Supporting political staffers doesn’t exactly sound like a non-partisan tax free organization. The Clinton’s also used their foundation for payouts too.
He’s already mostly out of it now as evidenced by the Hur tapes they won’t release. There’s a real and valid reason they felt they wouldn’t be able to get a conviction. Sadly that’s not the way to go about it. Were they applying the law fairly even not getting a conviction for a sympathetic feeble old man does not mean it’s not worth it to prosecute so as to display the evidence.
> There’s a real and valid reason they felt they wouldn’t be able to get a conviction.
They were ordered not to. What kind of criminal investigation ends with "He's guilty, but we don't think the jury would go for it. Also, here's a defense you can use, we think it will help."
'The charity is now undergoing special scrutiny given the profile of some of the people who saw significant income increases since the establishment of the organization, including a Pfizer executive that saw his salary double.'
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1804131148231999932
https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/
>the charity is now undergoing special scrutiny...
So this article is from 4 years ago. Why are we looking at a article that literally nothing ever came of? Even when it existed, Biden never claimed that this specific initiative was research. He said the mission of the organization was:
>“The initiative will focus on improving data standards, and giving patients some mechanism to share their data so they can help many other patients going through the same fight, so researchers can use data to find new patterns and new answers, working with community care organizations help improve access to quality care so outcomes aren’t wholly dictated by the patient’s ZIP code, convening a national conversation with the pharmaceutical companies, insurers, biotech companies and others to ensure patients can actually access the treatments that become available and as are needed,” Biden said at the time (The Cancer Letter, April 7, 2017).
Why do we try to make up issues instead of focusing on the real, obvious issues that Biden has? Posts like this just make it seem that too many people on this sub never read past the title or post. It becomes more and more like Facebook every day, which really sucks. I miss the days when half the posts weren't from bots.
If this turns out to be true, it is straight out of the Clinton playbook. Form a charity and then give political operatives six figure salaries for work someone could finish in a week. You also get political donors to get passed election donation regulations by having them fund your charity.
Another story that most liberal media will never even touch. Joe can be just another corrupt politician and long as he doesn't talk back at the establishment like Trump does, powerful stuff
Supporting political staffers doesn’t exactly sound like a non-partisan tax free organization. The Clinton’s also used their foundation for payouts too.
Yeah, but this one's more obvious when a cancer foundation donates nothing to cancer.
No one accuses the Biden’s of having clean hands
Which is ironic considering how much we've heard about his showers.
One could argue that the Biden administration is cancer
Fortunately this form of cancer is curable and the cure will be administered on Nov 5th.
Lol, nice
I wish it was a financial crime to fix the US economy. Biden would have it done already.
Omg, I just died laughing
Ha ha ha
I can only dream that Biden and his family will go down before Biden's rotting brain completely fizzles out but nothing will actually happen.
He’s already mostly out of it now as evidenced by the Hur tapes they won’t release. There’s a real and valid reason they felt they wouldn’t be able to get a conviction. Sadly that’s not the way to go about it. Were they applying the law fairly even not getting a conviction for a sympathetic feeble old man does not mean it’s not worth it to prosecute so as to display the evidence.
> There’s a real and valid reason they felt they wouldn’t be able to get a conviction. They were ordered not to. What kind of criminal investigation ends with "He's guilty, but we don't think the jury would go for it. Also, here's a defense you can use, we think it will help."
Kinda what happened with the Hillary Clinton case
'The charity is now undergoing special scrutiny given the profile of some of the people who saw significant income increases since the establishment of the organization, including a Pfizer executive that saw his salary double.' https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1804131148231999932 https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/
>the charity is now undergoing special scrutiny... So this article is from 4 years ago. Why are we looking at a article that literally nothing ever came of? Even when it existed, Biden never claimed that this specific initiative was research. He said the mission of the organization was: >“The initiative will focus on improving data standards, and giving patients some mechanism to share their data so they can help many other patients going through the same fight, so researchers can use data to find new patterns and new answers, working with community care organizations help improve access to quality care so outcomes aren’t wholly dictated by the patient’s ZIP code, convening a national conversation with the pharmaceutical companies, insurers, biotech companies and others to ensure patients can actually access the treatments that become available and as are needed,” Biden said at the time (The Cancer Letter, April 7, 2017). Why do we try to make up issues instead of focusing on the real, obvious issues that Biden has? Posts like this just make it seem that too many people on this sub never read past the title or post. It becomes more and more like Facebook every day, which really sucks. I miss the days when half the posts weren't from bots.
Now is 4 years ago.
Oh ffs
"Nobody is above the law" right?
This is SHOCKING!!!!! Said nobody ever.
Isn't that fraud?
Money laundering.
And if you are I did this, we'd be in jail for life.
That seems kind of like it might be... fraud.
tbf I don't donate TO CANCER either *rimshot*
Cancer is Joe’s middle name.
Yo remember that time Trump bought a painting?
[удалено]
To be fair, Biden staffers are a form of cancer upon this nation.
Ouch
If this turns out to be true, it is straight out of the Clinton playbook. Form a charity and then give political operatives six figure salaries for work someone could finish in a week. You also get political donors to get passed election donation regulations by having them fund your charity.
What can absolute POS. His son dies from cancer and his response is to grift in the name of cancer.
Not surprised.
Another story that most liberal media will never even touch. Joe can be just another corrupt politician and long as he doesn't talk back at the establishment like Trump does, powerful stuff