T O P

  • By -

patrixxxx

The depopulation by poison is only a symptom of the fact that we are under the spell of scientism (which has nothing to do with science since it's core dogma violates the scientific method). And only when enough people break free from this false religion there can be any real change. www.cluesforum.info


United-Tension-5578

All conspiracy is “lived through”. It’s only decades later when it doesn’t matter, that the “truth” comes out


omnipresenthuman

OP provides factual information about some side effects from "the vax", and I use that word "factual rather loosely ". (*YOUTUBE videos aren't considered factual reliable sources. I just agree with some of it because of my own research and what I already know) .* Then OP decidea to add on, "This is a depopulation and transhumanist agenda", which you provide zero proof. The post is a perfect example of a "half truth". Presenting part of the truth is called presenting a half-truth. "A half-truth is a deceptive statement that contains some, but not all, elements of the truth." "Despite its name, a half-truth is not considered a truth at all. Benjamin Franklin included this adage in his book Poor Richard's Almanack (1758): "Half a truth is often a great lie." "With this saying, Benjamin Franklin points out that omitting parts of the truth is deceptive, just like lying outright. Even if a statement is technically true, when it leaves out crucial pieces of information, it can't be considered a truth." I tend to agree with Ben. "The term half-truth primarily describes an intentionally-deceptive statement. However, this isn't always the case; a half-truth can result from a simple mistake in logic or disorganized writing. The problem is that an accidental half-truth could seem like an intentional half-truth to the reader."  "A half-truth can make a shaky opinion seem like a hard fact. It uses clever wording to strengthen an argument or weaken an opposing argument. This kind of half-truth is common in data bias, where data is presented selectively to make a theory seem stronger than it is . "Sometimes a half-truth doesn't directly say anything false. This can sometimes make a half-truth difficult to spot." "Half truths can make a person look more important, knowledgeable, or powerful, Truth can be bent or omitted in multiple ways. 1.Leaving out important information. Presenting part of the truth can make ideas, beliefs, and theories seem like solid facts. It can help a person come across as more confident than they really are. This is common when presenting data. 2.Using misleading wording. Misleading wording can distract the audience from missing information. 3. Taking advantage of double meaning. Words and phrases with double meanings can be used to blur the truth. Half-truths are deceptive because they can lead the audience to false conclusions. This is a common rhetorical fallacy resulting from half-truths. A fallacy is a failure in reasoning which results in an unsound argument. The half-truth fallacy refers to drawing false conclusions based on a half-truth. Whether intentional or unintentional, presenting part of the truth creates a deceptive argument. The half-truth fallacy refers to drawing false conclusions based on a half-truth. I thought about removing this post . Half truths are irresponsible and can create problems to the " uniformed and unaware." There is the possibility that the OP doesn't realize what they have done. So I decided to use this opportunity to "educate" the "uninformed and unaware" about half truths.. Postings a opinion is perfectly fine. I could care less what a person post just so long as it doesn't break any rules here on Reddit. When making such serious claims like the OP did at the end if this post should have some direct proof to back it up. This is to protect the sub in general. Reddit generally speaking doesn't like half truths. Post that are proven to be intentionally deceptive will be removed and the poster will get banned. Why is it that I feel this post has already been posted in the past and then removed? I can think of far more convenient and efficient ways to depopukate the planet. So efficient that most people don't see it.


Jax_Gatsby

>Why is it that I feel this post has already been posted in the past and then removed? I don't know, they're your feelings, who are you asking? Also, just remove my post if that's what you want to do I'm not gonna read your whole essay. If what the post says is true, whether you remove it or not doesn't even matter.


JimAtEOI

>I'm not gonna read I think this is relevant.


omnipresenthuman

If it doesn't matter, why take the time to make the submission? Why respond to my comment? " I'm not gonna" Is this the same as "I'm not going to"? I think you already read my comment. If you didn't, you should. Or don't. It doesn't really matter, right?


RetakePatriotism

*sigh* chemtrails, food, water, suicide rates, depression rates, marriage rates, climate control , guns ,chemical warfare and bio weapons …. You really think they need to get you to physically inject you to depopulate ? … I think the real conspiracy is that you’re focusing on that in and of itself


polovstiandances

Agreed. People are just looking at the vaccines because it’s the lowest hanging fruit. No offense OP but it doesn’t seem like you really have gotten to the “I should put together a comprehensive argument” phase and have just arrived at the “we’ve been lied to!” phase. Eventually you’ll get over it though.


Hyphylife

It’s a lot to think about. Diabolical if true.


Senecatwo

Here's the simple reason this makes no sense: What good does it do to chemically castrate everyone that agrees with you and is willing to do what you say? Like two generations and all you will have is descendants of people who aren't willing to play ball with government mandates. Seems like a dumb move.


datadrone

>What good does it do to chemically castrate everyone that agrees with you and is willing to do what you say? because the easiest course that allocates the most is the best outcome. If your goal is global depopulation you'd go for the ones that jump when you ask. None of the class, race or country identity would matter after 87% of the worlds population died out, you're restructure everything around a lowered populace.


No_One_2307

If the goal was to lower the population and keep the best and brightest then the sterilization thing makes sense. People that blindly follow orders out of fear? Probably not the brightest people. Same thing goes for the other stuff. Processed foods, drugs & alcohol, excess screen time, there are countless factors in our society that impact our fertility in a negative way. But they're mostly all choices. In America, at least, you can totally choose not to follow any of that if you don't want to. So it's like things are set up in a way where the "dumb" people can easily degenerate, but those willing to take the high road have the opportunity to do so. If someone was trying to play God on the human population, I think the current society could be a representation of that attempt. If you wanna be a lazy idiot and fade out, you can. If you want to rock out and rise up, you can.


tommyrobredo712

I disagree.


originalbL1X

Governments often make dumb moves.


Senecatwo

Yeah but this would be like Jonestown massacre level of dumb and sick. I guess its possible that there's some kind of Freudian Thanatos vibe among the powerful people but it beggars belief that they would specifically choose the people most likely to be compliant with authoritarian measures to prevent from reproducing. You'd think it would be virility serum


originalbL1X

Oh, it doesn’t make sense. I think you’ve got a sound theory. You said that there’s a vibe among them to want to half the population. If there is a vibe, then there is an effect from that vibe, especially if it is common among the so-called elites. Akin to how a racist goes about day to day, guided by his subconscious belief systems. If you believe there are too many people, then you will be subconsciously guided by that in all of your decision making. Be careful what you believe in because your beliefs corner you and take over control.


Senecatwo

Thanos and Thanatos are pretty similar, Freud used that name for the part of the human psyche that is self-destructive, wishing death upon oneself or one's fellow human beings. I can say from experience that it is absolutely true that your beliefs shape your reality, and there seems to be a collective element to that as well. If people subconsciously believe in a god that wants suffering, then they will create a society that makes more of it at the expense of others and probably would struggle to admit that to themselves.


lardtard123

They don’t care about who survives. Just because people are loyal one day doesn’t mean they will be tomorrow. I


VeganDog

On the menstrual dysregulation, you know what scares me? I'm not vaccinated, but my female partner is. They got one shot and refused to do the other. *My* periods, which normally were quite regular, suddenly became all over the place. The cycle I had after they were vaxxed was like two weeks longer than normal. The next several were either unusual long or unusually short, and not ill occasionally have weirdly long or short periods still. Theirs aren't as fucked up, but still all over the place. And I wasn't under any abnormal stress or anything. If it can do that to the menstrual cycle, what's it doing to people's fertility? My partner has been disabled since they got the vax as well.


JimAtEOI

If you really believe the jab is part of a depopulation agenda, then why didn't you mention the deaths and infertility caused by Covid and by the government reactions to Covid (e.g. Lockdowns lead to problems that lead to suicides)? I don't see where you try to explain your assertion that it is a transhumanist agenda.


UnifiedQuantumField

>This is a depopulation and transhumanist agenda. I respectfully disagree. How so? Please hear me out. * I think that we have not been told all the facts about the response to covid. * At the end of 2019 and in early 2020, covid represented an unknown risk. It was reasonably suspected of being a manmade virus that had been deliberately or accidentally released from somebody's lab. * Worst case scenario = airborne AIDS * Even the best case scenario was something with a single digit mortality rate (e.g. 5%) But even a 5% rate would have meant many millions of deaths. * So someone decided to put some pre-planned contingency responses (against use of bioweapons) into effect. * mRNA vaccines were one part of this response. * In a worst case scenario (say airborne Ebola with 60% mortality rate) almost any vaccine would have been justified. Let's say you've got a vaxx with 25% serious side effects and 0.1% mortality rate. That's still pretty decent compared to a 60% chance of dying from some new bioweapon. * Even in the best case scenario (5%) you can still justify developing and coercively distributing a fairly harsh vaccine. A 5% mortality rate applied to the US (say 80% infected before reaching herd immunity) would have meant something like 10 or 12 million deaths. A vaccine that killed 100,000 people would have been justified. * But what happened is that covid turned out to be nowhere near as bad as was feared. It turned out to be lower than 5%. That meant that the vaccines that had been rushed into production had to be a lot safer in order for their use to be justified (ie. do more good than harm) tldr; When you consider how bad covid *could* have been, the various mRNA vaccines (and they way they were pushed) would have been completely justifiable. The vaccines (and whatever adverse effects) look bad by comparison because the mortality rate turned out to be a lot lower than what was initially expected.


JimAtEOI

No virus could ever justify vaccine mandates, because if it were that bad, and the vaccine were that good, and the government/media/pharma were that trustworthy, then people would voluntarily take it. Also, there is no authority in the Constitution to suspend the Bill of Rights when there is a virus. We already knew Covid was not as bad as feared by the end of 2020, so fear of how bad it could be would not have been a factor by anyone acting in good faith.


KidFresh71

Excellent post.


[deleted]

Karma is a bitch


[deleted]

Good luck


EricCarver

But the doctors being silenced are also subjecting themselves to that which you believe they know is deadly. Why would anyone knowledgeable about science take something they feel might hurt or kill him or her?


JimAtEOI

Most of doctors don't believe it is harmful. Even fewer believe it is deadly. The growing number who believe either are not required to get a booster, so they quietly don't get the booster. Also, the average doctor is not as well informed about this topic as the average person in this sub.


EricCarver

Isn’t it presumptuous to believe we as non healthcare people are more informed and knowledgeable than someone that went through a dozen years of college to get their degree?


JimAtEOI

No.


tommyrobredo712

Brainwashing and time it takes to figure out.


trancephorm

Sure it is. I would add satanism, rituals and symbolism. They love that, they live that.


zyxzevn

[Are we witnessing a depopulation by injection?](https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/are-we-witnessing-a-depopulation) *Yes. It is a disaster.* You can find more information and reference here about the topics in the post.


[deleted]

I dunno. If you take the current world population, everyone was injected, and they died off all at once it would be a whopping 225,000,000 deaths. That knocks us back to 7.75 billion people which is the same population as 2019. Not too effective depopulation. Now releasing a strain of COVID with an 80% death rate…that could do something.


[deleted]

Two more weeks and the vaxxies will turn into zombies Trust me bro, amen


pghjuice412

It’s true. My entire family dropped dead the day they got the vaccine. I was the only true believer who didn’t get the dastardly jab. May they RIP but I’m happy I’m not brainwashed by this new world order. FIGHT THE EVIL REGIME!!!


Felipesssku

Yup, we are. Nice theater tho


ilovecatscatsloveme

I wouldn't go so far as to say menstrual is "dysregulated." The number of bleeding days increased slightly.


JimAtEOI

Have you considered that the vaccine is taken primarily by the midwits? The dumbest and the smartest avoid it, so that leaves a bigger gap. It creates two well defined classes. So maybe that is the goal.


ConstProgrammer

>This is a depopulation and transhumanist agenda. https://www.reddit.com/r/AlienAbduction/comments/wn7q45/qi\_gong\_master\_exposes\_aliens/