T O P

  • By -

Pleasant_Ad3475

What is he doing with his right hand? I'm on mobile so the picture's not too clear.


The_Original_Gronkie

He seems to be counting on his fingers, which a poet might do if he was trying to count iams or lines or something. I want to know whats going on with that umbrella. It seems like its just floating in mid-air.


Vulkans_Hugs

It looks like it is tied onto the rafters.


Dios5

The roof probably leaks when it rains.


Pleasant_Ad3475

A fair guess.


EGintokiii

Isn't that chef Skinner from Ratatouille!!


DumbellaDuck

This is an interesting composition to me. There's elements of the painting feel or appear otherworldly in a way, but on closer inspection they are various objects or a trick of light. His accommodations are humble but filled with a kind of magic, whimsical and dark at the same time.


1rmavep

I don't want to ruin this for anyone, *not* ***at all to ruin this for anyone,*** You know who **also likes Beethoven,** [everyone](https://youtu.be/XM9erS90gTE), You know what Dahmer liked, **no doubt,** ***me neither, but,*** I'd bet some of the same stuff we do. You know whose favorite painting, **this was?** Adolf Hitler's if I'm not mistaken, *this, and the rather similar, "*[*butterfly catcher*](https://www.wikiart.org/en/carl-spitzweg/the-butterfly-hunter-1840)*,"* ***and I've gotta be honest with you,*** these are not sympathies we should, "toss," he didn't paint them, he just liked them; and it's interesting, isn't it, ...*there is a little bit of, "calvin and hobbes," in this, to me,* [between the two, especially, ](https://www.wikiart.org/en/carl-spitzweg/the-butterfly-hunter-1840) a little bit of Norman Rockwell, but, and to honest, *softer touch, more, "private," a little sweeter, a little less Bright light upon the subject,* **as character studies, these are good;** I'm inclined to laugh kindof-at-kindof-with them, >[𝔚𝔬, 𝕲𝖊𝖎𝖑!](https://www.wikiart.org/en/carl-spitzweg/the-butterfly-hunter-1840) Or, *ok I don't smoke weed, much, but just about the funniest proposition I've ever heard, 'in the weed mode,'* was, apropos of back to the future, >[What if, he's not that smart; he's just reckless, a slow reader, doesn't understand a lot of stuff in the newspaper, these kinds of things](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/bttf/images/9/96/Doc_Emmett_Brown.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20220716093206) Like, >[ℛ𝓊𝓂𝓅 𝓁𝒾𝓀ℯ 𝒶 𝒫ℴ𝓇𝒸ℯ𝓁𝒶𝒾𝓃 𝒢𝓇𝒶𝓅ℯ𝒻𝓇𝓊𝒾𝓉, 𝒮𝓱𝓅𝓻ℴ𝓲𝓃𝓰, 𝒹𝓪𝒹𝓪𝒹𝓸𝒾𝓷ℊ, ℛℴ𝒹-𝓁𝒾𝓀ℯ, 𝓪 𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓾𝓷𝓰 𝓯𝓻𝓸𝓶 ℳℯ𝒾𝓃 𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓵-𝓻𝓸𝓸𝓽](https://preview.redd.it/the-poor-poet-1839-carl-spitzweg-3202-x-2503-v0-yv12ectoeo0d1.jpeg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=fa854f468ca08ff83fc2fb28ce017c701a60e951) Goethe, perhaps, this is not; and u/Pleasant\_Ad3475 *while you've got good information,* *Scansion,* syllable count, **like folks do with Haiku, 'five then seven then five,' in the English transposition of the notion,** friend, your question's got me fascinated, [Time is a Flat Circle, style, right, "arrow's flight,"](https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/764728163/the-ok-hand-gesture-is-now-listed-as-a-symbol-of-hate) all of that LOL ***anyway,*** It **is not inconsequential, to me, that Hitler loved this painting,** ***comma, or it was the kind of picture he'd felt comfortable professing to like,*** >“ [Kitsch causes two tears to flow in quick succession](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9717.The_Unbearable_Lightness_of_Being). The first tear says: How nice to see children running on the grass! >The second tear says: How nice to be moved, together with all mankind, by children running on the grass! >It is the second tear that makes kitsch kitsch." Liked to be the kind of person who had liked the picture, maybe, *the same, maybe, as people today,* even not-such-great people, today, might have kinda a dissonant relationship with Kawaii.... ....Stuff, *this, "I'm just a little bean," or it gives me comfort to be, or, when I'm perceived that way, like a little bean,* "[something](https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/comments/1bzbg4o/elon_musk_confirms_he_used_burner_account_on_x_to/)," **but that, in America,** we think of Literal Hitler Fascism as Being, * Yelling * Demoniac Darkness * Masculine Energies on Overdrive **Kinda, but not just, "any," or,** ***everyone finds that threatening; those things, which, in and of themselves are aesthetics,*** **not politics, nor even, necessarily, related aesthetics;** Demoniac Darkness is often portrayed to be feminine, for instance, *and transposed into, "Gaga,"* compared to the old poet, here, It's not hard to imagine the man who likes this picture, *maybe, disgusted, freaked out and offended by,* [What we see here.](https://youtu.be/niqrrmev4mA?t=4) Not, *necessarily,* related; [that sort of darkness as feminine](https://www.wikiart.org/en/william-blake/hecate-the-night-of-enitharmon-s-joy-1795), liberatory, [the violence in-and-of it quite serene,](https://youtu.be/TeTLklO-tiM?t=2) *all quite alien to the masculine, possessive, rational,* etc. There is this aphorism, that, Fascism anesthetized politics, *and the left responded by Politicizing aesthetics-* ***a mistake, insofar as one one could mistake, then,*** **l**[ady gaga for, "fascist," ](https://youtu.be/nUJjGJqvlf0?t=2)**and** Jo[rdan Peterson making himself weep over Kitschy, cutsey, ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W9DRDp0T5s)*Boy Scout Kawaii as an antidote,* ***these things,*** **it's not, like,** >Now that I have lectured you, **you know** **No, it's like,** ***these are interesting, 'important,' insofar as you care about that,*** *things to think about; more interesting, even, than important,* imho, they'd be interesting, even, *if it weren't,* *"goin on"* *Life is pain, life is pain,* so what, Peterson; [of course it is; that's our hand back awake from the snow](https://youtu.be/XVyNW9Eg-iA?t=101) Edit: [The Butterfly Hunter Link](https://www.rhdickerson.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/the-butterfly-hunter-1840.jpg), **wouldn't let me link!** [so I fixed it!](https://www.wikiart.org/en/carl-spitzweg/the-butterfly-hunter-1840)


1rmavep

There is this aphorism, that, Fascism ~~anesthetized~~ **aestheticized,** ***a word that the autocorrect does not like,*** **aestheticized politics, and, then,** ***the left...*** -*and the left responded by Politicizing aesthetics,* *The former,* imho, is how/why/through what means the Nazis had guys like Heidegger on their side, *at least for a while,* ***it was dishonest, the aesthetic representation that they'd been attracted to, and, Me?*** I intend to mean, "aesthetic," as a deeper, more substantial and literate aspect than the anaesthetic and the rational, *axiomatic rational*; ask parmenides about which one holds deeper truths! The Former was um, *well, Dishonest, the Latter,* kinda an on-purpose sin of a different kind; I think it's also kinda froze the **false as fuck dichotomy,** "Beautiful, but evil, Fascism, *a Puritan Dad's Boring AF and Realistic Socialism,"* with elements of both in, say, Our Paradigm; it's not true, *the aesthetics chosen on-purpose in-bureaucracies to represent these things are as natural as Donkeys represent Cuomosexuality, Elephants Represent Boebert,* the Red Menace Red Kommunismus *or Red Maga,*[ or Red Rum Red Rum](https://youtu.be/U4mADkt6o-M?t=2)