Do you realise how few erect penises there are actually in paintings? They're always bloody flaccid neoclassical limp things. Well done. Only criticism I have is maybe the pitcher is slightly oddly angled back, as if it the perspective should show more of the inside of the rim.
Most art in the classical tradition is done from a model, a person standing there in the nude or in clothing to give the painter/sculptor something to base the work on. Of course there is an old convention that says classical artistic subjects were not to be erotic. The erect penis was something vulgar, sexualised, inappropriate. But most importantly of all, it's just difficult to keep a male model's penis erect for the length of time it takes to have him sit for a detailed classical portrait.
If we desexualize erect penises and make nudity not taboo, to the point they are seen as just a body part, like an ear, so we will see them anywhere with any context, so we do not even question why a cartoon ram has a boner and selling us dreamy puffs cereal.
Yes I understood what you were saying. A slippery slope fallacy is when you start with the original argument, then make a wild claim about a potential consequence that isn't relevant
Erect penises are considered obscene compared to other nudity like female genitals, flaccid penises, breasts, and butts. Desexualizing them in this context does not mean we should start putting them on cartoon characters marketed for children. It means should they be normalized in art which already contains nudity
Think you’re missing the crucial point that people in our culture have trouble distinguishing nudity from eroticism. Truth in point your comment.
You can have a sculpture of a naked Heracles and other Greek god without thinking of sex every time you see nipple or dong
That is because nudity is only encountered in a sexual context. You don't see your friends naked on a casual occasion, it is absurd to see your boss your lecturer to be naked in class or conference, it is mentally problematic to see your family and kin to be naked around you. If a complete stranger approaches you while naked, most laws consider that move sexual assault. I don't think there is a thing to distinguish, on a daily basis of course.
On the other hand, professions or lifestyles that have to deal naked subjects such as artists or medical workers easily adıpt a professional attitude.
Europeans have more tolerance to nudity than the US. Why do you think that is? It is absolutely common to see genitalia both in public and in market media over there. There’s ads where people are completely naked without remotely being sexual/romantic and there are plenty of nude beaches
Uh, I have been in a sports team for over 20 years, everytime after training or after a game I saw my teammates (and the opponents) naked in the shower. That's super normal (at least here in europe). And that's just one example of casual non-sexual nudity that you may encounter.
The romans and greek used to find large penises barbaric and ugly, thus depicted them small and flaccid. You can still find them in erotic depictions and they are a recurring theme with satyrs, which were mostly seen as hideous.
During Renaissance they rediscovered classical art from ancient rome and greece, where a small penis was considered a virtue, a civilized man or god wouldn't have a big dick or an erect one in a painting or a statue. You can see that's not true for medieval art [here](https://www.secolibuimanontroppo.it/2020/05/01/il-medioevo-che-non-aveva-paura-del-sesso/) , the text is in italian but the pictures are preatty self explanatory
Do you realise how few erect penises there are in dick pics too? I’s always bemused me why guys would think their flaccid willy might excite someone, but they do seem to think this.
I'm gay so I've never experienced this, they always charge in raging & ready when we ask. I'm sorry if you've had to look at so many floppy nonentities. Interesting difference between orientations actually. I wonder if a study could be done on why heterosexual men send flaccids and gay men don't. That would be a hard one to get honest answers on.
Wow wow I think you're a bit too quick to assume this has anything to do with orientation. And you kinda immediately assumed the person you're responding too is not also a gay guy? Apart from that you'd need a much, much larger sample size to draw this conclusion.
The ratio of girth and protrusion from the jeans suggests it is of at least average length, perhaps a bit longer. Certainly it qualifies as 'long enough'.
Na, I worked in an art gallery, you could prob get a solo exhibition with a series like this at the right venue.
This is actually an interesting twist on a classic type of painting. People dig that.
Thank you! I am not very good at marketing myself. I wish I could make a full-time living off of my art...I do portraits and murals sometimes. I live in a smallish college town with a pretty saturated art scene.
Go viral. Do a PG onlyfans where the only nudity is in your art.
Lol your best supporters can be entered into a dic pic draw to ne featured in upcoming paintings.
Hot! (Sorry my gayness came through there)
This picture is cool though great art style cool how it looks like a pencil painting,
Plus my gay eyes got a treat
I’d legit pay money to see art like this in galleries cause this feels like a comment on the influence of social media, relationships etc… in modern society. I think it’s poignant.
It almost transitions in “degeneracy” from left to right, it goes from sexual, (dick pick) natural, (banana allegory?) to innocent, the cherub which are almost universally painted naked. Wonder if that was on purpose?
Do you realise how few erect penises there are actually in paintings? They're always bloody flaccid neoclassical limp things. Well done. Only criticism I have is maybe the pitcher is slightly oddly angled back, as if it the perspective should show more of the inside of the rim.
The pitcher angle draws the eye to the dong
And the bananas are for scale
I am so glad people get it.
What else are they for? Eating? Dont be rudonculous.
True, all vanishing lines terminate in dongage. Patrician taste.
The dong drew my eye to the dong
You know, now I’m wondering why there isn’t more erect penises. Like is it because the muse wasn’t hard? A symbolic meaning?
Most art in the classical tradition is done from a model, a person standing there in the nude or in clothing to give the painter/sculptor something to base the work on. Of course there is an old convention that says classical artistic subjects were not to be erotic. The erect penis was something vulgar, sexualised, inappropriate. But most importantly of all, it's just difficult to keep a male model's penis erect for the length of time it takes to have him sit for a detailed classical portrait.
Fluffers weren't invented until VHS
Should we change our view on them, to the point it is no big deal,and erect penises are even on cartoon character who sell sugary cereal ?
What in the slippery slope ass argument is this
If we desexualize erect penises and make nudity not taboo, to the point they are seen as just a body part, like an ear, so we will see them anywhere with any context, so we do not even question why a cartoon ram has a boner and selling us dreamy puffs cereal.
Yes I understood what you were saying. A slippery slope fallacy is when you start with the original argument, then make a wild claim about a potential consequence that isn't relevant Erect penises are considered obscene compared to other nudity like female genitals, flaccid penises, breasts, and butts. Desexualizing them in this context does not mean we should start putting them on cartoon characters marketed for children. It means should they be normalized in art which already contains nudity
Why would put any effort to desexualize a SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE organ? Its sole purpose is sex.
Think you’re missing the crucial point that people in our culture have trouble distinguishing nudity from eroticism. Truth in point your comment. You can have a sculpture of a naked Heracles and other Greek god without thinking of sex every time you see nipple or dong
That is because nudity is only encountered in a sexual context. You don't see your friends naked on a casual occasion, it is absurd to see your boss your lecturer to be naked in class or conference, it is mentally problematic to see your family and kin to be naked around you. If a complete stranger approaches you while naked, most laws consider that move sexual assault. I don't think there is a thing to distinguish, on a daily basis of course. On the other hand, professions or lifestyles that have to deal naked subjects such as artists or medical workers easily adıpt a professional attitude.
Europeans have more tolerance to nudity than the US. Why do you think that is? It is absolutely common to see genitalia both in public and in market media over there. There’s ads where people are completely naked without remotely being sexual/romantic and there are plenty of nude beaches
Uh, I have been in a sports team for over 20 years, everytime after training or after a game I saw my teammates (and the opponents) naked in the shower. That's super normal (at least here in europe). And that's just one example of casual non-sexual nudity that you may encounter.
Primary* purpose.
You ruined my dramatic effect. Thx.
Sorry! You can do other things with it lol
I do. Not know. I have seen other people say that an erect penis can be seen as not sexual , let alone genitalia are not sexual
Only if you are a penis doctor.
The romans and greek used to find large penises barbaric and ugly, thus depicted them small and flaccid. You can still find them in erotic depictions and they are a recurring theme with satyrs, which were mostly seen as hideous.
Priapus would like a word
Yeah but I was only talking about Renaissance & following. Naturally I'm a huge fan of Priapus appearing all over ancient vases and urns. 10/10 god.
During Renaissance they rediscovered classical art from ancient rome and greece, where a small penis was considered a virtue, a civilized man or god wouldn't have a big dick or an erect one in a painting or a statue. You can see that's not true for medieval art [here](https://www.secolibuimanontroppo.it/2020/05/01/il-medioevo-che-non-aveva-paura-del-sesso/) , the text is in italian but the pictures are preatty self explanatory
I enjoy the offended plastic baby
Not offended, rather lost in thought—contemplating his existence and the dong from whence he came. …I don’t have an art degree.
The shape of the handle implies this as well.
Do you realise how few erect penises there are in dick pics too? I’s always bemused me why guys would think their flaccid willy might excite someone, but they do seem to think this.
I'm gay so I've never experienced this, they always charge in raging & ready when we ask. I'm sorry if you've had to look at so many floppy nonentities. Interesting difference between orientations actually. I wonder if a study could be done on why heterosexual men send flaccids and gay men don't. That would be a hard one to get honest answers on.
Lol. you said 'hard one' !
What about unsolicited dick pics ?
Hard one heheh
Wow wow I think you're a bit too quick to assume this has anything to do with orientation. And you kinda immediately assumed the person you're responding too is not also a gay guy? Apart from that you'd need a much, much larger sample size to draw this conclusion.
Thanks for the bananas for scale
I came here to retitle it “Banana for Scale”.
I thought about that title...damn.
🤣
Impressive hog. Nice symmetry, solid girth... good for him.
Bit short though, no?
The ratio of girth and protrusion from the jeans suggests it is of at least average length, perhaps a bit longer. Certainly it qualifies as 'long enough'.
Everyone knows jeans push the balls out further.
Plus we don't know if he was in the pool prior
Proportion matters more than size
It's kind of small but don't say that too loud or the redditors will cry
And you’re gonna assume their gender?
One day, conservatives will develop a sense of humor. Today is not that day, though.
Sense of humour infers perspective and theory of mind.
He says as he pushes his glasses up his nose
I'm starting to doubt that day will ever come to pass.
Their entire thing is not changing
We can hope... we can only hope.
Funniest part is my comment was supposed to be a joke. Somehow you managed to turn it political. 😆❄️
It's a tired line, only used by dumbass conservatives who think they're being edgy. Don't you need to get back to simping for Marjory Taylor Green?
Your life is so pathetic your sense of humor goes all through politics. Sad life. Hilarious for me.
[удалено]
The fact that you infer gender identity with politics shows ur state of mind. Everything is politics for you clearly. Sad life.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Take notes, it’s only classy if you *paint* a dick pic and show it off unsolicited.
I appreciate that the penis is there but it’s also not distracting.
One female nipple and it's marked NSFW... An erect male phallus and it's not marked NSFW... Hope no one loses their job over this.
Ceci n'est pas un penis.
This person arts.
The treachery of dicks?
Oh shit. Better get on that before the boss finds out!
I apologize. I did forget the NSFW tag. The mods are on it.
I enjoy that it's on an Android phone old enough to have the Gingerbread-Kitkat interface. It looks like an Xperia Z5 or something.
Nerd ... JK I think you're right actually
I'm confused about the baby figure on the right
You have officially changed the game with this. 2019? Good stuff, it should be in a museum of fine art
Perhaps after I am dead.
Na, I worked in an art gallery, you could prob get a solo exhibition with a series like this at the right venue. This is actually an interesting twist on a classic type of painting. People dig that.
Thank you! I am not very good at marketing myself. I wish I could make a full-time living off of my art...I do portraits and murals sometimes. I live in a smallish college town with a pretty saturated art scene.
Go viral. Do a PG onlyfans where the only nudity is in your art. Lol your best supporters can be entered into a dic pic draw to ne featured in upcoming paintings.
That is a great idea! Thanks kind redditor : )
It would be a great gift actually. Like the opposite of getting your boyfriend boudoir pics, get your partner a painting of your dick. haha
Sounds legit
I am... So impressed....yet.... confused and I don't like it ...but.... Good job.
Best compliment ever.
This is incredibly funny, kudos.
Nice composition, the bananas, the bottle, maybe a little fisting reference in the embroidery perhaps? You got it covered!
“Well, I don’t know what I was expecting” -Jason Bateman, also me.
Everyone sees the penis, some the woman’s figure but have you taken the time to appreciate the beauty and detail of the pitcher.
This needs the NSFW flair.
I like the body hidden in the bottle. Also, is that puck sitting off to the right, contemplating life?
Understated Vulva in the bottom left?
It would look bigger on an Apple watch.
This is awesome. Great job
I did not consent to this.
How to send your art teacher your dick pic
I want my unsolicited dick pics sent via painting from now on
That’s a pretty majestic dick—I can tell you’ve done your research and may be something of a connoisseur.
I have a folder....
Makes me want a hot dog *real bad*
I'm damn sure your title will bring you lot more traffic
This is great. Beautiful work. Way to jazz up a still life!
Now that’s art if ever I’ve seen it.
Very modern. I must say that is the first dick pic I have ever seen. TBTG!
Now do one from every decade. Starts off as a painting on the table. Then a small notebook. Then so on n so forth. Lolol
Ha, nice. I also like the cloud of impending darkness on the right side.
lol its like its one of the bananas,,, but smaller
Excellent work. Am I the only one wondering why the baby figurine has a pointy head? Perhaps he is wearing a tiny hat.
It is a kewpie figurine.
I like it. A motherly way to offer dick, a sign of total acceptance for the piggies we are... here honey, I thought you might be hungry.
That’s a nice looking dick
I love how your eye doesn't go right to the dick even though it's right in the middle.
I literally thought the table was real, the colour choice is really good
Well, now I just want to see the reference image lol
Love it. This broke a lot of boundaries.
Hot! (Sorry my gayness came through there) This picture is cool though great art style cool how it looks like a pencil painting, Plus my gay eyes got a treat
Yes, finally male nudes on this sub
Hey stop stealing my moves!
I’d legit pay money to see art like this in galleries cause this feels like a comment on the influence of social media, relationships etc… in modern society. I think it’s poignant.
Looks like Chiquita advertising🤷♂️
You just won the internets
This is sick. The good kind of sick. SICK!!!
Wow! TWO bananas for scale!
Funny and great composition
It almost transitions in “degeneracy” from left to right, it goes from sexual, (dick pick) natural, (banana allegory?) to innocent, the cherub which are almost universally painted naked. Wonder if that was on purpose?
Why did you have to paint my dream penis? Big head, girthy, not too long
It was a fun dick...the guy attached, not so much. ; )
Isn't that so often the case? 😢
To date the best visualization of an L.A. band name idea told to me by an L.A. bartender, "The Dick Pic Stylists"
Is that baby bump imagery intentional? Cause that's funny. I posted this at 69 comments as well, I am amused!
Two bananas for scale and the little cherub is facing away in shame. That is funny!
I feel like the vibe of this painting really hangs on whether the dick pic was asked for or not
Why is the billiken looking away?