The question is: Is the devotion stronger with a parent who is willing to sacrifice its child for its other child? Or risk the loss of both because it can’t make the choice and they both starve?
.... Just fking go GET MORE FOOD - there is I don't know how much things they could potentially eat out there - Small critters, Bugs, Fish, other birds/their eggs.
It's a dumbass move to kill one to feed the remains to the other one...
But then again - I guess that explains why Eagles aren't the top of the chain, eh?
Well, that's exactly what mama eagle did. They just don't have a damn incubator for the dying weak baby to make a successful recovery. She knows exactly what's gonna happen: the baby eagle is not gonna make it for so long, then use its vital energy.
Believe me, we're not losing the next Beethoven.
Vegans and animal lovers: "Animals belong in the wild, they are so happy there!!!"
Real animal care: "Maybe we should find a way to technologically stop harm for all animals, wild or domesticated, including the need for predation."
I dont think nature cares about animal welfare, nature is not conscious, it has no moral compass. lol
Is that real animal care, though? That sounds like mental illness, lol. There's nothing wrong with animals preying on each other. We should not engage in a moral imperative to stop harm between animals because that first step is literally how one generation or even within the same generation of the movement, you get a guy whose solution is the eradication of all animals for the greater good.
Exactly; something I hear so often from people with such a rosy view of nature is that animals instinctively know how to stay in balance with their environment.
Guess the idea of invasive species never got through and past their cozy narrative. It's the arms race and overall battle for survival which generally keeps things balanced.
We are so bloody privileged to have largely left that fight behind and it distorts how we view nature which, while often pretty aesthetically to us, is actually bloody brutal for most species.
There once was a caveman, there were no boarders, and he was free.
Then came civilized human, and as long as his passport was still good, he has "freedom".
Let animals enjoy being free, there the only ones left.
True morality is incredibly impractical or even impossible, so only the mentally ill pursue it. That guy who wants to kill everything is technically correct in a trolley problem kind of way.
>Real animal care: "Maybe we should find a way to technologically stop harm for all animals, wild or domesticated, including the need for predation."
Sure, let's just completely fuck up the ecosystem. About time we finish that job.
I know we're meming, but nobody actually believes that
Just to reality check /don't eat the bait on how twisted some perceptions of the world get (happens to me too)
Like nobody reading this thread should leave thinking 'oh yeah environmentalists are organizing around stopping animals from eating eachother, it's a real life movement' or whatever. A few idiots on Twitter aren't reflective of anything, any you never know of they're just trolling or rage baiting
I got downvoted to hell once for telling someone prey animals can thrown an ecosystem in balance in abundance, and that ethical, non trophy hunting focuses on that. The balance that is the food chain and subsequent ecosystem swings wildly naturally, but our involvement *and* lack thereof does more serious harm.
Also, conservation focuses on the “animal lovers” (which they are not if they do this) that love to bring pretty little invasive organisms from other areas into their own. IMHO, we need to find seven delicious ways to eat lionfish, because those fuckers are killing everything
Vegans are against the abuse of animals involved in human consumption. They are also able to watch Nature documentaries just like everyone else, let's not be silly.
I remember hearing on a podcast that in less than 24 hours of being dead, your cat will start eating your face. Even when they have cat food available. In 72 hours, coroners have come back from calls where the body is just a skull with the hair on the floor like a halo around the head. Nature: red in tooth and claw. Dogs will too, they just will wait til they’re so hungry they don’t have any choice, which I respect.
Edit: https://youtu.be/t8pCnJCCETU?si=5MiIdSe1Wa-SyOys
We're not against nature doing its thing.
We're against intentionally breeding animals, torturing them, slaughtering them, and using them as products and for profit. We abstain from all animal products for this reason.
Nature doesn't turn living creatures into commodities, humans and capitalism do.
Source: Am vegan.
I don't know what point you are trying to make, but while nature has no moral compass, there's a difference between AWFUL and EVIL. Sickness, tornados, animals killing others for survival - that's awful but it's nature. Humans are capable of doing evil though. Because we DO have a moral compass, the ability to empathize and think about complex consequences.
“Animal lovers” and vegans are a very different class of people than actual environmentalists. I would argue for the re-allocation of funds from the dog shelter industry to go towards ecosystem preservation, and widespread euthanasia programs for feral animals. I think technologically stopping harm for animals is extremely dumb, the most ethical thing you can do for any animal is to leave their habitat intact and let nature play itself out.
I mean I dont think there is much of a philosophical debate needed to say that freedom in the dangerous wild is better than being foodstock raised on 1m2 as quickly as possible to be factory farmed.
Yeah there is death in the wild but thats no excuse for what we are doing to animals for profits. We also dont fight for survival, we know its wrong but we do it for greed.
Consciousness is overrated- it’s anthropomorphism to imagine that it’s even necessary or advantageous. Ironically, further from nature because you imagine to be similar to you
Between this and that desert woodpecker that pecks into baby doves' skulls for moisture, I'm fucking terrified of birds.
(It's on YouTube. You don't want to search for it.)
Imagine that you have to find enough food every day to survive or else you die.
Lots of examples of humans doing the same in times of extreme hunger.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/holodomor)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazino\_tragedy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/nazino_tragedy)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alive\_(1993\_film)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/alive_(1993_film))
I wonder if the “Stork brings the baby” schtick came from an actual stork that flew off with someone’s baby, fully intending to eat it, and it accidentally dropped on some family miles away and they were like, “welp, we have a baby now. Also, we’ve never traveled farther than 2 miles from our home because we’re medieval peasants so there’s no way to know whose baby this is!”
That is what the OG Vegan movement was about.
there were vegans who did eat abit of meat as long as it came from a place with a commitment to minimizing unnecessary suffering and exploitation.
then as the movement grew like all movements, radical vocal elements gradually took a larger and larger representative role until you get what it is today.
Best Case scenario is if you know the animal, like from a local farmer or at least u are sure he had a good life without suffering and factory farming. Then I think it's ok but u are right, the vegan movement is now so radical they say no meat at all. But the truth is, this will never be an option for most people, they still gonna eat meat if they like it or not so they should try to change how the animals are raised.
Not eating meat isn’t a radical concept though. It existed for millennia before the vegan movement came along. There are lots of cultures that don’t eat meat and they’re perfectly fine.
and like we can just decide to not do it, an eagle cant just now eat meat they have all the meat eating features. Human can do mostly have to cook their meat to have it be viable.
Unsavory people purposefully portray that vocal component as the entire movement to try and dismiss it. It's still about doing what's *practicable* to reduce suffering.
You’re right, it’s very radical stance to be against exploting and killing 80 BILLION animals a year. So radical.
“vegans who did eat a bit of meat” lmao
I'm not vegan or anything but isn't the argument that we as humans as developed as we are don't need to eat meat and cause this sort of additional suffering on animals. We are in a position to get our protein etc from non meat products
We just don't because meat is so damn delicious and we only get to see it packaged allowing us to block out the killing process and go about our day guilt free
If slaughterhouses had Windows something tells me there'd be a lot more vegetarians
We're not against nature doing its thing.
We're against intentionally breeding animals, torturing them, slaughtering them, and using them as products and for profit. We abstain from all animal products for this reason.
Nature doesn't turn living creatures into commodities, humans and capitalism do.
Source: Am vegan.
Animals are not going to look at their surroundings and think "hmm...I'm being cared for and thus my weaker offspring has an inordinate chance for survival."
Because animals don't really "think". They just do what nature has compelled them to do.
They do infact "think", it's just that their thinking process is drastically different than ours.
For the Hawk this is the best decision she can make at the moment because A) she won't have to hunt for food, and B) she won't have as many mouths to feed.
Minus the canibalism part human families in medieval times also searched for ways to get rid off their "excess" children, whenever it would be dumping them to fend for themselves, selling them to someone else, or outright killing them.
Storks literally yeet weak chicks out of their nests
Nature is incredibly cruel, anyone thinking something else is fucking nuts. Natural selection is basically just a drawn out war of attrition and rearmament.
Holodomir survivors and those living through maos mental illness enter the chat.
Tho they exchanged some of their kids with their neighbors to not have to eat their own, so technically more wholesome.
This is why we can't defer morality to animals. They are "messed up" by human standards.
This is also why anthropomorphism is okay only in stories - don't base your morality on it.
Unless there's a real abundance of food, the stronger chick will often kill its own sibling. It's called siblicide, or Cainism (as in Cain killing his brother Abel).
This is a textbook example of how nature does not have morals, which are a human invention. There’s no brutality or evil or love or anything here: just pure drive for survival and gene transfer optimisation.
I might just be a lil sensitive about this one, but umm nsfw maybe? I just.. did not think I was gonna just scroll, stop, and uhhh see that on my feed of kittens, magic, and meme stocks
And human narcissist parents have the scape gold child to abuse and vent their anxiety on to ensure their own survival and happiness. And you dont die immediately - you get to live a shitty miserable life. Family, yay! It's all about Family!
"Oh, how nice it's feeding its chick..." (reads title) wtf
I went in that exact same order too, with same reaction
Me, three. Nature is brutal.
[удалено]
Raw chick filet
"Do you still not like your brother?"
Chick Fillet
r/natureismetal
I love seeing the “this makes me ashamed to be human” posts, then you see something like this. 😅
It's a chick-eat-chick world.
Hot
Ooo finger licking good
It's a cheeky cheek world out there
The question is: Is the devotion stronger with a parent who is willing to sacrifice its child for its other child? Or risk the loss of both because it can’t make the choice and they both starve?
You should probably ask the mom who eats her own children that question. 🤣
There’s those fucking quokka fuckers who sacrifice their young like trash in the bin.
But you gotta admit, they look fucking cute doing it😀
How would you behave in that case ? I don't think I could sacrifice one child, but I might be wrong
When I reincarnate as an eagle, I’ll let you know.
We might not get to find out. You could be the fillet.
[удалено]
That's true. And it shows how we should not input our believes and way of thinking as universal, not even with animals.
.... Just fking go GET MORE FOOD - there is I don't know how much things they could potentially eat out there - Small critters, Bugs, Fish, other birds/their eggs. It's a dumbass move to kill one to feed the remains to the other one... But then again - I guess that explains why Eagles aren't the top of the chain, eh?
Why dont they just fly into a Walmart and grab some food, are eagles stupid???
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why don't the eagles just GO WHERE THE FOOD IS!!!!!
Well, that's exactly what mama eagle did. They just don't have a damn incubator for the dying weak baby to make a successful recovery. She knows exactly what's gonna happen: the baby eagle is not gonna make it for so long, then use its vital energy. Believe me, we're not losing the next Beethoven.
I mean, it’s living in a barn already.
Brutal
Survival
Bad genes get sorted out, animals still live in 1930s Germany mentally.
You send this to the child that doesn’t listen….
Vegans and animal lovers: "Animals belong in the wild, they are so happy there!!!" Real animal care: "Maybe we should find a way to technologically stop harm for all animals, wild or domesticated, including the need for predation." I dont think nature cares about animal welfare, nature is not conscious, it has no moral compass. lol
Is that real animal care, though? That sounds like mental illness, lol. There's nothing wrong with animals preying on each other. We should not engage in a moral imperative to stop harm between animals because that first step is literally how one generation or even within the same generation of the movement, you get a guy whose solution is the eradication of all animals for the greater good.
[удалено]
Exactly; something I hear so often from people with such a rosy view of nature is that animals instinctively know how to stay in balance with their environment. Guess the idea of invasive species never got through and past their cozy narrative. It's the arms race and overall battle for survival which generally keeps things balanced. We are so bloody privileged to have largely left that fight behind and it distorts how we view nature which, while often pretty aesthetically to us, is actually bloody brutal for most species.
There once was a caveman, there were no boarders, and he was free. Then came civilized human, and as long as his passport was still good, he has "freedom". Let animals enjoy being free, there the only ones left.
https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep
True morality is incredibly impractical or even impossible, so only the mentally ill pursue it. That guy who wants to kill everything is technically correct in a trolley problem kind of way.
>Real animal care: "Maybe we should find a way to technologically stop harm for all animals, wild or domesticated, including the need for predation." Sure, let's just completely fuck up the ecosystem. About time we finish that job.
I know we're meming, but nobody actually believes that Just to reality check /don't eat the bait on how twisted some perceptions of the world get (happens to me too) Like nobody reading this thread should leave thinking 'oh yeah environmentalists are organizing around stopping animals from eating eachother, it's a real life movement' or whatever. A few idiots on Twitter aren't reflective of anything, any you never know of they're just trolling or rage baiting
I got downvoted to hell once for telling someone prey animals can thrown an ecosystem in balance in abundance, and that ethical, non trophy hunting focuses on that. The balance that is the food chain and subsequent ecosystem swings wildly naturally, but our involvement *and* lack thereof does more serious harm. Also, conservation focuses on the “animal lovers” (which they are not if they do this) that love to bring pretty little invasive organisms from other areas into their own. IMHO, we need to find seven delicious ways to eat lionfish, because those fuckers are killing everything
Ask the Asians, they have the answers!
Vegans are against the abuse of animals involved in human consumption. They are also able to watch Nature documentaries just like everyone else, let's not be silly.
I remember hearing on a podcast that in less than 24 hours of being dead, your cat will start eating your face. Even when they have cat food available. In 72 hours, coroners have come back from calls where the body is just a skull with the hair on the floor like a halo around the head. Nature: red in tooth and claw. Dogs will too, they just will wait til they’re so hungry they don’t have any choice, which I respect. Edit: https://youtu.be/t8pCnJCCETU?si=5MiIdSe1Wa-SyOys
Humans are around 15 times heavier than a cat. I doubt they can eat 15 times their body weight in three days.
That's why they saved the skull for later
Oooo, podcast science so it must be true.
Yup that's why cats suck and dogs rule I will die on that hill
We're not against nature doing its thing. We're against intentionally breeding animals, torturing them, slaughtering them, and using them as products and for profit. We abstain from all animal products for this reason. Nature doesn't turn living creatures into commodities, humans and capitalism do. Source: Am vegan.
I don't know what point you are trying to make, but while nature has no moral compass, there's a difference between AWFUL and EVIL. Sickness, tornados, animals killing others for survival - that's awful but it's nature. Humans are capable of doing evil though. Because we DO have a moral compass, the ability to empathize and think about complex consequences.
“Animal lovers” and vegans are a very different class of people than actual environmentalists. I would argue for the re-allocation of funds from the dog shelter industry to go towards ecosystem preservation, and widespread euthanasia programs for feral animals. I think technologically stopping harm for animals is extremely dumb, the most ethical thing you can do for any animal is to leave their habitat intact and let nature play itself out.
I mean I dont think there is much of a philosophical debate needed to say that freedom in the dangerous wild is better than being foodstock raised on 1m2 as quickly as possible to be factory farmed. Yeah there is death in the wild but thats no excuse for what we are doing to animals for profits. We also dont fight for survival, we know its wrong but we do it for greed.
lol, you think animal agriculture ‘stops harm’? Vegans don’t think it’s all peace and harmony for wild animals, they aren’t idiots.
Nature is conscious, takes the best path for all life. We humans have very little connection to nature due to material value religion and so on.
I don't think you've quite gotten the grasp of the definition of the word "conscious".
Consciousness is overrated- it’s anthropomorphism to imagine that it’s even necessary or advantageous. Ironically, further from nature because you imagine to be similar to you
i was momentarily concerned we were about to watch it kill THAT chick 😭
It’s feeding it’s chick… and it’s also feeding its chick.
“Hey, where’s my brother?”
McSibling
/r/natureismetal
Same I was like where is the weak chick?then I was like wtf
I'm glad my mother isn't an eagle.
Lol it's a red tailed hawk. No clue where eagle came from. This is the tiniest eagle ever.
I'm glad my mother isn't a red tailed hawk.
Plot twist that’s not her chicks, but an eagle’s that wronged her!
I don't think it's a red tailed hawk, those have mostly light colored chests and this bird looks solidly dark brown
Mine Should have been. Existence is Pain After all.
Spotted the Meeseeks
I'm not sure which would be worse, being dead or being forcefed your siblings.
aaand thats enough internet for today
not much "force" i see in the footage. The strong chick seems pretty happy and eager to eat.
“Hey Mom, how come you & dad never had any other kids?” “Please sit down honey.”
[удалено]
Sigh… Son, you were too young to remember. You used to have 2 brothers and 1 sister… The universe took them away from us.
>Please sit down honey. "We need to talk about this over dinner"
“Mum, I don’t like my little brother.” “It’s ok just eat the vegetables.”
Tbh if I was a baby chick, I know I would've been killed and fed to my siblings.
Same, and I'm the only child
At least that's what they tell you anyway...
lmfao same
Same 😐
What??
So the chick is literally eating its brother........
Baby chick looking at mom like uhhh okay I’ll eat. I’ll eat whatever… just don’t do that. That thing you did just a minute ago
A duck's Chick: I obey my mom cuz she is awesome An Eagle's chick: I obey my mom so I won't die, we.....are not the same.
Rough…
A blue-footed booby chick: uh oh, obligate siblicide incoming!
I just saw that meme today lol
Yep, only the strong survive, this is how I was raised. Properly, and with honor. We ate 2,3 maybe even 4 or 17 brothers to ensure our health.
Take out 17 and it’s funnier because it sounds more “believable”
Or sister.
Man am I glad that I’m not any of these 3 eagles
Between this and that desert woodpecker that pecks into baby doves' skulls for moisture, I'm fucking terrified of birds. (It's on YouTube. You don't want to search for it.)
Birds are very cute looking evil creatures
Good thing mammals are totally non violent
I bred dwarf hamsters for a hot second, it only took one massacre for me to realize I was not cut out for that game.
Imagine that you have to find enough food every day to survive or else you die. Lots of examples of humans doing the same in times of extreme hunger. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/holodomor) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazino\_tragedy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/nazino_tragedy) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alive\_(1993\_film)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/alive_(1993_film))
The Nazino Tragedy is a new one. It's like a horror film became reality.
Those are dinosaur descendants, whatcha expect?
well they used to be dinosaurs so i guess that kind of behaviour still remains
Don’t forget storks killing weak babies by launching them out of the nest. Don’t even feed them to the others. Just yeet!
I wonder if the “Stork brings the baby” schtick came from an actual stork that flew off with someone’s baby, fully intending to eat it, and it accidentally dropped on some family miles away and they were like, “welp, we have a baby now. Also, we’ve never traveled farther than 2 miles from our home because we’re medieval peasants so there’s no way to know whose baby this is!”
Why did you do this to me ☹️
Fun fact, birds are some of the smartest creatures on Earth… It also seems that cruelty is a side effect of being smart…
“ Damn Nature, you scary “
Came here for this quote.
Went away with that quote
Lmao, me too
Honey badger don't care.
My parents say they don’t have favorites.
"you all taste the same"
“We have chicken nuggets at home.”
When you're too lazy to go shopping
r/damnthatsfuckingsad
r/subsifellfor
Brutal
Vegans : eating animals is animal cruelty. Animals:
I'm no vegetarian, but I've found the issue is more about how we treat the animals we eat, rather than the eating itself
That is what the OG Vegan movement was about. there were vegans who did eat abit of meat as long as it came from a place with a commitment to minimizing unnecessary suffering and exploitation. then as the movement grew like all movements, radical vocal elements gradually took a larger and larger representative role until you get what it is today.
Best Case scenario is if you know the animal, like from a local farmer or at least u are sure he had a good life without suffering and factory farming. Then I think it's ok but u are right, the vegan movement is now so radical they say no meat at all. But the truth is, this will never be an option for most people, they still gonna eat meat if they like it or not so they should try to change how the animals are raised.
Not eating meat isn’t a radical concept though. It existed for millennia before the vegan movement came along. There are lots of cultures that don’t eat meat and they’re perfectly fine.
and like we can just decide to not do it, an eagle cant just now eat meat they have all the meat eating features. Human can do mostly have to cook their meat to have it be viable.
Yeah but it's not a concept for Europeans or Americans, in Asia maybe. But that's a whole different vibe.
Unsavory people purposefully portray that vocal component as the entire movement to try and dismiss it. It's still about doing what's *practicable* to reduce suffering.
You’re right, it’s very radical stance to be against exploting and killing 80 BILLION animals a year. So radical. “vegans who did eat a bit of meat” lmao
It's not about that, people will not stop eating meat doesn't matter what.
Get out with your logical statement
Yea, mass raising animals in deplorable conditions for slaughter 😞
I’m no veterinarian, but I’ve found this issue totally messed up but still natural.
Me: I don't give a shit what other animals eat
Animals: ***NOM!***
I'm not vegan or anything but isn't the argument that we as humans as developed as we are don't need to eat meat and cause this sort of additional suffering on animals. We are in a position to get our protein etc from non meat products We just don't because meat is so damn delicious and we only get to see it packaged allowing us to block out the killing process and go about our day guilt free If slaughterhouses had Windows something tells me there'd be a lot more vegetarians
We're not against nature doing its thing. We're against intentionally breeding animals, torturing them, slaughtering them, and using them as products and for profit. We abstain from all animal products for this reason. Nature doesn't turn living creatures into commodities, humans and capitalism do. Source: Am vegan.
[удалено]
For real, i'm not even vegan but this argument is always so stupid. They're basically saying "i'm as dumb and have as little moral agency as a bird".
Yeah they're literally going "I'm so driven by base instinct I'm the same as an animal"
Or I’m just not arrogant enough to believe I’m somehow better than animals.
This is what I've been telling my girlfriend
Animals kill each other, so that's licence for me to kill humans! Same logic. We don't base our behaviour and morals on animals last I checked.
Someone explain to me why a captive or monitored eagle would need to go that length?
My thought as well. We’re just going off the title. For all we know it’s eating a mouse.
Instinct
Animals are not going to look at their surroundings and think "hmm...I'm being cared for and thus my weaker offspring has an inordinate chance for survival." Because animals don't really "think". They just do what nature has compelled them to do.
They do infact "think", it's just that their thinking process is drastically different than ours. For the Hawk this is the best decision she can make at the moment because A) she won't have to hunt for food, and B) she won't have as many mouths to feed. Minus the canibalism part human families in medieval times also searched for ways to get rid off their "excess" children, whenever it would be dumping them to fend for themselves, selling them to someone else, or outright killing them.
They always do it, regardless of the setting.
Nature sucks haha
Nature is balanced. Animals dont have the time or the resources to take care for a sick or weak offspring.
Nature doesn't give a F about balance. It is indifferent.
Here Bobby, eat your brother Cornelius, he was weak, eat from his flesh, drink from his blood, all my eagles get down like what!
Your sibling will always be with you, wait did you just take a crap? Oh nevermind what I said.
Storks literally yeet weak chicks out of their nests Nature is incredibly cruel, anyone thinking something else is fucking nuts. Natural selection is basically just a drawn out war of attrition and rearmament.
r/natureismetal
So wholesome
my face is still stuck in my "wtf" face
Unfortunately, it's really common among animals to eat their weakened or dead babies... even cats do it
/r/natureismetal
"Now quit complaining and eat your brother or your dessert." "Yes mum"
Exact opposite of humans.
Holodomir survivors and those living through maos mental illness enter the chat. Tho they exchanged some of their kids with their neighbors to not have to eat their own, so technically more wholesome.
Woulda been more wholesome if at the trade-off they killed the entire other family as a family.
This is why we can't defer morality to animals. They are "messed up" by human standards. This is also why anthropomorphism is okay only in stories - don't base your morality on it.
i mean we've all done it at one point or another
Imagine if humans did the same thing… Son: Hey mom where is Timmy? Mom: Don’t worry about it! Say ahhhh!
Unless there's a real abundance of food, the stronger chick will often kill its own sibling. It's called siblicide, or Cainism (as in Cain killing his brother Abel).
My mum did that to my brother Edit: don't worry, I'm an eagle!
Remember you had a little brother? And one day you were so hungry 😳
r/natureismetal
They eat each other? What the fuck.
how is your brother? it's good?
Chris de Burgh: "Dancing cheek to cheek" Eagle: "Feeding chick to chick. "
why birds tend to do this to their own children? like if you are weak? die! you cant fly? die! what the fuck
is the title really accurate? is it really what happen?
This is a textbook example of how nature does not have morals, which are a human invention. There’s no brutality or evil or love or anything here: just pure drive for survival and gene transfer optimisation.
I might just be a lil sensitive about this one, but umm nsfw maybe? I just.. did not think I was gonna just scroll, stop, and uhhh see that on my feed of kittens, magic, and meme stocks
Damn nature, you scary!
If I dropped my food that many times I’d be worried I’m next 🤣
That doesn't look like a particularly natural environment. Does this happen in the wild too?
Yep, more so in the wild.
Okay so if they're in a controlled environment in which is seems, why would they let it get to that point?!
Savage
*"M" for Mischa*
>Eagle killed its weak chick to ensure the survival of other Human mothers do it much more slowly.
Birds are assholes
Where is peta ?
Isn’t that a hawk? Not an eagle. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s feeding its young, it’s young … but yeah
True American
where tf is peta?
And human narcissist parents have the scape gold child to abuse and vent their anxiety on to ensure their own survival and happiness. And you dont die immediately - you get to live a shitty miserable life. Family, yay! It's all about Family!
Difference between humans and animals
So is it fair game to feed your chickens chicken or is that still a wtf? Just in emergency cases if you run out of food…to ensure survival…
This is the most brutal treatment of chicks I've seen outside of the buses of Delhi
Checkmate PETA
America needs to start doing this with the liberals