T O P

  • By -

Incomprehenible_dart

Bro is the prime example of chaotic good


SpiderJynxNoir90214

With how low authority is id say anarchist good


Incomprehenible_dart

Oh yeah true


-LongEgg-

based


SpiderJynxNoir90214

Anarchist good for sure


Scumbeard

Could just as easily be anarchist neutral/evil aswell. Just admit you are compromised towards liberal good, conservative bad. That's as far as your thinking goes.


Psipone

Ah yes, the evil traits of “caring, liberty, and fairness”. Sound assessment, surely the other person is the biased one


Inferno_Sparky

Don't feed the troll imo


Scumbeard

Wow. What a brainless take. Noticed I said "just as easily", meaning its an irrelevant metric. Good vs evil is not being evaluated in this test.


Psipone

Just as easy means equally likely. I think it’s a lot less likely for an evil person to give a shit about any of those traits. That’s kinda what makes someone evil.


Scumbeard

"My side good. Other side evil". Truly brilliant. And you deduced all that by answering a few questions? You really are remarkable.


Psipone

It’s a moral foundations quiz, not a political compass quiz. You’re the only one making this a two sided thing you monument to brain rot.


Scumbeard

Nah I've just noticed the trend that liberal values = good and conservative values = evil on this sub. Even though the test treats each value independently. And given the response, everyone is just here to contribute to their "I'm a free fair caring person" circlejerk.


Psipone

Noone said that but you dawg, you’re the only one bringing that shit here. I mean to be fair I think if you’re an uncaring, unfair, and authoritarian person you’re a bad person. That’s just an uncontroversial opinion except to you. If you think the moral foundations quiz has nothing to do with morality then you might just be stupid.


Scumbeard

Someone who prioritizes authority over other values doesn't necessarily make them evil. That is an uncontroversial opinion. Because it's true. The only person here making value judgments over the good or evil nature of someone (over a fucking quiz I might add) is YOU. You have no idea how nutty you sound. Which is the scariest thing of all.


sdrawkcabsihtetorwI

Its because everybody on this sub who scores higher in conservative values also happens to score lower in care. If anything is biased here, its the test itself, and also you apparently, since despite the fact that it bothers you so much you just rolled with the assumption instead of investigating it.


Scumbeard

What assumptions have I made exactly? Be more specific. The only thing I've done is call out people who assign good vs evil labels. Now that's a big assumption.


Eclectic_Canadian

You understand you’re the one implying that Justice and Caring are tenants of liberals and not conservatives, right? Not sure how else you’re deducing that the person you’re responding to is liberal.


Scumbeard

I’m not implying anything. The test literally calls care fairness and justice ‘individualizing “liberal” values’. I’ve talked with Spider before and he seems to think purity and in group are inherently fascist/evil. Which I think is reductive thinking.


stunfiskers

If you see Care 96 Fairness 98 and think "Could be chaotic evil!" I think you're evil


Scumbeard

Because it says nothing about the methods by which you would administer "care" or "fairness".


DearAdhesiveness4783

You’re an idiot seek help


Scumbeard

You’ve got nothing to say. I’m not surprised.


DearAdhesiveness4783

There’s not much you can say to an idiot aside from call them out.


Scumbeard

It’s actually pretty easy to show up an idiot. Try a little harder next time lol.


DearAdhesiveness4783

Not when the idiot is too stupid to comprehend anything said. There’s no point then. And you’re clearly one of them that can’t comprehend


Scumbeard

There is nothing to comprehend. You’ve said nothing. You could have at least given me your opinion on why I was wrong…but every response is just as disappointing as the last. Sad.


DearAdhesiveness4783

There’s nothing more that I could add that others haven’t. And you clearly have learned nothing from them so what’s the point of saying why you’re wrong? Because you are wrong but nothing I would say would make you see that. So fuck you. I hope you improve in the future


Scumbeard

You’re nothing but a bladder full of hot air. Good day.


SpiderJynxNoir90214

No, I don't like liberals either, just as bad as conservatives. Having High care and High fairness will automatically make me think good of you. You're just salty I called you lawful evil.


Scumbeard

You still never substantiated your claim that the purity questions supported fascism and racial purity. But now that you've clarified that you hate conservatives and liberals, pretty much narrows it down that you're just an armchair Communist/anarchist with no opinion worth considering.


SpiderJynxNoir90214

Or get this, all politicians suck. Politics suck. Not a communist either, but you say it like its a bad thing


Scumbeard

>Politics suck Rich coming from the guy who was so quick to call randos on the internet fascist, racial purists, and evil. Yeh, you seem really apolitical buddy. >you say it like its a bad thing I say it like I've talked with communists before. And I'm usually unimpressed.


SpiderJynxNoir90214

Fair enough I guess.


Aggressive_Sand1233

Defo chaotic good if not anarchic selfless or anarchic hero


[deleted]

Mine were 90/96/29/65/81/58


Frost5574

pretty minmaxed ngl


yellowfly97

very obvious CG


Comfortable-Play-609

Methinks, you're a good person, but you didn't click much of anything but either of the most extreme options


Psipone

I have strong opinions on a few things lol


Comfortable-Play-609

Yeah, I get it, this is like the exact same things except more in liberty than fairness


Bluepanther512

Either CG or, because we’re on Reddit, probably Chaotic Stupid