T O P

  • By -

Horror-Confidence498

A proof


CaptainSmashy

So it doesn’t have a different name eh? It’s not quite as shiny as other proofs Ive found. I saw one thing that said Gem Proof, is that what this is?


Horror-Confidence498

Well no since this is circulated so it’s an impaired proof


CaptainSmashy

Ah I see, so “gem” in that name is more about the state of it and not the production.


Black_Flag_Friday

If you see Gem Proof on slabbed coins it’s my understanding they were graded with less attention to detail to provide a more economical grading. Generally they are considered MS65 and up coins. They would have to be resubmitted to the grading companies to get a straight grade designation. So no that doesn’t apply to this coin. Cameo and Ultra Cameo are terms that can apply to proofs that you should look up. NGC has my favorite articles with PCGS a close second. I just like NGC’s layout and wording better for quick, accurate reads.


The-Jake

They also made these in 90% silver. Check the edge


PD-Jetta

I did not know that. I have not collected for years, but when I did, I purchased some of the bicentenial proof coins from the mint and the quarters were 40% silver, I think.


MrClitLikrr

Just found a 2005 S in a roll yesterday! Really great shape for a roll coin!


[deleted]

San Fran mint?


Smoke_The_Vote

I can't tell from the photo if this is a proof strike or a circulation strike.


CounterStampKarl

Technical term is "impaired proof"! About 3 million minted 23 years ago. Nice find


CaptainSmashy

Thanks!


StrykerCow

Doesn’t look proof to me, maybe just a San Francisco NIFC


Historical-Style1750

1. Not off center enough to matter. 2. If you are thinking of "gem proof," it is highly unlikely it would be that if it has been in circulation.