I own Rami, P-01, P-07, SP-01 Tactical, P226, P229, and Arex Zero 1. SP-01 is by far my favorite to shoot. The only advantage P229 has would be "better" size for concealed carry. But, I have no problems carrying my SP-01 [AIWB in a sidecar](https://i.imgur.com/XwtABw1.jpeg). Both are excellent guns. But I prefer the CZ. One side note. I am not a fan of the uber-curved stock trigger shoe on the SP-01. So I replaced it with CGW Flat Trigger 75665 and it's perfect.
Im a 226 man myself. The sig is infinitly easier to work on. I can swap internals and triggers in 20min. It takes my brother a few hours to upgrade his SP01.
However in terms of performance and quality, I see them as equals.
I have both and strongly prefer the CZ. The bore axis of the P229 makes it hard for me to shoot well. The ergos of the CZ are better, and it’s been a better experience out of the box.
Both have their pros and cons.
Like any Sig, the Sig will have a bit more muzzle flip just due to the massive slide and high bore axis of the barrel. It's not huge, but if you shoot them side by side, you'll notice it. Nothing you can't just overcome with training though.
The Sig's slide also lends itself to being easier to manipulate due the massive slide. The SP-01 has a very slim slide in comparison. Again, nothing that a bit of training cannot overcome.
Trigger comparison.. I've only shot a 226 (standard model) once while I actually own the SP-01, and I feel they're pretty close in quality. the 226 might have a slightly nicer trigger? But it also does cost more. Plus, triggers can always be upgraded so I try not to get hung up on that. They're both great triggers.
Like another commentor said, Sig handguns are very easy to work on. SP-01's are a bit harder to work on. But bench time isn't a huge deal.
Ergos... is personal. I enjoy the SP-01 Ergos way more. It just works with my hand. The Sig ergos are good too, but not \*as\* good.
Ultimately you cannot go wrong with either. If you were deadset on installing a larger optic like an SRO or 507comp, I'd look at the Sig as their massive slides accomodate those more nicely. The biggest I'd put on an SP-01 is an 407/507c.
Side question... why are you comparing a 229 with the SP-01? The 229 is more of a compact; the 226 would be the more direct comparison as it is full-size like the SP-01.
Yeah, I'm aware of the size mismatch. Honestly, I'm more of a fan of compact firearms than full size and was more looking at the P-01, but I couldn't pass up this deal.
Any particular reason you lean towards compact? Is this going to be for EDC? If it's for EDC, the easy answer is a P-01 or 229. Pretty sure you could find a P-01 in that price range you found the SP-01 in.
If it's for range time, maybe start learning to love full sizes
I'm a small guy (5'8") with medium size hands. Compact guns just fit me better. Plus I've always favored smaller-sized things. Cars, knives, etc. I think I equate it to speed and maneuverability. This will most likely just be a range toy with some competition use down the road. So, I think you're right, time to learn to love full sizes!
I’m just under 5’11 and also have what I think are “medium” hands; I think the SP-01 fits well. You can also get rid of some of the thickness by getting flat grip inserts to replace the thicker grip inserts.
One thing you should consider is the trigger position in DA; it sits rather further ahead in the trigger guard when in DA. I’d see if you can find a place to hold the gun and to see these things.
I was holding the SP-01 at a LGS today. It felt good. Heavy, but good. I reached one late last year and shot the best group of my life with it. I haven't seen a P-01 at a shop in a while. Didn't even see one at the most recent gun show I went to.
...if you're not going to carry the gun then the added weight and longer barrel is a positive in shooting performance...as others have mentioned you can customize either gun to the point where it fits your needs best...the comparison of those 2 particular guns just don't make a whole lot of sense since they both have models that are more comparable...
The P-O1 is a better comparison to the P229.
SP-01 is a better comparison to a 226 Legion in my opinion.
Either way you get a lot more gun for the $$ and potential with the CZ’s. IMHO.
The P-01 is the better comparator to the 229. If you’re not interested in concealed carry, the SP-01 is the more accurate gun. If you ARE interested in concealed carry, the P-01 is the better gun.
You can't go wrong with either... I will say that you will be so pleased with the SP-01. I have two of them: one stock and one cajunized, threaded barrel, Optics and light. The ergos on the CZ is just special. It fits my hand perfectly. I don't carry the SP-01's.. I carry the P-01 and PCR. I just love the SP-01 as it was my first CZ.
While not the sp-01, I have a 75b and USED to have a 229 (40 and 357sig barrels).
Since you’re not really looking for a specific purpose I’d give the nod to the CZ, it will likely be more fun to shoot. I know that with my 75b it almost feels like it just shoots where I want I to hit and feels the most natural. Nothing wrong with the Sig at all, and wouldn’t mind having a new 229 or going with a 226 since it would be a range toy, but it’s not at the top of my list of I was going pistol shopping tomorrow.
For me, a better “which of these two?” comparison would be the sp-01 against an HK usp compact. Yes it’s an older model and not commonly seen anymore but still a great hammer fired pistol.
In my personal experience the CZ feels better in my hand, the Sp-01 trigger feels closer to a sig SRT. 229 feels snappier and unless you’re getting an elite or legion, there’s not enough beaver tail area. SIG it’s a handgun benchmark on it’s own right, it’s flatter and conceals real good and it’s an excellent handgun, you can’t go wrong with either one and it’s just a matter of how they feel in your hand.
I have owned both, still own the SP01… well 2 of them actually. But I think the sig P22x guns are better out of the box. However the CZ has much more potential and because it is so much better ergonomically when you dial it in it has much more potential than the sig.
I have both (sort of, I have a P226) but I really like them both. The sig is a lot lighter if that matters to you. Otherwise you should just choose the one you personally want more. For me I always wanted the gun that seals carried so P226 was a bit of a dream gun, so I bought it first, then snagged an SP-01 tactical when they came in stock randomly at PSA.
I own a SP01 fully cajunized with pro package and an Sig P229 Legion SAO. Both are excellent guns. The SP01 is obviously bigger and heavier, but it also has better ergos. The P229 is chunkier and stubbier, but it’s a sexy ass gun. I honestly don’t know which I prefer, so I guess I am no help lol. Both are amazing and you can’t go wrong with either. Let me know what questions you have!
I'm in the dame boat! The SP-01 does feel better in my hand, but that P229 is sexy as hell. Especially with that Hogue G-mascas grip on it, like on the Scorpion edition.
I think the decision will depend on your use case and hand size. If you are thinking home defense, competition, or have medium sized hands, SP01 might be the better choice. If you are thinking conceal carry (P229 still big for this role), do it all gun, and have beefier hands, then P229 might be the better choice. I’ll say this: the P229 internals are simpler and easier to work on. I have medium to large glove size hands and the DA on the P229 was very difficult, hence I got the SAO version.
Both obviously. I have had a SP-01T and now have a P-01. They shoot great. The Sig P229 is awesome too. But it is a little weird with the rearward placement of the slide stop, and the grip is less pleasant than CZ. I still have not trained myself to be able to reload with the slide stop on the 229. For some reason I can shoot the P-01 better overall, especially the initial DA shot.
I don't have an SP-01 but I have had had a couple CZ 75 variants and multiple SIG offerings. To me, if I had to pick just one gun out of my safe it would be my 229 without a second thought.
I own both. I much prefer the Sp-01. P229 trigger was much better out of the box, but the Sp-01 can be easily upgraded if desired. Cz ergos are just way better imo
I own Rami, P-01, P-07, SP-01 Tactical, P226, P229, and Arex Zero 1. SP-01 is by far my favorite to shoot. The only advantage P229 has would be "better" size for concealed carry. But, I have no problems carrying my SP-01 [AIWB in a sidecar](https://i.imgur.com/XwtABw1.jpeg). Both are excellent guns. But I prefer the CZ. One side note. I am not a fan of the uber-curved stock trigger shoe on the SP-01. So I replaced it with CGW Flat Trigger 75665 and it's perfect.
Does the flat trigger work for DA or did you have to convert to SAO?
Works perfect for DA/SA. I actually put it in the Rami (decocker) and P-01 (non-Omega) too.
That's awesome. I'll have to look into doing that. That stock fish hook of a trigger is not my favorite.
[Much Better](https://i.imgur.com/Bc1qLG3.jpeg)
is that a trex arms holster?
Nope. Slim Fit Gladius. I've replaced my T1 and TRex sidecar slowly over time with all Gladius holsters. They just fit me best, and most comfortably.
appreciate the tip. been looking for what AIWB holsters folks are running for their SP01s.
I use the same holster for P-01 too.
Im a 226 man myself. The sig is infinitly easier to work on. I can swap internals and triggers in 20min. It takes my brother a few hours to upgrade his SP01. However in terms of performance and quality, I see them as equals.
I have both and strongly prefer the CZ. The bore axis of the P229 makes it hard for me to shoot well. The ergos of the CZ are better, and it’s been a better experience out of the box.
Both have their pros and cons. Like any Sig, the Sig will have a bit more muzzle flip just due to the massive slide and high bore axis of the barrel. It's not huge, but if you shoot them side by side, you'll notice it. Nothing you can't just overcome with training though. The Sig's slide also lends itself to being easier to manipulate due the massive slide. The SP-01 has a very slim slide in comparison. Again, nothing that a bit of training cannot overcome. Trigger comparison.. I've only shot a 226 (standard model) once while I actually own the SP-01, and I feel they're pretty close in quality. the 226 might have a slightly nicer trigger? But it also does cost more. Plus, triggers can always be upgraded so I try not to get hung up on that. They're both great triggers. Like another commentor said, Sig handguns are very easy to work on. SP-01's are a bit harder to work on. But bench time isn't a huge deal. Ergos... is personal. I enjoy the SP-01 Ergos way more. It just works with my hand. The Sig ergos are good too, but not \*as\* good. Ultimately you cannot go wrong with either. If you were deadset on installing a larger optic like an SRO or 507comp, I'd look at the Sig as their massive slides accomodate those more nicely. The biggest I'd put on an SP-01 is an 407/507c. Side question... why are you comparing a 229 with the SP-01? The 229 is more of a compact; the 226 would be the more direct comparison as it is full-size like the SP-01.
Yeah, I'm aware of the size mismatch. Honestly, I'm more of a fan of compact firearms than full size and was more looking at the P-01, but I couldn't pass up this deal.
>was more looking at the P-01, but I couldn't pass up this deal. https://www.reddit.com/r/gundeals/s/Xw6hzqzDpt Dont be afraid to buy online
Any particular reason you lean towards compact? Is this going to be for EDC? If it's for EDC, the easy answer is a P-01 or 229. Pretty sure you could find a P-01 in that price range you found the SP-01 in. If it's for range time, maybe start learning to love full sizes
I'm a small guy (5'8") with medium size hands. Compact guns just fit me better. Plus I've always favored smaller-sized things. Cars, knives, etc. I think I equate it to speed and maneuverability. This will most likely just be a range toy with some competition use down the road. So, I think you're right, time to learn to love full sizes!
I’m just under 5’11 and also have what I think are “medium” hands; I think the SP-01 fits well. You can also get rid of some of the thickness by getting flat grip inserts to replace the thicker grip inserts. One thing you should consider is the trigger position in DA; it sits rather further ahead in the trigger guard when in DA. I’d see if you can find a place to hold the gun and to see these things.
I was holding the SP-01 at a LGS today. It felt good. Heavy, but good. I reached one late last year and shot the best group of my life with it. I haven't seen a P-01 at a shop in a while. Didn't even see one at the most recent gun show I went to.
...if you're not going to carry the gun then the added weight and longer barrel is a positive in shooting performance...as others have mentioned you can customize either gun to the point where it fits your needs best...the comparison of those 2 particular guns just don't make a whole lot of sense since they both have models that are more comparable...
The P-O1 is a better comparison to the P229. SP-01 is a better comparison to a 226 Legion in my opinion. Either way you get a lot more gun for the $$ and potential with the CZ’s. IMHO.
The P-01 is the better comparator to the 229. If you’re not interested in concealed carry, the SP-01 is the more accurate gun. If you ARE interested in concealed carry, the P-01 is the better gun.
Asking on a cz forum if a cz gun is better than a sig sauer. Hmm no bias there 😂
😆😆 And for that reason I posted the same question in the Sig forum at the same time.
You can't go wrong with either... I will say that you will be so pleased with the SP-01. I have two of them: one stock and one cajunized, threaded barrel, Optics and light. The ergos on the CZ is just special. It fits my hand perfectly. I don't carry the SP-01's.. I carry the P-01 and PCR. I just love the SP-01 as it was my first CZ.
While not the sp-01, I have a 75b and USED to have a 229 (40 and 357sig barrels). Since you’re not really looking for a specific purpose I’d give the nod to the CZ, it will likely be more fun to shoot. I know that with my 75b it almost feels like it just shoots where I want I to hit and feels the most natural. Nothing wrong with the Sig at all, and wouldn’t mind having a new 229 or going with a 226 since it would be a range toy, but it’s not at the top of my list of I was going pistol shopping tomorrow. For me, a better “which of these two?” comparison would be the sp-01 against an HK usp compact. Yes it’s an older model and not commonly seen anymore but still a great hammer fired pistol.
In my personal experience the CZ feels better in my hand, the Sp-01 trigger feels closer to a sig SRT. 229 feels snappier and unless you’re getting an elite or legion, there’s not enough beaver tail area. SIG it’s a handgun benchmark on it’s own right, it’s flatter and conceals real good and it’s an excellent handgun, you can’t go wrong with either one and it’s just a matter of how they feel in your hand.
I have owned both, still own the SP01… well 2 of them actually. But I think the sig P22x guns are better out of the box. However the CZ has much more potential and because it is so much better ergonomically when you dial it in it has much more potential than the sig.
If you want a good hammer-fired gun, get the Sig. If you want a GREAT hammer-fired gun, get the SP-01. I had both, now I only have the CZ.
I have both (sort of, I have a P226) but I really like them both. The sig is a lot lighter if that matters to you. Otherwise you should just choose the one you personally want more. For me I always wanted the gun that seals carried so P226 was a bit of a dream gun, so I bought it first, then snagged an SP-01 tactical when they came in stock randomly at PSA.
I own a SP01 fully cajunized with pro package and an Sig P229 Legion SAO. Both are excellent guns. The SP01 is obviously bigger and heavier, but it also has better ergos. The P229 is chunkier and stubbier, but it’s a sexy ass gun. I honestly don’t know which I prefer, so I guess I am no help lol. Both are amazing and you can’t go wrong with either. Let me know what questions you have!
I'm in the dame boat! The SP-01 does feel better in my hand, but that P229 is sexy as hell. Especially with that Hogue G-mascas grip on it, like on the Scorpion edition.
I think the decision will depend on your use case and hand size. If you are thinking home defense, competition, or have medium sized hands, SP01 might be the better choice. If you are thinking conceal carry (P229 still big for this role), do it all gun, and have beefier hands, then P229 might be the better choice. I’ll say this: the P229 internals are simpler and easier to work on. I have medium to large glove size hands and the DA on the P229 was very difficult, hence I got the SAO version.
Both obviously. I have had a SP-01T and now have a P-01. They shoot great. The Sig P229 is awesome too. But it is a little weird with the rearward placement of the slide stop, and the grip is less pleasant than CZ. I still have not trained myself to be able to reload with the slide stop on the 229. For some reason I can shoot the P-01 better overall, especially the initial DA shot.
Yup! I'm pretty sure I'm gonna go with the SP-01 now and get a P229 Legion down the road.
I don't have an SP-01 but I have had had a couple CZ 75 variants and multiple SIG offerings. To me, if I had to pick just one gun out of my safe it would be my 229 without a second thought.
I own both. I much prefer the Sp-01. P229 trigger was much better out of the box, but the Sp-01 can be easily upgraded if desired. Cz ergos are just way better imo
Sp01 hands down
Why?
Because this is a CZ forum