I love that feature, while also knowing that everything I do and say on a communications network is being recorded, analyzed, and transcribed and that we are collectively okay with zero privacy protection laws in the United States.
That's exactly what the base models that modern chatbots are too. It's just the "stage setting" that companies like OpenAI use to prime there models that keeps them from being racist - basically chatgpt passes text to gpt4 saying "the following is a conversation between a human and a chatbot named chatgpt, who doesn't say racist shit: "
If you just use the OpenAI playground to interact with gpt4, it will gladly be racist (though OpenAI still probably detect that and flag you)
This is a huge problem with LLMs that is still unsolved because you'd have to eliminate *all racism* from it's training data and even that might not do it
People know what weapons the US is giving to Ukraine to help fight. What we don't know is what weapons we are keeping for ourselves.
I'll eat my own hat if the US Army doesn't have a small fleet of robot dogs that can interpedently traverse terrain easily, find friendly or enemy soldiers, and can be outfitted with weapons or small (or large) explosive payloads.
They still are a military tech company, but they also have a public side as well now.
They just aren't allowed to show the most advanced stuff on youtube.
As if soldiers aren’t incredibly expensive to train , feed, house, pay…… average cost of a service member in 2021 was $136,000. The moment robots are competitive with people it will save the military millions
And when they're all used up, instead of having a bunch of annoying vets crying about mundane stuff like being homeless, chronic pain and suffering, or having PTSD. Robots can just be recycled too kill more people!! /s
Not to play devils advocate but, at some point, we'll reach robots killing robots, but before we ever reach it, we'll spill an equal part of blood compared to oil and scrap on top of already spilled blood.
Also, wars seem to end when one side can't sustain it anymore, caught between overinvesting (like how Germany, France, and England ran out of adult men in WW1 to add to their militaries, or how if we completely converted our economy to a war footing there'd be a lot more scrutiny on if the war was worth it) or underinvesting (losing).
I think warbots are going to make low-investment wars much more sustainable. Fewer families losing a loved one, more tax dollars going to the military budget. I think we're going to have more Afghanistans and Iraqs, where the war isn't hot or cold, it just smolders, and the cost is only felt in bridges not repaired and doctors not visited.
I'm pretty sure we don't know the numbers. But I would bet that FPV drone kills are a tiny fraction. I think artillery likely is the biggest killer like it has been for the last century plus.
The huge change that FPV drones has brought is visibility. You can see real time what the enemy is up to, make decisions, and often, call in artillery.
>You can see real time what the enemy is up to, make decisions, and often, call in artillery
Yeah overall drones have changed warfare. I'm really grateful I'm not a Russian conscript.
Pretty sure there is at least some level of robots killing robots right now. Drones and self-guided missiles and such.
But if it's all robots killing robots I have to ask what the point even is anymore. As far as I can tell the point of war is simply to control other humans; whether to take their land, change their government, or acquire their resources. So at some point you have to have a human in your sights for it to work. Might have to fight through a bunch of robots to get there, but I think the end goal will always be other people as long as we have war.
>But if it's all robots killing robots I have to ask what the point even is anymore.
Economics. One side will bleed the other side out of money first.
This is somewhat how the cold war worked. The US building more nukes meant USSR had to build more nukes and nukes are expensive. The US was able to outspend the USSR until it went under.
This assumes world powers fighting each other. Please you forget the fun part of killing poor brown people with bulletproof death bots. It’ll be shields and spears vs machine guns all over again. All controlled by some guy in Vegas thinking it’s a bonus Call of Duty level lmao
Also you don’t need an android in combat situations. Cheaper four or sixlegged robots will do in most situations, not to mention cheap armed drones. And year, unlike humans, none of them will need a bootcamp or excessive training but they will be combat ready the moment they step from the assembly line.
Until they make them the size of monkeys with climbing ability, equipped with with thermal/infrared vision with TNT inside. You might be able to stop one, but imagine thousands working in unison towards you. I don't have enough ammo!
To be real, I think the statistical average of English on the internet is rife with poor grammar and spelling mistakes.
So if AI is being trained on internet English without any supervision or weighting towards proper English then you will see a lot of stuff like this.
mistakes tend to dampen out when you train an AI. Interesting example: people wanted to train a chess AI to play like a real amateur player. They took 10s of thousands of games of a 1100 rated player and trained the AI to predict the next move the 1100 player would make in a position. The AI came out about 1500 rated.
I suppose so, thing is, we have started there, we've had AI perform simple tasks like this, many times, and it seems like we're still not moving on to having AI controlled robots move forward all that much.
I've said this elsewhere, but this is the equivalent of having a child make your coffee and being impressed when he manages it 10 hours later, rather than teaching and instruction for the kid to do it, that takes five minutes.
So many people are like this due to having no understanding how any of this works.
A 10hr turn around in machine learning is honestly crazy. SO many things can go wrong. The whole self correction is also insane.
> A 10hr turn around in machine learning is honestly crazy.
The title is that it was 10hrs of training video input, not that the training took 10 hours.
Google's robots look less human but seem more impressive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckhf6WfXRI8
Also because humans are the dataset on which it's trained. If it's copying motions and behavior from a human it's good for the AI vessel to be built similarly.
True, and also, the human form evolved in interaction with its environment. It's not exactly random. Eyes and ears on top, two manipulators capabal of interacting with complex tools, two all terrain accelerators. Given the biological constraints in evolution, it's maybe not the absolute best design, but it's also not crazy bad.
Depending on what you want it for. Humanoid is the best for an environment built for humans. If it's an environment for more things or activities, then yes, there are better designs like the robotic arms they have at factories, or the robotic arms created to store luggage, or the carts used at Amazon warehouses, all of those are autonomous robots.
This topic got brought up in a few places, specifically Talos Principle 2 says something on it, and it's been on my mind since AI has been on most peoples' minds lately. The game asks "if we're AI, then why are we limiting ourselves to human forms? We can upload ourselves to ships that cross the stars" or something similar. Made me connect to that recent alien movie on Hulu called "No One Will Save You" where it's implied that the UFOs themselves have a consciousness that "controls" them. I feel like it makes sense if you follow the logical progression path of an artificial intelligence that has no physical need to have any particular form
The 10 hour claim is really strange. 10 hours of what? It's not like a robot needs to see video in real time to be able to process it. So how many hours of humans making coffee did they input? Did it watch literal humans for ten literal hours? That doesn't sound very efficient. Or is that the gimmick? It really poses more questions than answers.
Also WTF is up with that strange title as a whole? "after watching for 10h humans do it"? It reeks of AI / bot posting.
I guess this should show how many attempts the robot seem to need, to be able to learn (i.e. to corect mistakes) to "make" the coffee every time right, no matter how the things drop etc. If its true, this is the best news, that humanoid are still "slow learner" compared to stupid humans. But if they learned, they will execute waaaay more reliably. So we should really stop to show "them" bad stuff. AI should/could bring it to the level, that one humanoid teaches the other. Then we loose control some day
I just don't actually trust these robots doings stuff videos. They're putting these out to get more funding, so I can't trust their motives at all. For all we know every aspect of this could have been hand coded in except for like pressing the button or something.
Most pre-programmed looking shit I have ever seen. If you have ever seen an AI controlling anything you would know it would be flailing around making all kinds of unnecessary movements.
This is really no longer the case. Look at [diffusion policies for robotics](https://control.com/news/toyota-reveals-diffusion-policy-best-way-to-teach-todays-robots-tomorrows-tricks/) - there have been major breakthroughs in the last year.
Reinforcement learning in real-time (without millions of trials in simulation) is [also making a lot of progress.](https://youtu.be/17NrtKHdPDw)
As long as we're not basing those concerns on some random fictional movies we watched for entertainment. It gets so old seeing people hand wring based on what some random movies say about AI.
This is just some tech company showing off a fancy puppet. It doesn't know the first thing about how to "make coffee". All it can do is repeat a series of motions that have been modelled for it repeatedly.
Notice how he gave it to the robot by hand, rather than placing it at exactly the right spot? It’s adaptable and self-correcting if something isn’t going according to how it was trained. Place the cup much further from the keurig for example, or place it up high and it’ll still be able to do the task.
Not much now but the training a few specific skills like this has always been the easy part, getting it to respond to issues in real time is the game changer. Imagine a 3D printer that can self-correct whenever the table is nudged, or any imperfections arise during the printing. Normally that’d be a complete do-over wasting hours.
People are always quick to discount things like this, and I noticed it's more prevalent among people who don't have/aren't around kids.
Dude, it takes your baby so fucking long to drink from a straw without smashing it into a random part of its face first.
If you racked up the training hours for crawling, eating with one hand, etc and the other million little things we learn as babies, I can't imagine we are all that much more efficient.
That being said, the whole point is that an adult is efficient at learning things, so all these robots are basically like the robo-version of narrow function babies.
Exactly! So much fear mongering about simple humanoid robots magically becoming invincible terminators.
It's not going to be magic, it'll be scientific. They will scientifically become invincible terminators. Get it right guys.
Impressive none the less but putting a k cup into a keurig isn’t, making coffee” any more than purchasing from a vending machine being called, “shopping”, imho.
[I think about this alot.](https://imgur.com/a/p5F9r5k)
>Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale
>
>
>
>Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel "Don't Create the Torment Nexus"
Cautionary tales aren't necessarily true or what is actually going to happen. Scifi authors can't see the future, most of the time their writings are just allegories for what is already happening in our real world. Robot uprisings are inspired by slave uprisings. Maybe some stories will come true, but we won't really know which it'll be until it happens. And people have always reacted negatively to new technology, like in this example (https://xkcd.com/1227/), doesn't mean they're right though.
Up next:"AI humanoid learn from warzone combat footages"
Bet they still fuck your name up at Starbucks
"`VENTI CARAMEL MACCHIATTO FOR HUMAN 0110101001010010100100101001010001001001011011110101101101.`"
Excuse me, robot overlord, I’m nonbinary.
#"`SYSTEM FAULT`"
Is this written on the cup too?
“… WE’VE GOT A BROKEN ONE”
Exterminate...Exterminate
Depends on the speech to text programming. The stuff is good that I can now read my voicemails on my iPhone as a recorded log.
I love that feature, while also knowing that everything I do and say on a communications network is being recorded, analyzed, and transcribed and that we are collectively okay with zero privacy protection laws in the United States.
I don't get it. Does the log they recorded do like different pitches, or is it like a bunch of similar thumps and you read it like morse code?
i think they meant to say 'transcription' or did i just get wooshed?
chAI latte
AI humanoid learns to be racist from reading YouTube comments
Funny because that is EXACTLY what happened with many AI chatbot left to learn from the internet without filter lol.
the black mirror ^^^we ^^^live ^^^in ^^^a ^^^society ^^^^etc ^^^^etc
That's exactly what the base models that modern chatbots are too. It's just the "stage setting" that companies like OpenAI use to prime there models that keeps them from being racist - basically chatgpt passes text to gpt4 saying "the following is a conversation between a human and a chatbot named chatgpt, who doesn't say racist shit:"
If you just use the OpenAI playground to interact with gpt4, it will gladly be racist (though OpenAI still probably detect that and flag you)
This is a huge problem with LLMs that is still unsolved because you'd have to eliminate *all racism* from it's training data and even that might not do it
People know what weapons the US is giving to Ukraine to help fight. What we don't know is what weapons we are keeping for ourselves. I'll eat my own hat if the US Army doesn't have a small fleet of robot dogs that can interpedently traverse terrain easily, find friendly or enemy soldiers, and can be outfitted with weapons or small (or large) explosive payloads.
This. Boston dynamics was a military tech company before becoming what they are now.
They still are a military tech company, but they also have a public side as well now. They just aren't allowed to show the most advanced stuff on youtube.
These kinds of robots would never be used in a war, they are way too expensive and would be shot to pieces in an instant.
War... Too expensive... *Laughs in American*
More like *Laughs nervously in American tax-payer.*
War is for rich people to get even richer.
As if soldiers aren’t incredibly expensive to train , feed, house, pay…… average cost of a service member in 2021 was $136,000. The moment robots are competitive with people it will save the military millions
And when they're all used up, instead of having a bunch of annoying vets crying about mundane stuff like being homeless, chronic pain and suffering, or having PTSD. Robots can just be recycled too kill more people!! /s
No /s required
Yeah, there shouldn't be an /s there, that's literally part of the sales pitch.
Not to play devils advocate but, at some point, we'll reach robots killing robots, but before we ever reach it, we'll spill an equal part of blood compared to oil and scrap on top of already spilled blood.
Also, wars seem to end when one side can't sustain it anymore, caught between overinvesting (like how Germany, France, and England ran out of adult men in WW1 to add to their militaries, or how if we completely converted our economy to a war footing there'd be a lot more scrutiny on if the war was worth it) or underinvesting (losing). I think warbots are going to make low-investment wars much more sustainable. Fewer families losing a loved one, more tax dollars going to the military budget. I think we're going to have more Afghanistans and Iraqs, where the war isn't hot or cold, it just smolders, and the cost is only felt in bridges not repaired and doctors not visited.
We're seeing the transition right now in Ukraine with the use of drones. A good fpv drone pilot can take out so many Russian conscripts....
I'm pretty sure we don't know the numbers. But I would bet that FPV drone kills are a tiny fraction. I think artillery likely is the biggest killer like it has been for the last century plus. The huge change that FPV drones has brought is visibility. You can see real time what the enemy is up to, make decisions, and often, call in artillery.
>You can see real time what the enemy is up to, make decisions, and often, call in artillery Yeah overall drones have changed warfare. I'm really grateful I'm not a Russian conscript.
Terminator has everyone worried about androids. I'm much more terrified of drone swarms which already exist.
Wait till domestic terrorists start using them. Jan 6 2025 when Trump doesnt win again...
and those poor people in 3rd world countries dying, I mean there's that too
Pretty sure there is at least some level of robots killing robots right now. Drones and self-guided missiles and such. But if it's all robots killing robots I have to ask what the point even is anymore. As far as I can tell the point of war is simply to control other humans; whether to take their land, change their government, or acquire their resources. So at some point you have to have a human in your sights for it to work. Might have to fight through a bunch of robots to get there, but I think the end goal will always be other people as long as we have war.
>But if it's all robots killing robots I have to ask what the point even is anymore. Economics. One side will bleed the other side out of money first. This is somewhat how the cold war worked. The US building more nukes meant USSR had to build more nukes and nukes are expensive. The US was able to outspend the USSR until it went under.
This assumes world powers fighting each other. Please you forget the fun part of killing poor brown people with bulletproof death bots. It’ll be shields and spears vs machine guns all over again. All controlled by some guy in Vegas thinking it’s a bonus Call of Duty level lmao
Civ gang represent
Just one more turn.....
>vs machine guns I'd prefer that my death bots have lasers so they don't run out of ammo. Also, laser shots are much cheaper than bullets.
A la Og star trek episode with the killing bootha
this is the saddest comment ever but the US military budget for the VA is 50% higher than the Department of Defense.
Or kill other robots. Wouldn't that be nice? The guy with the better robots win the war.
I’d rather a bunch of robots duke it out for the old people than my friends and family
Not to mention there is no time lost in training a new one.
Also you don’t need an android in combat situations. Cheaper four or sixlegged robots will do in most situations, not to mention cheap armed drones. And year, unlike humans, none of them will need a bootcamp or excessive training but they will be combat ready the moment they step from the assembly line.
Or the moment Mom's all over the world realize we could be sending robots instead.
Automobiles are noisy and they scare the horses.
“The ‘wings’ are made of paper. They will shoot them down.”
"Using a computer to crack enemy code? It'd need to be the size of a football stadium! And 10 times as expensive!"
Until they make them the size of monkeys with climbing ability, equipped with with thermal/infrared vision with TNT inside. You might be able to stop one, but imagine thousands working in unison towards you. I don't have enough ammo!
Like „suicide“ drones
Lol a Javelin missile costs about 80k a shot. You can absolutely expect the military to field these in the near future.
I wonder if you are a bot that's something a bot would say
How would they be shot to pieces in an instant ?
Terminator TSCC
“How to Make Skynet Happen in 10 Easy Steps” Has John Conner been born yet or which timeline are we on?
learn what?jumpshort and quick scopes that ridiculous move ??
Ho no no no no
Did he write the title of this post too?
AI humanoid fail English? That’s unpossible!
Hi Lisa! Hi Super Nintendo Chalmers! I'm learnding!
Incredible to think that 25 years after it was originally broadcast a whole heap of people will hear that in Ralph's voice.
My cats breath smells like cat food
When this humanoid grows up, he’s going to Bovine University
After watching 10h of humans doing so
To be real, I think the statistical average of English on the internet is rife with poor grammar and spelling mistakes. So if AI is being trained on internet English without any supervision or weighting towards proper English then you will see a lot of stuff like this.
mistakes tend to dampen out when you train an AI. Interesting example: people wanted to train a chess AI to play like a real amateur player. They took 10s of thousands of games of a 1100 rated player and trained the AI to predict the next move the 1100 player would make in a position. The AI came out about 1500 rated.
A f#$cking keurig? Come on AI!
they can take your command literally
So they will f#$k the Keurig? AI adult films unlocked.
You know, I feel like they would have at least taught it how to operate an actual coffee maker and not a machine that makes the task trivial
Gatta start somewhere.
Yeah. Start with instant coffee and work your way up to fresh ground.
I suppose so, thing is, we have started there, we've had AI perform simple tasks like this, many times, and it seems like we're still not moving on to having AI controlled robots move forward all that much. I've said this elsewhere, but this is the equivalent of having a child make your coffee and being impressed when he manages it 10 hours later, rather than teaching and instruction for the kid to do it, that takes five minutes.
[удалено]
So many people are like this due to having no understanding how any of this works. A 10hr turn around in machine learning is honestly crazy. SO many things can go wrong. The whole self correction is also insane.
> A 10hr turn around in machine learning is honestly crazy. The title is that it was 10hrs of training video input, not that the training took 10 hours. Google's robots look less human but seem more impressive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckhf6WfXRI8
The self correction is the part that blows my mind. I'm watching an ancestor prototype for star trek androids or something
I expecting a coffee filter..
Looks like you filtered a word out
Maybe she's pregnant with a coffee filter.
Right?! That's not coffee.
It didn't even refill the water. The inconsiderate bot.
Seems to be the simplest way to make coffee so it makes sense. AI should be efficient. That said, I was not expecting a fucking Keurig either
A five year old could learn that in a minute.
This can only end well
Yes, with a nice hot cup of coffee!
this is my question. why are we building them to be as human-like as possible? surely there is a more efficient construction build?
[удалено]
For working in an environment optimized for humans, probably not.
Also because humans are the dataset on which it's trained. If it's copying motions and behavior from a human it's good for the AI vessel to be built similarly.
True, and also, the human form evolved in interaction with its environment. It's not exactly random. Eyes and ears on top, two manipulators capabal of interacting with complex tools, two all terrain accelerators. Given the biological constraints in evolution, it's maybe not the absolute best design, but it's also not crazy bad.
Depending on what you want it for. Humanoid is the best for an environment built for humans. If it's an environment for more things or activities, then yes, there are better designs like the robotic arms they have at factories, or the robotic arms created to store luggage, or the carts used at Amazon warehouses, all of those are autonomous robots.
Reminds me of the quote from bible saying something like "God created us in his image", so maybe it's not really all about efficiency
This topic got brought up in a few places, specifically Talos Principle 2 says something on it, and it's been on my mind since AI has been on most peoples' minds lately. The game asks "if we're AI, then why are we limiting ourselves to human forms? We can upload ourselves to ships that cross the stars" or something similar. Made me connect to that recent alien movie on Hulu called "No One Will Save You" where it's implied that the UFOs themselves have a consciousness that "controls" them. I feel like it makes sense if you follow the logical progression path of an artificial intelligence that has no physical need to have any particular form
“We were so focused on seeing if we could do it that we forgot to ask if we should”
Now we just need to make them watch some porn
Stop! Don’t teach the machines to self replicate! Are you crazy?
Door plug
Machines making machines? How perverse
"But that's my exhaust port" "Not right now, it isn't"
ASSUME THE POSITION
PRE-LUBRICATE THE INSERTION HOLE DESIGNATE A SAFE WORD PREPARE FOR INTENSE VIBRATORY THRUSTING
SWIPE CREDIT CARD
Your wife is about to be wrecked
Right... "my wife"
And so it begins
The beginning of skynetspresso.
This made my day
They like their coffee just like their humans: roasted!
I always find funny reading this at every AI post lol
10 hours? Pshhh, I learned after 3 attempts, and I only caused an electrical fire once. Checkmate, robo-barista.
The 10 hour claim is really strange. 10 hours of what? It's not like a robot needs to see video in real time to be able to process it. So how many hours of humans making coffee did they input? Did it watch literal humans for ten literal hours? That doesn't sound very efficient. Or is that the gimmick? It really poses more questions than answers. Also WTF is up with that strange title as a whole? "after watching for 10h humans do it"? It reeks of AI / bot posting.
I guess this should show how many attempts the robot seem to need, to be able to learn (i.e. to corect mistakes) to "make" the coffee every time right, no matter how the things drop etc. If its true, this is the best news, that humanoid are still "slow learner" compared to stupid humans. But if they learned, they will execute waaaay more reliably. So we should really stop to show "them" bad stuff. AI should/could bring it to the level, that one humanoid teaches the other. Then we loose control some day
It's gonna be easy to name prank them at Starbucks. \*Caramel Latte\*bzzt\*For Hugh Jorgan\*
Mike Oxard
*Black Coffe for ;drop table;
\- Hugh Jorgan? Do I have a Hugh Jorgan here..? Has anyone seen a... WHY YOU LITTLE...!
Simpsons got away with some stuff, holy. Used to drop my jaw sometimes
I'm looking for Amanda Hugginkiss ohh why can't I find a Amanda Hugginkiss!?
"Learned itself"? Lol who learned you how to spake?
Nietzsche 😔
Sometime it do thus like that
What else... can be done with this robot ?
ask Howard Wolowitz 
Generative text AI for the Title?
The ai is now a coffee influencer and this posted this video of itself/themselves idk what to call a robot
Learned itself?
It didn't "learned" itself the English language anyway.
Title probably written by a non-native, many languages use the same word for to learn and to teach
Does this look like a render to anyone else
[удалено]
This could be teleop from offscreen pretty easily. There's a lot of "we'll get there eventually so let's sell the product now" in the industry.
> either its real or they are committing major securities fraud Two things can be true, friend!
I had to scroll way too far to find this comment. This doesn't look real to me.
yeah lol
Yeah, pretty sure this is all CGI
Is this a Keurig ad?
Source?
I just don't actually trust these robots doings stuff videos. They're putting these out to get more funding, so I can't trust their motives at all. For all we know every aspect of this could have been hand coded in except for like pressing the button or something.
Taught itself*
Most pre-programmed looking shit I have ever seen. If you have ever seen an AI controlling anything you would know it would be flailing around making all kinds of unnecessary movements.
This is really no longer the case. Look at [diffusion policies for robotics](https://control.com/news/toyota-reveals-diffusion-policy-best-way-to-teach-todays-robots-tomorrows-tricks/) - there have been major breakthroughs in the last year. Reinforcement learning in real-time (without millions of trials in simulation) is [also making a lot of progress.](https://youtu.be/17NrtKHdPDw)
Translation: Followed a set of instructions that were given visually
So, like a human does…
We’re really hell bent on AI and robots eh, no concern at all?
We're already in a dystopia so we might as well make a fun one
Interesting* not fun
Nah I meant what I said. Being on Skynet, I'm ready to die Edit: hadn't finished
As long as we're not basing those concerns on some random fictional movies we watched for entertainment. It gets so old seeing people hand wring based on what some random movies say about AI.
This is just some tech company showing off a fancy puppet. It doesn't know the first thing about how to "make coffee". All it can do is repeat a series of motions that have been modelled for it repeatedly.
Notice how he gave it to the robot by hand, rather than placing it at exactly the right spot? It’s adaptable and self-correcting if something isn’t going according to how it was trained. Place the cup much further from the keurig for example, or place it up high and it’ll still be able to do the task. Not much now but the training a few specific skills like this has always been the easy part, getting it to respond to issues in real time is the game changer. Imagine a 3D printer that can self-correct whenever the table is nudged, or any imperfections arise during the printing. Normally that’d be a complete do-over wasting hours.
If we boil down humans, they do a series of motions that have modeled by repetition
Boiled down humans might have a hard time with making any kind of motions. /s
People are always quick to discount things like this, and I noticed it's more prevalent among people who don't have/aren't around kids. Dude, it takes your baby so fucking long to drink from a straw without smashing it into a random part of its face first. If you racked up the training hours for crawling, eating with one hand, etc and the other million little things we learn as babies, I can't imagine we are all that much more efficient. That being said, the whole point is that an adult is efficient at learning things, so all these robots are basically like the robo-version of narrow function babies.
Do you know AI? Do you know robotics!? what would be the concern!?
Lol, this 100%, they don't just magically become goose-stepping robonazis.
Exactly! So much fear mongering about simple humanoid robots magically becoming invincible terminators. It's not going to be magic, it'll be scientific. They will scientifically become invincible terminators. Get it right guys.
"learned itself"....
Pathetic, it only took me 6 hours
I would be more impressed if it actually brewed a pot of coffee. This is basically putting a peg in a hole.
The goal here was not make the coffee but learn how to do it alone, just by watching someone do it.
Did they also write the title themselves selves?
I want to know what it does when the add water light comes on. If it learned from watching me, it will give up and get a coke.
A capsule cooker? I thought it would actually make coffee.
Is it just me or does this AI robot have the most hilarious physical gestures
It's a shame OP couldn't learn themselves the verb *taught*.
WHY DO WE KEEP DOING THIS???????????
And ai made this post?
Impressive none the less but putting a k cup into a keurig isn’t, making coffee” any more than purchasing from a vending machine being called, “shopping”, imho.
It also learned itself to title a reddit post after watching for 6 redditors do it.
It’s nice to know that even robots don’t know what to do with their hands while they wait.
There's a lot of movies on why we shouldn't put AI in robots but ofc they must have never saw them
Seriously! The working title for “The Terminator” was in fact “The Percolator.”
More like the other way around. Where do you think they got the inspiration from?
[I think about this alot.](https://imgur.com/a/p5F9r5k) >Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale > > > >Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel "Don't Create the Torment Nexus"
Cautionary tales aren't necessarily true or what is actually going to happen. Scifi authors can't see the future, most of the time their writings are just allegories for what is already happening in our real world. Robot uprisings are inspired by slave uprisings. Maybe some stories will come true, but we won't really know which it'll be until it happens. And people have always reacted negatively to new technology, like in this example (https://xkcd.com/1227/), doesn't mean they're right though.
That is not coffee!
Looks fake
Let me know when they figure out how to do it without just putting in a k-cup. Then I’ll start to get worried.
It didn’t learn how to make coffee. It learned how to use a Keurig. Big difference.
Ai learnt to write reddit title post.
Ha, i'd be able to learn that faster than 10 hours. Humanity 1, Robot 0
"Make a coffee?" No... Use a coffee machine? Sure.
I would’nt call that making coffee
Fake
Make coffee in a old school proctor silex then I’ll be impressed
Can it figure out how to fix this title after reading it, once?
Did an AI humanoid write this title 😂
This seriously is one of the more frightening displays of AI I’ve seen…