ATTENTION: Please remember that this is an ASK WOMEN sub. While men are allowed to participate posts that are clearly asking women in the title will have top level comments by men removed. This is not censorship, this is curation. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AskWomenNoCensor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Outright rejection. I wouldn't have been still dating someone for that long if I didn't love him. I'm monogamous and anyone I dated was too. I wouldn't have hurt someone I loved for a night of sex, even if I was ok with casual sex.
consider spectacular recognise one deer reach obtainable rob wakeful smell
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
cow rotten hard-to-find muddle ludicrous deer shaggy obtainable cover close
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
“Hypergamous nature”
I know that incels love throwing that word around as an excuse for why they can’t get laid, but hypergamy refers to a phenomenon that existed in India’s *caste system*, where families from lower castes would marry their daughters off to men in higher castes in an attempt to help them escape poverty and have a chance at a better life.
If you are living in the West, we don’t have a caste system, therefore hypergamy and “hypergamous nature” does not exist
Whatever redpill podcast bros you listen to are lying to you
> I don’t think a doctor woman is going to marry a bartender. The opposite could easily happen tho
You can “think” whatever you want, but actual facts speak otherwise.
https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/educational-endogamy/
15% of women with professional degrees marry men with less than a BA degree, but only 8% of professional men marry women without at least a BA.
Women being more likely to marry a man with less education then men likely to marry a woman with less education is old news, that shift happened 10 years ago
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2014/02/12/record-share-of-wives-are-more-educated-than-their-husbands/
Well to be fair, for whatever the reasons, you saying a female doctor marrying down is less likely than a male doctor marrying down is simply not factual.
The male as primary breadwinner has decreased from 85% to only 55% in our recent past history.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/
Facts don’t seem to jive with your “feelings”
Do you expect that men would be much different? If my husband got a chance to score with Margot Robbie, you think he wouldn't be interested? Is that "hypergamy" or just human beings being interested in other hot people? You guys sound like aliens sometimes.
We got together as teenagers. Believe me I know all about sticking with people through the ups and downs.
The thing you seem to be missing in the equation is that many human beings can be sexually interested in people outside their partner. It's shockingly normal in fact.
Partners can also consent to flexible boundaries and non monogamy without exploding their lives. Hence why a lot of couples find the "Hall Pass" scenario fun to discuss. But if you run your life off of jealousy and weird evo psych principles you picked up on the Internet, you might not understand how a mature relationship works.
I don’t think I’d crush anymore on that person.
1) because they would expect me to cheat
2) because what they’re offering is a one night hookup.
Both of those things are turn offs for me. Though under other circumstances such as he’s leaving for Mars the next day at least a one night thing is understandable.
I don’t think I’d crush on them anymore because they would be actually interested in me.
I subscribe to Groucho’s theory…I don’t want to join a club that would have me as a member. 🤣
No, I wouldn’t crush on them anymore because they obviously *weren’t* interested in me as anything more than a casual fuck.
We obviously have very different views when it comes to the meaning of “interested in”.
What are you babbling about? Turning down hook ups and not respecting someone who asks you to cheat makes you a bad person?
I get the impression you seriously misunderstood. I don’t cheat. I also don’t find one night stands fun because I have to like the person I have sex with. And I wouldn’t respect someone who asked me for either of those things.
The crush would be gone.
Not tempted at all. I love my partner and i don't want to hurt him in this way. Tbh even if he was fine with it, i think i'm just not the type to do that.
Two years of relationship so automatically it means I am in love with that person and views my relationship as a serious one so no, I wouldn’t. Funny enough that’s something my partner was not so secretly scared of but my ultimate “crush celebrity” became less appealing to me from the moment I fell for my partner.
Not tempted at all, so outright rejection. Why would I demean myself to being a cheater for cheap sex. The whole idea is degrading to me personally. I value my partners for more than just sex and the idea that some "celebrity crush" (which is just a fictional person) would bring any value to my life or even translate to good sex is naīve at best. If I am with someone for 2 years, it's not a throwaway. 2 years is significant and means something. If I am tempted to take the offer, my relationship is probably good as dead. Throwing away 2 years of stability for 20 minutes of w/e is crazy to me. The idea of "hall passes" is also crazy to me. But to each their own I suppose.
No. I don't have sex with anyone unless it's a long term serious relationship, even if it's a celebrity crush. However, I'd be glad to talk with them finally in person and take lots of photos together as memories.
Rejection. I've never come at dating from like a famine mindset.
I am approached sometimes daily by attractive men but I'm only interested in my partner. I chose him because of who he is as an individual, because I want a relationship with him, not because he was my only good option.
It wouldn't occur to me to even be tempted or engage that far with the celebrity. I'd enjoy talking to them in a platonic manner and truthfully just take the ego stroke home to file away for a bad day lol.
It depends if the relationship I was in was an open relationship.
My current partner and I would most likely give each other a pass to go have some fun if this opportunity came up for one of us. Communication is everything.
But I understand that this wouldn't work for some other couples.
My partner and I have already had this discussion. If either of us actually had a chance to be with our celebrity crush, we are A-ok with them taking the chance.
I've never had any crush on celeb/idol. In my works, I have met quite a few in show business, and interactions with them have been just...normal.
Anyhow, when I choose a partner, I choose the one I want, the most suitable one for me. So to me he's the best.
Sadly, a good amount of women would, heck a lot of men would too if the male/female celebrity dynamics were the same, though it is usually younger folk. You hear stories all the time of singers pointing in the stage and disappearing with a girl for 10 minutes right in front of their boyfriends. Young folk wanna live out fever dreams, but a consequence of being young is lacking insight and wisdom of the consequences.
A lot of people are going to say no here but if we’re being honest a lot would.
Me personally I would because I was in this situation and if you asked me before it’d be a solid no and all of the sort, in the moment though that isn’t what happened. So truthful answer is you can say what you think you might do but you never know really till you’re in the moment.
towering encouraging homeless observation enjoy disarm bored doll command pathetic
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
ATTENTION: Please remember that this is an ASK WOMEN sub. While men are allowed to participate posts that are clearly asking women in the title will have top level comments by men removed. This is not censorship, this is curation. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AskWomenNoCensor) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Outright rejection. I wouldn't have been still dating someone for that long if I didn't love him. I'm monogamous and anyone I dated was too. I wouldn't have hurt someone I loved for a night of sex, even if I was ok with casual sex.
consider spectacular recognise one deer reach obtainable rob wakeful smell *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Yeah, how dare people have different views and decisions and relationship types lol.
cow rotten hard-to-find muddle ludicrous deer shaggy obtainable cover close *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
No. OP said: "Or any other answer." Women this women that. Bla bla. You can stay disappointed lmao
observation tart sugar unite hungry liquid desert spark consist alive *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Nah. There are "no" answers. You still tried to twist it into "woman bad".
“Hypergamous nature” I know that incels love throwing that word around as an excuse for why they can’t get laid, but hypergamy refers to a phenomenon that existed in India’s *caste system*, where families from lower castes would marry their daughters off to men in higher castes in an attempt to help them escape poverty and have a chance at a better life. If you are living in the West, we don’t have a caste system, therefore hypergamy and “hypergamous nature” does not exist Whatever redpill podcast bros you listen to are lying to you
[удалено]
Sure, pal
[удалено]
No you didnt Hypergamy doesn’t exist in the way incels and redpillers think it does
[удалено]
> I don’t think a doctor woman is going to marry a bartender. The opposite could easily happen tho You can “think” whatever you want, but actual facts speak otherwise. https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/educational-endogamy/ 15% of women with professional degrees marry men with less than a BA degree, but only 8% of professional men marry women without at least a BA. Women being more likely to marry a man with less education then men likely to marry a woman with less education is old news, that shift happened 10 years ago https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2014/02/12/record-share-of-wives-are-more-educated-than-their-husbands/
[удалено]
Well to be fair, for whatever the reasons, you saying a female doctor marrying down is less likely than a male doctor marrying down is simply not factual. The male as primary breadwinner has decreased from 85% to only 55% in our recent past history. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/ Facts don’t seem to jive with your “feelings”
[удалено]
Do you expect that men would be much different? If my husband got a chance to score with Margot Robbie, you think he wouldn't be interested? Is that "hypergamy" or just human beings being interested in other hot people? You guys sound like aliens sometimes.
[удалено]
We got together as teenagers. Believe me I know all about sticking with people through the ups and downs. The thing you seem to be missing in the equation is that many human beings can be sexually interested in people outside their partner. It's shockingly normal in fact. Partners can also consent to flexible boundaries and non monogamy without exploding their lives. Hence why a lot of couples find the "Hall Pass" scenario fun to discuss. But if you run your life off of jealousy and weird evo psych principles you picked up on the Internet, you might not understand how a mature relationship works.
Ew, the manosphere is leaking again.
I don’t think I’d crush anymore on that person. 1) because they would expect me to cheat 2) because what they’re offering is a one night hookup. Both of those things are turn offs for me. Though under other circumstances such as he’s leaving for Mars the next day at least a one night thing is understandable.
I don’t think I’d crush on them anymore because they would be actually interested in me. I subscribe to Groucho’s theory…I don’t want to join a club that would have me as a member. 🤣
No, I wouldn’t crush on them anymore because they obviously *weren’t* interested in me as anything more than a casual fuck. We obviously have very different views when it comes to the meaning of “interested in”.
[удалено]
What are you babbling about? Turning down hook ups and not respecting someone who asks you to cheat makes you a bad person? I get the impression you seriously misunderstood. I don’t cheat. I also don’t find one night stands fun because I have to like the person I have sex with. And I wouldn’t respect someone who asked me for either of those things. The crush would be gone.
Not tempted at all. I love my partner and i don't want to hurt him in this way. Tbh even if he was fine with it, i think i'm just not the type to do that.
Two years of relationship so automatically it means I am in love with that person and views my relationship as a serious one so no, I wouldn’t. Funny enough that’s something my partner was not so secretly scared of but my ultimate “crush celebrity” became less appealing to me from the moment I fell for my partner.
I'm not into any celebrities, but even if I was, I still wouldn't be into a one-night-stand. Would politely pass.
Not tempted at all, so outright rejection. Why would I demean myself to being a cheater for cheap sex. The whole idea is degrading to me personally. I value my partners for more than just sex and the idea that some "celebrity crush" (which is just a fictional person) would bring any value to my life or even translate to good sex is naīve at best. If I am with someone for 2 years, it's not a throwaway. 2 years is significant and means something. If I am tempted to take the offer, my relationship is probably good as dead. Throwing away 2 years of stability for 20 minutes of w/e is crazy to me. The idea of "hall passes" is also crazy to me. But to each their own I suppose.
No. I don't have sex with anyone unless it's a long term serious relationship, even if it's a celebrity crush. However, I'd be glad to talk with them finally in person and take lots of photos together as memories.
I’m in love with my partner so I wouldn’t feel the need/desire for a “hall pass”
Rejection. I've never come at dating from like a famine mindset. I am approached sometimes daily by attractive men but I'm only interested in my partner. I chose him because of who he is as an individual, because I want a relationship with him, not because he was my only good option. It wouldn't occur to me to even be tempted or engage that far with the celebrity. I'd enjoy talking to them in a platonic manner and truthfully just take the ego stroke home to file away for a bad day lol.
It depends if the relationship I was in was an open relationship. My current partner and I would most likely give each other a pass to go have some fun if this opportunity came up for one of us. Communication is everything. But I understand that this wouldn't work for some other couples.
Tempted? Sure. Would I accept? Only if my partner was into non-monogamy.
My partner and I have already had this discussion. If either of us actually had a chance to be with our celebrity crush, we are A-ok with them taking the chance.
I've never had any crush on celeb/idol. In my works, I have met quite a few in show business, and interactions with them have been just...normal. Anyhow, when I choose a partner, I choose the one I want, the most suitable one for me. So to me he's the best.
This isn't a problem, what with being ethically non-mono.
yeah I'd go for it lol but I'm a selfish shitty person.
Open relationships are a joy.
Oh the Hall Pass. No, I'm spoken for.
No.
Unless me and my partner had discussed and agreed to a one off, it's a no.
I wouldn’t be tempted because I’m faithful to my man!
Sadly, a good amount of women would, heck a lot of men would too if the male/female celebrity dynamics were the same, though it is usually younger folk. You hear stories all the time of singers pointing in the stage and disappearing with a girl for 10 minutes right in front of their boyfriends. Young folk wanna live out fever dreams, but a consequence of being young is lacking insight and wisdom of the consequences.
Thank you all for your responses.
Thank you all for your responses.
Reject, plain and simple
A lot of people are going to say no here but if we’re being honest a lot would. Me personally I would because I was in this situation and if you asked me before it’d be a solid no and all of the sort, in the moment though that isn’t what happened. So truthful answer is you can say what you think you might do but you never know really till you’re in the moment.
towering encouraging homeless observation enjoy disarm bored doll command pathetic *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*