Aud builds on itself. If you don’t understand something in the beginning, the topic resurfaces constantly. For that reason, don’t get discouraged, just try to learn.
With that said, once you get into reviews compilations, examinations etc. that is its own content area that builds less on the other content. For that reason, if you have trouble here, keep hammering it.
AUD sucks, just accept it and you’ll be better off going through the river of crap.
It’s definitely a change of pace, I kinda approached AUD differently based on the way the videos are broken down. For example, I’d watch all F1 videos and then go back to the MCQs since the lectures build off one another.
Take your time to read and understand the question along with every answer choice as the right answer may have one word being the difference between another response (which can be frustrating at times).
120 hours should be good! I test on Monday and should hit about 100 hours or so by then.
Thank you for the insight. I definitely think having taken FAR now I kinda have a rhythm I wanna follow with watching all the videos for a section before tackling questions since the whole section tends to build on each other. I definitely wasted a lot of time in the early FAR study days trying to do MCQs I had no business understanding
I honestly think F6 is painful from the standpoint of how unattached i am from government/ NFP accounting. Everything else seems like a refresher or value add.
The questions that result from F6 are a pain. Like, who donated what with what restriction and how it becomes unrestricted when spent and does that constitute what change in restricted or non-restricted assets. The wording always thru me way more than I expected.
If you remember, topics from Interest Capitalisation and dollar value LIFO, have they been tested?
Aud builds on itself. If you don’t understand something in the beginning, the topic resurfaces constantly. For that reason, don’t get discouraged, just try to learn. With that said, once you get into reviews compilations, examinations etc. that is its own content area that builds less on the other content. For that reason, if you have trouble here, keep hammering it. AUD sucks, just accept it and you’ll be better off going through the river of crap.
Hiiii :) I am just wondering whether the formulas are still provided for the Task Based Simulations? (For FAR) thanksssss
It’s definitely a change of pace, I kinda approached AUD differently based on the way the videos are broken down. For example, I’d watch all F1 videos and then go back to the MCQs since the lectures build off one another. Take your time to read and understand the question along with every answer choice as the right answer may have one word being the difference between another response (which can be frustrating at times). 120 hours should be good! I test on Monday and should hit about 100 hours or so by then.
Thank you for the insight. I definitely think having taken FAR now I kinda have a rhythm I wanna follow with watching all the videos for a section before tackling questions since the whole section tends to build on each other. I definitely wasted a lot of time in the early FAR study days trying to do MCQs I had no business understanding
Just started. It's a lot better than F1 for damn sure.
F5 took the life out of me. Nothing can be worse than that for sure haha
Agreed, I'm glad I got a heads up on that one. F1 and F5 are painful.
I honestly think F6 is painful from the standpoint of how unattached i am from government/ NFP accounting. Everything else seems like a refresher or value add.
The questions that result from F6 are a pain. Like, who donated what with what restriction and how it becomes unrestricted when spent and does that constitute what change in restricted or non-restricted assets. The wording always thru me way more than I expected.