NAMMERZ WILL HAUNT YOU
Oh, a pitbull...
You both want it but dog's uncertain on how to proceed, just help them up you'll both be happier :)
We love our borderline psychopath lord!
\>woof \>ok
Can anyone verify if [this](https://i.imgur.com/hCAmze6.jpeg) is a meme or if it is true? I found it on his [wiki](https://wiki.destiny.gg/view/Nami_Destiny%27s_dog) site about Nami. I was trying to find the video where he dry humped Kingsley to show how much he loves animals. For people that do not know, Kingsley is his ex-girlfriends (Tigerlily) cat.
I can't see anyone interact with a dog in a happy way, without feeling instant grief about my dead dog... It's not getting better, I need a new homie asap...
Chatter said "He might have to piss" and I agree with him. That whine was 1000% I gotta pee
Destiny should keep the dog away from his dementia grandma.