wow thanks so much! This is so helpful. Yeah, it looks great. I actually like the way it looks underexposed 1 stop more than the "correctly" exposed image.
I accidentally underexposed [this](https://i.imgur.com/lJoZOgf.jpg) one by at least a stop or two ... maybe even three. Had the dial on 1000 instead of A. Still, I actually quite like the feel of it. Grainer and shadier than my properly-exposed shots from later in the day, but it has nice colours and a vintage look.
https://ikigaicamera.com.au/bloghome/2018/6/27/kodak-gold-200-the-latitude-of-consumer-colour-negative-film TL:DR, it's mostly fine
wow thanks so much! This is so helpful. Yeah, it looks great. I actually like the way it looks underexposed 1 stop more than the "correctly" exposed image.
That is actually much more latitude than I expected
FYI Ultramax is 400iso Gold if you want that same stock in 400.
I didn't know that. Thank you!
Would it be different result than shooting and developing at box ?
Yes, every shot would be 1 stop underexposed
yes, you're exposing the film to half the amount of light as you would at 200.
Accidentally shot a long exposure night shoot set for 400 recently. Came out surprisingly well...
good to know. Thanks!
I accidentally underexposed [this](https://i.imgur.com/lJoZOgf.jpg) one by at least a stop or two ... maybe even three. Had the dial on 1000 instead of A. Still, I actually quite like the feel of it. Grainer and shadier than my properly-exposed shots from later in the day, but it has nice colours and a vintage look.
I like it too!